iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Iowa Caucuses Aren't Really About Iowa Anymore

Iowa Caucuses

First Posted: 12/30/2011 7:01 am Updated: 12/30/2011 12:02 pm

DES MOINES, Iowa -- Newt Gingrich is fading faster than a winter sunset in a plowed-down cornfield. So why did a pro-Mitt Romney super PAC just go up with a vicious new attack ad against him here? Isn't that overkill?

The answer is simple enough: The race here is no longer just about the Iowa caucuses, or even about Iowa. It is about the next three primaries in January, which, taken together, are likely to decide the GOP presidential nomination.

For the Romney campaign, it is not enough for Gingrich to lose next Tuesday; they want to bury him and spread salt on his grave. As flawed as Gingrich is, the former House speaker remains a formidable debater and dangerous counterpuncher, and there are more debates ahead, including pivotal ones in New Hampshire on Jan. 7 and 8.

Gingrich also has some fabulously wealthy independent backers, who show no signs of losing their allegiance to him.

And he possesses strong, if provisional, poll numbers in New Hampshire (with its Jan. 10 primary), South Carolina (Jan. 21) and Florida (Jan. 31). He is running a strong though distant second (17 percent) in the Granite State, where he has the support of the dominant Union Leader newspaper and its acid-penned editor, Joe McQuaid. He is still leading in polls in South Carolina (37 percent) and Florida (43 percent). Moreover, he is at least nominally a Southerner -- that is, a Pennsylvania native educated in the South who was elected to Congress from Georgia.

Thursday evening, the Gingrich campaign asked members of the press if they wanted to join the former speaker on a charter flight to New Hampshire on caucus night in Iowa. The message: Forget Iowa; we're on to the next state ....

All of which is why, at least for now, Romney doesn't mind the rise of Rick Santorum. The Romneyans wouldn't mind if the former Pennsylvania senator finished ahead of Gingrich in the race to be the alternative to Romney and Texas Rep. Ron Paul. (Texas Gov. Rick Perry, unless he stages a miraculous comeback in Iowa, doesn't figure in these calculations.)

So should Romney's people be wary about what they wish for? Is Santorum a sleeping giant about to wake up?

At a campaign event in Muscatine, it was hard to see that. Santorum was earnest and, to a conservative crowd, endearingly passionate on issues of family, traditional marriage and welfare reform. It was his third visit in a year to the small Iowa city, and on this occasion he drew a crowd of about 100, perhaps half of them supporters.

They liked him well enough. They liked his emphasis on family issues and his effort to link love of family to fear of federal debt and federal bureaucratic oppression. "He is who I am," said Greg Bickel, a former member of the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department who has returned home to Iowa to raise his family. "I identify with his values."

But Santorum, who served in both the House and Senate, has a tendency to recite his history of legislative accomplishment -- which makes sense to a former member, but which sets off alarm bells in the minds of conservative, anti-Washington voters.

"I liked what he said about family, but when he talked, he sounded too much like a congressman," said Linda Steele, a former schoolteacher who is now staying home to raise her kids. "Ron Paul doesn't sound like that."

Still, Santorum is coming on steadily in the polls, and he is expanding plans to compete in the other early states. Thursday night he went up with his first television ad in New Hampshire, a necessary move to take advantage of whatever windfall he gets from his Iowa finish.

A fundraising appeal the same night was successful, according to Santorum's national communications director, Hogan Gidley. "We raised 25 times what we raised on a normal day a week ago," Gidley said, although he refused to give a specific figure.

Santorum claims to have made more visits to New Hampshire than any other candidate except Romney (who has a home there) and more to South Carolina than any other candidate. But he remains in the low single digits in polls of both states. He is pursuing the classic "early state" strategy perfected by Jimmy Carter in 1976, but rarely duplicated since.

Can Santorum do it? His aides hope so. Romney is betting otherwise, which is why he and his allies are still attacking Newt.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
DES MOINES, Iowa -- Newt Gingrich is fading faster than a winter sunset in a plowed-down cornfield. So why did a pro-Mitt Romney super PAC just go up with a vicious new attack ad against him here? Isn...
DES MOINES, Iowa -- Newt Gingrich is fading faster than a winter sunset in a plowed-down cornfield. So why did a pro-Mitt Romney super PAC just go up with a vicious new attack ad against him here? Isn...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 396
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
04:09 PM on 12/30/2011
Iowa: Fields of manure and chemicals that pollute every lake, pond and stream. Produces fish that are deformed in many lakes and ponds.
04:06 PM on 12/30/2011
Iowa is meaningless. The media is fixated on this baloney. I want to know about JOBS period. Politicians and the media are just a bunch of rich people who want money, not worried about anything else.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Post31
Good grief!!!
02:20 PM on 12/30/2011
This is all a facade. We already know who the GOP nominee is. The one that raised the most money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Querent
I say the things that have to be said.
02:16 PM on 12/30/2011
Newt was already declared politically dead earlier in this campaign, but it turned out he was UNdead. You may be able to put him back in his grave, but will you be able to keep him there?
04:08 PM on 12/30/2011
Why do the republican rich pretend to care about anything but money and power. We now have two known "crybabies" in the GOP. Boehner and the huckster Newtie.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Querent
I say the things that have to be said.
05:06 PM on 12/30/2011
I'm sure you actually know the answer to that. It's simple misdirection.
02:10 PM on 12/30/2011
It will be interesting to see what happens if Ron Paul can maintain a lead because he will NEVER get the GOP nomination. No way. No how. It doesn't matter what lead he has or what his numbers are.
photo
TJ Logan
Fifth Generation Real Republican
01:59 PM on 12/30/2011
Mitt was digging a grave for his presidential opponent. Mitt was thoroughly absorbed in his work, dug a pit so deep one afternoon that he couldn't climb out when he had finished.

Come nightfall and evening's chill, Mitt's predicament became more uncomfortable. Mitt shouted for help and at last attracted the attention of a wounded Newt staggering by.

"Get me out of here," Mitt pleaded. "I'm cold!"

The harried Newt peered into the open grave and finally spotted the shivering Mitt in the darkness.

"Well, no wonder you're cold, Mitt," said Newt, kicking some of the loose sod into the hole. "You haven't got any dirt on you."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Kelley 1
01:29 PM on 12/30/2011
Gingrich and the rest of the GOP want you to forget about Iowa precisely because of one person, Ron Paul. He's the one person who has consistently done well there and is about to have a better than expected showing in that state and also the one person the GOP establishment absolutely doesn't want on the ticket. Paul is the Republican Party's ultimate nightmare of a candidate, precisely because he doesn't support key parts of the party's business policy, foreign policy, and military policy. He's a libertarian flying uncomfortably high under the GOP banner, and the sooner Republicans can forget about him and his probable good showing in Iowa the better. The real fear the GOP has is that Paul not only gets a good outcome from Iowa, but that he builds momentum that carries into other states. Even if he only draws 20% of the delegates in the remaining states, that's 20% he will deprive from the party frontrunner and possibly prevent anyone from having an absolute majority. Paul could be the ticking time bomb that sends a divided GOP to their national convention with no clear winner, thus forcing a bartered outcome for the nomination, which is the worst way to kick off a general election effort.
12:55 PM on 12/30/2011
ABSOLUTELY correct, the cake is now pretty much baked in Iowa.

BUT, I'd say THIS election IS PROOF POSITIVE that Iowa IS an IMPORTANT START for ANY party.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nana-anne
just trying to make sense of the senseless
12:41 PM on 12/30/2011
What is it about all these Tea Party inspired Republicans, who have their feet firmly planted in the second half of the 20th century and are screaming that the principles of that era are what they wish for our country today. In this new century where communications and ideas move at the speed of sound their regressive posture of stop everything and move backwards is insane for the nation that leads the world. The benevolent leader always wins over the tyrant and war monger and it is time for The United States to evolve into that position. There is also a difference between strength and might. Strength never has to rattle it's weapons where as might must always have a gun in it's hand.
12:59 PM on 12/30/2011
F & F
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nana-anne
just trying to make sense of the senseless
01:15 PM on 12/30/2011
Thank you we so have to stick together. Fanned back at ya.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Graywolf48
If you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu
12:59 PM on 12/30/2011
"What is it about all these Tea Party inspired Republican­s, who have their feet firmly planted in the second half of the 20th century..." Wow, the GOP/TP has really progressed! I always considered them to have their feet firmly planted in the 19th century, when certain people "knew their place" and the wealthy were not just respected, but feared.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nana-anne
just trying to make sense of the senseless
01:13 PM on 12/30/2011
I bow to your correction, I was trying to be charitable. Fanned.
photo
99er2049er
Democrats create jobs and build strong economies
12:33 PM on 12/30/2011
I don't know which of these clowns I want to lose more. Each is worthy of losing the game, but a winner, there isn't one worthy of being a winner.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Graywolf48
If you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu
01:02 PM on 12/30/2011
It is a strange election year, to be sure. We have a moderate Republican running as a Democrat and the Republicans will end up with who knows running as the lunatic fringe. Oy!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pinkensteve
Dogs like toast
12:24 PM on 12/30/2011
I'd take Addams Family values over Republican family values any day.
photo
busterggi
I'm a Sally Randian
12:23 PM on 12/30/2011
I'm glad that Obama has given up talk about bi-partisanship. Rethugricans can't work with one another so they can't be expected to work with Democrats.
12:06 PM on 12/30/2011
I know Santorum's poll numbers constitute a mere boomlet or rather "surgelet" -- he's having his 15 minutes moving up toward the head of the pack, but I'm trying to imagine him as the GOP nominee. The mind boggles. Whomperjawed, that is -- here's to you, Molly Ivins, how I wish you were here to witness this. You'd have such fun!
12:17 PM on 12/30/2011
Rick Santorum's whole purpose is to take our attention away from jobs, Wall Street, the dirty bankers and our real problems and focus on a few "moral" issues that appeals to the hard right evangelicals. This is what the money who have bought Santorum have paid for. The American voter will not be taken down that road again. Gay marriage and abortion just do not matter in the lives of people struggling to survive, much less get ahead.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
indianacarnie
Don't panic!
12:27 PM on 12/30/2011
I miss Molly too ......
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
nannews
Frances Perkins would weep...
12:54 PM on 12/30/2011
X2
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truly moderate
Paleo-conservative and Anti-tea party
12:05 PM on 12/30/2011
Rick Sanatarium is a firey "by force" moralist. faith is supposed to guide you, empower you to make good decisions. It is NOT supposed to be a platform for forced morality. I dislike it when only 40 percent of Americans support a view, but those 40 percent are conservatives, so suddenly it becomes "the will of the people". forget the other 60 percent because they aren't conservative, right?

Rick Perry and rick Sanatorium are both poisoness because they have their own egotiscal agenda, one they believe is best for America, not one that's based on what Americans on the whole actually want.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lithium12
Fighting ignorance makes you an enemy of the right
12:27 PM on 12/30/2011
Santorum has also never held a job outside of politics yet the "get the career politicans out of office" baggers like him. shows the mental clarity of the bags...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truly moderate
Paleo-conservative and Anti-tea party
12:42 PM on 12/30/2011
I don't think its so much baggers as it is social conservatives. Most baggers aren't as socially conservative....with the exception of Bachman.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
juzcuz
11:59 AM on 12/30/2011
I don't know about you all but every day I'm doing a snow-dance in hopes that the entire state of Iowa is stuck in the worst blizzard conditions ever and that no one can get out and vote for any of the losers. How funny would that be?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kathy smelser
02:54 PM on 12/30/2011
i could see all of the candidates wearing Mrs.B. sweatshirts that they just bought for 10'000 dollars standing back to back to back screaming that the Dems.or the liberal media were behind the weather and now they all want do overs