More

Newt Gingrich's Judicial Views Put Judge Supporting Him In Tough Spot

William Wilkins

First Posted: 12/21/11 09:44 AM ET Updated: 12/21/11 12:15 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- One of Newt Gingrich's most high-profile backers in South Carolina is a former judge who has been put in an awkward position by the former House Speaker's controversial proposals to rein in the judicial branch. So far, he is staying silent on Gingrich's statements, even as several other prominent conservatives have voiced their disapproval.

Last Friday morning, Gingrich announced that prominent South Carolina attorney William "Billy" Wilkins and his wife, Debra, will serve as the campaign's state co-chairs, working to raise money and build support in the critical state.

Wilkins is the former chief judge of the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals and is currently a partner at the law firm Nexsen Pruet.

"It is an honor and privilege to serve, along with my wife, as State Chairs of the South Carolina effort. Under Newt's leadership as Speaker of the House the budget was balanced for the first time in a generation, welfare was reformed, and taxes were significantly cut," Wilkins said in a statement. "Newt Gingrich has experience, knowledge, and a strong work ethic -- just the kind of track record we need to reverse our stagnant economy and get America growing again."

The announcement came less than 24 hours after Gingrich's controversial proposals for the judicial branch were brought up during the Fox News debate in Sioux City, Iowa.

Gingrich argued that the judicial branch had become "grotesquely dictatorial" and that there was a "judicial dictatorship" terrorizing America.

He has aggressively gone after the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals -- which is despised by conservatives for its perceived liberal bent -- and said that courts that are "anti-American" or "anti-religious" should be abolished. Gingrich would also like Congress to be able to subpoena judges, and he has even proposed using the Justice Department to arrest judges who issue decisions with which he disagrees.

These comments no doubt put Wilkins in a tough spot, torn between disagreeing with the candidate he's backing and endorsing positions that would weaken and politicize the branch of government to which he has dedicated his career. Wilkins did not respond to repeated requests for comment from The Huffington Post.

Other conservatives, however, have been less shy about disagreeing with Gingrich's plan for the judicial system.

"It would lead us to become a banana republic, in which administrations would become regimes, and each regime would feel it perfectly appropriate to disregard decisions of courts staffed by previous regimes," said Michael Mukasey, who served as U.S. attorney general under President George W. Bush. "That's not what we are."

Michael McConnell, a former federal appeals court judge appointed by Bush, said Gingrich's ideas on the judiciary would be "scary" if implemented, but that he doubted they ever would be because they were so far-fetched.

Former governor and presidential candidate Mike Huckabee has criticized Gingrich's proposals, as have his fellow presidential candidates Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas.) and former senator Rick Santorum.

The announcement of Mr. and Mrs. Wilkins as co-chairs was was likely intended to counteract some of the punch that came from Mitt Romney picking up the backing of South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley (R), which was announced the same day.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- One of Newt Gingrich's most high-profile backers in South Carolina is a former judge who has been put in an awkward position by the former House Speaker's controversial proposals to rein...
WASHINGTON -- One of Newt Gingrich's most high-profile backers in South Carolina is a former judge who has been put in an awkward position by the former House Speaker's controversial proposals to rein...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 89
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Querent
I just had to say that.
11:09 PM on 12/21/2011
David Corn commenting on Hardball today said, "Not only is Newt's life and open book, it's an open sewer."
photo
Yorksgal
Until everyone has EQUAL RIGHTS, I will not rest.
07:34 PM on 12/21/2011
To Newt, they are only activist bad judges when they are liberal, or actually follow the law.

As for Wilkins selling himself so cheaply, bet he is kicking himself now.
06:09 PM on 12/21/2011
Someone wants to be an ambassador or maybe a cabinet member.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thepoliticalcat
Eradicate your microbioflora
01:58 PM on 12/22/2011
Somebody's gonna be lucky if he *ever* sees a path back to the judiciary until, at least, 2056.
gibraltar
Put in D to go forward to go backwards put it in R
03:55 PM on 12/21/2011
Professor Irwin Corey was reincarnated as Newt.
gibraltar
Put in D to go forward to go backwards put it in R
03:53 PM on 12/21/2011
Anyone around Newtie should know he has warts. I'm guessing they thought that was a metaphor. Now they are finding out he has genital warts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thepoliticalcat
Eradicate your microbioflora
02:00 PM on 12/22/2011
I just want to point out that, in Newt's case, they're not confined to his genitalia.
photo
homer winslow
Truth in Beauty, Beauty in Truth
03:39 PM on 12/21/2011
Newt/Saddam six of one half a dozen of the other.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeanwny
02:28 PM on 12/21/2011
"Controversial", how does that translate, could it be, not possible, "zany", goofy, or a just plain stupid thing to suggest?
02:08 PM on 12/21/2011
Talk about Conservative activist Judges!
photo
SantaMonican
Visit the carousel, in the Hippodrome, on the pier
01:43 PM on 12/21/2011
This judge joins a long list of people who have no business supporting this "historian".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Geo Bruno
Balance the farces that release within you
01:43 PM on 12/21/2011
They better keep theirs wives away from him.

Just saying.
photo
Stan DaMann
Is your money safe in the Caymans?
01:14 PM on 12/21/2011
"Gingrich argued that the judicial branch had become "grotesquely dictatorial" and that there was a "judicial dictatorship" terrorizing America.

He has aggressively gone after the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals -- which is despised by conservatives for its perceived liberal bent -- and said that courts that are "anti-American" or "anti-religious" should be abolished. Gingrich would also like Congress to be able to subpoena judges, and he has even proposed using the Justice Department to arrest judges who issue decisions with which he disagrees."

In recent years, violence aimed at federal judges has increased. A few years ago in Chicago, someone disagreed with the ruling of a federal judge, and killed the judge's mother and spouse.

Newty's dangerous, irresponsible, verbally violent rhetoric will be repeated for years, since he is a presidential candidate.

But look at the bright side, Newty......you will get the endorsement of convicted federal criminals.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
firstcougar1
Not what you think . . .
12:54 PM on 12/21/2011
Anyone who thought GWB overreached his authority should really fear Gingrich and his threat to co-opt the third independent branch of government.
photo
Soulsurfer
Solar Electrician,Longtime Surfin'Fool
01:09 PM on 12/21/2011
Absolutely. The comments are seditious, and treasonous. The fact that so many in the GOP actually support these views shows we have some serious problems facing us.
athiesttoo
reorganization: creating an illusion of progress
12:50 PM on 12/21/2011
As long as he runs all his decisions by Newt first he'll be just fine.
12:49 PM on 12/21/2011
Nice combover, Mr. Wilkins.
12:47 PM on 12/21/2011
Newt Gingrich, the non-lawyer/judge and history professor, knows best.