iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Iran Threatens U.S. Navy

First Posted: 01/03/12 12:31 PM ET Updated: 01/05/12 12:05 PM ET

(Reuters) - Iran threatened on Tuesday to take action if the U.S. Navy moves an aircraft carrier into the Gulf, Tehran's most aggressive statement yet after weeks of saber-rattling as new U.S. and EU financial sanctions take a toll on its economy.

The prospect of sanctions targeting the oil sector in a serious way for the first time has hit Iran's rial currency, which reached a record low on Tuesday and has fallen by 40 percent against the dollar in the past month.

Queues formed at Tehran banks and some currency exchange offices shut their doors as Iranians scrambled to buy dollars to protect their savings. On world markets, oil prices soared.

Army chief Ataollah Salehi said the United States had moved an aircraft carrier out of the Gulf because of Iran's naval exercises, and Iran would take action if the ship returned.

"Iran will not repeat its warning...the enemy's carrier has been moved to the Sea of Oman because of our drill. I recommend and emphasize to the American carrier not to return to the Persian Gulf," he said.

"I advise, recommend and warn them over the return of this carrier to the Persian Gulf because we are not in the habit of warning more than once."

The U.S. military brushed off the threat: "The deployment of U.S. military assets in the Persian Gulf region will continue as it has for decades," said spokesman Commander Bill Speaks.

"The U.S. Navy operates under international maritime conventions to maintain a constant state of high vigilance in order to ensure the continued, safe flow of maritime traffic in waterways critical to global commerce."

The aircraft carrier USS John C Stennis leads a U.S. Navy task force in the region. It is now outside the Gulf in the Arabian Sea, providing air support for the war in Afghanistan, said Lieutenant Rebecca Rebarich, spokeswoman for the 5th Fleet.

The carrier left the Gulf on December 27 on a planned routine transit through the Strait of Hormuz, she said.

Forty percent of the world's traded oil flows through that narrow straight -- which Iran threatened last month to shut if sanctions halted its oil exports.

Brent crude futures were up more than $4 in late Tuesday afternoon trade in London, pushing above $111 a barrel.

Tehran's latest threat comes at a time when sanctions are having an impact on its economy, and the country faces political uncertainty with an election in March, its first since a 2009 vote that triggered countrywide demonstrations.

The West has imposed the increasingly tight sanctions over Iran's nuclear program, which Tehran says is strictly peaceful but Western countries believe aims to build an atomic bomb.

After years of measures that had little impact, the new sanctions are the first that could have a serious effect on Iran's oil trade, 60 percent of its economy.

Sanctions signed into law by U.S. President Barack Obama on New Year's Eve would cut financial institutions that work with Iran's central bank off from the U.S. financial system, blocking the main path for Iran to receive payments for its crude.

The EU is expected to impose new sanctions by the end of this month, possibly including a ban on oil imports and a freeze of central bank assets.

Even Iran's top trading partner China -- which has refused to back new global sanctions against Iran -- is demanding discounts to buy Iranian oil as Tehran's options narrow. Beijing has cut its imports of Iranian crude by more than half for January.

THREATS

Iran has responded to the tighter measures with belligerent rhetoric, spooking oil markets briefly when it announced last month it could prevent shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

It then held 10 days of naval exercises in the Gulf, test firing missiles that could hit U.S. bases in the Middle East. Tuesday's apparent threat to take action against the U.S. Navy in international waters takes the rhetoric to a new level.

Experts still say they do not expect Tehran to charge headlong into an act of war -- the U.S. Navy is overwhelmingly more powerful than Iran's sea forces -- but Iran is running out of diplomatic room to avert a confrontation.

"I think we should be very worried because the diplomacy that should accompany this rise in tension seems to be lacking on both sides," said Richard Dalton, former British ambassador to Iran and now an associate fellow at Chatham House think tank.

"I don't believe either side wants a war to start. I think the Iranians will be aware that if they block the Strait or attack a U.S. ship, they will be the losers. Nor do I think that the U.S. wants to use its military might other than as a means of pressure. However, in a state of heightened emotion on both sides, we are in a dangerous situation."

Henry Wilkinson at Janusian Risk Advisory consultants said the threats might be a bid by Iran to remind countries contemplating sanctions of the cost of havoc on oil markets.

"Such threats can cause market confidence in the global oil supply to wobble and can push up oil prices and shipping insurance prices. For the EU powers debating new sanctions, this could be quite a pinch in the current economic climate."

The new U.S. sanctions law, if implemented fully, would make it impossible for many refineries to pay Iran for crude. It takes effect gradually and lets Obama grant waivers to prevent an oil price shock, so its precise impact is hard to gauge.

The European Union is expected to consider new measures by the end of this month. A blockade would halt purchase of Iranian oil by EU members such as such as crisis-hit Greece, which has relied on easy financing terms offered by Tehran to buy crude.

French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe said Paris wants new measures taken by January 30, when EU foreign ministers meet. A German Foreign Ministry spokesman said Berlin was in talks with other EU states on "qualitatively new sanctions."

Greek government sources said that Athens, thought of as a possible veto-wielding holdout, was ready to support sanctions. One official told Reuters: "If the European Union decides to impose the sanctions, Greece will join them."

Michael Mann, spokesman for EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, said member states would discuss the issue this week in the hope of agreeing on new steps before the January 30 meeting. "The ball is still in the Iranians' court," he said.

Iran has written to Ashton asking to restart talks over its nuclear program that collapsed a year ago. The EU says it does not want talks unless Iran is prepared to discuss serious steps, such as halting its enrichment of uranium.

CHINA CUTS IRAN OIL IMPORTS

Although China, India and other countries are unlikely to sign up to any oil embargo, tighter Western sanctions mean such customers will be able to insist on deeper discounts for Iranian oil, reducing Tehran's income.

Beijing has already been driving a hard bargain. China, which bought 11 percent of its oil from Iran during the first 11 months of last year, has cut its January purchase by about 285,000 barrels per day, more than half of the close to 550,000 bpd that it bought through a 2011 contract.

The impact of falling government income from oil sales can be felt on the streets in Iran in soaring prices for state subsidized goods and a collapse of the rial currency.

"The rate is changing every second...We are not taking in any rials to change to dollars or any other foreign currency," said Hamid Bakshi at an exchange office in central Tehran.

Housewife Zohreh Ghobadi, in a long line at a bank, said she was trying to withdraw her savings and change it into dollars.

Iranian authorities played down any link between the souring exchange rate and the new sanctions.

"The new American sanctions have not materialized yet," Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said.

The economic impact is being felt ahead of a nationwide parliamentary election on March 2, the first vote since a disputed 2009 presidential election that brought tens of thousands of Iranian demonstrators into the streets.

Iran's rulers put those protests down by force, but since then the Arab Spring revolts have show that authoritarian governments in the region are vulnerable to street unrest.

In a sign of political tension among Iran's elite, a court jailed the daughter of powerful former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani on Tuesday for "anti-state propaganda."

Rafsanjani sided with reformists during the 2009 protests. Daughter Faezeh Hashemi Rafsanjani went on trial last month on charges of "campaigning against the Islamic establishment."

(Additional reporting by Hashem Kalantari in Tehran, Humeyra Pamuk in Dubai, Brian Love in Paris, Keith Weir and William Maclean in London; Angeliki Koutantou in Athens and Florence Tan in Singapore; Writing by Peter Graff)

Photos: Iran holds Navy drills
1  of  14
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Iranian Soldiers aim during the 'Velayat-90' navy exercises in the Sea of Oman near the Iranian port of Bandar Jask, in southern Iran on December 30, 2011. Iran, which has been carrying out war games in the Strait of Hormuz over the past week, has said that 'not a drop of oil' would pass through the strait if Western governments follow through with planned additional sanctions over its nuclear programme.(ALI MOHAMMADI/AFP/Getty Images)
FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

(Reuters) - Iran threatened on Tuesday to take action if the U.S. Navy moves an aircraft carrier into the Gulf, Tehran's most aggressive statement yet after weeks of saber-rattling as new U.S. and EU ...
(Reuters) - Iran threatened on Tuesday to take action if the U.S. Navy moves an aircraft carrier into the Gulf, Tehran's most aggressive statement yet after weeks of saber-rattling as new U.S. and EU ...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,602
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (43 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gunrunner99
freedom of speech
04:02 PM on 07/04/2012
Send a sniper to take this guy out,he has big man,little penis syndrome.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Goforth
contempt for the status quo
09:47 PM on 01/09/2012
Here we go another war and another "decisive victory". The industrial military monster marches on. I get a feeling this war may be different though. I'm for Ron Paul because he would most likely keep us out of this mess but I think this will be a hot war by the time the election starts. We will see ape men beating their chests in the elections relentlessly calling each other inept cowards.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
You can't take the sky from me.
12:28 PM on 01/09/2012
Bring it on Iran. As Harry Callahan once said, "Do you feel lucky, punk?"
01:34 AM on 01/07/2012
Don't laugh, but Iran is already towing their Catapults toward the coast.

Around 85% of the Oil that flows through the Strait of Hormuz goes to Asia.
China has a Carrier, let them keep it flowing, let THEM pay for peace.
Not U.S. Taxpayers, that already have too much in debt to China.
(Thanks, Barrack)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
canpete
06:31 PM on 01/06/2012
isn't the american vessel in a threatening position being in the gulf, lets clarify the bully here....
12:47 AM on 01/06/2012
This is a days old post by Reuters. There is more recent rhetoric to be reported on and Rafsanjani's daughter has already been given a sentence. Get with the program.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anne Mccormick
12:08 AM on 01/06/2012
only someone with a decided lack of common sense threatens the United States Navy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael D OBrien
We can be heroes, if just for one day!
11:40 AM on 01/06/2012
You're not recognizing what audience the statement is meant for.
Just like the North Koeans........................
Attack a US Navy Aircraft Carrier Battle Group?
And let's not forget those 'subs' lurking below the surface...........................
Actually. kinda sounds like grounds for an 'insanity defense!'
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
canpete
06:32 PM on 01/06/2012
why is america sailing in the gulf waters other than to threaten iran?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ladywiccan
a wife, mother and grandmother
09:26 PM on 01/06/2012
the air carrier is there for air support to OUR troops
01:17 AM on 01/07/2012
Another article showed how the U.S. NAVY is protecting Iranian fishing boats from Somali pirates.
Why is it, when American Sailors, Soldiers or Marines risk their lives to protect others from 'evil people', they are sometimes called the aggressors?
demsrsilly
Proud supporter of workplace freedom.
11:01 PM on 01/05/2012
I am sure that the iranians know not to trifle with the US Navy. I foresee many new iranian martyrs if this happens.
08:06 PM on 01/05/2012
I'm sure the Commanders of every U.S. aircraft carrier capable of launching zillions of planes and more shells and missiles than you can count, and especially the Commanders of every Polaris submarine which carries about 20 missiles each armed with dozens of independently guided nuclear missiles, and capable of being launched while the sub is deeply submerged, are all shaking in their boots as a result of Iran's threat. And, if Iran thinks President Obama will hesitate to protect American ships, they should read up on what happened to Bin Laden.
12:49 AM on 01/06/2012
Simma down yankee. You're gettin an erection.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael D OBrien
We can be heroes, if just for one day!
11:42 AM on 01/06/2012
General Curtis LeMay, never needed 'viagara!'
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
You can't take the sky from me.
12:26 PM on 01/09/2012
Polaris? We use the Ohio-class missile submarine and the Virginia-class and Sea Wolf-class attack submarines.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LC Scotty
12:52 PM on 01/09/2012
Polaris is the missile system carried on the Ohios
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Captai
Get out while you still can!!
04:49 PM on 01/05/2012
I’ve just been reading up on the Russian-made anti-ship missile, the Sunburn, supplied to Iran in the hundreds. Despite the fact that Russian military might is generally a paper tiger, this weapon is fearsomely effective. It flies at supersonic speeds (2,100 mph) hugging the ground (as low as 45 feet) and is barely perceptible on radar. It is so fast that ship-board defenses may not even be able to pinpoint its location before impact. It collides with its target at such force that a single well-placed missile might sink an entire aircraft carrier. The missile can be fired by ship, submarine, aircraft or from a truck.

http://poorrichards-blog.blogspot.com/2012/01/how-iran-could-close-straits-and-damage.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rbenjamin
Rule 5 rules
12:29 AM on 01/06/2012
This weapon has been around since the '70s, and it's formidable, even fearsome in the right circumstances. What your reference doesn't mention is that it weighs 9000 lbs and is 30 feet long. A monster. So yes, you can haul it by ship, submarine or large aircraft, but you have to have the right ship, sub or airplane. This is going to be a problem for the Iranians, and they will have to haul it, because, as your reference notes, it's range is 75 miles and the USN is going to be standing well out to sea to avoid it and other models of cruise missiles.

So, the USN must treat it with respect, but it's not a game changer. Just one of the first targets they'll want to suppress after dealing with air defenses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Goforth
contempt for the status quo
09:56 PM on 01/09/2012
If the American commanders are stupid enough to parade our carriers through that straight they just need one good shot to make monkeys of us.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
04:14 PM on 01/05/2012
I don't remember Iran being off either one of our coasts
demsrsilly
Proud supporter of workplace freedom.
11:02 PM on 01/05/2012
I do not remember iran being permitted to close international waters.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
10:40 AM on 01/06/2012
international waters vs coastal waters :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gunrunner99
freedom of speech
04:12 PM on 07/04/2012
And,if they would comply with the UN (instead of hiding stuff) we wouldnt be on theirs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
albant
04:02 PM on 01/05/2012
Doesn't US Navy threaten everyone else by going half a world away to "Proyect US power"?
demsrsilly
Proud supporter of workplace freedom.
10:57 PM on 01/05/2012
A HP liberal taking sides against the US???? Shocking I tell you! Shocking!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael D OBrien
We can be heroes, if just for one day!
11:58 AM on 01/06/2012
Ron Paul's a democrat?
Libertarian, Republican, Democrat....................
Well, at least he's movin' in the right direction!
12:51 AM on 01/06/2012
Yes, America has a myriad of specific military bases all around the world, all in the name of protecting American "interests". No wonder they are broke.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
03:40 PM on 01/05/2012
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/05/uk-warns-iran-over-strait_n_1186686.html?ref=world

so, is the UK threatening Iran ??

Its funny how words can change the tone of the whole discussion.
03:08 PM on 01/05/2012
Time to tell Iran that we mean business and shutting the Hormuz Strait is an act of war. Death to the Iranian President and all the religious fanattics.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
04:31 PM on 01/05/2012
How on earth did our

straits of Hormuz
get all the way over there !!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Captai
Get out while you still can!!
04:52 PM on 01/05/2012
Much less DUHmerica's oil under their desert!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael D OBrien
We can be heroes, if just for one day!
12:00 PM on 01/06/2012
And what about all the 'gays' in Hormuz?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
canpete
06:35 PM on 01/06/2012
yeh, we can't let those Eyeranians stop OUR oil.....
02:16 PM on 01/05/2012
iran 's goverment are run by a lunitic sick'o we don't need another war iraq kicked their butt's for 10 years and they was a lot smaller country than iran we can go to war with them and we will dog them and they can cause alot of damage but in the end who win's
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
03:41 PM on 01/05/2012
no one wins. We sure havent won anything since the Korean war. We didnt even win there.
12:53 AM on 01/06/2012
Go back to the WWII. The West won that one but nuttin since to speak of.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael D OBrien
We can be heroes, if just for one day!
12:02 PM on 01/06/2012
Ask the Military Industrial Complex!