More

Indiana Statehouse Surprise: Officials Limit Number Who Can Assemble


First Posted: 12/31/11 12:05 PM ET Updated: 12/31/11 12:30 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Indiana officials delivered an end-of-year surprise to state residents on Friday, announcing a limit on the number of people who can be inside the statehouse at any one time. Democratic and labor leaders swiftly condemned the move as an attempt to quash dissent and reduce the size of public protests.

Effective Jan. 1, only 3,000 people will be allowed inside the building at one time. That number includes the 1,700 state employees who work there, meaning that just over 1,000 others will be able to assemble on a given day.

The rule was drafted by the Indiana State Police, the state's homeland security department and the state fire marshal's office. Gov. Mitch Daniels (R) appointed the heads of all those offices.

"For generations Hoosiers have been welcomed to the Indiana Statehouse where they could speak directly to their elected representatives about legislative matters that impact their daily lives," said Indiana AFL-CIO President Nancy Guyott in a statement. "But with this decision by the Daniels administration, it is the people's house no more."

Last February, thousands of union supporters gathered at the statehouse to protest the GOP-controlled legislature's push to pass "right to work" legislation, which would have barred companies and employees from negotiating contracts that required all employees to pay representation dues.

Thirty-nine Democratic lawmakers walked out to protest the bill, eventually staying away from the state for five weeks. Daniels persuaded the legislature to postpone the bill.

Republicans are expected to take it up again when they reconvene for the 2012 session on Wednesday, and labor leaders had anticipated thousands of Hoosiers turning out at the statehouse next week to make their opposition known. With the new rule, however, they will be barred from coming in en masse.

"This policy is designed specifically to prevent working Hoosiers from coming to the Indiana Statehouse to register their concerns about implementation of a 'right to work for less' policy that will give them fewer jobs at lower pay in unsafe workplaces," said Indiana House Democratic Leader B. Patrick Bauer in a statement. "It now appears the governor will do anything to silence the thousands of Hoosiers who oppose this plan, including abandoning concepts of free speech and assembly that are the founding principles of government."

State Police Superintendent Paul Whitesell, however, told the Indianapolis Star that the capacity limit was being implemented strictly for safety reasons.

"During the last legislative session, several scheduled events were interrupted or canceled, and we want everyone who visits or schedules an event in the building to have a pleasant and successful experience," he said.

Indiana State Teachers Association spokesman Mark Shoup said he was also concerned about the effect the rule would have on residents who weren't trying to protest but simply wanted to speak with their elected officials.

"How are the rest of us able to get in the building to see our representative" if the capacity limit has been reached, Shoup wondered to the Indianapolis Star.

Democratic leaders are calling on the governor to overrule Whitesell. The governor's office did not return a request for comment.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Indiana officials delivered an end-of-year surprise to state residents on Friday, announcing a limit on the number of people who can be inside the statehouse at any one time. Democratic ...
WASHINGTON -- Indiana officials delivered an end-of-year surprise to state residents on Friday, announcing a limit on the number of people who can be inside the statehouse at any one time. Democratic ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,484
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (41 total)
  1 of 4  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
PharmaCan 09:33 PM on 12/31/2011
Indiana was admitted to the Union on December 11, 1816. The present Statehouse was built in 1888, and it was preceded by three smaller Statehouses. In the 196 year history of the State of Indiana, the many and various governments and governors of that state have never found it necessary to limit the number of people who can assemble in the Statehouse. Indiana has been through the Civil War, two world wars,  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elgeezr
annoying Libs daily with orgasmic gusto
07:28 PM on 01/04/2012
Not so sure that I like this, much as I favor the pending change in the labor law. I do believe in free speech & assembly as much as the next guy. 3,000 protesters in the state house at one time does seem a lot, though. I'm sure the Unions can find a judge who'll give them an injunction.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
02:55 PM on 01/04/2012
I can understand doing it for security reasons.Othres feel it's an attempt to not allow people who want better working conditions and better pay from gathering there
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MemeticHazard33
A circle can not even begin to describe me.
09:20 PM on 01/03/2012
Oh, so now they want to scream about the maximum capacity....kind of strange that now, all of a sudden, they have a problem with a building that's been standing since 1888. Yes that's right folks, our statehouse has NEVER had a maximum capacity limit until now. Hmmmm.....

http://www.fox59.com/news/wxin-new-safety-policy-will-limit-number-of-people-allowed-in-indiana-statehouse-20111230,0,2433712.column
foresure
Brash and Harsh
02:01 PM on 01/01/2012
He is rather clearly positioning himself for the Vice Presidential nomination. To do so, he has to make his loyalties to the 1% manifest.
01:22 PM on 01/01/2012
Easy remedy, hold the meeting outside. You have already put the people out in the cold, it's time for government to experience it too.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Corbit
You ARE being followed, but not on Twitter..
01:21 PM on 01/01/2012
Way to go, Mitch...take a page straight out of "Mein Kampf" and claim "public safety" as the reason. How many arrests will you have to make before we, the people, take the Statehouse by mass of numbers and say "Enough is enough"?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
01:09 PM on 01/01/2012
I'm not in favor of limiting the right to assemble but if it is inside a building then what about fire codes? You couldn't put 50 people in an elevator designed for 20.
photo
Brian Gilmer
Respect the bunny.
01:53 PM on 01/01/2012
If it is possible to put 18000 people in a building to watch a basketball game them it is possible to get more than 3000 people into an office building.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elgeezr
annoying Libs daily with orgasmic gusto
07:30 PM on 01/04/2012
Is the office building the same size as a stadium?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:03 PM on 01/04/2012
A legislative building such as a State House is an "A" occupancy--which stands for "Assembly." It is designed for the purpose of assembly and was granted permits for that purpose by the building authority. It's hypocritical to limit the right to assemble in a building designed for that purpose simply because you don't agree with the message.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elgeezr
annoying Libs daily with orgasmic gusto
07:31 PM on 01/04/2012
Was there a building authority in 1888?
12:11 PM on 01/01/2012
If Gov. Daniels follows historical precedent, the next step will be to torch Indiana's Reichstag and dissolve the assembly. In a state of emergency, it will be necessary for him to govern by decree--"temporarily," of course.

The party which claims to defend our Constitution has stomped all over the first ten amendments. The citizens of Indiana, like those of Wisconsin, Ohio, and Tennessee, no longer have the right to assemble freely and seek redress for their grievances. This is indeed a "Brave New World."
12:03 PM on 01/01/2012
all the people posting here who dont know that all buildings have max occupants limits. yes building codes. is 3,000 the right number i dont know i'm not a fire marshal. but all buildings have limits.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
01:09 PM on 01/01/2012
Thank you!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Corbit
You ARE being followed, but not on Twitter..
01:27 PM on 01/01/2012
There is no max occupancy limits for the area surrounding the building...they are going to wish for just 3,000, but this outrage will make that number a fraction.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
proudtohaveserved
11:27 AM on 01/01/2012
i tell you what nothing surprises me coming out of IO,OHIO, MN, MI and WI b y the way what is the word "CONTENTIOUS"? I AM SICK AND TIRED OF SEEING IT OR READING ABOUT. ENOUGH ALREADY
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CBasilJr
62 Retired Vet
11:49 AM on 01/01/2012
"Contentious" is defined as tending to argument and strife.

Whether you are SICK AND TIRED OR SEEING IT OR READING ABOUT (IT), is not germaine to the article.

Flagged for extremism.
12:13 PM on 01/01/2012
"Flagged for extremism?"

You must be very busy in this forum.
11:26 AM on 01/01/2012
if you go to any buisness there is allways a max. occupants in the building. i dont no if 3000 is the correct number for that building but i'm sure there should be a limit. i would think it would be set by the fire marshal. it does appear that the repubs are trying to limit speech. but there does need to be a limit.
01:17 PM on 01/01/2012
Was there a maximum capacity sign posted before this decision. The concern for safety should have been instituted at least shortly after 9/11, by Homeland Security, Otis Elevator, or the architect who designed it, but why was that over looked, and now only become an issue?
photo
Brian Gilmer
Respect the bunny.
01:57 PM on 01/01/2012
A capacity crowd at a high school basketball game is about 1500.
11:19 PM on 01/03/2012
Uhhhh... Maybe in YOUR state. In Indiana, not so much.
10:40 AM on 01/01/2012
being from Indiana.....can't wait til this guy leaves office. he's a menace, raises taxes on this people and now stopping free speech. a violation of ones rights. the courts will be busy on this.
Mitch is not a man
01:20 PM on 01/01/2012
"raises taxes" that is a No No with republicans, who told him to do this, corporations? Did he sign Gover's pledge?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Hillbilly49
Don't tell me you are a Christian; let me guess.
10:13 AM on 01/01/2012
Those who suppress freedom always do so in the name of law and order.




~John V. Lindsay
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elgeezr
annoying Libs daily with orgasmic gusto
07:33 PM on 01/04/2012
John Lindsay's nickname in school was Capt Obvious.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JOHNMEDLIN
sharp left ahead
10:11 AM on 01/01/2012
Repubs once again wasting money defending the undefendable in courts. They are the most anti-constitutional party. none of this stuff holds up once it gets to federal court. They get a year or so play out of it and it's overturned. They anger their constituents and lose the next election for gestapo oveer reaching. What's their gain. It makes no sense
photo
stunsitfel
Liberale sind verlorene Schafe
09:55 AM on 01/01/2012
GO MITCH!!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ed leveridge
11:06 AM on 01/01/2012
stright to hell
photo
stunsitfel
Liberale sind verlorene Schafe
11:43 AM on 01/05/2012
Public schools?