More

Obama Administration Asking Congress To Raise The Debt Ceiling

Obama Debt Ceiling

CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER   12/27/11 01:29 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration says the federal government has nearly reached its borrowing limit – again.

Treasury officials said Tuesday that the White House plans to request another $1.2 trillion in borrowing authority Friday. The increase is necessary, they say, because the government will be within $100 billion of its current limit by then.

In the past, such a request would be routine. But this one follows a summer of intense partisan debate over the nation's record debt, which has yet to end despite a last-minute deal reached in August that averted a potential default.

The increase would boost the debt limit to $16.4 trillion. Congress and the Obama administration agreed to raise it to that level in three steps as part of the August deal. Officials say that should be enough to allow the government to keep borrowing until the end of 2012, or just after the presidential election.

Congress can reject the request, although Obama can veto their objection. If Congress doesn't act by Jan. 14, the increase will take place automatically.

The debt limit is the amount the government can borrow to finance its operations. It has soared because the government has run record deficits over the past decade. The borrowed money has helped pay for two wars, stimulate the nation's economy after the worst recession since the Great Depression and finance broad tax cuts initiated during the Bush administration.

The enormity of the debt has also stoked a debate in Congress over spending and taxes. Polls show growing voter anger with the inability of both parties to reach solutions to the country's budget problems.

In August, Congress and the administration agreed to raise the borrowing limit by $2.1 trillion in three steps. The deal was reached hours before a potential default on the nation's debt and only after the parties also agreed to cut more than $2 trillion from the deficit over the next 10 years.

Three days after the agreement was signed into law, credit rating agency Standard & Poor's downgraded long-term U.S. debt. The difficulty Congress and the White House had in reaching agreement was a key reason for the downgrade, S&P said.

The parties remain at odds over how to reduce the deficit. In November, a bipartisan panel failed to meet a deadline to agree on $1.2 trillion of the cuts. That means automatic cuts of that amount will begin in January 2013 – a condition included in last summer's deal.

Republicans want to modify the timetable for the automatic cuts, largely because it includes steep cuts to the nation's defense budget.

Congress agreed to raise the debt limit by $400 billion in August and by another $500 billion in September.

House Republicans voted against the second increase. But they failed to block it because the Senate approved it. The increases are scheduled to take effect unless both chambers vote against them.

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration says the federal government has nearly reached its borrowing limit – again. Treasury officials said Tuesday that the White House plans to request ano...
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration says the federal government has nearly reached its borrowing limit – again. Treasury officials said Tuesday that the White House plans to request ano...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,434
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (104 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LudeDude714
04:16 PM on 01/01/2012
Obama needs the limit raised, he needs the money so he can continue to fly around the country and campaign for re-election. It costs the tax payers billions to fly A.F. One, A. F. Two, all the secret service, and his staff from state to state. This all adds to the debt, money spent by Obama to campiagn, if he was really for change he would do things differently than other Presidents but he is doing what every other President has done. The only change Obama is for is to change the constitution to fit his agenda and to get more people dependent on Gov. assistance. Obama helps the rich get richer and the poor stay poor and the middle class drop below the poverty level. K-mart and sears are closing 100 stores, then Obama administration told U.S. owned Hawker Beechcraft earlier this week they are being excluded from bidding on the US Air Force contract for a light attack aircraft. Brazilian owned Embraer who has a Soros connection as the likely recipient of the lucrative deal he sends our tax dollars overseas at the expense of American jobs and income for an American company. Obama gave billions of tax payer money to companies that went under, even the Democrats in the Senate reject his stimulus plans 97-0, he could not get one Democrat to vote for his ideas and now he wants more debt, worst President ever.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:47 PM on 12/30/2011
Funny thing how progressive liberals don't have a problem making drive by insults on anyone who doesn't represent or agree with their views. Yet if someone should state their opinion of Mr. Obama as a narcissist who believes in order to keep his job he needs to blame everyone else for his failures and takes visions of grandeur should someone else do the job for him...the killing of Osama bin Laden). I don't hate Mr. Obama, so you can do away with the rhetoric of racism, so called "hate" speech that progressive liberals tend to wrap their "feelings" around when someone disagrees with them. I know it's hard to come to the realization that no matter how much you want something such as Mr. Obama to succeed, he has failed. It will be evident in 2012. Sorry...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cristoballs
aim screenname: cristoballs76. cuz moderators suck
12:53 AM on 12/30/2011
as a fiscal conservative (not to be confused with a republican), i do feel a little bit sorry for obama, not that he's doing much to fix the situation. however, the problems we're experiencing with our federal budget deficits are because of legislation that was passed long before obama took office, before either of the bushes were president too. for the most part, this all has to do with entitlement spending. we would not be in the mess we're in today, if we did not have programs like social security and medicaid and medicare. this is not to say obama isn't contributing to the problem. his plans for moving our country to a single-payer health care system will only make matters worse. combine that with his wreckless spending on bailouts and stimulus packages, as well as the fact that we continue to spend way too much on military and it's no wonder that we're in the mess we're in today. it's time we scale back out federal government to what our founding fathers had intended. we could easily cut our military spending in half, but it wouldn't be enough. even if we completely wiped out all military spending, we'd still be spending $800B more than what we collect in tax revenues. it's time we start looking at entitlement spending before it's too late.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stekathy
09:49 AM on 12/30/2011
Like you said, the mess the country is in isn't because of something President Obama did or didn't do, it's about legislations from the past. It seems that most of the people that submit a comment about this topic believe that all the Debt is because of Obama. What many don't know is that $2.9 trillion of today's debt comes from borrowing for WWII. President Obama's request for an additional $1.2 trillion (which he wants now instead of later during the year) is to pay obligations already approved by Congress during the August Debt Ceiling fiasco. This isn't a Blank Check (as some Republicans insist upon) or additional spending; it's paying on obligations that already exist! Obama has proposed cutting spending by between $1.5 trillion and $1.7 trillion over 10 years in exchange for increasing the borrowing limit and the president has proposed well more than a trillion in spending cuts, according to White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, as well as tax increases to raise revenue. House Republicans refused to support the bill because it contained a repeal of the tax cut to millionaires, billionaires and big corporations. Social Security or Medicare and Medicaid isn’t the cause of America's economic ills.
12:08 AM on 12/30/2011
WHERE ARE THEY NOW?

FRANKLIN RAINES?
Raines works for the Obama Campaign as his Chief Economic Advisor.

TIM HOWARD?
Howard is a Chief Economic Advisor to Obama under Franklin Raines.

JIM JOHNSON?
Johnson was hired as a Senior Obama Finance Advisor and was selected to run Obama's Vice Presidential Search Committee.

Kinda makes you sick to your stomach.
12:35 AM on 12/30/2011
Aren't they three of the guys we've been waiting to hear of thier indictments?
12:08 AM on 12/30/2011
Here's a quick look into the three former Fannie Mae executives who brought down Wall Street.

Franklin Raines - was a Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Fannie Mae.
Raines was forced to retire from his position with Fannie Mae when auditing discovered severe irregularities in Fannie Mae's accounting activities. Raines left with a "golden parachute" valued at $240 Million in benefits. The Government filed suit against Raines when the depth of the accounting scandal became clear.

Tim Howard - was the Chief Financial Officer of Fannie Mae. Howard was a strong internal proponent of using accounting strategies that would ensure a "stable pattern of earnings" at Fannie. Investigations by federal regulators and the company's board of directors since concluded that management did manipulate 1998 earnings to trigger bonuses. Raines and Howard resigned under pressure in late 2004. Howard's Golden Parachute was estimated at $20 Million!

Jim Johnson - A former executive at Lehman Brothers and who was later forced from his position as Fannie Mae CEO. Investigators found that Fannie Mae had hidden a substantial amount of Johnson's 1998 compensation from the public, reporting that it was between $6 million and $7 million when it fact it was $21 million." Johnson is currently under investigation for taking illegal loans from Countrywide while serving as CEO of Fannie Mae.
Johnson's Golden Parachute was estimated at $28 Million.
12:50 PM on 12/29/2011
When people believe in something, it becomes part of them,
so when President Obama ran for office, he gave the younger
generation hope for their future. He gave the
middle class belief again in the system; and the older
crowd saw their past rise up as the greatest generation
when a knight of honor entered the arena for the
people, to lead us,during troubled times. He was a man
loved for what he said and what we wanted to hear.
The bigots came out and the attacks were brutal,
relentless, and the nation got that the Civil War was
a bottomless pit, though instead of plantations,
corporations owned us like chattels. Who knew
things were that bad? We all saw President Obama
as fixing everything. We worked for him and he
simply got absorbed into the corrupt government,
and we are disappointed that nothing changed.
It got worse when we saw the power and greed,
and the jury is still out on who is the man we
thought would make a difference?
We still love him but you can love your parents and
hate what they do as well.
What happened to this knight in the arena?

Or, without a roof, or without a place to go for
help. Who is the man we elected to make
the government work for everybody and not
a few?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:26 PM on 12/30/2011
Try believeing in yourself and your creator. Instead of "others". Your only a victim as long as you cling to it. Don't you know? You're are America. In the end you'll be what save's your life and others. Be prepared my friend.
02:20 AM on 12/29/2011
This government is out of control.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Who Honest
11:57 PM on 12/28/2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyLmru6no4U

But when Bush increased the nation debt by $4T over 8 years, Senator Obama called Bush "unpatriotic" for adding trillions to debt!

So? Is Obama with his $7T over three years even more "unpatriotic" than Bush?
12:36 AM on 12/30/2011
Yes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
juicybrisket
dont start none, wont be none
10:17 PM on 12/28/2011
here we go again...
10:09 PM on 12/28/2011
Here's a little thoguht expereiment for you all. will soonbe getting my first Socila Security payment. I would galdly take a 10% hairdcut, if the government would do th e same(zero based cut, not baseline)

A ten 5 across the board cut for the entire government.

Half of it would go to debt reduction.

I'd prefer all of it go to debt reduction, but he has to be realistic so the second half would go to tax relief. Again being realistic, this could be means tested: no tax break for millionaires.

Many of you no doubt, as I have, have had to function in work environments with shrinking resources. Why shouldn't the government learn to cope with the same circumstances?

A second option would be an across the board freeze.

We all know that we will never pay off the debt, but getting it back it to a reasonable debt:to GDP ratio
is still possible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fred Bronson
America Unite
08:03 PM on 12/28/2011
We ought to just bite the bullet, we are putting our childrens future in big trouble. Our grandparents, our great grandparents, our parents would not let this happen we are a generation of wosses. Dependent on the government for every thing, they tell us we need to ship the jobs over seas for lower prices yet the only thing that changes went down was the size of the package. Then they tell us we need cheap labor here, so here comes the illegals and there goes our jobs, and our country, our welfare cost have risen $ 100,000,000 to support their families they brought here. What is going to happen when china calls for the loans.
Frederick Bronson NC
photo
baldwjo
Rehabilitating Liberals..One by one!
03:09 PM on 12/28/2011
Once again, President Obama blamed Bush and the situation in Europe for his own failures.

Reuters reports that the President told attendees at a $15,000 per family fundraiser Monday that he inherited many of the problems he now faces from the previous administration.

It is true that he inherited the war on terror, but he also inherited a AAA credit rating. Thanks to his own reckless spending, however, he racked up more debt than the first 40 Presidents combined, and the U.S. lost its stellar credit rating. Asking for more money is tantamount to insanity!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:37 PM on 12/28/2011
He also inherited his parents thought process, MARXISM.
06:12 PM on 12/28/2011
Is that you Gingrich?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnblack53
Destroying conservative talking points one post at
12:21 AM on 12/29/2011
Is that where your stupidity comes from?
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
01:58 PM on 12/28/2011
Actually, the more debt issued means the old debt is worth less. Look at it in terms of supply and demand. Doubling the debt would halve it's value. The rich, however, don't want that scenario. Since their wealth is directly linked to the debt.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gwrit
05:17 PM on 12/28/2011
Explain to me how my debt is directly related to the debt of the nation? If the nation is doing well I have more work for my employees ans our dollar is worth more. I do not own any debt in America! This will be another mess when it gets to the congress and once again the Democrats will play the rich vs poor card, the rich need to pay fair share card, as well as the "We can't pay SS recipients if this is not passed. They (Democrats) agreed to do certain thing to lower the national debt in order to pass the first raise in the debt ceiling and they have not accomplished that yet. I am going to tell my representatives in congress to not add another 1.2 trillion to the debt unless they can show us how they will pay for it. There is no way we can achieve a balanced budget if we keep going 120 million in the hole every month. WAKE UP PEOPLE!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:44 PM on 12/28/2011
How can Obama ask for another "debt ceiling raise" with a straight face?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
m2modon
some can't see the forest for the trees
01:47 PM on 12/28/2011
No he's too used to using his poker face
06:17 PM on 12/28/2011
Why not? Bush got it twice in one year. The Republicans passed them both times and didn't think it was an issue because it was a Republican president asking for it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
m2modon
some can't see the forest for the trees
07:02 PM on 12/28/2011
And your point is?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
duey35
do the right thing for country
01:38 PM on 12/28/2011
In manufacturing we do more with less so we have a saying.
We have been doing so much, for so long, with so little. We are now qualified to anything with nothing.
In Obama case.
I have been doing so little for so long, give me more so I can do less for more.