iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Ron Paul Touts Newsletters In 1987 Interview (VIDEO)

First Posted: 12/23/2011 11:25 am Updated: 12/23/2011 11:58 am

It is hardly a new revelation that newsletters sent under Rep. Ron Paul's name often contained provocative and occasionally racist material. When the Texas Republican ran against Lefty Morris for Congress in 1996, the issue first surfaced as a potentially crippling skeleton in the closet. When Paul gained popularity as a truth-telling Libertarian-leaning presidential candidate in 2008, it came up once again.

Each time, Paul has denied that he knew what was being published in the Ron Paul Political Report, Ron Paul’s Freedom Report, the Ron Paul Survival Report and the Ron Paul Investment Letter. They may have contained screeds against urban black culture; they may have ridiculed Martin Luther King Jr. as a philanderer; they may have accused the federal government of covering up the AIDS crisis; but none of it was being done with the congressman's sign-off, he claimed.

"I didn’t write them. I disavow them. That's it," Paul told CNN in a recent interview.

Now that he is poised to potentially win the Iowa Caucus in a matter of weeks, the idea that Paul was blissfully unaware of what was happening with his newsletters is being seriously challenged. On Thursday, USA Today reported that Paul had told the Dallas Morning News in 1996 that the contents of his newsletter were accurate -- including accusations that 95 percent of black men in Washington were "semi-criminal or entirely criminal" -- but that they needed to be taken in proper context. That same day, Reuters reported that Paul's signature was on a 1993 direct mailer warning of a "coming race war" and a "federal-homosexual cover-up," though the Paul campaign said he didn't write the mailer and disavows its content.

On Friday, The Huffington Post located an Oct. 11, 1996, article from the Houston Chronicle in which a Paul spokesman once more didn't dispute that he had authored some of the newsletters but accused the candidate's opponent of trying to make a political issue of something written in an "abstract" sense. Reviewing old videos in the C-SPAN Video Archive, The Huffington Post also uncovered previously unreported footage of Paul talking about how in his time away from public office he spent time on his newsletter.

"I also put out an investment type of letter because I've always been fascinated with the hard money school, and been interested in the gold standard, so I put out an investment letter on those lines," he said in a C-SPAN interview on May 29, 1987, amidst his run for the presidency on the Libertarian ticket.

WATCH the original video:

It is worth noting that the most controversial of the Paul newsletters -- Ron Paul Political Report -- was started in 1987, while the Ron Paul Investment Letter and the Ron Paul Survival Report began in 1985. Likewise, most of the inflammatory material that has surfaced (much of it published Friday by the New Republic) came years after the C-SPAN interview.

Paul may, indeed, have not authored the political and cultural commentary that would make these newsletters such a political liability. The most common suspicion is that the material was written by Lew Rockwell, his former chief of staff and the man listed as editor on these letters' mastheads.

But the notion that he was totally unaware is increasingly difficult to believe. Certainly, in May of 1987, he was acknowledging that he knew about and was invested in the success of these newsletters, and they would generate an estimated $1 million in one year alone. And as reported by Andrew Kaczynski, the video archivist, he continued to take ownership of them through 1995.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,818
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (50 total)
11:34 AM on 03/04/2012
Your article stating Ron Paul admitted writing hate letters under his name was proved false in the very video you provided. You stated he 'admitted' writing the newsletter when all he mentioned is that he was, at the time, "putting out" an Investment Letter. Nothing else about any other writings was even mentioned in the video. Also, he said 'putting out' an investment letter - not "I'm writing" a news letter. Even the Huffington Post should realize that there would/could be other contributors to his newsletters. When is the news media going to get on with telling the 'whole truth' and not just nit picking verbiage to incite readers?
I, for one, feel that if a miracle occurred and Ron Paul could be our President for even one term, our country would be turned around and put on the right track back to the wonderful country we used to
believe in. It is way past time for an entire government shake-up and pare-down. Protect our borders and not the entire world and we could be proud of ourselves again.
09:37 PM on 12/31/2011
The cognitive dissonance and semantic calisthenics being used to disassociate Paul from these newsletters are astounding. It's this simple:

1) Either he really believed these things when they were published under his name; or,
2) He was not paying attention to what was being published under his name.

Either way, I think it shows shockingly bad judgement.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Miz Fit
Paragraph breaks are not your enemy.
04:26 PM on 12/29/2011
It's great that he disavows them. Too bad it took running for office for him to do it. Not sure you can trust any apologies or disavowals made under such "duress".
04:24 PM on 12/29/2011
Really ?? When I watch the debates I see a whole panel of Racist Homophobes. There is not one Lilly White candidate that feels any different than Ron Paul. They all live in the whitest neighborhoods in their respective cities and they denounce gay marriage. This isn't a contest to see who is the best at hiding their true beliefs. This is about who is truely capable of running our Country. So Far - no one in the Republican ranks looks like a viable candidate.
01:59 PM on 12/29/2011
I agree 150% with Ron Pauls views as he makes sense and is a very practical human being. Anyone that don't agree with his views, that is your god given right! For those that want to start issues, gossip, and cause problems, you know where to go and how to get there. Confront me with it, I will personally take you there! Believe me, there are more people in this WORLD that agree with his views than not. Get it!
02:37 AM on 12/27/2011
Consider this internet-researched defense.  It is better researched than nearly all "professional" journalists have done so far.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/76280303/PaulNewslettersFaq-Tunk
09:51 PM on 12/26/2011
"I also put out an investment type of letter because I've always been fascinated with the hard money school, and been interested in the gold standard, so I put out an investment letter on those lines," he said in a C-SPAN interview on May 29, 1987.

That's the quote from the video above. Is he touting racism there?
09:48 PM on 12/26/2011
Ron Paul is winning and no matter what kind of bogus attacks the power elite hurl at him, americans will see through all the B.S. and we will finaly have a true and honest man in charge.
photo
shadypotential
Excuse My French
06:17 PM on 12/29/2011
BWAWAWA your funny
09:42 PM on 12/26/2011
Ron paul cant be stoped. The closer he gets to winning it all the more outragous the attacks will become.
01:25 AM on 01/09/2012
He can be (is) stupid, however. You need to (re)move your vowels, and stuff some different ones up there.
09:27 PM on 12/26/2011
The establishment controlled media is terrified of Ron Paul because he is truly a politician who will fight for all americans. Anyone who has half a brain can see through this totally bogus attack agaainst him. I find it hard to believe a man of his libertarian values could in any way , shape or form be a racist. to the contrary, he is the only Presedentail candidate who has the courage to speak of the truth regarding topics such as the privately owned Fedral Reserve, and the true terroristic state of isreal. The american people are begining to see through all the lies and deception that the ruling elite have been forcing upon the public . I pray to god Ron Paul gets elected President in 2012.
07:37 PM on 12/26/2011
Black community members speak out about Ron Paul

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JA2ehvB-_Ac
shakesome
Freedom. Not corporatism, not socialism.
06:12 PM on 12/26/2011
Obviously, Paul was interested in financial and economic info and took almost no interest in the rest of it. he should have taken closer watch since it was under his name. but he disavows it. If any racists want to view him as sympathetic, he just disavowed them too. So, goodbye, racial issue.
10:40 AM on 12/31/2011
Nope, that's not going to work.
05:12 PM on 12/26/2011
Yes he touted the letters, so what?
03:19 PM on 12/26/2011
President Obama has the good fortune of having 3 primary opponents. One created a health care system similar to the core of Right Wing animus towards the President.
Another was not only reprimanded by the House, but his moral compass went askew long ago, and again, I don't know how the Right Wing could feel comfortable with him, altho 'anyone but Obama' could carry him a little bit. The last is someone who seems to avoid responsibility for his past; his ideas, tucked neatly in a liberatarian costume, are inconsistent with many Americans. Yes, we all would like less gov't, but we truly want honest government and effective. When the people in New Orleans needed help, the Fed Gov't was called upon to save them from Katrina. One can site numerous events where the Fed Gov't was an imperative, their failing was that there WAS a Fed Gov't to intervene, but how greedy and incompetent those in power were......on both sides of the aisle......so while I will support Obama, not with an enthusiasm I have had with other leaders granted, I didn't think he would stand a chance until I saw the GOP present the most insipid group of candidates who have done one thing competently, and that is to bring to the fore the major flaws in each of these people.......
09:02 PM on 12/26/2011
wow, one thing that almost everyone who was IN Katrina can agree on is how miserably the federal govt failed them! what helped was all the private individuals, groups, charities -- the grassroots.
02:15 PM on 12/26/2011
So I get two things from this, mutually exclusive.

Paul either did -- or didn't -- write the articles in the newsletter. But if he didn't write them, then WHY OH WHY was his NAME on the masthead? I don't sign or put my name on things I don't agree with -- and elected officials shouldn't do so, either.

And if he didn't write them, then it means that anyone who PAID GOOD MONEY to read the words of Ron Paul, was being taken for a ride.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Shan Wells
Sciencey sun venerator + political cartoonist
04:22 PM on 12/26/2011
One would assume that Paul would endorse everything in a newsletter bearing his name. Otherwise, as you say, the subscribers were being swindled.
07:45 PM on 12/26/2011
Ironic that these writings not only took place while Dr. Paul was busy with a full-time medical practice and touring to give speeches on humanitarian and economic issues, but also:

This fit in conveniently during the time period when Ron Paul went for re-election into the same Congressional district. The GOP was NOT happy about his returning to office, and even "chose" as their main opponent to Ron Paul a man who had to switch to the Republican Party just for the election.

The GOP tried everything to smear Ron Paul way back then, and he still got voted in.

Would the GOP send someone in to infiltrate the group of ghost writers to smear Ron Paul and his ideas of freedom, liberty, and small gov that he had been pushing in Congress those early years?

Nah, the GOP would never stoop that low.
10:41 AM on 12/31/2011
There's an easy way to stop that "infiltration:" DON'T ALLOW STUFF TO BE PUT OUT UNDER YOUR NAME UNLESS YOU AGREE WITH IT.