'Sherlock Holmes 2': Jared Harris As Moriarty, The Villain Who's Become A Big Deal

Moriarty

DAVID GERMAIN   12/14/11 09:46 AM ET   AP

LOS ANGELES — Professor James Moriarty has taken a lot of heat the last century for crimes he didn't commit.

The archrival of Sherlock Holmes, who called his nemesis the "Napoleon of crime," appeared in only two of Arthur Conan Doyle's tales about the great detective.

Yet in post-Doyle fiction about Holmes and in many movies, including Robert Downey Jr.'s sequel "Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows," Moriarty has loomed as the grandfather of all super-villains, the forerunner to Ernst Blofeld and many more James Bond baddies, along with legions of heavies that make life difficult for comic-book superheroes.

"I can't think of a super-villain in a sort of obvious commercial sense before Moriarty in literature," said Guy Ritchie, who directed 2009's "Sherlock Holmes" and the sequel. "He really has become the most famous villain in literature, for not doing a great deal, either, by the way. But it is interesting how he's carried so much momentum. He's an elusive character, really, and he gained his equity as much by being elusive as for being potent."

That elusive presence of Moriarty as a diabolical puppet-master of worldwide chaos, an evil doppelganger with an intellect possibly surpassing that of Holmes, was touched on at the end of Downey's "Sherlock Holmes" two years ago.

The new movie, which opens Friday in North America, unleashes Moriarty in all his malice, played with quiet, chilling detachment by Jared Harris.

"You could say that Blofeld was a version of Moriarty in that he was created for the same reason by Ian Fleming," Harris said. "You have Superman, you have to create a Lex Luthor or you have to have a kryptonite. Otherwise, there's no jeopardy in your story. You have someone who's invulnerable, who never loses. After a while, you get fed up with the stories. ...

"He's there for the reason that the audience would feel like somewhere out there lurking is this opponent for this character they've come to love, and they start worrying for the future of that character. Will he be all right? Will he finally meet this person? What's going to happen?"

What happens in "A Game of Shadows" is that Holmes has come to obsess over the shadowy Moriarty and what he's up to. Downey's Holmes, aided by loyal but bickering buddy Watson (Jude Law), uncovers a scheme by the professor that could launch a World War I-style global conflict years earlier, in the late 1800s.

Ritchie is not exactly known for restraint in his crime romps, yet when it came to re-creating Moriarty, he settled on the low-key Harris, best known for a recurring role in "Mad Men."

Harris brings cool menace to Moriarty, whose previous screen incarnations range from a holographic character on "Star Trek: The Next Generation" to Laurence Olivier as a subconscious boogeyman for Holmes as the detective undergoes psychotherapy with Sigmund Freud in "The Seven-Percent Solution."

"How do you come back and reclaim the original gangster status of Moriarty?" Downey said. "For me, it was the subtlety and the implied threat."

"He's like the shark in `Jaws.' You have to imagine him a long time before you actually meet him," said Lionel Wigram, a producer on both "Sherlock Holmes" movies. "He's the spider who sits at the center of a web of crime. He's the first organized crime boss, and you get the sense of this massive worldwide network of stuff that he's into. You just sense that Holmes, were he not so horrified, would be mesmerized by how brilliant Moriarty is."

"A Game of Shadows" sends Holmes and Watson out of England to continental Europe in pursuit of Moriarty, a voyage similar to their journey to escape the criminal overlord in the short story "The Final Problem." That was the tale the Holmes-weary Conan Doyle used to kill off his detective along with Moriarty in a death match that sends them tumbling over Switzerland's Reichenbach Falls.

Downey, Ritchie and their collaborators fashion their own clever take on how the Falls factor into Holmes and Moriarty's fate in "A Game of Shadows."

"We wanted some homage to it. It felt as though you had to," Ritchie said. "If you're going to deal with Moriarty, you're going to deal with Holmes, and if there's going to be a faceoff, then that would have to happen at the Reichenbach Falls. That was never really up for debate."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CULTURE

Filed by Mallika Rao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 41
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
c-tom
Badges we don't need no stinking badges
08:36 PM on 12/19/2011
The only actors who really jumped out in this film were Kelly Reilly and Noomi Rapace who had fairly small roles. They appeared to enjoy what they were doing and they brightened the action whenever they were on screen.
photo
OutAtFirst
Mountain goat, desert rat and sea dog
04:26 PM on 12/19/2011
I just saw this film, and while it was entertaining, I couldn't help wondering why Holmes spent so much time trying to thwart Moriarity's every move instead of just planning a way to kill Moriarity. Oh well, I guess that would have ruined the whole show.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:40 PM on 12/17/2011
Besides one or two short story appearances (and one was only a mention as I recall) there was another major Moriarity contribution by the original author,Conan Doyle - and that was in the play "Sherlock Holmes" written by him and actor William Gillette who played Holmes for decades on the stage. Between Rathbone films and others - and books (two wonderful ones by John Gardiner come to mind) - Moriarity as Holmes' nemesis continued to thrive. I thought the actors in this current film hit just the right notes with the characters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Litho-stone
Those who believe in telekinetics, raise my hand
03:58 PM on 12/15/2011
Jared Harris as Moriarty!
A fantastic choice!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
didereaux
The Flying Spaghetti Monster is my Lord & Saviour!
12:13 PM on 12/15/2011
All in all this one fails for the reason many movies in the past few years have failed...BAD COMPUTER EDITING!

Everyone, particularly paying movie goers are not sugar-hyped ADD adolecents with attention spans measured in micro-seconds. If you want to play seizure inducing video games do it...(are you listening producers and directors?)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:42 PM on 12/17/2011
I am a bit of a Holmes snob and I did not see the first film. Just the idea of Downey as Holmes and the "Indiana Jones" trailers made me think "no thanks." Yet, I love the actor Jared Harris, and in my mind he is the perfect Moriarity and so I went. Though the film is full of Indiana Jones stuff (Holmes shooting a machine gun?) the situations may not have been, but the characters were adequately portrayed. Downey did an admirable job.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alumcreek
sorry to see humanity repeating errors ad nauseam
08:43 AM on 12/15/2011
In a subsequent Holmes story probably not written by Doyle, Mycroft explains that Moriarity was Sherlock's math tutor which is why Sherlock is so vehement towards him.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:32 PM on 12/17/2011
Nicholas Meyer's - "The 7% Solution" had a look at the "real" Holmes. They made Moriarity the boyhood math tutor of both Holmes's, but said M had an affair with their mother. Holmes in his cocaine fed derangement made him a villian when all he was, was a failed human and humble math tutor (played by Sir L. Olivier in the movie). In the Holmes stories he was always the "Napoleon of Crime" and was in one or two stories, and referred to in a third.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ed438
egoldmidincd.com
08:09 AM on 12/15/2011
I have to add that, as far as I'm concerned, Jeremy Brett got the character of Holmes right before he and the producers eventually went over the top with the later installments.

Yes, I know about Basil but that was for an earlier era and Nigel Bruce hardly helped matters with his ditzy portrayal of Watson.

It seems that too many actors insist on playing Sherlock whether they can or not. (Charlton Heston and Rupert Everett come to mind!)
photo
michelesda
My micro-bio is empty.
03:45 PM on 12/15/2011
So true. And "Game of Shadows" so NOT true to the canon. Robert Downey is a fine actor, but no way could I sit through either one of his kid-stuff Sherlock fiascos.

And what's this about Sherlock Holmes "books?" By my recollection, most Sherlock Holmes adventures were short stories.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ed438
egoldmidincd.com
06:40 PM on 12/15/2011
Yes, as I recall though fashioned into groups such as "The Casebook of S.G. and "His Last Bow" but some are really novellas like "A Study in Scarlet", "Valley of Fear", and "Hound of the Baskervilles".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:35 PM on 12/17/2011
I saw Heston on stage doing Holmes (in Crucifer of Blood before it was a tv movie) and I complained before intermission at how horrible he was...but then by the 2nd act it kicked in...he was actually good! Nimoy (who I saw in "Sherlock Holmes" on stage in L.A. in the late 70's) was horrible, but his Moriarity (Laugh-In comedian Alan Suess) was amazingly wonderful.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ed438
egoldmidincd.com
05:05 PM on 12/17/2011
I'll take your word about Chuck but I couldn't wait for the 2nd act of the TV version of "Crucifer".

Alan Sues just died on Dec.1st at 85.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edgeninja
Ayn Rand was an Atheist & Reagan Raised Taxes 11x
07:59 AM on 12/15/2011
Wow, could've put a spoiler warning in there for those of us who haven't read the books. -_-'
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hickspy
World's top researcher of Chicken Pot Pie Theory.
09:48 AM on 12/15/2011
Can you have spoiler warnings for books that came out a hundred years ago?

SPOILER!

Scrooge changes his ways.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edgeninja
Ayn Rand was an Atheist & Reagan Raised Taxes 11x
11:14 AM on 12/15/2011
False equivalency FAIL.

There've been half-a-billion adaptions of "Scrooge" across all mediums of entertainment. Not so with "Sherlock Holmes", which also caters mostly to adults, unlike the former.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gemini68
01:03 PM on 12/15/2011
Read the books! They've been around forever.
photo
michelesda
My micro-bio is empty.
08:44 PM on 12/15/2011
Actually, they haven't. Up until some time maybe in the seventies or eighties they were under copyright and unless you found something in grandma's attic it wasn't easy. Then the copyright went extinct and Sherlock anthologies were suddenly on the racks everywhere... including some very well done ones that reproduced the originals, artwork, old type faces and all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jason Bullock
07:56 AM on 12/15/2011
The Joker was once just a one time throw away Batman villain, and Lex Luthor was just a petty thief. Sometimes we latch onto a character, and they just keep becoming bigger. They get to the point where they become to entrenched into culture that their small beginnings are almost forgotten.
10:31 PM on 12/19/2011
For that matter, Dracula was in only two works by his creator, Bram Stoker: the eponymous novel and a short story, "Dracula's Guest," but has since appeared in countless other works, including other writers' books, stories, films and videos including--but not limited to--various adaptations of the original book.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ed438
egoldmidincd.com
07:54 AM on 12/15/2011
Of course, what isn't mentioned in the story is that public opinion forced Conan Doyle to bring Holmes back from the dead after "The Final Problem". I think the story was called "The Empty Room".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gemini68
01:04 PM on 12/15/2011
Yup. He had intended for Moriarty to be Holmes' ultimate nemesis and for them to take each other out. Which is why in The Final Problem both Moriarty and Holmes "disappear".
10:20 PM on 12/19/2011
It was 'The Empty House' (or 'The Adventure of the Empty House'--don't have a copy at hand), but you had the 'Empty' part right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ed438
egoldmidincd.com
07:33 AM on 12/20/2011
Thanks!
11:51 PM on 12/14/2011
Because Hollywood producers insist on reducing everything to the dumbest lowgrade level possible.
Good guy vs. bad guy - got it? Don't make the audience have to think, it's too difficult.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edgeninja
Ayn Rand was an Atheist & Reagan Raised Taxes 11x
08:05 AM on 12/15/2011
And yet, some of the most popular and critically-acclaimed movies of all time boil down to little more than "good guy vs. bad guy":

Star Wars saga
Terminator 2
The Dark Knight
Lord of the Rings trilogy

Your argument is moot.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
c-tom
Badges we don't need no stinking badges
10:44 AM on 12/18/2011
These are children's movies, good kid's movies, but your point would be served better if you included some films made for adults.

Your argument is puerile.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hickspy
World's top researcher of Chicken Pot Pie Theory.
09:49 AM on 12/15/2011
It's called an antagonist.

You kind of need one for most stories.