iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mitt Romney Poised To Do Well In Iowa Caucus

First Posted: 12/28/2011 7:49 am Updated: 12/30/2011 7:36 am

As millions of Americans turn their full attention to the Republican presidential primary for the first time, there are two competing choruses with seemingly opposite narratives regarding the importance of the Jan. 3 Iowa caucuses.

The wall-to-wall TV, radio and print coverage of the caucuses certainly fits the definition of hype. The implicit message is that Iowa is a critical and all-important contest. This, of course, prompts a backlash from press critics and political pundits who downplay Iowa to the point of saying it really doesn't matter all that much.

As usual, the truth is somewhere in between.

Until former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) started to drop in the polls just before Christmas, it appeared for a week or two in December as if the Hawkeye State might deal a major setback to former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's shot at the nomination.

Now, however, Gingrich's fall has returned the race to its oft-revisited state of equilibrium, with Romney playing the confident role of likely nominee being chased by a pack of second-tier candidates who are unlikely to pose a serious challenge to him. On Tuesday, Romney ridiculed Gingrich's failure to make the ballot in Virginia, comparing him to "Lucille Ball in the chocolate factory."

If one of Romney's challengers does unexpectedly well in Iowa, or if Romney does unexpectedly poorly, then the caucuses could shift the dynamics of the race. But if things go as they are currently on track to, Iowa will likely position Romney to win the nomination.

Romney is not going gangbusters by any means. He's hovering around 20 percent in Iowa, where he's been all year. But he is facing a field of fellow candidates even more flawed than he.

Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) is currently Romney's closest competitor in the polls. Paul will still likely have a strong showing in Iowa, despite having been dogged for the last week by coverage of newsletters that appeared in his name during the 80's and 90's that included racist and bigoted comments.

Paul has a committed core of supporters, and is believed to have the most organized campaign operation in Iowa. So his support -- until new polling data says otherwise -- is expected to remain steady around 20 percent, give or take a few points. But the rest of the GOP field has begun to go after Paul on the newsletters and on other topics. Gingrich ripped Paul during an interview on CNN Tuesday and former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) criticized his claim that he will be able to cut $1 trillion from the federal budget upon taking office.

Gingrich, who hit 31 percent in the second week of December, has fallen to around 14 percent in the Real Clear Politics average of Iowa polling. The closest competitor after that is Texas Gov. Rick Perry, at roughly 12 percent.

Rounding out the field are Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn), Santorum and former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman. Bachmann peaked in the high 20's in late July, but has since fallen back to earth and is now just under 9 percent.

Santorum is the only candidate who has campaigned in Iowa and has not caught a wave of support there at any time. As Jan. 3 approaches it looks less likely that he ever will. He is currently at just under 8 percent.

Huntsman has not campaigned in Iowa, choosing instead to bank on New Hampshire's Jan. 10 primary. He is at 4 percent in the RCP average of Iowa polling.

If the current dynamic holds -- and it very well could change dramatically over the course of a few days -- it looks as though the outcome will be good for Romney. A win or strong second-place showing would put him in the driver's seat for the nomination. A third-place finish for Romney would, given expectations at this point, be a disappointment but not a serious problem. If he somehow finished fourth or worse, though, he would face real questions.

Gingrich and Perry are the two candidates who would be a threat to Romney if they were able to post a huge win in Iowa and catch a groundswell that took them to a strong showing in New Hampshire, where Romney is expected to win, and on to a possible victory in South Carolina on Jan. 21.

But increasingly, it looks as if both Gingrich and Perry have been so badly wounded, by an onslaught of critical TV ads and by their own gaffes, respectively, that they can only hope to limp to the finish line on Jan. 3. That is not the kind of outcome they need to challenge Romney, who is much better organized and financed and has made a consistent and strong argument that he is the GOP's best hope to defeat President Obama.

It is possible that Bachmann or Santorum could wildly out-perform their poll numbers and finish in the top three or even win, if there is a dramatic shift by Iowa's large population of conservative Christians to unite behind them. But that result would do little other than marginalize the Iowa result, since neither candidate is considered in the same tier as Romney.

If Romney and Paul finish in the top three in Iowa, whoever rounds out that group with them will face a daunting set of hurdles. They will have to compete and do well in New Hampshire, South Carolina and then in the very expensive state of Florida on Jan. 31.

And then, possibly an even greater challenge will confront them. There are four contests in early February -- Colorado, Nevada, Minnesota and Maine -- that are likely to blunt any hope of momentum for an anti-Romney candidate. That's because all four are caucus states.

Caucuses are quite different from primaries, because going to a caucus meeting and spending two to three hours there requires much more effort from a voter than simply walking into a polling place and casting a ballot. Caucus states therefore pose greater organizational challenges for campaigns.

Only the Romney and Paul campaigns have been preparing for the caucuses in these states. The other campaigns have done little to nothing. And so a third-place Iowa winner who fared well during the rest of January would be faced with a series of likely losses in early February, followed by what Romney's political director Rich Beeson called a "Rubicon of downtime" until two Feb. 28 primaries in Arizona and Michigan.

Then on March 6, Super Tuesday, four of the 11 contests are caucuses, further undercutting the opportunity for a Romney challenger such as Gingrich or Perry to gain any advantage.

Given all this, Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus signaled Tuesday that the Republican primary could be over rather quickly, a statement that could only be viewed as a nod to Romney's likely victory.

"We will have a nominee pretty quickly," Priebus said on ABC's "Good Morning America."

Priebus, who in the fall predicted a drawn out primary at a time when Romney's challengers appeared more formidable, will only be wrong if Iowa serves up a dramatic surprise next Tuesday night.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this report incorrectly described Colorado as a primary state. It is a caucus state.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 527
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Stewart J. Lawrence
Veteran policy analyst and news journalist
12:16 AM on 12/29/2011
I think the really interesting question is: could someone win Iowa and New Hampshire, and still lose the GOP nomination? 2012 could be the year.

What no one wants to look at is the simple fact that Gingrich is still tied for the lead nationally.

Romney and the right shot their total wad, outspent Gingrich 10-1 in the two early states in a desperate bid to knock him out and keep themselves relevant.

And it may not work - which is quite a story.
11:22 PM on 12/28/2011
Rep. Paul and Romney are polling in the 20 percentile, so...

...shouldn't the title of the article indicate that Rep. Paul and Romney 'are poised to do well in the Iowa caucus?'

...seems like some media folks are not so subtle in their support of Romney.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Stewart J. Lawrence
Veteran policy analyst and news journalist
12:13 AM on 12/29/2011
Yes, the pro-Romney bias is across the board, from the National Review to the Washington Post to POLITICO to Huff-Po. No question.

Romney's support is where it was in 2008, just expanded outward a bit. The evengelical support for Santorum et al. is largely in a different part of the state.

If the right could unify, they would wipe their rear-ends with Romney, just as Huckabee did.
It's really that simple.

He's already reached his outer limit.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Stewart J. Lawrence
Veteran policy analyst and news journalist
12:20 AM on 12/29/2011
Just for the record, Romney also finished with 25% in the Iowa Caucuses in 2008. Tat's what he has now.

Huckabee had 36% in 2008. Add the Santorum, Bachmann and Perry percentages and what do you get? It's the same dynamic.

Romney's not done anything - with 4 more years.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shilparules
06:11 PM on 12/28/2011
Of course, Romney will do well in Iowa. After he was endorsed by Christine O'Donnell & Nikki Haley, he had the fearless feminist vote locked up. He now owns the Republican nomination, barring the unlikely chance that Gov. Sarah Palin speaks out against him.
04:54 PM on 12/28/2011
Paul winning in any state at all would be about the most dramatic surprise to occur in US politics since Watergate. But this author somehow manages to turn that shocking event into a ho-hum nothingness.

"It's entirely natural that a majority of GOP voters are choosing the candidate opposed to militarism and not a suprise at all. Now let's talk about Romney's inevitable nomination, and forget about the actual election results."

Yeah right.
05:03 PM on 12/28/2011
very good point. lets end the empire and sell the bases and bring the troops home. good place to start. it would shock the world
04:50 PM on 12/28/2011
no way Jose does Romney get there. does not play well in the south which is the republican bastion. need to start operation chaos vote Ron Paul. thats will actually represent what most little r republicans believe in
see polls
photo
IndyvoterRob
Free Adam Kokesh!
04:38 PM on 12/28/2011
As soon as the Republican candidates were announced I pointed to Mitt Romney and said he will be the nominee. The Republican ticket is always decided by who has the most money period not on who is the most electable.

Romney floods t.v. markets with ad's and with name recognition easily gets the nod these debates are worthless the masses do not watch them.

Romney will then lose the general election to Obama who is a TERRIBLE executive but a MASTERFUL public rally speaker. Obama will lie as usual and promise free mortgage and gas for all and the dummies will fall for it again.

I predict Obama will win re-election and the recovery of the economy will stall until around the last year of his second term when business will fell confident enough to let loose their coffers which are bulging with over produced dollars.

The majority of people who vote Republican are Christians of the baptist or evangelical variety and they will not be bothered to vote for a Mormon.

Add the moron Donal Trump splitting the vote and Obama is in. May the Creator or Creators have mercy on our soul.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PotomacOracle
The Solution:debt free credit clearing systems
04:28 PM on 12/28/2011
Romney dosen't know squat about our national debt...when he says without equivocation that he won't borrow money from China to fund federal programs, (MSNBC Martin Bashir Show 3:00 today.)

The crowds sucked it up and the media repeats it at every opportunity. What Willard and most folks don't know or understand is that we do not borrow from China to finance our consumption: the borrowing that finances an import from China is done by a U.S. consumer at a U.S. bank.

Right now, China is holding some $2 trillion of U.S. Treasury securities because consumers imported stuff from them for the same amount. So what do we do when they mature and it’s time to pay China back? We remove those dollars from their savings account at the Fed and add them to their checking account at the Fed, and wait for them to say what, if anything, they might want to do next.

This is what happens when all U.S. government debt comes due, which happens continuously.

It’s all a tragic misunderstanding.

China knows we don’t need them for “financing our deficits” and is playing us for fools. Today, that includes Geithner, Clinton, Obama, Summers, the rest of the administration, Congress and the media.

And when the dreaded day arrives, and the Treasury securities which China holds come due and need to be repaid, the Fed again simply changes two numbers on its own spreadsheet. That’s all - debt paid!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
zdeedle
Keep safe all who gather here.
04:10 PM on 12/28/2011
romney's argument: it's better to cut programs, even ones that are incredibly beneficial to this country and its citizens, than to borrow more money from china. THOSE ARE NOT THE ONLY TWO CHOICES! we can tax the wealthy who have gotten over a decade of lower taxes than they should have been paying all along. time for them to give back some of what they've taken. it's patriotic to help your country.
04:17 PM on 12/28/2011
Few if any federal programs give the taxpayer fair bang for buck.
photo
IdeatoEmpire
Let's have a retirement party for 535
03:53 PM on 12/28/2011
The majority of Republicans don't want Romney because they don't like him and they know he can't win.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chicago0048
03:52 PM on 12/28/2011
First off, the only people who care about the Iowa caucus are the Media and Iowa. I don't think anybody is really paying attention to what happens in Iowa, because it don't mean nothing. It don't mean that the candidate who wins will go to the convention and win....why are we/the media getting in a lather about this caucus?
Second, HUFFPO -- which is it? Paul or Romney? You got them both winning.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:52 PM on 12/28/2011
Romney: ‘Big Bird Is Going To Have Advertisements’
At a campaign stop in Iowa Wednesday, Mitt Romney reiterated his promise to cut the National Endowment for the Arts as well as PBS funding and other programs as part of his plan to balance the budget.

“No, we’re not going to kill Big Bird,” Romney, who said he personally “love[s]” PBS, told the town hall at a diner in Clinton, IA. “But Big Bird is going to have to have advertisements.”
---

commercials on PBS ? I cannot stand Romney......
photo
Moxo
Our enemies are in the GOP.
03:51 PM on 12/28/2011
My latest favorite Romney quote: Romney: "I'm not going to change my positions by virtue of being in a presidential campaign."

He said this on Fox News!

When Faux's employees go home do they just laugh hysterically at Mitt?

http://thepage.time.com/2011/12/28/romney-sees-iowa-surge-of-enthusiasm/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddemos
my micro-bio is none of your business
03:44 PM on 12/28/2011
Hmmm...just not sitting pretty with his own party or base...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
elkabong
Campaign finance is the disease.
03:41 PM on 12/28/2011
A working man voting for Mitt Romney is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
flossophy
the unfamous anti-establishment classical liberal
03:27 PM on 12/28/2011
America would be making a huge mistake allowing the Republican establishment to decide the nominee.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gelceea
Life without liberty has no value.
03:28 PM on 12/28/2011
Why? What has your boy done?