More

World Time Changing? Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) May Eliminate "Leap Seconds" In 2012

Coordinated Universal Time Change Utc

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 12/27/11 07:06 PM ET Updated: 12/28/11 03:01 PM ET

The way we keep time is imperfect, and it's causing plenty of problems for modern society.

But what scientists at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures in Paris, France (BIPM) have been considering eliminating next month could fundamentally change the way we tell time, and most people don't even know it exists. They plan on deciding whether or not to eliminate "leap seconds" from Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).

Most people are aware of leap years, which add an extra day (tacked on to the end of February) every four years in order to adjust for the extra partial day in Earth's yearly rotation around the sun. But leap seconds serve a much less predictable purpose: adding a second to the clock in an unpredictable pattern to account for slight, unpredictable changes in the Earth's rotation on its axis, caused by things like the gradual slowing of Earth's rotation caused by the friction of ocean tides or the gravitational pull of the moon.

Simply put, every now and then we have to stop the clock for a second, so the Earth's rotation can catch up to our measurement of time.

According to a press release from BIPM, government representatives at the World Radio Conference of the International Telecommunication Union in Geneva, Switzerland will decide whether or not these adjustments are to continue when they convene in January 2012. While many might think this ruins our fundamental perception of time (or, perhaps, that it could diverge real astronomical time from our atomic measurement of time), scientists say the effect would likely be minimal.

In an interview with New Scientist, Felicitas Arias BIPM's "time director" explained that the difference between astronomical time and the unadjusted atomic time scale would be about half an hour in 600 years, so adjustments wouldn't be made in the near future:

It was agreed some years ago that we should not think of any kind of adjustment in the near future, the next 100 or 200 years. In about the year 2600 we will have a half-hour divergence. However, we don't know how time-keeping will be then, or how technology will be. So we cannot rule for the next six or seven generations.

In 100 years we will only see a 1-minute divergence, however, due to time zones, many already see up to half an hour in divergence from astronomical time.

While the change seems simple enough, it has major implications for technology, namely GPS systems that rely on precise timing to coordinate locations, BIPM discussed in a more recent release. By abolishing these pesky little differences (which occur about once every 1.5 years) greater safety can be ensured without sudden, unexpected stops in time.

Currently, BIPM calculates UTC based on an average of measurements from 400 atomic clocks around the world and UTC never differs from the time defined by the rotation of the Earth (UT1) by more than .9 seconds due to "leap seconds."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

The way we keep time is imperfect, and it's causing plenty of problems for modern society. But what scientists at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures in Paris, France (BIPM) have been ...
The way we keep time is imperfect, and it's causing plenty of problems for modern society. But what scientists at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures in Paris, France (BIPM) have been ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 600
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
10:49 PM on 12/30/2011
Hey bubba... Why not try to use OUR TAX MONEY and the rest of your private grants to actually do something of value like figure out how to break the light speed barrier? Having everyone ignore you for the next 25 years while getting them to replace their clocks seems a waste of time..
04:32 AM on 12/31/2011
Umm, "bubba" is in Geneva, Switzerland, so unless you're also in Switzerland, this does not involve your tax money. Also, if you think that trying to break the light speed barrier is a "useful" use of tax money, please pick up a physics book.
02:40 PM on 01/30/2012
LOL too funny.
photo
webwzrd
Reality is liberal indoctrina­tion.
02:11 PM on 12/30/2011
It will be interesting to hear Ron Paul's conspiracy theory in this.
09:45 AM on 12/30/2011
You think these scientist have anything better to do
photo
webwzrd
Reality is liberal indoctrina­tion.
01:35 PM on 12/30/2011
You are obviously an ignorant end user of a modern world you understand little of the mechanics of. There are millions of people around the working behind the curtains to make the things in your world work. A 1.5 second variation in time would make your GPS calculate a location many miles from your actual one. The worlds stock exchanges rely on accurately times electronic transactions that 1.5 seconds in variation could cost billions if not trillions of dollars.

Yeah. The people probably have better things to do, but instead they are making YOUR life better. Get a clue.
07:19 AM on 01/18/2012
A little bitter, no? This timing thing is very important, as you state, but your characterization is a little off. Nevertheless, there are tons of examples of this sort of activity and implications that the everyday citizen is unaware of. The comment in the article regarding a 30 minute shift needed by 2600 doesn't seem to follow the historical average of a second every 18 months. At the present rate, it looks more like six and one third minutes.
09:46 PM on 12/29/2011
What if Wall Street and FTSE traders had the advantage of knowing about an extra second given or taken away to move billions of shares before anyone else? Control time, control the world!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
authorized-user
No right way to do a wrong thing
05:56 PM on 12/29/2011
It is interesting that scientists want to eliminate leap seconds.
Compare this with the GOP that wants to roll back the clock 50 years. (maybe a leap century, pre SSI and bank regulation)

Does time really have a meaning?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Homercles
All your base are belong to us.
07:50 PM on 12/29/2011
It's all relative.
09:16 PM on 12/29/2011
As a scientist, I'm completely against the idea. I don't know why these people think it's acceptable to be officially imprecise. Stupid!
04:59 PM on 12/29/2011
Just sent my email in to "Dr." Arias about this meeting happening in January. I worded it politely, but firmly. Seriously, I am planning on buying myself a new watch in January (or shortly thereafter), and if they put this change in place, I'm pretty sure this means they've just made the second hand on my new watch completely useless. Nice, France, reeeeeaaaaaal nice.

Oh, and Dr. Arias' email address is farias@bipm.org.
03:36 PM on 12/29/2011
This is all complete bunk. First, there is no "unpredicted" or "abrupt" stopping of time. It's well announced in advance and always done the second after 23:59:59 on December 31st. Midnight should be midnight, and we need to adjust our official clocks every few years.

This change is nonsensical for every scientist and meaningless for other people, so LEAVE IT ALONE. If the GPS guy can't hit the SYNC button every January 1st, then hire someone smart enough to program an automatic synchronization at 10 seconds into the new year. TA-DA, problem solved.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissFrijole
My bite is worse than my bark.
01:53 PM on 12/29/2011
I would like to add that I have this wall clock from when I was a little kid that is unable to keep time at all anymore. I noticed that it was gradually falling behind my other clocks, so I changed the battery, but to no avail. I guess it's just really old (26 years old.) It's a cheapy plastic clock, but I still have it because my grandparents (R.I.P.) gave it to me. I let it hang in my living room and stay 6-7 hours behind (or ahead.) It doesn't bother me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissFrijole
My bite is worse than my bark.
01:45 PM on 12/29/2011
As a wise friend of mine once said, "If you spend time trying to keep up with time, you are wasting time." LOL! Nonetheless, they are worried about time 600 years from now? I doubt humans will still be around anymore.
01:38 PM on 12/29/2011
My day is officially ruined. Time can't keep up with time. Fudge.
07:26 AM on 12/29/2011
Tee hee--a global bureaucracy that few know about but on which almost everyone relies is seeking hyperaccurate clock time under the constraints of a calendar accurate to only 1 day every @7700 years.

This does show the extent to which time is determined by objects and the people who design and manage those objects. One could say that clocks and calendars make us stupid because by spoon-feeding us ideas of time we learn not to think critically about time. People give the ending of the Mayan long count credence for the same reason that some people thought that the ending of the millennium was of cosmic importance. The truth is both are just symptoms of calendrical logics created by humans in an effort to make sense of a world that is too irregular for human tastes.

The present change is not being prompted by research scientists (most of them hate it), but by industry--leap seconds are inconvenient for computer engineers and the telecommunications industry. Since money talks louder than science, it looks like those who study Earth-bound phenomena will now have to shoulder the burden of calculating the relationship of a wobbly Earth to the global time system.
11:51 AM on 12/29/2011
"money talks louder than science" - no one could have said it in a better way. Even further I think science depends to a huge extent on economics factors for funding of R&D. So I think, like you say also, that industry in this case is forcing the hand of science in this direction.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PizzaGuy1
Konnichiwa. Hajimemashite. Karasu desu.
03:43 PM on 12/29/2011
#1
photo
ponyloco
citizen @ large
04:28 AM on 12/29/2011
I'll tell you what!

I'm so glad this is finally getting some mainstream media attention! If I had a dollar for every time those darn leap seconds messed up my life i'd have...uh..well...ummm....

well - at least the scientists are having fun?
01:53 AM on 12/29/2011
While we are at it, let's dump daylight saving time too.

Astonishing amount of time WASTED changing every single freaking clock twice a year.

Statistically, if you are going to have a heart attack, you are more likely to have it on the day the clocks are changed than on any other day. So it isn't just time being wasted, it is also an extra stress for no good reason.
photo
ponyloco
citizen @ large
04:25 AM on 12/29/2011
I'm with you - only in reverse...

I wish "daylight wasting time" would go away as I can't stand it getting dark at 5PM...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissFrijole
My bite is worse than my bark.
01:48 PM on 12/29/2011
I agree. There have been so many times where I forgot when the change was going to occur. I have been super early to work a few times and super late to work a few other times because of that out-dated nonsense.
12:56 AM on 12/29/2011
The Earth slowing down? More proof of global Warming.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
02:00 AM on 12/29/2011
That one's down to gravity, but don't worry - that's just a theory too.
12:14 PM on 12/29/2011
Growing population and too many obese individuals are taking a HEAVY toll on the Earth turning speed...
02:47 PM on 01/30/2012
They say the area around Burger Kings are especially slow.
photo
planetjeffy
On the other hand, you have different fingers.
12:55 AM on 12/29/2011
well then fcuk it...I am going to sleep in tomorrow
02:47 PM on 01/30/2012
I'm gonna have to light up.