* Traditional companies retain former congressman on issue
* Wawa, Wegmans pushing debate alongside hot tech firms
* SEC, Congress may loosen private firms' shareholder limits
By David Ingram and Alexandra Alper
WASHINGTON, Dec 29 (Reuters) - Two traditionalretailers and a manufacturer have joined the ranks of hot techcompanies like Facebook in the debate over a U.S. securitiesrule that can force privately held companies to disclosefinances they'd rather keep secret.
The three companies - Wawa Inc, Wegmans Food Markets Inc,and W.L. Gore & Associates, best known as the maker of GORE-TEXclothing - have formed a loose coalition and retained a formerU.S. congressman as their lobbyist.
They are lobbying for legislation that would increase thenumber of shareholders a company can have before it must makedetailed disclosures to the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission, and exempt employees from that cap.
The cap has stood at 500 for over four decades.
Unlike Facebook, which had to find a way around the rule toattract outside investors and still stay private, the oldercompanies say the limit threatens their ability to offerstock-based compensation plans to senior managers.
"As we grow, we don't have the ability to retain and attractthe number of people we'd like because of the restriction ofthis rule," said Paul Speranza, vice chairman and generalcounsel of Wegmans, a grocery chain based in Rochester, NewYork.
In an interview with Reuters, Speranza said Wegmans is"quite close" to the 500-shareholder limit.
Lobbying for the privately held companies is a team headedby Thomas Reynolds, who served in Congress for 10 years as aRepublican representing the Buffalo, New York, area.
Now a lobbyist with the firm Nixon Peabody, Reynolds haslobbied for Wegmans since May, according to a registration hefiled. This month, he filed paperwork for two other clients:Wawa, which sells gasoline and food at 600 stores along the EastCoast, and W.L. Gore.
The involvement of the companies, with decades of historyand established corporate cultures, may broaden a regulatorydebate that has focused on tech companies like Facebook andTwitter, which want access to more investor cash but are notquite ready for initial public offerings.
"Wawa is not a high-growth, go-go, potential IPO thatdoesn't want SEC disclosure," said John Coffee, a ColumbiaUniversity law professor.
Companies like Wawa "would get most of the protection theywant through a provision that excludes employees" from the totaltally of shareholders, Coffee said.
Still, Coffee voiced concern that the Senate bill, aswritten, would make investors vulnerable by exempting too manybig companies from disclosing important information.
The debate is playing out at the SEC, which appointed anadvisory committee to review possible changes to reportingrequirements to make it easier for small, fast-growing companiesto raise capital.
Congress is also considering loosening the rule.
A bill that passed a House committee in October would bumpthe shareholder limit up to 1,000, while a version in the Senatewould raise it to 2,000. Both bills would exempt shares receivedas part of an employee compensation plan.
Lawmakers have promoted the changes as a way to boostcapital raising and economic growth, but they are trying toensure that the reforms don't erode investor protections.
In testimony at a Senate hearing earlier this month, Wawa'sincoming chief executive and current chief financial officer,Christopher Gheysens, said the 500-shareholder limit will forcethe company to make a big decision in the not-so-distant future.
"We will be required to choose between becoming a publicreporting company and initiating a costly, time-consumingcorporate restructuring," Gheysens said.
Wawa would likely choose to restructure under a process suchas a reverse stock split, rather than make public reports thatmay come with heavy compliance costs, Gheysens said. (Editing by Steve Orlofsky)
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.