iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Unemployment Benefits Extension: Some Would Lose Aid Under Senate's Payroll Tax Deal [UPDATED]

Unemployment Benefits

First Posted: 12/17/2011 4:01 pm Updated: 01/10/2012 6:17 pm

WASHINGTON -- A breakthrough deal between the White House and party leaders in the U.S. Senate would preserve federal unemployment insurance programs through February. The agreement would prevent more than 1 million jobless from missing out on federal unemployment compensation in the first two months of 2012, but people in some states would nevertheless lose benefits during that time.

The deal would reauthorize two federal programs that provide benefits for people who use up the standard 26 weeks of benefits provided by most states. The first program, called Emergency Unemployment Compensation, lasts for 53 weeks. Then the Extended Benefits program adds in up to 20 additional weeks, but only in states where the unemployment rate has risen significantly over the past three years.

Even though the jobs situation is almost as dire as ever, it hasn't worsened much from three years ago, so Extended Benefits, even if it is reauthorized, would begin to phase out unless Congress changes the way the program is triggered. In November, Democrats in both chambers of Congress introduced bills that would have allowed states to change their "look back" periods to encompass four years instead of three. But as Republicans have pointed out, the White House supports letting the program shrivel up next year.

Due to the timing of increased joblessness, in January and February the program could expire in Minnesota, Maine, Michigan, and Oregon according to an analysis by worker advocacy group the National Employment Law Project. The analysis cautions that due to the uncertainty of when unemployment rates will decline, Maine and Oregon could keep Extended Benefits until April.

"This is a result of the complete unwillingness of Republicans to ask the very wealthy to sacrifice some of their tax breaks to help get our economy back on a more stable footing," Rep. Sander Levin (D-Mich.), top Democrat on the committee that oversees unemployment insurance in the House of Representatives, said in a Saturday statement. "At every turn, whether it is jobs legislation or deficit reduction, the consistent priority of the Republican majority is protecting the tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires."

The House still has to approve the bill that cleared the Senate on Saturday. Levin did not say in his statement whether he would oppose the measure, and his spokesman did not immediately respond to an inquiry from The Huffington Post.

Initially, the "look back" period for Extended Benefits was just two years. Faced with the same situation last December, Congress stretched it to three years so people would not lose benefits.

The unemployment extensions are part of a broader package of legislation that would also preserve a payroll tax cut, prevent reduced reimbursement for doctors who see Medicare patients, and force the White House to act on a controversial oil pipeline.

CLARIFICATION: An earlier version of this story contained a different list of states where the Extended Benefits program would expire. That reporting was based on outdated information in a National Employment Law Project report. Click HERE for the latest.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- A breakthrough deal between the White House and party leaders in the U.S. Senate would preserve federal unemployment insurance programs through February. The agreement would prevent more...
WASHINGTON -- A breakthrough deal between the White House and party leaders in the U.S. Senate would preserve federal unemployment insurance programs through February. The agreement would prevent more...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,295
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (53 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
ResearchtheFacts 07:44 PM on 12/17/2011
Westend1 I was replying to your comment and HP said it was removed. It wasn't a bad comment. You were quite civil. I don't get that, but here is my response.

You keep outlining what the money is being spend for. We can say the same about money taken from you for taxes too, going with your rebuttal. All you (republicans) care about is having to pay the taxes. Nobody is talking about what money is used  Read More...
photo
LaFemmeNikitty
What Would Wyatt Earp Do
05:28 PM on 12/07/2012
I'm hearing an echo. Hello ello llo lo ...
photo
sylkol
You can't buy soap on aid if you don't have kids.
03:11 AM on 12/24/2011
It's so wrong. It is the most 'dire' of nobody getting a job. And they want to cut the people without warning who are already in the system by 5 months - something Obama has said all along. He made it sound like the extensions for the year he was fighting for were for everyone on unemployment - but he was really saying he would cut off millions 5 months so unemployment would be 8% and he could say he reduced unemployment in re-election. If anything, the rules should change for only new filers after a certain date.
11:18 AM on 12/21/2011
The GOP exists to satisfy the needs of the wealthy and the only way to resolve the issues they create is by eliminating the 1% that holds all the wealth in this country. The wealthy live of the blood and sweat of the middle class and they must go. We could outsource them to Asia where they are sending our jobs.
photo
sylkol
You can't buy soap on aid if you don't have kids.
03:12 AM on 12/24/2011
Sending our jobs - exactly. So people elsewhere who could never afford an apt - now go out every Friday and Saturday night for drinks and back to their new place - while common Americans are told to cut their grocery bills.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UWorlds1
I'm a 99%er
12:12 PM on 12/20/2011
I just seen a report that retailers LOST money this Christmas season..you know why, because people (like me) don't have the money to spend. This repubs ideal that rich peoples money trickles down is ludicrious. We need decent jobs.
01:46 PM on 12/19/2011
To the GOP "Thank you for being there to let us down".
12:30 PM on 12/19/2011
If you don't participate enough in the election process to put people who do not work for the best interest of the entire country instead of those who only serve them, then do not complain. According to every poll I've seen the country overwhelmingly believes that Tax revenues need to be made fairer and tax breaks that do nothing but make people richer should be removed. If EVERYONE that believes that contributed to a campaign, helped gather like minded folks to the polls and at least freaking VOTED the problem would be solved and our elected officials would know they needed to do their jobs or be removed.
11:31 AM on 12/19/2011
Boy am I tired of hearing the phrase "job creators" repeatedly coming out of the mouths of conservatives. The only ounce of honesty in this phrase remains the in the fact that the jobs they are talking about are being created overseas by these so called job creators. Yes, by all means, lets continue to give preference to the wealthy job creators so they can move more manufacturing to China. The poor soles (Chinese) have only one aircraft carrier presently.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kojak007
10:56 AM on 12/19/2011
Can someone get these Republicans an Economics 101 book. Supply and demand is pretty dependant on people having money to spend. By increasing the unemployment benefits to the people who have lost their jobs we can continue to allow them to spend on goods and services...you know...demand. If they stop spending money then demand goes down and the supply will be cut...which means more jobs will be cut. The Republicans seem dead set on simply destroying this country.

www.currentlychicago.com
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
10:43 AM on 12/19/2011
"This is a result of the complete unwillingness of Republicans to ask the very wealthy to sacrifice some of their tax breaks to help get our economy back on a more stable footing,"

No..IMPO...........this is the result of campaign financing that is nothing short of legalized state sanctioned bribery.

The Republicans are looking out for their OWN interest. They work for the 1% because that's who pays for their elections.

"Nothing personal Jack........................it's just good BUSINESS". -Cutler Becket, just before his world comes to an end........

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHSBZc8Mp0Y

The Future of American Democracy?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brainsurgery1
Person of Interest
10:12 AM on 12/19/2011
It appears a lot of government spending could be avoided entirely by phasing out the GOP. They do nothing but drag out the process and then trick out bills that seek to do good so that in the end they cost more and hurt people. The GOP is the single most expensive entitlement program (operating as a political party) subsidized by the very taxpayers it hurts.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kojak007
10:53 AM on 12/19/2011
Excellent idea. Can you imagine what this country would look like if we had done this 10 years ago? You should run for office.

www.currentlychicago.com
photo
camelias and sweet tea
Small drinking village with a shrimping problem
09:50 AM on 12/19/2011
States cutting government jobs is contributing greatly to the unemployment...The GOP/TEA says the government does not create jobs, they are making sure of that and hurting a lot of people in the process ..When will they learn we DO need government, and not only when your residents are under water.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mater
mater
09:56 AM on 12/19/2011
Fed. Govt = largest employer in the nation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
centsable
are u smarter than a republicant..
11:10 AM on 12/19/2011
Wouldn't that be Walmart???
photo
KenGirard
"American" is my religion. I have faith in it.
11:41 AM on 12/19/2011
And the one making the biggest layoffs.
Employment in both state government and local government has been trending down since the second half of 2008. 5,000 layoffs in Nov 2011 alone.
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
In June 2011, local governments reported job losses of 18,000, and the federal government shed 14,000 jobs. Nearly 100,000 local government employees have lost their jobs so far this year, and 464,000 have found themselves jobless since local government employment peaked in September 2008.
http://money.usnews.com/money/careers/articles/2011/07/08/public-sector-job-cuts-threaten-recovery
Given the downsizing in the public sector, Washington, D.C., has had more announced layoffs this year than any state, with more than 98,000 cuts so far in 2011. California is next with just over 60,000 layoffs, followed by North Carolina with nearly 55,000 job cuts.
http://money.cnn.com/2011/11/30/news/economy/jobs_challenger_adp/index.htm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KadejaLatefah
That's right...I said it!
07:25 AM on 12/19/2011
maybe Boehner could round up all the US unemployed and put them to work on his pipeline. he could move them into all the empty homes in Ohio....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Fattonecat
whoops !!
11:31 AM on 12/19/2011
Did you see the 60 Min segment on tearing empty houses down in Cleveland last night ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KadejaLatefah
That's right...I said it!
08:59 PM on 12/19/2011
yep -that is my point. he should tend his own garden!
03:11 AM on 12/19/2011
"This is a result of the complete unwillingness of Republicans to ask the very wealthy to sacrifice some of their tax breaks to help get our economy back on a more stable footing," Rep. Sander Levin (D-Mich.) A normal Dem. He seems to forget those are the people who create the jobs. not some one who is on welfare their whole life. Plus it wont go to creating jobs. the Dem want to use it to cover up their mistakes and earmarks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Paganas
And then there was ONE..
05:17 AM on 12/19/2011
The job creators were given tax breaks to create jobs, hence the term job creators.. What they did was take every cent out of the economy, send all the jobs overseas, and cut wages while making record profits and not creating a single job.. I like the way the formula worked when they paid very high taxes, and were given breaks ONLY when the re invested in their business In America, and forced to participate in our economy instead of robbing and pilaging it.. Your entire party does not understand this concept.. If you look at any chart on taxation and GDP growth you will find the largest most substancial growth between 1935 to 1980.. High taxes right after the great depression and it sustained and maintained a stable and flourishing economy and growth for America.. As soon as Regan gave tax breaks, the economy tanked, and even he realized this error and then raised taxes 12 times to compensate for the mistake.. It stands to reason, that if you profit in THIS country you should pay the higher tax rate here.. The countries that they do business in charge a much HIGHER rate of tax, so they stay here to hide, as our level of taxation is the lowest its been in 30 YEARS... Its really very simple economics..
09:26 AM on 12/19/2011
It is simple only if you are interested in facts.
04:33 PM on 12/19/2011
You seem to forget that the reson for those companies going overseas. was because of union greed. they needed to leave so they could compete in the world market. plus you might want to recheck your facts they are wrong. If you'd like i can prove it. I just did look them up.if you really read up up on it. you would have found that the new deal back in the great depression lengthened and deepened the depression. the same thing your party is trying now. But you forgot to mention that every time taxes got raised thing like the collapse of the Bretton Woods system in 1971, the growing influx of imported manufacturing goods, such as automobiles and electronics 70's, the 1973 oil crisis, the 1973–1974 stock market crash. The dems didn't learn or you. they are making the same mistakes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shadowgirl52
09:33 AM on 12/19/2011
Such crazy talk so early in the morning!
05:56 PM on 12/19/2011
crazy but fun some times ")
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MUDPUPPY
02:18 AM on 12/19/2011
When a democrat says "compromise,"It doesn't necessarily mean that Democrats should make any substantial compromises.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Paganas
And then there was ONE..
05:24 AM on 12/19/2011
Yeah, but Republicans do not even have the word compromise in their lexicon..Thats why they have been given the exhalted title of 'The Party of NO" and practically drove America off a cliff with hostage style politics.. Personally I am happy, as America is angry and the polling numbers show it.. With single Digit approval ratings, and candidates who should be auditioning for a comedy show instead of the presidency how do they expect to win anything.. Add to that they have insulted Womans rights, every Gay Man, Woman and soldier, All the Protesters, All the poor and sick, and have tried to dis enfranchise voters.. I wonder who will be left to vote for them? Nah, I would say, the presidency is lost, and I would really worry about the House.. All the re calls, and simply turning a deaf ear to the Majority of Americans I think your party of NO has effectively shot themselves in the foot..
07:39 AM on 12/19/2011
I hope so, but I just heard an Iowa woman saying the Bachmann (MS Politifact Pants on Fire) represents her beliefs the best. And I was wrong about Reagan...not to mention Bush...twice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rogo99
They're the new extreme right-you know...the rest
07:39 AM on 12/19/2011
I see the Conservative Republican Projection Disease has afflicted you too.
01:27 AM on 12/19/2011
26 weeks is what was promised......it should end after that
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KadejaLatefah
That's right...I said it!
07:29 AM on 12/19/2011
do you read the paper? have you ever been out of work?

maybe they could stop unemployment for the trades - because those people go on unemployment every year then return to the same job at the same company...so start there and don't allow companies to re-hire people who they have had on unemployment. oh yeah - and make the 1% pay the social security and medicare of their household help. start here too
09:29 AM on 12/19/2011
.... happens. most people though have never taken an ue check. why do you people keep apologizing for the people not working?