More

Ostrich Penis Study Solves Evolutionary Puzzle

The Huffington Post     First Posted: 12/16/11 04:01 PM ET   Updated: 12/17/11 12:40 AM ET

Thanks to a new study on the mechanics of ostrich erections, the animal kingdom's biggest birds have a new reason to bury their heads in the sand. Fortunately, for evolutionary biologists, a little peek under the feathers has solved a long-standing mystery about avian evolution.

A new study of the ostrich's male organs reveals that the birds achieve erections using a burst of lymphatic fluid through the penis, a vastly different approach than the rush-of-blood-to-the-veins method employed by the organs of reptiles and mammals, researchers reported in a study published this week in the journal Zoology.

So why are scientists so excited about the study, aside from the fact they have a new arsenal of ostrich penis facts to whip out at scientist cocktail parties?

In brief: Only three percent of birds have penises, and all previously studied bird penises were found to use lymph nodes to achieve erections, Adam Marcus explains in Nature. The discovery that ostriches also have erections fueled in this way suggests that the common ancestors to all birds had a lymphatic system, which suggests that the evolutionary split between animals with lymph and blood-based erection occurred in the last common ancestor of birds.

"Our findings reveal that the evolution of a lymphatic erection mechanism likely occurred in the ancestor of all birds rather than within birds," co-author Patricia Brennan, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, told Nature.

That's welcome news for ostriches, whom scientists might have suspected were a little freaky because when they mate, it doesn't look like other birds. Most of the 3 percent of birds with penises mate using a lightning-fast maneuver called the 'cloacal kiss,' where sperm is quickly inserted into the female, Nature explains. But not so with ostriches (as documented in more than one YouTube video).

No, ostriches didn't evolve some strange bird penis to mate in their strange unbird-like ways. Nor are all the other phallus-endowed birds weird for having developed a strange lymphatic-erection mechanism out of nowhere. In fact, the evolutionary shift to lymph-fueled erections occurred in the last common ancestor they shared with all other birds.

Still, researchers are continuing to study the implications of what lymph-based erections mean for different species of birds with penises and the evolutionary advantages they might offer.

"What is weird about birds is that they evolved not just a new structure, but a novel way to do something that was already being done," co-author Richard Plum explained to Nature.

Ostriches aren't the only animals whose mating habits have raised evolutionary questions this year. Thirty years ago, entomologists Darryl Gwynne and David Rentz observed certain kinds of Australian beetles trying to have sex with discarded beer bottles, prompting the scientists to conduct research on the poor insects, who often died as a result of their mating attempts, BBC News reported. The scientists were award an "Ig Nobel" prize for their work, an alternative award to the Nobel Prize which seeks to honor research that will "first make people laugh, and then make them think."

"It was just co-incidental that my area of research was Darwinian sexual selection and how sex differences evolve, and here was a classic example taking place in front of my eyes where males were making mating errors," David Rentz told the BBC. "It was very obvious the beetles were trying to mate. These beetles have enormous genitalia, and they're large to start with - over two inches long. The sad thing was that these beetles were dying; they wouldn't leave the bottles alone. They'd fall off them exhausted."

Another insect seems to have the opposite problem of mating fatigue: bedbugs.

After last year's disastrous bedbug infestation, researchers looked at 21 bedbug infestations from Florida to Maine and found that most could be traced back to one or two insects in a single room, Bloomberg reported. This suggests that bedbugs mate incestuously with parents and siblings without any ill-effect.

"Parent-sibling matings and sibling-sibling matings are rare in the animal kingdom. So this study reveals an exception to the anti-inbreeding rule," Amy Maxmen, a blogger for Scientific American, wrote on the site. "But I'm drawn to the report for a pettier reason. As far as I'm concerned, DNA evidence has trumped the words of my landlord and a New York City housing inspector."

Want to learn about more weird animal traits? Check out these bizarre animal mating rituals (WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT):

Angler Fish: Just A Little Clingy
1 of 16
The next time you think your mate is getting a little too attached, just be glad you're not an angler fish. According to an h2g2 post, when a male angler fish finds a mate, he clings on for dear life. Perhaps because the angler fish is so horrifyingly unattractive, he feels that any less drastic measure would surely lose her. Thus, he bites into her, attaching himself permanently, linking his blood supply to hers. While she provides nourishment to him, he offers her sperm whenever there are eggs to fertilize. Fair trade-off?
Total comments: 113 | Post a Comment
1 of 16
This Gesture Of Love
Not Bad
Not Worth It

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Most Ridiculous Mating Rituals
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Thanks to a new study on the mechanics of ostrich erections, the animal kingdom's biggest birds have a new reason to bury their heads in the sand. Fortunately, for evolutionary biologists, a little pe...
Thanks to a new study on the mechanics of ostrich erections, the animal kingdom's biggest birds have a new reason to bury their heads in the sand. Fortunately, for evolutionary biologists, a little pe...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 113
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
11:23 AM on 12/20/2011
Our country is starving and living in poverty and MY MONEY is being spent on something like this. How many millions were used for this? Wouldn't it have been more useful to HELP OUR CITIZENS?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hoochie-coochie
Was an atheist until I discovered that I'm God.
11:28 AM on 12/19/2011
Does this mean we're destined to evolve a Cinemax-fueled erection?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Democrab
Pretty far so good
09:43 AM on 12/19/2011
Lots of humans leave their mates for beer bottles. This isn't such an anomaly now, is it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Liberty427
09:14 AM on 12/19/2011
Wonder if ostriches are the least bit interested in our male 'equipment.' Probably not. They have better things to do.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mrsbean54
05:59 AM on 12/19/2011
So, what are the other birds with penises? And how do birds without penises mate? And they didn't really detail what's so different about the ostrich's strategy.

Can somebody clue me in, because I'm at work and am NOT going to Google it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EnemyLister
follow me on Twitter!
11:09 AM on 12/19/2011
Birds without peni have a cloaca, where they excrete urine and sperm. The testes are inside the bird's body. Thats why you never seen chicken penis or testicles on poultry.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EnemyLister
follow me on Twitter!
11:10 AM on 12/19/2011
google "cloaca kiss".
photo
wetbonder
Educating liberals one day at a time
07:56 PM on 12/18/2011
Come on- did Barney Frank really write this story?
07:00 AM on 12/18/2011
You can always count on HP bringing "edge-of-the-seat" breaking new in Science. Why, by the incredible 89 comments garnered so far, this may the Science 'News of the Century'.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rich Cash
Enlisted in 1971 - Retired in 1996
09:38 PM on 12/17/2011
Why does Huffington-Post create such juvenile headlines for science stories? There have been 2 or 3 stories in the last several months using Uranus to create suggestive headlines. Now this. And we complain about the "dumbing-down" of America.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mrsbean54
05:57 AM on 12/19/2011
Oh, don't lose your inner child in the name of intellectualism.

I'm a neuroscientist and I still laugh at "Uranus".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EnemyLister
follow me on Twitter!
11:12 AM on 12/19/2011
just dont make me smell uranus.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rich Cash
Enlisted in 1971 - Retired in 1996
09:41 PM on 12/20/2011
Okay, I give up...ROFL!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EnemyLister
follow me on Twitter!
11:13 AM on 12/19/2011
Scientists are considering changing the name of Uranus because of those jokes. The new name will be Urectum.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frank-Landfield
09:08 PM on 12/17/2011
Alrighty then
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:49 PM on 12/17/2011
Why was this necessary? WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT
Sometimes I find U.S. media notions of what is and what isn't acceptable impossible to understand.
You've just read an article about a totally different reproductive mechanism and when you go into greater detail you are shown other totally different reproductive behaviour. Animals aren't people. Their diversity is one of the things that makes them fascinating.
photo
BannedInBoston
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
01:35 PM on 12/17/2011
Suggested alternate headline: Lymph Goes Limp....
photo
BannedInBoston
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
01:28 PM on 12/17/2011
According to an h2g2 post, when a male angler fish finds a mate, he clings on for dear life. -- Caption. Heh. Like some guys I know, lol....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
henrypapillon
Mitt--free up the last 9 years' taxes
10:28 PM on 12/17/2011
Or some girls--buy them a dinner and you have to divorce them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Chernesky
17 Year Old Little Gay Monster on HuffPost
01:12 PM on 12/17/2011
lol cocktail party.
06:57 AM on 12/18/2011
That deserves a reply

RLOLU
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karen lyons kalmenson
i poem/paint, sometimes, i ain't
12:28 PM on 12/17/2011
but which head do they bury in the sand(box;-)
flipacoin
Heads they win, tails we lose.
12:11 PM on 12/17/2011
There is really no discovery here. Something was observed and then it was yarned like a nighty-nite story. This is what I call a "Life is this so evolution was thus" story. Or LITSEWT for short. This is what these all are, pontificated by those thru the evolutionary lens. A creationist lense is just as viable. Macroevolutionary changes thru the rewrite of the DNA nucleotide sequences [indels of insertations and deletions] of the theoried chimp/man divergence from one common animal summised thru the completed tabulation comes to...90 millions indels...in 5 million years. More changes than there are years, folks. Think of a tax preparer claiming $5 million dollars in wages but banking $90 million. Red flag to the IRS? 90 million changes in 5 million years should be a red flag to the theory of evolution. It comes out to one very complicated change every 20 DAYS for 5 million years. The kicker? These fast and furious supposed past changes are not eyewitnessed or detected by modern equipment. Only scientific models exist of indel action with no real examples. Please know that gene mutations or single nucleotide polymorphisms are not nucleotide indeling action
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
janalyce
12:53 PM on 12/17/2011
It seems to me that your "logic" is based on a very big flaw....that there is only one genetic line in all those 5 million years.

If you have a hundred thousand organisms and 1 percent of those organisms experience some kind of genetic change per generation, and sexual recombination is thrown into the mix, creating the possibility of even more genetic changes that multiply the effect of the original genetic change, your "scientific model" goes right out the window.

Genes ain't dollars, pal.
flipacoin
Heads they win, tails we lose.
01:00 PM on 12/17/2011
Are there political ramifications to the evolution belief? It seems that in the Communist Manifesto and in practice in communist regimes, religion is hindered or banned. Evolution belief is a replacement of a creation. Politically, if a creator doesn't exist then rights are endowed by the government. More convenient for central control. With no creator, shades of gray outlooks prevail and politicians are not hindered by absolutes. With no absolutes, then politicians that depend on votes, do not have black and white restrictions put upon them...giving more leeway. Hence, easier re-elections. If evolution is true then the evolving of communal thought and nation's Constitution can occurr and accepted. Thus giving the 'center control' government types the means to chip away at a Constitution. Scientist do not bemoan the use of evolution for political gain since the 1800's. Why? It's one hand washing the other. It's prid pro quo.