More

Joe Arpaio, Arizona Sheriff, Rebuked By Justice Department For Civil Rights Violations

Joe Arpaio Civil Rights Justice Department

Posted: 12/16/11 08:01 AM ET

By JACQUES BILLEAUD, ASSOCIATED PRESS

PHOENIX -- Sheriff Joe Arpaio's boundary-pushing foray into Arizona's immigration enforcement over the last six years met its most bruising criticism when the U.S. Justice Department said the lawman's office carried out a blatant pattern of discrimination against Latinos and held a "systematic disregard" for the Constitution.

Arpaio, defiant and caught by surprise by the report's release on Thursday, called the allegations a politically motivated attack by President Barack Obama's administration that will make Arizona unsafe by keeping undocumented immigrants on the street.

The Obama administration "might as well erect their own pink neon sign at the Arizona-New Mexico border saying welcome illegals to your United States, my home is your home," he said.

The government found that Arpaio's office committed a wide range of civil rights violations against Latinos, including unjust immigration patrols and jail policies that deprive prisoners of basic Constitutional rights. "We found discriminatory policing that was deeply rooted in the culture of the department, a culture that breeds a systematic disregard for basic constitutional protections," said Thomas Perez, who heads the Justice Department's civil rights division.

The report will be used by the Justice Department to seek major changes at Arpaio's office, such as new policies against discrimination and improvements of staff and officers. Arpaio faces a Jan. 4 deadline for saying whether he wants to work out an agreement to make the changes. If not, the federal government will sue him, possibly putting in jeopardy millions of dollars in federal funding for Maricopa County.

The fallout from the report was swift. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security announced it is severing its ties with Arpaio, stripping his jail officers of their federal power to check whether inmates in county jails are in the county without documents.

Homeland Security officials also are restricting Arpaio's office from using a program that uses fingerprints collected in local jails to identify undocumented immigrants.

Arpaio has long denied the racial profiling allegations, saying people are stopped if deputies have probable cause to believe they have committed crimes and that deputies later find many of them are undocumented immigrants. He also said the decision by Homeland Security to sever ties will result in undocumented immigrants being released from jail and large numbers.

The sheriff has built his reputation on jailing inmates in tents and dressing them in pink underwear, selling himself to voters as unceasingly tough on crime and pushing the bounds of how far local police can go to confront illegal immigration.

While widely popular among conservatives nationwide, Arpaio faces numerous problems at home that have him facing almost-daily calls to step down.

Apart from the civil rights probe, a federal grand jury also has been investigating Arpaio's office on criminal abuse-of-power allegations since at least December 2009 and is specifically examining the investigative work of the sheriff's anti-public corruption squad. The squad launched investigations of officials, lawyers and judges who ran afoul of Arpaio, and the cases all collapsed.

Arpaio has also been under pressure from his opponents to resign in the last week after an Associated Press article brought new attention to his office's bungling of sex crime and molestation cases in a predominantly Hispanic Phoenix suburb. His office said more than 400 sex-crimes investigations had to be reopened after the department learned of cases that hadn't been investigated adequately or weren't examined at all.

Officials discovered at least 32 reported child molestations – with victims as young as 2 years old – where the sheriff's office failed to follow through, even though suspects were known in all but six cases. The cases were originally reported by The Arizona Republic and other local media and received national attention in the last week.

Thursday's report said federal authorities will continue to investigate whether the sex crimes are being properly looked at; complaints of deputies using excessive force against Latinos; and whether the sheriff's office failed to provide adequate police services in Hispanic communities.

The report took the sheriff's office to task for launching immigration patrols, known as "sweeps," based on complaints that Latinos were merely gathering near a business without committing crimes.

Federal authorities single out Arpaio himself and said his office has no clear policies to guard against the violations, even after he changed some of his top aides earlier this year.

The report also said he and some top staffers tried to silence people who have spoken out against the sheriff's office by arresting people without cause, filing meritless lawsuits against opponents and starting investigations of critics.

One example cited by the Justice Department is former top Arpaio aide David Hendershott, who filed bar complaints against attorneys critical of the agency along with bringing judicial complaints against judges who were at odds with the sheriff. All complaints were dismissed.

The anti-corruption squad's cases against two county officials and a judge collapsed in court before going to trial and have been criticized by politicians at odds with the sheriff as trumped-up. Arpaio has defended the investigations as a valid attempt at rooting out corruption in county government.

The civil rights report said Latinos are four to nine times more likely to be stopped in traffic stops in Maricopa County than non-Latinos and that the agency's immigration policies treat Latinos as if they are all in the country without documents. Deputies on the immigrant-smuggling squad stop and arrest Latino drivers without good cause, the investigation found.

A review done as part of the investigation found that 20 percent of traffic reports handled by Arpaio's immigrant-smuggling squad from March 2006 to March 2009 were stops – almost all involving Latino drivers – that were done without reasonable suspicion. The squad's stops rarely led to smuggling arrests.

Deputies are encouraged to make high-volume traffic stops in targeted locations. Latinos who were in the U.S. legally were arrested or detained without cause during the sweeps, according to the report.

During the sweeps, deputies flood an area of a city – in some cases, heavily Latino areas – over several days to seek out traffic violators and arrest other offenders. Undocumented immigrants accounted for 57 percent of the 1,500 people arrested in the 20 sweeps conducted by his office since January 2008, according to figures provided by Arpaio's office.

Police supervisors, including at least one smuggling-squad supervisor, often used county accounts to send emails that demeaned Latinos to fellow sheriff's managers, deputies and volunteers in his posse. One such email had a photo of a mock driver's license for a fictional state called "Mexifornia."

Federal investigators focused heavily on the language barriers in Arpaio's jails.

Latino inmates with limited English skills were punished for failing to understand commands in English by being put in solitary confinement for up to 23 hours a day or keeping prisoners locked down in their jail pods for as long as 72 hours without a trip to the canteen area or making nonlegal phone calls.

The report said some jail officers used racial slurs for Latinos when talking among themselves and speaking to inmates.

Detention officers refused to accept forms requesting basic daily services and reporting mistreatment when the documents were completed in Spanish and pressured Latinos with limited English skills to sign forms that implicate their legal rights without language assistance.

The Justice Department said it hadn't yet established a pattern of alleged wrongdoing by the sheriff's office in the three areas where they will continue to investigation: complaints of excessive force against Latinos, botched sex-crimes cases and immigration efforts that have hurt the agency's trust with the Hispanic community.

----

Associated Press Writer Alicia A. Caldwell contributed to this report from Washington, D.C.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
By JACQUES BILLEAUD, ASSOCIATED PRESS PHOENIX -- Sheriff Joe Arpaio's boundary-pushing foray into Arizona's immigration enforcement over the last six years met its most bruising criticism when the ...
By JACQUES BILLEAUD, ASSOCIATED PRESS PHOENIX -- Sheriff Joe Arpaio's boundary-pushing foray into Arizona's immigration enforcement over the last six years met its most bruising criticism when the ...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,139
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (43 total)
DesertRatzoRizzo
Slavery birthed the Civil War
01:42 PM on 12/21/2011
For HuffPo posters who do not live in Maricopa County, Arizona and who wonder why Joe Arpaio keeps getting elected, take a look at the video accessible from the link below in which residents of one of the Sun City retirement communities extol to the heavens the Sheriff's "virtues." There are tens of thousands of these retired people living in various Sun City communities all over Arizona; they are right-wing, and they vote.

http://www.azcentral.com/video/1338624185001
08:05 AM on 12/21/2011
The investigation is here-say.... a small majoritys opinion not worthy of attention! The opinion of many out-weighs the opinions of a few.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marie Ruley
09:19 PM on 12/21/2011
The "opinion" of many is based on no fact or merit and therefor meaningless. Hopefully Joe will be gone soon.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hoochie-coochie
Was an atheist until I discovered that I'm God.
02:06 AM on 12/21/2011
Can he help it if he likes brown dudes in pink underwear? He was born that way.
06:02 PM on 12/21/2011
But do you think he should be allowed to marry them?
01:44 AM on 12/19/2011
Most of Arizona's illegal immigrant population is native American or native American mix from Mexico, so how is it that the federal government refuses to acknowledge that those profiled racially are being profiled because they are NATIVE AMERICAN-latinos. Latin Americans are as diverse as non Latin Americans, so what is Sheriff Arpaio's biological criterial for selecting and stoping individuals driving cars if not native American? If, however, in its suit, the Justice department is officially stating the bigoted position that all Latin Americans are dark or racially the same, and therefore that all Latin Americans are easily identifiable a single biological race, then it is the US Justice department that is, through this bigoted position, violating the civil rights of everyone politically labeled Latino.
06:05 PM on 12/21/2011
OMG that is ridiculous logic. It doesn't matter whether you are native American Mexican or Latin American. Brown skin will get you pulled over. I'm sure they pull african americans over double quick too. Middle aged white guys with whiskey bottles on their laps,no problem.
01:44 AM on 12/19/2011
The Justice Department's expert on measuring racial profiling said that the Arpaio-case is the most egregious case of racial profiling in the nation. But how is that possible if the Justice Department is labeling those "racially" profiled as only "latino" or "Hispanic?" Having a Spanish or Portuguese surname, or speaking Spanish has nothing to do with Latin Americans' BIOLOGY because in colonial Latin America a Spanish or Portuguese(christian) surname, was a pre condition to being baptized, and, more importantly, those languages are the official languages in Latin America. The political label "latino" has NO racial characteristics attributed to it, therefore one can only GUESS if a person driving a car is politically labeled "latino"? So, if it's a guessing game then it is a 50/50 chance that the person stopped is or isn't politically labeled "latino."
01:33 AM on 12/19/2011
The Justice Department's expert on measuring racial profiling said that the Arpaio-case is the most egregious case of racial profiling in the nation. But how is that possible if the Justice Department is labeling those "racially" profiled as only "latino"?" Having a Spanish or Portuguese surname, or speaking Spanish has nothing to do with Latin Americans' BIOLOGY because in colonial Latin America a Spanish or Portuguese(christian) surname, was a pre condition to being baptized, and those languages are the official languages in Latin America. The political label "latino" has NO racial characteristics attributed to it, therefore one can only GUESS if a person driving a car is labeled "latino"? So, if it's a guessing game then it is a 50/50 chance that the person stopped is or isn't labeled "latino." Most of Arizona's illegal immigrant population is native American or native American mix from Mexico, so how is it that the federal government refuses to acknowledge that those profiled racially are being profiled because they are NATIVE AMERICAN-latinos. Latin Americans are as diverse as non Latin Americans, so what is Sheriff Arpaio's biological criterial for selecting and stoping individuals driving cars if not native American? If, however, in its suit, the Justice department is officially stating the bigoted position that all Latin Americans are dark or racially the same, and therefore easily identifiable a single biological race, then it is the US Justice department that is, violating the civil rights of everyone politically labeled Latino.
01:29 AM on 12/19/2011
Sheriff Arpaio was quoted as saying, "This is a sad day for America as a whole," suggesting that the federal government's suit against him is tantamount to a neon welcome sign for illegal immigrants.

It's not fair to bash Arizona's illegal immigrants, per se. However, the Justice Department is violating the human rights and the civil rights of immigrants by using itself as a conduit to encourage trafficking in illegal immigration. That's right trafficking. People are being brought into this country illegally by sophisticated means, and the beneficiaries of this people-cargo are the businesses that underwrite the trafficking, the criminal underworld that abuse and intimidate the illegals, the non profit organizations that guarantee the six figure incomes of their executives by promoting stereo types through gross generalizations of those politically labeled "latino," and the attorneys that make a living on the perpetual existence of illegal entry into the United States. It is a travesty, so why does the US federal government argue that the poor and desperate of Latin America deserve to enter the United States in such a repugnant way? Why does the federal government feel that these desperate people are beneath LEGAL entry into the USA?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vidian6
Consultant with hard advice
10:20 AM on 12/18/2011
Putting it plainly this bigot shouldn't be allowed to police a dog kennel.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
hrpmap
Retired man still active..
12:37 AM on 12/20/2011
I have been to Pheonix that is what he is policing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vidian6
Consultant with hard advice
08:03 AM on 12/20/2011
You mean that's where he's harassing people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goteamobama2012
is are children learning? -GWBush
11:55 PM on 12/17/2011
and now..the recent arrests at the Occupy La two weeks back had people sitting on buses for up to 8 plus hours with no restrooms..etc..etc.. and additional 'cruel & unusual ' punishment was meted out by deputies in LA some were held in custody without charges for up to 2-3 days! That too constitutes more civil rights violations.. our country is fast become the facist states of republicanstan!
10:03 PM on 12/17/2011
The DOJ refuses to investigate BLACK PANTHER thugs harassing voters and SELLING WEAPONS to DRUG DEALERS and KILLERS in Mexico. With at least one of those weapons used to MURDER a Border Patrol Agent and they have their panties in a knot about Sheriff Joe pulling over a bus load of Mexicans to see if they're here legally ???? Congress needs to DE-FUND the DOJ until Holder and that bunch of IDIOTS can be RETRAINED about EXACTLY what their function in the United States Government IS !!!!!!!! If they refuse to ENFORCE the IMMIGRATION LAWS, then we need a REFUND of that portion of taxes we pay. Maybe we can contract it to someone who can stop the INVASION !!!!!! Also WHY SHOULD we obey Washington's laws, if INVADERS don't have to ??????????
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Downrivers
Siskiyou Mountains
10:58 AM on 12/18/2011
The Arpaio investigation......began under the previous administration, in June 2008
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
hrpmap
Retired man still active..
12:38 AM on 12/20/2011
Three years of fishing and still nothing valid.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marie Ruley
09:24 PM on 12/21/2011
You are so clueless it's sad.
08:34 PM on 12/17/2011
This is just an attempt to smear him by obama adm. Joe is coming after obama not being a legal citizen of usa. therefore he cannot run in arizona for president.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Minnehaha
Ohio Buckeye
09:36 PM on 12/23/2011
A little sheriff is coming after the President, hilarious, simply hilarious!
07:23 PM on 12/17/2011
Yea 1st its them then its anyone the redneck does not like or pays him off , martin county florida is the same way corrupt .

Cops are on the take , judges everyone is doing something they should not
07:01 PM on 12/17/2011
Is the criticism from that same Justice Department that pardoned FALN terrorists in Puerto Rico? That same Justice Department that turned a blind eye to the New Black Panthers voter intimidation case? That same Justice department that wanted to extend Miranda Rights to enemy combatants? That same Justice Department that set up Operation Fast & Furious, which cost the life of a Federal Agent, and numerous others people? That same Justice Department that allows "Sanctuary Cities," and won't enforce Federal immigration law; and yet, won't allow local local law enforcement to protect their jurisdictions from the flood of illegal immigrants and the subsequent crime waves which follow? Yes, THAT Justice Department. The one that is politicized because they follow what is best for the Democrat Party. What is best for the Democrat Party? Allowing Illegal immigrants into this country so they can get on welfare, collect benefits, get free health care, get a free education, and then vote for those that support them. And yes, the subsequent crime from illegal immigration is just collateral damage, isn't it, Jacques? Crime like molestation cases, or rapes, or murders. Hey Jacques Billeaud at the AP, you PUTZ, you let your pants fall down. Your Leftist is dangling.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
hrpmap
Retired man still active..
12:40 AM on 12/20/2011
Yes to all...F&F.
06:37 PM on 12/17/2011
You go, Joe! Kick illegal butt.
06:28 PM on 12/17/2011
I want the Illegals to go back to mexico, if they are so poor, than how can they afford brand new escalades and house's???????????????