More

Marcus Brauchli, Washington Post Editor, Gathers Veteran Staffers To Steady Uneasy Newsroom

Washington Post

First Posted: 12/20/11 05:12 PM ET Updated: 12/20/11 05:12 PM ET

NEW YORK -- The Washington Post newsroom has changed dramatically in recent years, with hundreds of staffers leaving in a series of buyouts and numerous star reporters and editors decamping to established competitors, such as the New York Times, or starting their own, like Politico. Just this past week, four Post staffers left the paper's National desk for other news organizations, including Reuters, NPR and NBC News.

But there are still a few drops of institutional memory in the Post reservoir, into which executive editor Marcus Brauchli recently tried to tap, in order to squeeze out ideas for using the paper's past to improve its future. On Dec. 4, Brauchli, who arrived at the Post only three years ago, invited a half-dozen Post loyalists for lunch at his home to discuss the current state of the paper and how they might contribute more in 2012, according to sources with knowledge of the meeting.

Brauchli invited three Post veterans, Bob Woodward, David Maraniss and Rick Atkinson, who primarily write books these days (even though the former two retain "associate editor" titles). Also, national security reporter Dana Priest, chief correspondent Dan Balz and enterprise editor David Finkel were on hand that afternoon for sandwiches and chips at the Brauchli home. All six distinguished journalists have won, or shared in winning, Pulitzer Prizes.

Sources said the group didn't just talk about the glory days but also discussed concerns about the paper's quality and sagging morale. Longtime Post chronicler Harry Jaffe charged Brauchli a few months ago with having "sapped the newsroom's vitality." And one Post staffer told The Huffington Post that there's "a leadership vacuum," with management perceived as unresponsive to defections, mistakes and continued frustrations with the paper's costly new content management system.

Like any newspaper newsroom, gossip flows freely. And some details from Sunday's lunch inevitably filtered out and led to speculation that Brauchli was now relying on Post veterans -- some of whom haven't had daily interaction with the rank-and-file in years -- to help fix the newsroom's problems. (Brauchli confirmed the meeting but declined to comment on it.)

"There was no hidden agenda," Maraniss said, in an email to The Huffington Post. "We all love the newspaper and want to help it, and Marcus asked for our help in various ways: story ideas, threads of coverage, and -- for those of us who are Post alumni who mostly write books but still feel very attached to the place -- to pitch in and write or edit when we can."

Maraniss, whose long-awaited Barack Obama biography will be published in June, has recently attended meetings with the paper's politics staff, in another sign of bringing veterans a bit more into the fold.

"I intend to work with many of the younger reporters at the Post in helping shape their political stories," Maraniss added.

Still, it remains to be seen whether and to what degree Brauchli heeds the advice he's solicited from Post veterans -- along with the unsolicited advice he might get. A few days after Brauchli had lunch with the Post veterans, he received an email from Henry Allen, a former Style writer and editor who left the paper after a newsroom fistfight in late 2009.

Allen was surprised to see the Post's David Ignatius write an "Appreciations" piece about the late Washington businessman and philanthropist Joe Robert -- a Style staple feature that was quickly phased out by Brauchli in favor of straight obituaries. But now it appeared that Brauchli had changed course, leading Allen to question the editor's stewardship and whether his many changes early on actually did any good. "He broke a lot of eggs," Allen recalled telling Brauchli in the email, "but never made the omelette."

While Brauchli has focused much of his effort on the paper's digital strategy since coming aboard in 2008, the editors at the lunch did discuss whether the paper's brass has diverted attention from traditional journalistic values. Lately, it appears the Post is trying to re-emphasize the latter through a series of brown-bag lunches with veterans like Priest, Finkel, Vernon Loeb and Joel Achenbach, who are stressing narrative journalism and old-fashioned reporting.

Indeed, the Post can still produce strong, narrative journalism that also plays well online. Over the past few days, the Post has run a moving series following up on the 1988 promise made by two Washington-area businessmen to pay college tuition for the students of a fifth-grade class at Seat Pleasant Elementary school.

On Tuesday afternoon, Brauchli and managing editors Liz Spayd and Raju Narisetti told staff that the series is "a powerful reminder of what we can accomplish with narrative journalism," according to a memo obtained by The Huffington Post.

"Their work attracted nearly half a million page views yesterday and are on track to do better than that today," they wrote, "a reminder that good journalism works for us on many levels."

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

NEW YORK -- The Washington Post newsroom has changed dramatically in recent years, with hundreds of staffers leaving in a series of buyouts and numerous star reporters and editors decamping to establi...
NEW YORK -- The Washington Post newsroom has changed dramatically in recent years, with hundreds of staffers leaving in a series of buyouts and numerous star reporters and editors decamping to establi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:02 PM on 12/26/2011
The Washington Post has fallen prey to owners that run scam educational institutions and feature GOP hacks on the editorial page. I subscribed for 30 years but could no longer put up with it when it became Fox cable news on paper. I purposely avoid the companies that advertise in it as much as possible.
photo
skybar
history repeats the old conceits
12:22 PM on 12/24/2011
I grew up with the Post. I used to love the huge Sunday paper. It would keep me occupied all day, even as a kid.
I went back to D.C. recently and was saddened at how small the paper had gotten. History is not on the side of newspapers these days, and that's a sad thing. For me, at least.
12:48 PM on 12/23/2011
With Brauchli running the news side and that dreadful Fred Hiatt running the op-ed page, the once-pround Washington Post has become nothing more than the Wall Street Journal with comics.
They're disgraceful.
01:54 PM on 12/22/2011
I can hear Nixon laughing in hell...
12:06 PM on 12/21/2011
"Ooh-ooh-ooooh! Pick me!"

Hire more Goopers! G'head, G'head!

The Little Debbie model ought to finish that disgraceful rag off for good.
11:42 AM on 12/21/2011
Brauchli can improve the paper by resigning and taking don grham with him. The paper has no integrity. Brauchli lied to the NY times about salongate. Graham tells fibs about Kaplan U. The paper censors bad news about kaplan, prints advertorials about kaplan as if it were news.

a news apaper without integrity is like a pizza without cheese
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AdHack
Dr. Syn
11:15 AM on 12/21/2011
They're just a bad, ideologically driven newspaper now. Very sad.
10:04 AM on 12/21/2011
1. EXPAND not contract your Sunday paper. The Sunday paper is supposed to be the cash cow for the organization, but over the years sections have been deleted, writers left, etc. So now we ar epaying more for less. MAKE YOUR PAPER A DESIRABLE PRODUCT THAT WE CAN'T LIVE WITHOUT.

2. The Washingtonpost.com website is differentiated from other websites because of the Chats. These chats bring people to the website on a regular basis. Used to have a daily politics chat. No more. Used to have a daily Traci sports chat. No more. Number of chats on most days are half of what they used to be. If you want to differentiate yourself MAXIMIZE chats.
11:21 AM on 12/21/2011
You could argue that chats take staffers' time away from reporting, but I agree that they made Washingtonpost.com different than any other news site in the early going. It says something when Weingarten takes a buyout, but management makes sure he can still do chats. And get rid of a daily politics chat in Washington, D.C.? A little short-sighted.

I know there are some people who've never participated in them, but they can provide real insight into how a reporter covers a beat (I'm a former one, not at the Post), as well as context from somebody who's covered those stories for a long time.
photo
basenji
Dog lover
10:43 PM on 12/20/2011
WP can't improve anything until they get rid of every single neocon_scum posing as reporter/columnist.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CeePeeDee
"Morning in America" began the end of our era.
08:12 PM on 12/20/2011
The Post has fallen because for more than a they have consistently failed to have the quality of reporting and writing they once had. Great writing brings readers. The Post simply quit trying, and many of us have quit looking there.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JPETERB
03:38 AM on 12/21/2011
Worse than worthless. 90% of the commercial corporate media fronts for the 1%. Misinformation is the most valuable product they buy and sell. And much of the international and domestic news is mixed half truths and official disinformation. The base pandering to human weakness and fears is not limited to the corporate advertisements, but can be found daily on the front cover and editorial page.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VA Lady2008
07:38 PM on 12/20/2011
You get what you pay for.

A little late, I'd say for them to be worrying, although to give them credit, there does appear to be at least a scintilla of IQ sufficient left over to realize that they have a real problem. . The Post has been quite slow to adapt to the 21st century, and with a dreadfully Republican mindset that will do whatever it takes to maximize share holder value, decided it could shave expenses by getting rid of pretty much everyone who actually KNEW anything about journalism. There are a excellent few who remain, why I cannot imagine. But many of the old timers, given the boot, said "to heck with it" and took the money and ran. Some ran to other news organizations.

Some (like the execreble Fred Hiatt, doubtless because he couldn't find any better) remained.