More

Harald Haas: Wireless Data From Every Lightbulb

Posted: 12/16/11 10:51 AM ET

In this special year-end collaboration, TED and The Huffington Post are excited to count down 18 great ideas of 2011, featuring the full TEDTalk with original blog posts that we think will shape 2012. Watch, engage and share these groundbreaking ideas as they are unveiled one-by-one, including never-seen-before TEDTalk premieres. Standby, the countdown is underway!
Watch the University of Edinburgh's Harald Haas discuss how future wireless data can be transmitted through lightbulbs.


When we use smartphones or tablet PCs to surf the internet, check emails, share pictures, engage in social networking, or store information in a cloud, we make use of wireless communications technology.

Traditionally, all the information we move around with these devices is transmitted using radio frequency spectrum. The more data we generate, the more radio frequency spectrum we need.

It is forecast that by the year 2015, we will transmit six exabytes -- six billion, billion bytes -- every month through wireless networks. This is a ten-fold increase on the amount of data we send now.

In order to meet this increased demand, we need either 10 times more radio frequency spectrum for commercial wireless networks, or we have to make the existing radio frequency spectrum 10 times more efficient.

The first is impossible -- most of the available radio frequency spectrum is already used. The second option is difficult to achieve, as existing wireless technology is very sophisticated, and it has been shown that further improvements are often offset by unmanageable complexity.

Therefore, we are heading to a saturation point in terms of how efficiently we can use the radio frequency spectrum. The only way out of this is to find new ways to transmit data wirelessly. Fortunately, the electromagnetic spectrum not only incorporates the radio frequency spectrum, but also includes the visible light spectrum, the best know transmitter of which is the sun.

In the past we used incandescent light bulbs in our homes and offices. This technology is more than 100-years-old and, as such, is hugely inefficient. In the past decade, there have been massive developments in the use of light emitting diodes (LEDs). Since LEDs are far more energy efficient than incandescent bulbs, they are at the heart of the latest generation of lights. In fact, research by my team at the University of Edinburgh has shown that, if all the world's incandescent light bulbs were replaced by LED, the energy saved would be equivalent to that produced by more than 100 nuclear power stations.

However, this is not the only advantage of LEDs. These lights are semiconductor devices similar to transistors, which are commonly found in devices such as TVs, laptops or smartphones. Like transistors, LEDs can be switched on and off very quickly.

We have harnessed this feature to develop novel techniques that enable ordinary LED light bulbs to wirelessly transmit data at speeds many times faster than WiFi routers. We have named the new technology Li-Fi (light fidelity) which we now commercialize via the university spin-out company VLC Ltd.

In our lab, under ambient light conditions, we are able to achieve data speeds of 130 megabits per second. If all light bulbs were able to do this, it would create a simple, energy-efficient solution to the lack of available radio frequency spectrum for future wireless broadband communication. The new Li-Fi technology utilizes existing infrastructures and as a result the installation costs are minimal, let alone the reduced cost of the technology as it does not require an antenna.

On top of this, there are other advantages to this technology. Light does not penetrate walls, and so internet signals cannot be intercepted outside the room in which they are transmitted, which enhances security. Light also travels through water, and so short-range underwater communication is possible. For instance, divers could share pictures, or remotely operated vehicles could exchange information.

Light is inherently safe and can be used in places where radio frequency communication is often deemed problematic, such as in aircraft cabins or hospitals. So visible light communication not only has the potential to solve the problem of lack of spectrum space, but can also enable novel applications.

In the not-too-distant future, a day in the life of an average person, whom we'll call Sally, could look like this:

  • When Sally switches on the light in the morning, she gets the latest news flashed on her smartphone. From the breakfast table she sends a few emails through the table light.
  • Sally gets into her car and drives to work. On the way, a cat crosses the street and she has to brake hard. Her LED backlights tell the car behind to slow down even before the driver has a chance to brake -- an accident is avoided.
  • Sally stops in front of a traffic light that operates using LEDs. While showing red, the traffic light is able to send a signal to switch off the engine in Sally's car, reducing CO2 emissions. The traffic light also communicates with the navigator inside the car, and helps Sally avoid a traffic jam ahead.
  • In the office, Sally's fast internet access is provided through the LED ceiling lights. She has internet access in all meeting rooms, but no-one on the street outside can intercept the signals.
  • After work she decides to go to an art gallery to pass the time until she meets Tom, her new boyfriend, for a date at a restaurant downtown. The LED spotlights in the gallery illuminate the pictures and provide information about them.
  • Sally leaves the art gallery and, on the way downtown, she passes some shops. LED lights in the shop windows broadcast offers. She buys a pair of shoes on sale.
  • The restaurant is in a large shopping mall. Sally's navigation system guides her there. Inside the mall, LED ceiling lights take over the task of guiding her to the restaurant.
  • Once inside the restaurant, LED table lights beam the menu card onto Sally's smart-phone. She enjoys her meal and leaves a recommendation on the restaurant's home page, using the connection from the same table light.
  • By the time Sally leaves the restaurant it is dark. She is in a good mood after her date. On the way back to her car, she leaves a little message at a street light, which acts as a local message board, saying "Sally loves Tom" -- just as in the past she might have carved the same into a tree.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

jQuery(function($) { $('#ad_sharebox_260x60').prepend(''); }); In this special year-end collaboration, TED and The Huffington Post are excited to count down 18 great ideas of 2011, featur...
jQuery(function($) { $('#ad_sharebox_260x60').prepend(''); }); In this special year-end collaboration, TED and The Huffington Post are excited to count down 18 great ideas of 2011, featur...
Filed by Stuart Whatley  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 212
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
04:07 AM on 12/28/2011
Hello, what you've missed here ,is what Mr. Harald Haas applied from the beginning of his seminar. The device is not finished and that what is being shown,a hole in the table projector,is merely an initial performance of its capability.
03:08 PM on 12/20/2011
The wireless operators have not reached the limit of radio frequency spectrum potential at all. Haas mentions "radio frequency spectrum" and "spectrum efficiency" but he (conveniently) forgets about frequency reuse.

Frequency reuse is just to add more Radio Base Station between existing ones, turn the power down by half and Bingo! Throughputs are doubled. Do that 3-4 times and you get the tenfold bandwidth increase that Haas is asking for.

For the common people out there : just think about FM radios. There is a station on frequence 98.5 MHz in city X, another one in city Y and so one. The 98.5 MHz frequency is reused with no problems as long as the distance between city X and city Y is large enough for the RF signal to fade away between the reuse sites. That is exactly the same in mobile telecom, except that fading distance are much shorter.

In fact, the data volume that can be transmitted in mobile telecomm is limitless.
photo
Torcho
Artist, Activist, Small Business Owner.
09:37 PM on 01/01/2012
Yes! Excellent insight.
01:56 PM on 12/19/2011
Bad idea. Line of sight is a show stopper, there are so many other good wireless communication technologies that this will never take off.
05:07 PM on 12/19/2011
I don't think LoS will be any more of a show-stopped than it is for normal radio wireless. After all, you can still see with ambient light, the information transmission is just weaker. It's a bit different than laser or microwave in practice, as I understand from this brief overview.
01:47 PM on 12/19/2011
Very disturbing! Non ionizing radiation from wireless technology is increasing dramatically. The EPA states that no level of non-ionizing radiation above background levels is considered safe. In the U.S. the FCC establishes the level of "safe" non-ionizing radiation which is based on thermal effects (burning of tissue). The Swedish government provides its citizens with cell service at levels the U.S. EPA would consider safe. Telecommunications lobby is second only to the oil industry in terms of money contributed to politicians.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Fay
10:57 AM on 12/19/2011
I can see a classroom full of students with no teacher. They simply turn on the lights and get that days lessons. They also have the ability to ask questions through their own led devices and receive answers through the same system.
04:18 AM on 12/19/2011
UH ... three words ... line of site. If you move your device or your light or something blocks your view - forget it. This is a very interesting idea, a good idea, but it does not really seem suited for what he is suggesting it for ... an ubiquitous network routing infrastructure, at least the way he shows it.
05:13 PM on 12/19/2011
It's sight, in this case, but I disagree. This isn't like laser or microwave networking, it's more the transmission of information via light fluctuation -- invisible to the human eye but meaningful to electronic sensors. You can still read a book when the light is not directly on it, as long as there's enough ambient light. I'm guessing that the more "shady" the spot is, the less signal you'll get, but should still probably get a connection.
05:48 PM on 12/19/2011
Really, I have never been able to read a book when it is turned around and I am can only see the cover of the book. But then if would also be as if the book had multiple pages printed over each other, possibly in different color inks. All local devices are probably not using the same frequency, there is a lot of computation, memory, and power and even heat inferred in what's said to fit into a lightbulb even at today's miniaturization levells.
04:13 AM on 12/19/2011
Nope
09:39 PM on 12/18/2011
This is an interesting idea, but I don't believe it's practical for communications on a marco level. Some of the examples, like cars talking to each other, could be legitimate applications. But the air planes? please, if the airlines wanted to give you internet access they would have to come up with a way for the plane to communicate with stationary towers. Once that's done, they could put an RJ-45 in each seat and let you plug in. The wireless from the light bulbs offers no benefit there.

As far as security goes - how are the light bulbs connecting to the rest of the world? You'd have to retrofit some sort of low voltage communications wire to each light bulb. Are they a peer to peer network? Sure, you stop someone from picking up your wireless signal. But what about the transmission from that light bulb out to the world?
photo
keramos
Who are the brain police?
06:31 PM on 12/18/2011
I wasn't really to keen on the idea of having traffic lights turn my car off.  The rest is interesting.  What would really be good in the parking lot would be LED lights guiding you to available parking spaces.
photo
yeti7
not bigfoot
05:33 PM on 12/18/2011
I wonder what all these new radio waves are going to do to our bodies. If cell phone waves are bad then ....
10:42 AM on 12/19/2011
What new radio waves? It's all about using light waves, not radio waves. Read the article.
05:14 PM on 12/19/2011
The yellow face, it burnses him...
photo
yeti7
not bigfoot
06:36 PM on 12/19/2011
it using the lights to transmit radio waves.
04:49 PM on 12/18/2011
This almost sounds like science fiction, but I can't recall an SF story that predicted this type of advance.
To achieve a massive leap in data capacity and improve security at the same time is a remarkable feat.
04:38 PM on 12/18/2011
A WOW of an idea. Forgive my ignorance but how do these light bulbs communicate with each other around the world?
photo
yeti7
not bigfoot
06:43 PM on 12/19/2011
Great question. I don't think the complete story is there.
10:23 AM on 12/18/2011
A lot of wireless use is in situations where it would be perfectly easy to connect a cable to a suitable modem outlet. In the case of telephones, people sit and chat on their cell phones when there is a wired phone sitting next to them. in other words, a lot of wireless use is just trendy, not actually necessary or convenient. if you take this out of the picture, there's much less need to increase wireless capacity.
06:29 AM on 12/18/2011
Communicating through light bulbs. Bizarre! Does this mean, with a bit of micro-technology in their packing, that food manufacturers can connect direct to our mobile phones every time we open the fridge? You know, tell you what you've got for dinner, send you recipe suggestions and promote other products of theirs you might buy next time you go shopping. And there are other marketing opportunities: text MILK for your chance to win a holiday on the space station orbiting mars; click here to connect via the Large Hadron Collider with an entity in a parallel universe near you who also likes fish fingers. What will they think of next?
05:17 PM on 12/19/2011
While I have no doubt that your vision will come to pass (knowing the corporitization of the world today and guessing how it will only get worse), think about other opportunities:

Egg low-threshold exceeded: only 4 eggs left. Added to shopping list.
Your milk has expired. Do not drink it.
Leftover container 3 has been in refrigerator for 7 days; lid color changed to red.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AAKAlan
Web Developer, photographer, artist, old fart.
05:05 AM on 12/18/2011
I'm in the Web software business. Nonetheless, I am unable to figure out how this will work or what its real advantage would be.

Supposedly, the whole reason for this technology is to reduce the load on the Internet from the ever-expanding hunger for wide bandwidth applications.

But this is strictly a 'local' technology. It's what used to be called "the last mile", the part of the system that goes directly to the user.

But outside the door of the house, outside the lobby of the office, it will still have to be RF or some other new technology that carries the signals over the vast worldwide distances the Internet covers and up to the door of the Li_Fi-equipped home or office.

Think about that: every video your kid downloads indoors STILL has to come over conventional pipes to the house, and the LED solution does not diminish that bandwidth requirement one bit.

Furthermore, large parts of the Internet are already using light to carry their signals: it's called fiber-optic and the fiber optic pipes are so huge and so fast that there is no imaginable limitation to what they can carry in the near or foreseeable future.

Seems to me that this is the wishful thinking of a group of people who have a vested interest (their own research and funding) in LED communications.

I mean, let's be honest. The Internet bottleneck is not between me and my router!

Nice try, though....
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Harald Haas
03:58 PM on 12/18/2011
The FCC acknowledges that the demand for wireless data outstrips the supply since smartphones, tablets, etc. generate huge data traffic, and this trend is set to increase in the near future. Therefore, there are even talks of re-farming TV spectrum to make it available for wireless connectivity. Please also see:

http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-11-04/tech/30358744_1_spectrum-auction-wireless-data-wireless-spectrum
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AAKAlan
Web Developer, photographer, artist, old fart.
01:15 AM on 12/19/2011
That was my point - that it's the main trunks and the lines from ISPs that are being overloaded. And DSL is just anothera ntiquated technology.

We are going to have to find more inventive solutions from the ISP to the front door (ISP to backbone is often already fiber-optic). I get my connection over a Motorola Canopy receiver in a dish - essentially microwave relay from a tower that's also used for TV and radio broadcasting. I get 30GB down and 10GB up, on most days, which is plenty of bandwidth for my use. And it is all based on a 5 watt transceiver that doesn't interfere with anything else. The only limitation is line-of-sight to the tower.

We need to be looking at similar solutions. LED sounds like a usable and cost-effective solution within an office building, for example. But, obviously, not for the "last mile" or the round-trip to the ISP.

Your article invoked a funny memory for me. In 1965, when I was first in college, our signal was broadcast through the electrical system. You could get it anywhere on campus, and it wasn't too bad - if you could get used to the 60-cycle hum!!

BTW, I thought they did refarm some of the TV spectrum when analog went away - the space between the channels?

Oh well, interesting and important conversation.
04:23 AM on 12/19/2011
So you are talking the last some number of feet from your wireless device to the closest internet pipe then? Do you just move the bottleneck up a level to a higher level infrastructure? How does the lightbulb route to the local building router? Does anything at that level or above change with this scheme. This idea and technology are so good, I just did not get the idea that a product was being discussed or sold. This is a demo, and a good one ... and what is the cost of putting it in a smart phone, what is the power cost, what is the benefit? Seems like if there were all kind of things in an average room that needed to talk at high bandwidth to each other this would be a great solution,
photo
yeti7
not bigfoot
06:44 PM on 12/19/2011
We are on that last mile, more like a light yea r Slow band dsl