More

New York Times Staffers Express 'Profound Dismay' With Management

Arthur Sulzberger

First Posted: 12/27/11 01:35 PM ET Updated: 12/27/11 01:47 PM ET

NEW YORK -- New York Times staffers unhappy with management are letting publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. know it. In recent days, more than 270 current and former Times employees have signed an open letter expressing their "profound dismay" with recent company decisions.

Bill O'Meara, president of the New York Newspaper Guild, said some staffers had considered even "more dramatic" actions.

"There were people who wanted to storm Arthur Sulzberger's office," O'Meara told The Huffington Post. "There were people who wanted to stage a walkout."

For now, Times staffers opted for the letter, which was composed in the newsroom and posted online by the guild at saveourtimes.com. Since last week, hundreds of current staffers -- from metro reporters to foreign correspondents, arts critics to web producers -- and several Times alumni have continued adding their names.

The letter calls attention to several grievances. Last week, Times brass notified foreign citizens employed in the paper's overseas bureaus that their pensions would be frozen. In the letter, Times staffers dismayed by this decision point out to Sulzberger that some of these foreign employees, working alongside Times reporters in war zones, have "risked their lives so that we can do our jobs."

The open letter may have been prompted by this and other recent decisions, but it brought to the surface long-simmering tensions. In the past several years, staffers have faced temporary pay cuts, layoffs, and buyouts. They have worked since March without a new contract. Regarding ongoing negotiations, the letter notes that Sulzberger's "negotiators have demanded a freeze of our pension plan and an end to our independent health insurance." O'Meara said staffers did not receive a raise this year.

Such compensation and benefit issues are playing out while the Times faces a problem with retention, as executive editor Jill Abramson acknowledged when she landed the paper's highest-ranking masthead job last June. The Times, which could once keep high-profile reporters and editors from heading to rival newspapers based on the paper's cachet alone, has recently faced increased competition for top talent from non-traditional outlets, such as Bloomberg News, ESPN, and The Huffington Post.

The letter also mentions that a member of "senior management" is now leaving with "a very generous severance and retirement package, including full pension benefits." Indeed, outgoing CEO Janet Robinson -- the unnamed executive-- will reportedly take home a $15 million exit package, according to Reuters. Times staffers with stock options have seen the share price drop from over $35 at the beginning of Robinson's tenure in 2003 to less than $8 at opening on Tuesday.

A Times spokeswoman told The Huffington Post that the paper is "not commenting on the negotiations while they are ongoing but we continue to look forward to reaching agreement with the guild."

O'Meara said he hopes to present the letter and signatures to Times management at the end of the week. The guild also plans to post comments from some of the Times staffers who signed the letter, after he obtains their permission. "Many people wrote powerful, moving comments," he said. "We want to make sure they're OK putting it out there."

One such comment, O'Meara said, included pictures of Sultan M. Munadi and Khalid Hassan, two Times foreign employees killed in Afghanistan and Iraq, respectively.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

NEW YORK -- New York Times staffers unhappy with management are letting publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. know it. In recent days, more than 270 current and former Times employees have signed an open le...
NEW YORK -- New York Times staffers unhappy with management are letting publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. know it. In recent days, more than 270 current and former Times employees have signed an open le...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,247
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (20 total)
01:37 PM on 12/29/2011
Any rank & file that believes O'Meara didn't have advance notice of this is a idiot tool!
01:23 PM on 12/29/2011
The New York Times squandered a great reputation for high quality impartial journalism and embraced a policy of selling out to the hyper-politicized leftist agenda of many of their writers and their owner -- with the result that they killed the goose that laid the golden egg . . . . and paid them good salaries, provided security, paid pensions and gave them prestige . . . . and now have to live with the stagnation and decline that their own leftist philosophy has foisted on the rest of America. This is all fitting - although as someone who used to read the NYT bus has abandoned doing so I miss the quality, objectivity and impartiality the NYT had before the politicized 60s generation rose to leadership and destroyed it.
10:54 PM on 12/29/2011
"Hyper-politicized leftist agenda"? Do you remember the flawed NYTimes reporting that helped sell the war in Iraq?
01:04 PM on 01/01/2012
I am more impressed by their consistent praise of Obama and slagging of all things Republican as well as their consistent support of big government and the regulatory state.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bailey Reynolds
Gulf War vet, Recovering Republican
07:58 PM on 12/30/2011
Yah right. Try they sold its soul to become stenographers for the Bush propaganda machine.
01:03 PM on 01/01/2012
The consistent undermining of the military and the Bush administration by the NYT is record.
12:04 AM on 12/29/2011
Leaving with a $15 million severance package while cutting pensions and benefits to lower-level employees?!? I could not be MORE annoyed by Jill Abramson---OMG she needs to stay off television and radio--a voice only a mother could love. She also sounds like quite the elitist, as I'm sure many of the other top brass there are. That said, I am a long-term subscriber to the NYT, and I take great offense in paying top folks millions, while the paper is struggling. These top, overpaid jerks will pull down the sinking ship, stripping everything they can get out of it while it goes down. No wonder they are losing staff and customers. I will have to rethink my subscription.
05:58 AM on 12/29/2011
In other words...you'll still subscribe
01:23 PM on 12/29/2011
Janet Robinson, not Jill Abramson
12:03 AM on 12/29/2011
Am I the only one who thinks the NYT mass email spam was really one of these pissed off people? It's hard to make a mistake that big
10:22 PM on 12/28/2011
Wow how does it feel over there at the NYT to see that crummy news paper fall to the shredder? You have done such a good job propping up the liberals now you are getting a taste as to what your fellow Americans have been experiencing across this country such as loss of wages, benefits, and industries all thanks to Obama and the Washington oligarchy. Maybe it would be in your best interest to have Obama create more jobs with his wan at your expense.
02:54 PM on 12/29/2011
Why am I not surprised that your rant would eventually lead to President Obama. From your tone it seems that in your world everything negative started with the President never mind reality and the previous administration.The Times may have changed somewhat but bias is the name of the game at the other publications, you know the ones.
05:52 PM on 12/29/2011
In response to your accusation of me ranting I would just like to say I will take a deep breath and say that there is no doubt that President Bush made a number of mistakes in his presidency but the media ( especially papers like the NYT ) could not wait to try to destroy him at every turn. No? Only until very very recently the MSM has found it exceedingly difficult to say anything negative about his excellency Barack Obama and his minions. It really is a shame how the msm have not only expressed but feel they have experienced tingling and shaking in their legs for such a bloke. Sorry Obama has done nothing that I can see that will have lasting memories except for the debt, porous borders, Egypt unleashed, Libya unleashed, Syria unleashed, and of course Hillary Clinton on behalf of Obama siding with the OIC. If you don't know what the OIC stands for then you don't deserve the freedom you enjoy at present.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
james denton
11:08 PM on 12/31/2011
arcadiaP you are very confused, perhaps reading a newspaper would be beneficial to your lack of understanding and knowledge
06:12 PM on 01/01/2012
James maybe you could enlighten me instead of your lame comment of judgement. You probable don't have any intellectual argument because you have not the ability to formulate a sentence or two. I'll choose what to read and really don't need your recommendation. It sounds to me that all you do read is the NYT. Not thanks.
09:13 PM on 12/28/2011
Poor little darlings. Time to occupy! Let's see the times staff camping out on 8th Ave and defecating on the sidewalks... right out there with the bums from the Port Authority.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Kilbourne
07:28 PM on 12/28/2011
Just because I don't like what the left is doing to this country does not make me a Republican. This paper is a prime example of following blindly on a policy that its former readers disagreed with. If it had listened when they started to all away this might not have happened. From a great paper to shilling for the liberal cause is a sure fire way to fail. Air America anyone? But the left doesn't learn and continues on course to fail big time. As for the golden parachutes- sink them all. After bankrupting a company why should they get anything? There should be performance bonus in these contracts. Meet them you get something. Don't- get nothing. To have these regardless of performance is a crime. But unfortunately they are done and gone now. Companies should learn and wise up. Giving compensation or performance- no problem in giving what the contract calls for. Not perform- give money back as you should be in the same boat as the other workers.
photo
splashy
Really?!?!!!
04:19 AM on 01/01/2012
The "left" has no power in this country. It's all corporate these days. Have you not been paying attention?
06:46 PM on 12/28/2011
Hillary Clinton is dismayed everyday also. World is on fire and she is either dismayed or disapponted.
05:57 PM on 12/28/2011
Al Sharpton needs to keep his big fat mouth SHUT! The man is nothing but and agitator and a crook!
12:05 AM on 12/29/2011
Perhaps, but he is also exceedingly intelligent, which by your post, is a trait you do not share with him.
01:25 PM on 12/29/2011
If Sharpton, an ignorant, thoughtless, agitator is your definition of exceedingly intelligent I pity you. I would be so sad if in my life the people I interacted with were so intellectually impoverished that I saw a fool like Sharpton as someone to look up to rather than someone to pity.
08:14 AM on 12/29/2011
mr. sharpton fights for we the people.
maybe you're a 1% big money guy.
if you're not maybe you should put your prejudices away and listen more carefully
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Confuso
Australian/American Broadcast veteran...
05:41 PM on 12/28/2011
Hey Times employees....welcome to our world.
01:17 PM on 12/28/2011
The once universally admired NYT has slowly but continuously slipped beneath the waves of journalism. Non-family members of the board made numerous recommendations but the squirely arrangement of family controlled stock has prevented wise advice from Morgan Stanley and others from winning the day. It appears the Ochs/Sulzbergers plan to ride this ship right to the floor of the ocean. It is a shame to see what was once the flagship of all American newspapers, the newspaper of record, sink to such dismal depths.
banana republican
Provoking Progressives with unwelcome perspectives
01:33 PM on 12/28/2011
The loss financial viability is the direct result of the abandonment of journalistic credibility in favor of political activism. If Liberals were as smart as they claim, wouldn't they have seen it coming? Seems the Left as killed their own golden-egg-laying goose.
02:24 PM on 12/28/2011
Your handle sums up exactly what will become of this great country if the republibaggers take over.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RichInSeattle
02:46 PM on 12/28/2011
Stick your talking points where they belong. All newspapers are hurting and closing their doors. It has nothing to do with being Conservative or Liberal, it has to do with the internet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Confuso
Australian/American Broadcast veteran...
05:43 PM on 12/28/2011
My new 'Newspaper of Record' will be 'The Onion'...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jerryengelbach
Working class heritage
01:15 PM on 12/28/2011
Well, the usual suspects are out in force on this thread, slamming the Times for its "liberal slant."

But when asked, not one them cites an example.

They believe in "truth by rant."

Nevertheless, for all its faults, the NYT is still one of the leading newspapers in the world.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greta42
Undo 2010 in 2012
01:51 PM on 12/28/2011
Yes, they do like to rant especially about "liberals" and they don't see the incongruity of supporting the Murdoch empire of fake news.
02:38 PM on 12/28/2011
Was. Newspapers are no longer relevant.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jumpingjohnny
11:44 AM on 12/28/2011
This is just the "new" beginning of the progressive downsizing of the private sector,especially the journalist side as we move beyond the information age to instant global information.The local news is redundant and day old....People are online and reading news around the world evidenced by the number of people who read the Huffington Post....It will be survival of the fittest...and that means the leanest, not the best, to the profit driven corporists who own the newspapers...Ask Fox...quality isn't everything..just make it up as you go..People will still watch your programs or read your articles.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Kilbourne
12:19 PM on 12/28/2011
Come on. Admit it your favorite soap on MSNBC makes up more contrived news than all other news channels combined. Any corporation that is not "profit driven" will not be in business for long. Nobody, not even your favorite news organization will survive without profits. H-P is profit driven just like everybody else. The times is losing readership because of its news reporting, not because people are going on line. After all they are on line also. I don't see made up news stories on Fox. I see both sides without all the yelling and shouting down of an opposing viewpoint. Learn O wise one before parroting Media Matters talking points word for word.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greta42
Undo 2010 in 2012
01:55 PM on 12/28/2011
If you don't see made up news stories on Fox, it's because you are not looking or are sight impaired. From labeling Repubs as Dems when reporting something untoward about them, and it has happened numerous times, to creating the birther movement and fanning the flames of racism, that is what is seen on Fox.
You need to take your own advice about learning and not parroting talking points.
01:34 PM on 12/29/2011
You are absolutely correct. Corporations have to earn profits by providing a value that people are willing to pay for. Unlike governments they cannot seize wealth, they have to earn it. When companies produce an inferior product insulting their customers they decline - like the NYT, Newsweek, Time Magazine, and the many failed papers. Fox consistently has opinion discussants from both sides of the spectrum - unlike MSNBC, ABCm CBS or NBC who air only the left side and advocate positions opposite to the experience of their (now former) viewers. Media Matters is just another pimp organization, funded by Soros types intent on protecting their own privileged status by restraining the capitalism that over time would be producing new wealthy talented individuals who would challenge their position. It is not a coincidence that for the most part people who inherited their wealth - the Rockefellers, Kennedys, etc favor leftist policies and the suppression of competitive capitalism as well as the growth of crony capitalism enriching their enterprises - while the people who created their own wealth from nothing favor competitive capitalist policies.
10:27 AM on 12/28/2011
The New York Times is a traitor to its 4th estate obligations and generally a joke, a glorified catalog of banalities and products.

They deserve this demise, and worse.

Their record in the Vietnam era is appalling, but when they linked hands with the neocons to promote the Iraq War they really nailed themselves into the casket.

Enjoy choking on the rot, sell-outs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Kilbourne
12:28 PM on 12/28/2011
WOW!! A far left newspaper being set on by its own. We are eating our young these days aren't we? Correct if I am wrong, but didn't 3/4 of all Democrats believe what was laid out before the war? Didn't the Democrats like going into Iraq just as much as the Republicans? Oops I forgot- We rewrote our history after the progressives came into power. So sorry to bring up the hidden past.I promise not to do so again. (fingers crossed)
The Times was a newspaper worth reading until it fell into the trap of the far left and started thinking that it could grow along with it. See how that thinking gets you into trouble. The far left turns on you once you are no longer useful Watch out all other organizations who think like this. They will turn on you once you are no longer useful. You will die a death of a thousand cuts like the Times.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jerryengelbach
Working class heritage
01:10 PM on 12/28/2011
Bob,

You throw around the term "far left" as if you know what you're talking about.

But you don't.

There is hardly a near left in the United States, much less a far left. The country's leadership has moved so far to the right that the Democrats now represent what the moderate Republicans once were, and the Republicans represent -- well, the unthinkable.

Both parties represent the ruling class, and the corporate-owned media all represent their owners.
05:43 PM on 12/29/2011
The New York Times is of the far left?

Oh, sure.

You would do less damage to you credibility as a sentient observer of reality by claiming Pat Boone is a member of the Zulu Nation.
10:07 AM on 12/28/2011
Perhaps if they actually reported the news instead of acting as Obama's Ministry of Propaganda, they would attract more readers.
11:15 AM on 12/28/2011
Attract more readers?! The Times is wildly popular. Their recent foray into paid digital subscriptions succeeded beyond their most optimistic projections. This article is about the Times' management, not its overall popularity.

By the way, notice how many commenters are convinced that the Times is either slanting its news coverage to the left, in order to influence the upcoming election, or to the right, in order to please its neocon, corporate masters? But neither group even acknowledges the other's existence?

That's a hint that it's actually steering a thoughtful middle course.
12:23 PM on 12/28/2011
Not wildly popular enough to keep from losing more money each year.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Kilbourne
12:37 PM on 12/28/2011
I like your thinking. A middle course between the far and the far-far left is still left. It is not nor has been middle ground for decades. Its corporate managers are as far left as you can get. It is wildly popular only to the left. Want proof? Circulation- down. Stock prices- collapsed. It acknowledges that it is losing money. It had to borrow money to stay in business. Optimistic projections- If I under cut and said what I thought I would get and then got what I thought I would get in the first place- Yep I did better than what I said. Sorry the Times is a shell of what it once was.
11:20 AM on 12/28/2011
Thats why I stopped reading. Pretty sure im not alone asthe times stock price is down 80% in six yrs.