iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Texas Drought Takes Cow Numbers Down By 600K

BETSY BLANEY   12/16/11 10:21 AM ET   AP

LUBBOCK, Texas — The worst drought in Texas' history has led to the largest-ever one-year decline in the leading cattle-state's cow herd, raising the likelihood of increased beef prices as the number of animals decline and demand remains strong.

Since Jan. 1, the number of cows in Texas has dropped by about 600,000, a 12 percent decline from the roughly 5 million cows the state had at the beginning of the year, said David Anderson, who monitors beef markets for the Texas AgriLife Extension Service. That's likely the largest drop in the number of cows any state has ever seen, though Texas had a larger percentage decline from 1934 to 1935, when ranchers were reeling from the Great Depression and Dust Bowl, Anderson said.

Anderson said many cows were moved "somewhere there's grass," but lots of others were slaughtered. He said that in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Louisiana and Arkansas, about 200,000 more cattle were slaughtered this year, a 20 percent increase over last year.

That extra supply could help meet increased demand from China and other countries, but the loss of cows likely will mean fewer cattle in future years.

"Consumers are going to pay more because we're going to have less beef," Anderson said. "Fewer cows, calves, less beef production and increasing exports."

The U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates that beef prices will increase up to 5.5 in 2012, in part because the number of cattle has declined. That follows a 9 percent increase in beef prices in the past year.

Oklahoma, the nation's second-largest cattle producer, also saw about a 12 percent drop in cows, Oklahoma State University agriculture economist Derrell Peel said.

Anderson said beef production nationally will be down 4 percent next year.

In Texas, the problem is primarily due to the worst single-year drought in the state's history. From January through November the state got just 46 percent of its normal rainfall of about 26 inches.

The drought was the result of a La Nina weather pattern, which brings drier than normal conditions to the southwestern states. Forecasters have said La Nina is back, meaning another dry year for Texas, Oklahoma and other nearby states.

The lack of rain coupled with blistering summer heat caused pastures to wither, leaving rancher with the choice of buying feed for the cattle or selling them.

Betsy Ross, a 75-year-old rancher from the small central Texas community of Granger, said she sold all but 80 of the 225 grass-fed animals she had in January. With feed costs up 40 percent and her pasture parched, Ross said she didn't have any other option.

"It's not a profitable year, heavens no," she said. "If you can't keep them on grass when they're grass fed you're not going to make any money."

About 200 miles north in Sulphur Springs, Texas, part-time rancher Dwyatt Bell said producers in his part of the state sold off up to half their herds. Bell said high prices for cattle have helped offset increases expenses, but many ranchers still are struggling to stay afloat.

"It's been a rough year," he said.

Across Texas, the drought has caused an estimated $5.2 billion in losses to farmers and livestock producers, and that figure is expected to rise

Nationally, the number of cows has dropped by an estimated 617,000 this year, a 2 percent decline from the 30.9 million animals on Jan. 1. That number would be larger, but states in northern plains such as North Dakota, South Dakota and Nebraska, increased their cow herd.

Anderson said it's unclear whether high beef prices would hurt U.S. sales or limit exports. The U.S. is the world third largest consumer of beef per capita at 85.5 pounds per year. Uruguay is first at 137 pounds per capita.

"Exports have been the strongest part of beef demand all year and they're expected to remain so but higher prices should constrain their growth," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

LUBBOCK, Texas — The worst drought in Texas' history has led to the largest-ever one-year decline in the leading cattle-state's cow herd, raising the likelihood of increased beef prices as the n...
LUBBOCK, Texas — The worst drought in Texas' history has led to the largest-ever one-year decline in the leading cattle-state's cow herd, raising the likelihood of increased beef prices as the n...
Filed by James Gerken  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 92
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daniel Zook
Just an observant Millenial.
03:33 PM on 12/19/2011
It might have gotten better if only that mystique Prayerpalooza Ricky threw worked. Man it's glad to know his God pays attention to him.
01:31 PM on 12/18/2011
This not just a drop in the numbers of cows, it is an extreme example of the climate crisis. It's not normal for 600,000 cows to drop dead of dehydration & starvation &/or heatstroke. This is a big sign that we're doing something wrong. First of all, how can the ranchers allow this to happen? They should have given the cows away when the first few started to get sick & die! Imagine a field where there are 600,000 dead cows- to give you an idea, baseball stadiums may be able to seat about 50,000 people. Multiply that by 12 & triple the size of the bodies since cows are much bigger than people, & you have 12 baseball stadium seats filled with dead cow bodies! Just visualize that. That is a giant statement, warning us to change our ways. If we don't wake up now, there will be millions of deaths, animals & people.
11:48 AM on 12/19/2011
They cows didn't drop dead for dehydration or starvation - they were sold for slaughter. If you eat roast beef at Arby's or enjoy a burger, your probably eating cow meat (as opposed to grain feed steers and heifers used for more primal cuts).

You've got to get out of the city every once in a while and find out how the real (rural) world works.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
doriath22
Born-again Jacobin. Robespierre had the right idea
10:48 AM on 12/18/2011
Another article to send to my sun-belt friends who ask why I still haven't left Michigan. Besides, grass-fed Michigan beef tastes waaaay better than that stringy, desert-raised dog food from the southwest
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
henrypapillon
Put a Psychiatrist in every NRA meeting.
10:31 PM on 12/17/2011
All hat , no cattle.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frank-Landfield
09:10 PM on 12/17/2011
God's will?!
Global warming?!
Or just plain old Texas weather patterns?!
You decide.
:-)
photo
Deep Thinking Man
Always Remember, A Wet Bird Never Flies At Night !
06:39 PM on 12/17/2011
a taste of things to come ???
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frank-Landfield
09:12 PM on 12/17/2011
Hm...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quillsinister
02:51 PM on 12/17/2011
Our taste for cow meat is unsustainable. Texas is merely the first to suffer. With the vast amounts of water and fossil fuel consumed in beef production, we can't rationally believe that the status quo will continue much longer. We'll be back to the Sunday roast before long.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:25 PM on 12/17/2011
We should eat up all the cows and pigs and switch to rabbit and chicken with are far more efficient meat producers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
henrypapillon
Put a Psychiatrist in every NRA meeting.
10:32 PM on 12/17/2011
They use little compared to the average person's other uses of water. Most countries do not use the water each week that we use to wash our cars.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quillsinister
12:07 PM on 12/19/2011
Our obsession with personally owned automobiles is also unsustainable. Certainly I would never defend our civilization's absurd misuse of water. That will cause us no end of problems in the near future. Still, I think you understate the impact of meat production. You might find this interesting: http://www.news.cornell.edu/releases/aug97/livestock.hrs.html
12:18 PM on 12/17/2011
Obviously the Texas cattle industry needs to try and out-bribe the Texas dirty energy industry to try and protect their industry from being destroyed by the pollution generated by the dirty energy industry. Good luck with that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ghostberry
All empty souls tend toward extreme opinions.
06:30 PM on 12/17/2011
Sounds like a dirty sword-fight in the making.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frank-Landfield
09:12 PM on 12/17/2011
Bingo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bluecatb
FORWARD, the ONLY way to go America!
10:07 AM on 12/17/2011
Time for Texas to go green and get into water efficient drip irrigation for crops and animals. Time to capture that flood water annually for just such desperate times and have the farms use a water treatement pump to recycle the storm water.

Wake Up Texas, think outside the box. People are going to school for this same efficiency in energy, resources, and land to have a sustainable future for your kids.

Let's go green together Texas, and there will be no limit to the progress.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
janalyce
01:17 PM on 12/17/2011
How can you capture flood water when there are no floods? How can you recycle storm water when there are no storms?

This is what used to happen in Texas. Each spring, we would have storms....big ones, sweeping fom west to east, often fifty miles or more wide and 200 miles from north to south. A single such storm could drop 5 inches of water in a day.

These storm filled the reservoirs, lakes, ponds, streams. The water soaked deep into the soil, ten feet down where our long-rooted grass could reach it when the surface dried up.

Even with these big storms, we rarely had flooding, because the ground was so dry from the previous summer. It absorbed the water.

When summer came, the rain would stop, the heat would come, but there would be enough water in the reservoirs and deep in the soil to keep the grass growing and provide necessary water for agriculture and human use.

Now? We have fewer storms in the spring, and they are smaller, much smaller. They don't provide enough water, period. When you DON'T HAVE ENOUGH STORMS, you don't have enough storm water.

Another few such summers and people will start moving north. Because there simply will not be enough water. For anything.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:18 PM on 12/17/2011
I've been trying to get people to move north for the last year. If you own land in Texas sell it while you can still find someone dumb enough to buy it and get out. Move someplace with more water and a better climate.

And as for all those cows, eat them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roadrun
In Financial Theocracy we Trust
09:35 AM on 12/18/2011
That all sounds good except for that one word - drought. You can't "go green" when the drought dictates that you will go brown.
06:41 AM on 12/17/2011
If folks respond to rising beef prices by eating less of it, there might be an improvement in our national cardiovascular health, though not if they simply substitute one fatty meat for another in their diets. Eat your veggies folks, and get rid of the spare tire around your middle. You'll feel lots better than ever before. Smaller herds will mean the pastures can have a chance to recover from over grazing when the drought breaks. Unless its the new climate changed normal...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rafael Perez
02:03 AM on 12/17/2011
moo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frank-Landfield
09:13 PM on 12/17/2011
With poo
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:48 AM on 12/17/2011
We do not need to feed on red meat anyway.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:35 AM on 12/17/2011
Eat more chickin'.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frank-Landfield
09:13 PM on 12/17/2011
And veggies
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
08:10 PM on 12/16/2011
This is not good. Food prices are still rising faster than most peoples' incomes and it is hard to see how this can do anything but make things worse.

An earlier article said that Texas can't realistically put any more coal fired power plants on line due to the unavailability of cooling water.

Windmills don't require cooling water, or fuel, and they don't contribute to global warming. They also don't release radioactive elements and heavy metals into the environment like coal plants do. And they don't require huge coal ash sludge waste ponds like coal plants do. Can't see any downside to
windmills as a supplemental source of energy. Especially when you can't bring on any new coal or nuclear plants due to lack of cooling water.
photo
julieintx
End the Hollywood tax cuts
11:23 PM on 12/16/2011
There is a downside to everything--no free lunch. Wind turbines are fine in the right place, but it takes a lot of acreage to produce significant power, and it's still more expensive than conventional energy. Worse, in the wrong place, they can ki!! or damage the habitat of endangered birds and bats. Also, wealthy people do not allow them in their sight, so they have to be built far from the consumer. The huge transmission lines cause all kinds of fights by people who do not want the lines on their land but are coerced into giving up easements for them.

Plus, since the wind is unreliable, the turbines need gas-fired backup plants to keep the grid from going on the fritz.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Dickey
Futurist-Historian-Astrologer
12:45 PM on 12/17/2011
plenty of room in TX. and, we need new transmission lines to replace the ones from Eisenhower' era!