More

Ron Paul CNN Interview: Did CNN Edit The Video Unfairly? (VIDEO)

Ron Paul

First Posted: 12/27/11 03:28 PM ET Updated: 12/27/11 05:42 PM ET

An uncut version of Ron Paul's seemingly testy interview with CNN surfaced on Sunday, and has raised questions about whether or not the network may have unfairly edited the interview.

Paul was interviewed by CNN's Gloria Borger last week. During the version that aired on CNN, Borger asked Paul about controversial newsletters from the 1980s and 90s that were published under his name. Paul seemed to grow frustrated by Borger's questions. The candidate took off his mic while Borger was still speaking and abruptly ended the interview.

The unedited version that surfaced on Sunday seemingly caused some viewers and Paul supporters to draw a different conclusion about how the interview ended.

The unedited version shows that the interview seemed to have lasted more than eight minutes. As The Hill pointed out, Borger interviewed Paul about a number of topics. While Paul was clearly frustrated, he answered questions about the newsletters for "almost three minutes before walking off, and that the interview was likely over." Paul supporters have been criticizing the network for what they believe was an unfair editing job by CNN.

Paul's controversial newsletters, which came up during his previous runs for Congress and the Republican nomination for president, has made its way back into the news in recent weeks.

Watch the unedited version and the version that played on CNN below.

Unedited version:

Edited version:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

An uncut version of Ron Paul's seemingly testy interview with CNN surfaced on Sunday, and has raised questions about whether or not the network may have unfairly edited the interview. Paul was inte...
An uncut version of Ron Paul's seemingly testy interview with CNN surfaced on Sunday, and has raised questions about whether or not the network may have unfairly edited the interview. Paul was inte...
Filed by Rebecca Shapiro  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,710
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (64 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MuchMadness 01:39 AM on 12/28/2011
The editing was completely fair. Ron Paul just likes to play to the worst elements of the electorate and make easy money from them, though he is unwilling to make the same incendiary statements in a nationally televised debate. Playing to the worst elements of the electorate is a lot easier than working for an honest living. Even his time in Congress has been feeding at the public trough without doing  Read More...
10:45 AM on 01/05/2012
Wow. What hateful and misinformed comments. Apparently many people here are willing to believe whatever the media feeds them. Ron Paul is not a racist. You should learn more about the man and the reality behind the accusations before you smear his good name. You should also learn more about the Liberty movement in order to better understand Dr. Paul's positions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gregory57
Micro-bio, was one of my favorite classes.
08:22 PM on 01/01/2012
Either he was lying when he published them (he claimed to be the author), or he's lying now.

Either way he is being irresponsible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rowdiman
Cayman Mitt: Why ya hiding your money?
09:55 PM on 12/31/2011
8 or 80 minutes; he still left like a baby. Own it, Ronald.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:56 PM on 12/30/2011
i havent paid too much attention to the ron paul papers, but even if i knew nothing, his interview was all over the place...first he didnt read them all the time (what does that even mean?) then he read them on occasion, then he never read them...but, he said he wasnt a very good publisher at the time and had to make a living, but he didnt write them and disavows them...he also never said, flat out, that he absolutely didnt make money off them...i dont know, if i actually had an opinion and thought that ron paul wrote these very incendiary papers, he wouldnt have changed my mind with those answers
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PollyTics
undefined
09:04 PM on 12/30/2011
I see very little difference between the two versions. Paul was annoyed, and left in a huff...yes, she asked him a few more questions but I do not see how that really impacts the supposed truth of the segment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bailey Reynolds
Gulf War vet, Recovering Republican
07:44 PM on 12/30/2011
She deserved to be dismissed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raymond Foret
09:00 PM on 12/31/2011
Just as Mr Paul DESERVES to be DISMISSED.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
swengnikaerb
'ello Duckies :)
11:57 AM on 01/01/2012
For asking questions?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
USS Constitution
Any fool can know. The point is to understand.
05:37 PM on 12/30/2011
There is a wise saying that half the truth is the biggest lie.

No question it was edited in order to present a half truth.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:11 PM on 12/30/2011
For the most part Ron Paul followers are the same type of desperate persons that followed The One in 2008. Libertarians never grew up intellectually from 9th grade.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PollyTics
undefined
09:05 PM on 12/30/2011
Ahhh, I see. Why just denigrate one group when you can do two at the same time...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floridafun
09:07 PM on 12/31/2011
LOL jealousy making you a tad silly?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin1961
11:43 AM on 12/30/2011
I don't think the edited version makes Ron look any worse then the unedited version.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:56 AM on 12/30/2011
Paul gets attacked by the right and the left daily.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bigdaddy Milkman
11:15 AM on 12/31/2011
As he should be.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
notakochdealer
07:41 PM on 12/29/2011
I would love to see more unedited interviews. It sure would be nice to be able to draw our own conclusions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PollyTics
undefined
09:07 PM on 12/30/2011
There is an issue with "time". It is simply impossible to show the entirety of unedited versions of all interviews or speeches EXCEPT when it is edited purposefully to mislead. I don't see much difference in these 2 versions of the interview.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
notakochdealer
09:13 PM on 12/30/2011
True.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MoreFreedom
07:30 PM on 12/29/2011
It seems to me, given Paul's anti-war, anti drug war, and pro civil liberty positions (something Obama promised but instead mostly did the opposite) that Democrats would create great fun by switching parties to vote for Paul in the primaries. What a slap to the Republicans that would be. And think of how Obama would react against Paul. He might actually reverse himself and follow thru on some of his promises.
01:03 PM on 12/30/2011
The problem is he also is somewhat rascist and homophobic and doesn't really like poor people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PollyTics
undefined
09:08 PM on 12/30/2011
Somewhat???
11:33 AM on 01/01/2012
The fact that Obama and his family attended a racist, anti-American church for twenty years didn't stop him from getting elected. The media asked once, accepted his answer, and haven't discussed it since. Yet, the media has made Ron Paul answer this question over and over for years and years. And they're bringing it up again now because they realize he is in the forefront of this race and they can no longer ignore him.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bigdaddy Milkman
11:23 AM on 12/31/2011
Democrats generally are not ok with ending Soc.Sec., Dept. of Ed., EPA, allowing businesses to segregate and discriminate, taking away women's rights, allowing people to die because they are too poor to afford the scam of ins. co., and generally having an "everyone for themselves" ideal.
Just because Paul says a couple of things that sound good (unless you actuallt think about them for more than one second) or says something that Dems like, does not mean we like Paul.
You may as well say we should vote Teapublican because they claim to "love America".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floridafun
09:09 PM on 12/31/2011
well said..the baggers and pauls 30 supporters are posting all kinds of nonsense. thanks for a breath of reality! f&f
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lulubelle1956
07:27 PM on 12/29/2011
No surprise that CNN is shilling for the GOP/TP and corporate interests. It always does. And Erin Burnett is just the latest example. Hope it goes the way of Faux which has been losing viewers in double digit percentages.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
notakochdealer
07:43 PM on 12/29/2011
I do agree with you about Erin Burnett. I can't stand watching her. I did twice.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bigdaddy Milkman
11:25 AM on 12/31/2011
I like looking at her though. Very easy on the eyes.
06:38 PM on 12/29/2011
Is there footage of Gloria being that aggressive with candidate Obama on his ties to terrorists Ayers and Dorn, and his 20-year relationship with the most racist Jeremiah Wright? If so, I would love to see it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mij13
They only call it class war when we fight back.
07:22 PM on 12/29/2011
You have a short memory. There's lots of footage of lots of interviewers going after candidate Obama until it became obvious there was nothing there. In Paul's case there's obviously something he's been denying about his racist newsletter.
photo
mpilkanis
Attitude Adjustments Done Here
06:55 AM on 12/30/2011
You can stop flogging the horse now. It's not going to get up and carry you anywhere.
04:06 PM on 12/31/2011
As long as congressman Paul remains pinned under the carcass the dead horse is fine where it is
03:26 PM on 12/29/2011
So ... the story is that CNN didn't run the unedited version? Seriously? That's NEWS JUDGMENT.

The reason this made news in the last week is that Ron Paul blamed reporters for "pestering" him about this (when he's running for President) and insisting that he holds no responsbility for the publishing of racist, incendiary documents. Not his fault ... just cause his NAME was on it. Sheesh!

Remember this when your Mastercard bill arrives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
notakochdealer
07:44 PM on 12/29/2011
Lol. Good point.