More

9 States Win Race To The Top Early Learning Grant

Race To The Top

KIMBERLY HEFLING   12/16/11 03:04 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Nine states won a collective $500 million Friday from the federal government to help make pre-K and other early learning programs more accessible and better capable of narrowing the achievement gap between those who start kindergarten without any formal schooling and those who do.

California, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island and Washington state were announced as winners at the White House.

"Nothing is more important than getting our babies off to a good start," said Education Secretary Arne Duncan.

The money to aid the nation's youngest learners is part of the administration's cornerstone education initiative – the "Race to the Top" grant competition. It has states competing for federal dollars to create programs intended to make schools more effective in exchange for education initiatives it favors. Last year, it handed out $4 billion in similar grants focused on K-12 education.

The goal of this competition is to get more children from birth to age 5 ready for kindergarten. Thirty-five states along with the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico applied for the chance to win between about $50 million to $100 million apiece in prize money.

The winnings are to help build statewide systems that affect all early learning programs, including child care, Head Start centers and public or private preschools.

Billions are spent annually in America on early education programs, but the quality and availability of those programs varies greatly. Roughly half of all 3-year-olds and about a quarter of 4-year-olds do not attend preschool, said Steve Barnett, director of the National Institute for Early Education Research at Rutgers University.

Kids who attend quality early education programs have been shown to do better in school, be less likely to spend time in prison later and to make more money as adults. But children from low-income families who start kindergarten without any schooling are estimated to start school 18 months behind their peers, a gap that is extremely difficult to overcome.

Sharon Lynn Kagan, co-director of the National Center for Children and Families at Columbia University, said during a conference call with reporters that the contest has helped jumpstart what she describes as one of the most exciting times in early education in 40 years.

It's like "an alarm has gone off and finally everyone is waking up to what the research is showing for a very, very long time about the importance of intervening with very high quality programs for all young children," she said.

To win, states were asked to demonstrate a commitment to making such programs more accessible, coordinated and more effective. Providing professional development for teachers and creating ways to assess the education level of kids entering kindergarten were among the areas states were asked to focus on in their applications.

The top scoring state in the competition was North Carolina, Duncan said. The state's plan included the creation of a "transformation zone" in the distressed northeastern corner of the state where specialty services would be available.

Other states took similar but different approaches in their comprehensive proposals. Massachusetts, for example, said it will use the funding to help conduct better and earlier screenings of children's learning needs. And, Rhode Island plans to connect health care and early learning providers.

Duncan was joined at the White House by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, whose agency helped run the competition. HHS oversees the federal Head Start program, which provides early education to nearly 1 million low-income children.

Sebelius said the goal is to provide high-profile encouragement to programs that improve teaching skills, encourage healthy eating and exercise and get parents – especially in low-income neighborhoods – more directly involved.

"By pushing everyone ... to raise their game, we intend to foster innovation in early education programs around the country," Sibelius said.

Last month, Obama announced new rules that require lower-performing Head Start programs to compete for funding. The Education Department also has proposed creating a new office to oversee the grants and better coordinate early learning programs.

_____

Associated Press writer Alex Dominguez in Baltimore contributed to this report.

_____

Online: Education Department: http://www.ed.gov/

Department of Health and Human Services: http://www.hhs.gov/

_____

Kimberly Hefling can be followed at http://twitter.com/khefling

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

WASHINGTON — Nine states won a collective $500 million Friday from the federal government to help make pre-K and other early learning programs more accessible and better capable of narrowing the...
WASHINGTON — Nine states won a collective $500 million Friday from the federal government to help make pre-K and other early learning programs more accessible and better capable of narrowing the...
Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 87
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
wacado
Responding to the world as I see it. . .
09:01 PM on 12/22/2011
Seems to me that the 500 billion could got to all the states, not just nine. Swift is right. The moeny isn't given to those who NEED it most, but is given to those who PERFORM the best. Being in a district where there is wealth, parental involvement in a positive way, and expectations for students within the school and their own families is great, and a good place to work. These kids are not at a disadvantage. The money should be given to schools who really need it and are struggling to get the students what they need to compete in the real world later on.

BTW--I did not attend any school before kindergarten. In fact, I began kindergarten at the age of 4 because I could read. We did not live in rich neighborhoods--we were middle class, I guess. Both of my parents worked. My mom cleaned and my dad worked in a factory. Neither could really help with homework because they are immigrants and their education was limited to the 8th grade; however, they were always helpful in encouraging us to do our best and not give up. I am a history and English professor. My sisters are nurses.
01:37 PM on 12/21/2011
I can see one major flaw with the race to the top grants that might not have been explored. The grants are supposedly based on the quality of the proposals. So the states with the most messed up school departments are at a disadvantage. The states, like Massachusetts, that have things pretty well together probably put in great proposals. States that don't know which way is up - and could use some sort of help - are just going to end up losing more.
photo
aliceandthecat
the most curious thing I ever saw
10:38 AM on 12/21/2011
Grants can make all the difference to a community, both at the individual level and at the community level. Please help me fight cuts to our Pell Grant programs.

Will you sign my petition? Click here to add your name:

http://signon.org/sign/restore-pell-grants?source=c.fwd&r_by=78344

Thanks!
10:51 AM on 12/18/2011
So we are picking winners and losers in education? This is sad. I'm not surprised though.
wacado
Responding to the world as I see it. . .
09:04 PM on 12/22/2011
And the winners take it all, leaving the rest in their dust. Delaware, Maryland and Mass are some of the wealthiest states in the union. I wonder what the criteria was for selection as a WINNER? I think Louisiana, Arizona, Missouri and Texas might be need the money more.
09:01 AM on 12/18/2011
Times must be really tough when schools need to duke it out in a last-man-standing royal rumble in order to properly educate our kids. We, and the Obama Administration, ought to be ashamed.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
blindjester
English and ESL teacher
09:46 PM on 12/17/2011
They leverage horrible change in the way we run our schools with just the possibility of money at the end. And it is far less money than we spend on Iraq and Afghanistan, if you even get some of it.

About 1/300th of the amount. (Two days of war is more money than a year of RTTT.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_cost_of_the_Iraq_War
wacado
Responding to the world as I see it. . .
09:04 PM on 12/22/2011
Saddening, isn't it?
photo
Grouchland
No day, But today! ~ RENT
09:35 PM on 12/17/2011
are comments working?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:05 PM on 12/17/2011
"Win" the money? How about you give it to the most dysfunctional districts who actually need the money the most? The poorest students/schools should get the money to pay for more teachers, school improvements and basic materials....often what better (i.e. richer) schools have plenty of.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xargaw
06:33 PM on 12/18/2011
Some of what you say is true. On the other hand, states competed with ideas to run programs spending the money with real results in mind to benefit kids. Just throwing money at education without a detailed plan of how it will be used to benefit the kids usually ends up just funding more administrators.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:12 PM on 12/19/2011
Don't fool yourself. It is never about the kids. Is teaching to a test what's best for kids? That's all they care about, supposed "data".

The teachers can tell you what needs to be done, but the administrators don't care what they have to say. And big laugh, if they will pass the money along to help. It will be the same thing, only teachers will be expected to be Stepford Teachers. THAT is not the solution. Give teachers control of their classroom again, and kids will start learning again.
wacado
Responding to the world as I see it. . .
09:05 PM on 12/22/2011
Would make sense, wouldn't it?
09:52 AM on 12/17/2011
Nice of Obama to encourage educational class warfare.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ortho Stice
Only the Left is in its right mind
09:37 AM on 12/17/2011
I am an unabashed liberal, leaning to progressive, so it galls me to say this: I actually agree with Rick Perry on something. The Department of Education needs to be abolished. Chart a timeline of what the Right loves to call "the decline of public education," and you will see all roads lead to 1979. Unions were even more powerful prior to that time. Schools were just as big and unwieldy before 1979. Districts were just as poorly funded pre-1979. What's the difference? The DOE was established in 1979. (Thanks, Jimmy.) Once the federal government got its hooks into American education system, it started to run it like everything else in Washington, which is to say, poorly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ortho Stice
Only the Left is in its right mind
09:19 AM on 12/17/2011
"Ready for kindergarten?" Really?
LATEACHER1X
tellin' it like it is
02:22 PM on 12/18/2011
Yes, really. Many children who live in poverty are 18 months behind their more affluent peers in language development alone. High quality preschool programs expose these children to concepts, activities, and language experiences which are the fundamentals for future reading development.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ortho Stice
Only the Left is in its right mind
05:15 PM on 12/18/2011
I am part of the generation that was supposedly the beneficiary of the halcyon days of public education in an America that people seem feel was better than it is now. We had no early childhood education and finger-painted and took naps in kindergarten. I didn't learn to read until first grade and ended up with multiple degrees. And, my parents never cracked the $20K plateau between them.

We wonder why kids walk into schools with semi-automatic weapons. It's partly because we start putting pressure on them to "excel" when they are toddlers. Maybe if we went back to letting kids be kids, they might actually see learning as an enjoyable experience with intrinsic value rather than another notch on their—or more likely, their parents'—belts.

Lateteacher, far be it from me to discourage education of any sort, but where does this obsession end? What's next, in utero education to "prepare" children for life outside the womb?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Olderandwiser55
getting older and wiser....
06:45 PM on 12/20/2011
I agree LA teacher. 30 years ago, my son attended the college nursery school where i attended. When he reached kindergarten, he complained he already knew everything! I really didn't realize that he and I were lucky he had preschool. many kids still don't.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
P Alan Greene
08:33 PM on 12/16/2011
Thank heavens PA didn't make the list!
06:43 PM on 12/16/2011
getting our babies off to a great start how about the finish line not ready for college sounds like the gopers pro fetus until it is born.. education needs to be fully funded stop bashing teachers, get rid of arne duncan, get parents as equal partners. stop charters private business sucking public funds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TFT
High-Stakes Tests? Opt out.
06:26 PM on 12/16/2011
Education is not a race. Only a jock would think it is. I'm looking at you, Arne and Barack.
photo
treemonkey
Illegitimi non carborundum
05:32 PM on 12/18/2011
You are so fanned and faved. The only correction. Arne is the basketball jock. Barack basks in the reflected glory of Arne letting him play on the same basketball court, which would be fine if it ended there, but to make the guy who lets you play the Secretary of Education of the United States of America. And I am a teacher who contributed money to, and voted for Obama and his message of hope. What a sad state that he is still, by far, the most qualified, and the most intelligent of all who will be running for president. There must be some sort of name for for the type of bargain those like me make when we vote for the guy whose policies are so horrible for our chosen field. Not sure if it fits, but Faustian does come to mind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopnlisten
Hitch your wagon to a star!
01:42 PM on 12/16/2011
A program that to win the money you had to have money in the first place to show your intentions.
Washington state? Really ? Gates could have coughed up the money and barely felt the impact.