iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Feldheim, German Village, Powered By Renewable Energy

Feldheim Germany

First Posted: 12/29/11 03:53 AM ET Updated: 12/29/11 09:20 AM ET

FELDHEIM, Germany (AP) — This tiny village of 37 gray homes and farm buildings clustered along the main road in a wind-swept corner of rural eastern Germany seems an unlikely place for a revolution.

Yet environmentalists, experts and politicians from El Salvador to Japan to South Africa have flocked here in the past year to learn how Feldheim, a village of just 145 people, is already putting into practice Germany's vision of a future powered entirely by renewable energy.

Chancellor Angela Merkel's government passed legislation in June setting the country on course to generate a third of its power through renewable sources — such as wind, solar, geothermal and bioenergy — within a decade, reaching 80 percent by 2050, while creating jobs, increasing energy security and reducing harmful emissions.

The goals are among the world's most ambitious, and expensive, and other industrialized nations from the U.S. to Japan are watching to see whether transforming into a nation powered by renewable energy sources can really work.

"Germany can't afford to fail, because the whole world is looking at the German model and asking, can Germany move us to new business models, new infrastructure?," said Jeremy Rifkin, a U.S. economist who has advised the European Union and Merkel.

In June, the nation passed the 20 percent mark for drawing electric power from a mix of wind, solar and other renewables. That compares with about 9 percent in the United States or Japan — both of which rely heavily on hydroelectric power, an energy source that has long been used.

Expanding renewables depends on the right mix of resources, as well as government subsidies and investment incentive — and a willingness by taxpayers to shoulder their share of the burden. Germans currently pay a 3.5 euro cent per kilowatt-hour tax, roughly euro157 ($205) per year for a typical family of four, to support research and investment in and subsidize the production and consumption of energy from renewable sources.

That allows for homeowners who install solar panels on their rooftops, or communities like Feldheim that build their own biogas plants, to be paid above-market prices for selling back to the grid, to ensure that their investment at least breaks even.

Critics, like the Institute for Energy Research, based in Washington, D.C., maintain such tariffs put an unfair burden of expanding renewables squarely on the taxpayer. At the same time, to make renewable energy work on the larger scale, Germany will have to pour billions into infrastructure, including updating its grid.

Key to success of the transformation will be getting the nation's powerful industries on board, to drive innovation in technology and create jobs. According to the Environment Ministry, overall investment in renewable energy production equipment more than doubled to euro29.4 billion ($38.44 billion) in 2011. Solid growth in the sector is projected through the next decade.

Some 370,000 people in Germany now have jobs in the renewable sector, more than double the number in 2004, a point used as proof that tax payers' investment is paying off.

Feldheim has zero unemployment — despite its tiny size — compared with roughly 30 percent in other villages in the economically depressed state of Brandenburg, which views investments in renewables as a ticket for a brighter future. Most residents work in the plant that produces biogas — fuel made by the breakdown of organic material such as plants or food waste — or maintain the wind and solar parks that provide the village's electricity.

"The energy revolution is already taking place right here," says Werner Frohwitter, spokesman for the Energiequelle company that helped set up and run Feldheim's energy concept.

But it's not only in the country. Earlier this month in Berlin, officials unveiled a prototype of a self-sustaining, energy-efficient home, built from recycled materials and complete with electric vehicles that can be charged in its garage.

The aim of the prototype home is to produce twice as much energy as is used by a family of four — chosen from a willing pool of volunteers who will be selected to live in the home for 15 months — through a combination of solar photovoltaics and energy management technology, in order to show the technology already exists to allow people to be energy self-sufficient.

"We want to show people that already today it is possible to live completely from renewable energy," said German Transport Minister Peter Ramsauer as the project, dubbed "Efficiency House Plus," was unveiled. The house is part of a wider euro1.2 million ($1.57 million) project investing in energy-efficient buildings.

"The Efficiency House Plus will set standards that can be adopted by the majority in the short term," Ramsauer told The Associated Press. "The basic principle is that the house produces more energy than needed to live. The extra energy is then used to charge electric-powered cars and bicycles or sold back to the public grid."

Germany's four leading car makers are also participating in the project with BMW AG, Daimler AG, Volkswagen AG and Opel, which is part of Buick's parent company, General Motors Co., each making an E-car for use by in the home.

Such strong cooperation between Germany's industrial sector coupled with a political landscape that emphasizes stability and a heightened public ecological sensibility makes Germany fertile ground to lead the way in the transformation from a post-carbon economy to one run on renewable energy.

"Germany has the most robust industrial economy per capita. When you talk about industrial revolution, that's Germany. It's German technology, it's German IT, it's German commutation," said Rifkin, who outlines what he calls the "The Third Industrial Revolution," in a newly released book of the same title that explains how the economies in the future could swap fossil fuels for renewable energies and still maintain growth.

Robert Pottmann, an asset manager with Munich Re, one of the world's biggest reinsurers, says the company seeks to invest about euro2.5 billion ($3.27 billion) in the next few years in renewable energy assets such as "wind farms, solar projects or maybe new electricity grids."

Alan Simpson, an independent energy and climate adviser from Britain who visited Feldheim as part of a wider tour of Germany last month to see what the renewable revolution looks like up close said it was inspiring to view what is being accomplished on the ground.

"It's great to think about Germany delivering on everything that we are being told in Great Britain is impossible," Simpson said.

Amid the excitement, there is also an awareness of the real need for the German experiment to succeed.

"If Germany can't pull this off," said Rifkin. "We don't have a plan B."

___

Associated Press writer Juergen Baetz contributed to this story from Berlin.

___

On the Internet:

Feldheim: http://www.neue-energien-forum-feldheim.de/

German Renewable Energy Agency: http://www.unendlich-viel-energie.de/en/homepage.html

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

FELDHEIM, Germany (AP) — This tiny village in a wind-swept corner of eastern Germany seems an unlikely place for a revolution. Yet environmentalists, experts and politicians from El S...
FELDHEIM, Germany (AP) — This tiny village in a wind-swept corner of eastern Germany seems an unlikely place for a revolution. Yet environmentalists, experts and politicians from El S...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:52 PM on 12/31/2011
So, is everyone here planning on calling their state and local representatives and demanding a GERMAN STYLE FEED IN TARIFF so that WE can install the solar and efficiency upgrades on our own homes and businesses and reap the profits?

The default is that Chevron Solar, BP Wind, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Exelon, Sempra, and other Big Energy/Big Bank mercenaries are just going to destroy millions more acres of wilderness for greenwashed Big Solar, Big Wind, and Big Transmission, jack up our prices, and we will be left baking and sprawling with NOTHING. Our government is not working for us - they are working for Big Energy and Big Banks and will not implement the proven success model that Germany has unless we demand it.

The conservatives in Germany were behind the FIT in Germany as much as the Greens - because this is not a Big Fossils vs. Big Renewables fight - this is a Big Energy/Big Banks against all ratepayers, all taxpayers and all ecosystems fight - which side are you on?
08:37 PM on 12/30/2011
This is inspiring. It's good to know there are nations on the planet that look forward, and act likewise. The USA is so unwilling to embrace what must happen if we are to have any hope of transitioning smoothly to a post-carbon world. Our leaders, and their corporate puppeteers won't make the move unless they have cornered the resources, and means of production of alternative energy, or until the last drop of oil, the last lump of coal has been used, whichever comes first. With our profit-today-at-all-cost attitude, we refuse to think about the future, the environment, our descendants, much less the ethical wasteland that defines our capitalistic dogma.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mezzanoche
Jack the Bean Stalker
06:21 PM on 12/30/2011
Two thumbs up for this. :-)
11:00 AM on 12/30/2011
This article has a decidedly narrow focus. Wind, solar and biogas are visible in small towns across Germany. The mention of one town as demonstration is missing the scope of what has already been accomplished.

The number of jobs is mentioned but not broken out by category or region. Those figures would show how widespread acceptance of clean energy has become.

The huge costs get prominent treatment, but no context. Compared to fossil fuel subsidies and tax breaks in the US, huge would be considered an inaccurate adjective. The cost of pollution is of course ignored as always. Never mind the military expenditures to keep oil flowing, and the suffering and rights violations the oil kings and dictators inflict. The article does not even bother to compare those huge costs to the actual cost of creating or importing twenty percent more energy using dirty sources. Nor is there a comparison to the cost to taxpayers supporting the thirty percent who would be unemployed.

A little more context, some basic math and number crunching, and accurate descriptions would have turned a hesitant and doubt filled article into a sales pitch for replication of success. Instead we get the dirty fuel CEO talking points that suggest failure is right around the corner.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 99
GEOENGINEERINGWATCH DOT ORG
11:07 PM on 12/29/2011
Breakthrough Swedish Hemp Energy Farming Study Corroborates Hemp Emperor Herer

1:42 pm in Uncategorized by normanb
from today’s edition of MaMaMoJo — the Massachusetts Marijuana Movement Journal:
Hemp Energy Farming Breakthrough Study –Corroborates Jack Herer’s Assertions
Hot off the lab table: Five scientists working at Lund University in Sweden on October 31, 2010, published online their findings about the potential of Hemp as an energy crop. The findings support activist Jack Herer’s teachings, that through growing Hemp on a percentage of our available land, our society can switch to completely clean fuel that causes no Global Warming.

Emma Kreuger and Lovisa Bjornsson of the Lund U. Dept. of Biotechnology, the Budapest University of Technology & Economics Dept. of Applied Biotechnology & Food Science’s Balint Sipos and Guido Zacchi (both with the LU Dept. of Chemical Engineering), and Sven-Erik Svensson of the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Dept. of Agriculture — Farming Systems, Technology & Product Quality in Alnarp completed the research just days ago, showing that every ten square kilometers (about 2.5 acres) of cultivated great Hemp yields about 3,000 liters (about 800 gallons) of Ethanol AND 3,000 cubic meters of Methane. Both Ethanol and Methane burn cleanly, causing no Global Warming. Methane left in the atmosphere, however, is a Greenhouse Gas many times as Carbon Dioxide.

Jack famously guaranteed that devoting 6% of continental US land to growing Hemp could replace all our country’s energy usage. This study supports Jack Herer’s research.

http://my.firedoglake.com/normanb/tag/biogas/
05:52 PM on 12/29/2011
Thanks for the Great Article,
This is inspiring. Even though the article focused on what small, conservative community can do (which is important), the larger goal is bringing about a fundamental shift and showing that we can do it in a way that creates jobs, helps the economy, reduces greenhouse gas emissions, protects the environment and increases national security.
With Appreciation and Sustainability,
Terry Gips, President
Alliance for Sustainability
In the Hillel Center at the University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, MN
Terry@afors.org www.afors.org
05:10 PM on 12/29/2011
Not far away from Germany you will find Limburg, a province in Belgium, with a high target for 2020 - To be Climate Neutral. Read the blog and see the interview with the Governor at http://bit.ly/ubhceA
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 99
GEOENGINEERINGWATCH DOT ORG
03:17 PM on 12/29/2011
How to save fuel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeS51cO6U5o
03:12 PM on 12/29/2011
"The goals are among the world's most ambitious, and expensive, and other industrialized nations from the U.S. to Japan are watching to see whether transforming into a nation powered by renewable energy sources can really work.

"Germany can't afford to fail, because the whole world is looking at the German model and asking, can Germany move us to new business models, new infrastructure?," said Jeremy Rifkin, a U.S. economist who has advised the European Union and Merkel."

It is unfortunate that the U.S. is just sitting back and watching. What happened to being a world leader? The #1 nation? It's disgraceful. I would not mind giving up more in taxes to the PUBLIC sector if it meant less pollution, lower energy bills, more jobs, and more energy for all.
03:53 PM on 12/29/2011
All these short-sighted people need to invest in a pair of glasses - look reality straight in the face!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
behavingbadly
lovingly crafted artisanal comments
04:49 PM on 12/29/2011
Well said ... but you have to admit, that in two areas—starting wars and political idiocy—the US takes a back seat to no one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hanspij
12:53 PM on 12/29/2011
Institute for Energy Research says USA ppl dont can pay so much tax for clean energy! So?Are those German ppl wonder ppl? They pay, and are happy with it.And we pay much more tax than the USA ppl.Oure oil products are much more expencive than the USA oil products. And thats much more importand, we live oure lifes in much more freedom and health than those in the USA.
06:24 PM on 12/29/2011
The "Institute for Energy Research" is run by an ex-Enron executive and is funded in part by corporations and ALEC, yes that ALEC which funds all the anti-moving forward initiatives at the behest of MNC's.

See here: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Institute_for_Energy_Research
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alvdh1
07:15 PM on 12/31/2011
Glad to be your first fan for pointing out the hypocrisy of the Institute For Energy Research and the funding by the conservative group ALEC. Alec is the main problem and it is ruthlessly infecting politics by writing all of the bills in Republican controlled legislatures. Their efforts have been accelerated by unlimited funding due to Citizen's United.
12:47 PM on 12/29/2011
It is a town with so little people that making it depend on renewable energy is easy. We could do the same if the government gets out of the way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alewis14151
Spiritual grump
01:13 PM on 12/29/2011
The government IS the people, rabby.
03:08 PM on 12/29/2011
Exactly how is the gov't in the way? If anything ,special interests groups (e.g. oil, coal, etc.) are pumping money into the gov't to influence it to be more lack, not invest heavily in new technologies, and to ignore the findings of a number of commissions on climate change and the environment.

The gov't is what you make of it. It is "We, the People." But unfortunately, people are trying to put blame on it and drown it rather than confront the real culprits who are blocking energy reform.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
behavingbadly
lovingly crafted artisanal comments
04:56 PM on 12/29/2011
F&F Jelly Jam. When government acts responsibly in the common interest and actively promotes solutions—as in this case in Germany—progress begins and private enterprise rises to the challenge.
10:52 AM on 12/29/2011
It is time to transition to safe, clean alternative energy.

We have seem the BP oil spill in the Gulf.

We have seem the Nuclear disaster at Fukishima.

We have seen the coal mine deaths in West Virginia.

Wind, solar, wave energy, geothermal and second generation biofuels made from cellulose, algae and waste are the future.
12:05 PM on 12/29/2011
And that's why I'm in Grad school. But the US gov't is taking away subsidized loans for graduate students. Great way to encourage innovation.
12:44 PM on 12/29/2011
I agree with using renewable energy but your reasoning is off. Do you think that disasters won't happen with renewable energy?
01:12 PM on 12/29/2011
Had the Fukishima nuclear plant been a solar plant or a wind energy plant the site would already be cleaned up and the 80,000+ people that are evacuated would all be home.
03:03 PM on 12/29/2011
Disasters may or may not happen, but CLIMATE CHANGE and POLLUTION will be decreased.