iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Republican Endorsements Breaking In Favor Of Mitt Romney, Slowly

Posted: 12/20/2011 7:03 am

WASHINGTON -- The recent endorsement of presidential candidate Mitt Romney by South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley and the Des Moines Register are the highest-profile examples of a larger trend: While the pace of endorsements remains slow compared to other recent GOP nomination battles, Romney has been steadily increasing his share from the upper echelons of the Republican Party, while endorsements for the other candidates remain stagnant.

An analysis by The Huffington Post shows that Romney has nearly tripled his endorsements from the Republican Party establishment over the last three months. He has been endorsed by 59 Republican governors, members of the U.S. House and Senate, and state party chairs, up from 22 at the end of September. Over the same period, Romney's share of all the endorsements issued so far by these categories of Republican officials has increased from 46 to 65 percent.

2011-12-19-Blumenthal-endorsementcounts.png

In contrast, the other Republican candidates have made little or no progress winning over the GOP establishment at this level. By Oct. 1, for example, Newt Gingrich had won endorsements from just six members of Congress, four from his home state of Georgia plus two from Texas. Since then, despite briefly rocketing to the top of public opinion polls, he has picked up only two more endorsements in this universe: Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal and Rep. Andy Harris of Maryland.

The overwhelming majority of these Republican officials have yet to take a public position on the presidential contest. As of this writing, just 25 percent of Republican governors, members of Congress and state party chairs have endorsed a candidate, slightly less than in 1979 and 2007 and far behind the pace of 1987, 1995 and 1999 -- all contests without a Republican president running for reelection. Many major officeholders who traditionally endorse a presidential candidate remain on the sidelines.

2011-12-19-Blumenthal-howmany.png

Do endorsements matter? Elected officials rarely "deliver" votes in the manner of the party bosses who once controlled large blocks of convention delegates. But political scientists have demonstrated that endorsements by party leaders and activists are an important indicator of the state of consensus on a presidential nominee. And while an individual endorsement may not swing many votes, a larger pattern of endorsements can send a message about whether a candidate has what it takes to win the general election and serve as president.

In their book, "The Party Decides," political scientists Marty Cohen, David Karol, Hans Noel and John Zaller found that candidates' shares of endorsements just before early primary elections is often a better predictor of the ultimate nominee than early polling is.

Cohen and his colleagues catalogued all endorsements in presidential contests since 1980 by any individual or institution in and out of government that merited news coverage. The HuffPost analysis focuses more narrowly on top-level elected officials -- governors, party chairs and members of Congress -- because that more-defined universe allowed not just raw counts but also a calculation of the rate of decision-making by potential endorsers.

While much of the Republican establishment has yet to endorse, Romney's dominance among those who have now exceeds or rivals that of recent Republican presidential nominees at this stage in the electoral cycle. His 66 percent share of top-level endorsements exceeds the share of three of the last five Republican nominees -- Ronald Reagan in 1979 (52 percent), George H.W. Bush (60 percent) and John McCain (27 percent) -- and nearly matches a fourth, Bob Dole in 1995 (68 percent). Only George W. Bush in 1999 (77 percent) did better.

2011-12-19-Blumenthal-shareofendorsements.png

Romney's share of endorsements may be lower at the grassroots level. For example, the recent Huffpost-Patch Power Outsider survey of a nonrandom sample of local Republican activists and elected officials in the early primary and caucus states finds that, although about one-third had publicly endorsed a candidate, Romney was the choice of only about one in four (17 out of 62 who had endorsed).

The decline of Newt Gingrich in recent weeks in national polling is evidence of the power of testimonials, although in his case it was more the power to dissuade than to promote. Gingrich has been under assault from a number of current and former Republican elected officials and pundits (as seen in this "Daily Show" mash-up), and that pounding has had an impact, particularly with so few high-profile endorsers defending Gingrich.



So far, his success with endorsers has not raised Romney's support in public opinion polls, either nationally or in the early primary states. But the endorsements may play a larger role in the immediate aftermath of the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary. The last two Democratic presidential nominees saw their numbers soar in this period, with endorsement from their party's establishment playing an important role. The Romney campaign would do well to follow that pattern.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 908
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (22 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brian J Nibbe
Forever sure....
05:59 AM on 12/30/2011
It's gonna be Romney, unless he implodes like Cain and Company. I was swayed towards him when he wiped up the floor with Perry during a debate a couple of months ago. I do believe he is the only one that can beat Obama. The chaff that the Republicans have put up so far is sad. It has been a long time since the GOP has had a good candidate for national office. I cannot say the Romney would be my first choice, I am a Marco Rubio fan myself, or even a Chris Christy fan (he looks too much like Herbert Hoover though). I wish Bachman would go back to Minnesota and stay in her congressional seat, I think she is biding her time for some sort of appointment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arn Arn
03:54 PM on 12/21/2011
I think he'd do a better job ruling North Korea than ruling America. After all, he is the top 1%.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brian J Nibbe
Forever sure....
05:43 AM on 12/30/2011
And so are about 90% or more of the congress. It is an historical fact that wealthy people get into politics to defend, mostly, their interests. And for the record, presidents do not rule, your comment has no basis in fact.
02:51 AM on 12/21/2011
Romney= sixty million dollars in the bank, :-0))
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stryker
08:16 PM on 12/20/2011
What I love about Romney is how he explains all his flip-flops. Now people do change their minds on things over time, but Romney is the only one I've seen who has changed his mind on everything he ever thought about before. 100% different on abortion, gay marriage, healthcare, you name it. Can anyone name one thing that he used to be in favor of before and is not against now? Just don't think it is possible that one's beliefs over 40-50 years can do a 180 in less than a decade. Unless you are one pandering fool.
04:34 AM on 01/04/2012
Interesting is the look on Romney´s face when he flip flops. It is the same look from the used car salesman who answers the question,"Do the breaks work?" with "Would I sell you a car where the breaks don´t work?".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
acapoz
08:14 PM on 12/20/2011
What they all have in common besides being rich is none of them will ever or have ever put their boots on and put their life in sacrifice to protect our country. Our country they claim to love & honor.& protect. For them freedom is free, for our kids, they have to pay a price for freedom.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brian J Nibbe
Forever sure....
05:46 AM on 12/30/2011
The fact is, NOBODY MUST put their boots on and sacrifice their life, the USA has a wholly volunteer military. Anyone who join did just that, they joined. If nobody joined then there would be a draft. Your logic is lacking in one main thing, logic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
acapoz
07:22 PM on 12/30/2011
I am of the belief that they support these wars as "noble" (their words) but why did they refuse to volunteer, its sounds out of touch to me. What kind of patriotism do they believe in. Our country is in trouble, The same military personal is going back and forth for the last 10 years, because there isn't enough soldiers. So why did they refuse to volunteer. Your answer sir is without logic
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stryker
08:09 PM on 12/20/2011
When the jump said Romney was getting increased support from these, I thought it meant weathervanes. Whichever way the wind blows... so does Romney.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brian J Nibbe
Forever sure....
05:47 AM on 12/30/2011
Congratulations, you understand the definition of a politician. Those that are not politicians do not last long in Washington.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vaeho
woof
06:47 PM on 12/20/2011
he is a one percenter who makes his money by firing people.
FaceReality2
Democracy in the U.S. is an illusion
06:41 PM on 12/20/2011
The MIC loves Romney because he will spend even more on the military and will undoubtedly start a war with Iran. He said so in a speech at the Citadel.

"I will reverse the hollowing of our Navy and announce an initiative to increase the shipbuilding rate from 9 per year to 15. I will begin reversing Obama-era cuts to national missile defense and prioritize the full deployment of a multilayered national ballistic missile defense system.

"I will enhance our deterrent against the Iranian regime by ordering the regular presence of aircraft carrier task forces, one in the Eastern Mediterranean and one in the Persian Gulf region. I will begin discussions with Israel to increase the level of our military assistance and coordination. And I will again reiterate that Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon is unacceptable."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
acapoz
08:20 PM on 12/20/2011
Of course they need to build the military, because for these rich politicians and corporations, they have the most to lose. But why is it the people they disrespect, the working class continues to join the front lines to protect them. They should be on the front lines and we will stay home and work to make the bullets for them.
FaceReality2
Democracy in the U.S. is an illusion
09:42 PM on 12/20/2011
"But why is it . . . the working class continues to join the front lines to protect them."

Because it is the only job they can get.
photo
clivechristy
Pith and Vinegar
05:57 PM on 12/20/2011
Of course the elite like him, he has that lock jaw town and country constipated look that warms their heart.....and he hasn't met a fact he couldn't contort or wouldn't flee from. Furthermore, if they feel nonspecific malaise by any of his flipflopping, he is so dull he will lull them off to a long slumber with his drone like voice. Rich boring Republicans are people friend....and they are good friends of Mitt.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Awake-and-Sing
named after a great play written by Clifford Odets
05:46 PM on 12/20/2011
I knew there was some reason for my man-crush on this guy.
05:34 PM on 12/20/2011
the money side to tea baggism was always for mitt. He will continue the wealth through out sourcing, downsizing and massive tax cuts approach that the 1% need to survive

the bomm throwing base however demands an ideological purity that mitt and his multiple personalities are unable to provide

and in the end...........Obama wins
photo
sindurrella
now where did I put my bootstraps?
05:32 PM on 12/20/2011
it's sort of like when your mother used to ask you if you wanted cauliflower or lima beans for dinner - Both were yucky but if you didn't make the choice, you'd surely get the most yucky one of all!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martha Fair
Professional RepubliBilly Factchecker
05:25 PM on 12/20/2011
Romney is too intelligent to be embraced by the TeaGOPS. They don't like him because he's not dumb enough for them. If he didn't cave to them originally and pretend to be dumb, he probably could have picked up some indy voters and also some blue dog dems but...you should have thought of that in the first place Romney before you renounced your sucessful health care system in your state and other blunders. Quit trying to play dumb now...it's all over for the TeaGOPS anyway...and I for one am glad to see them go...oh and...don't let the door hit you in the a*s on the way out TeaGOPS. LOL. here's a tip for you Romney...play down your friendship with the Indian in the cave and maybe they won't notice it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mr Universe
Shiny, let's be bad guys
05:24 PM on 12/20/2011
Wow, My comment from a couple of hours ago was zapped. It was on topic, thought provoking, didn't have any foul language, and had been faved over a dozen times. What gives?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brian J Nibbe
Forever sure....
05:52 AM on 12/30/2011
You must hate the correct side with loathing adjectives and invective if you want your topics to remain. Tick off the wrong person and your thoughtful, on topic, well liked posts will become chaff in the wind as they exercise their right to eliminate free speech while yelling about supporting the issue of free speech. This is AMERICA, land of the right to be as wrong as possible and to have a blog to prove it. Keep your head up, and attempt to tick off the ones who are spouting rhetoric like they have their own personal teleprompters.