iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Ohio Fracking: Earthquakes Could Incite Policy Shift

By JULIE CARR SMYTH   01/ 3/12 07:12 PM ET  AP

COLUMBUS, Ohio -- In Ohio, geographically and politically positioned to become a leading importer of wastewater from gas drilling, environmentalists and lawmakers opposed to the technique known as fracking are seizing on a series of small earthquakes as a signal to proceed with caution.

Earthquakes caused by the injection of wastewater that's a byproduct of high-pressure hydraulic fracture drilling, aren't new. Yet earthquakes have a special ability to grab public attention.

That's especially true after Saturday's quake near Youngstown, at magnitude 4.0 strong enough to be felt across hundreds of square miles. Gov. John Kasich, a drilling proponent, has shut down the wastewater well on which the quake has been blamed, along with others in the area, as the seismic activity is reviewed.

"Drilling's very important for our economy and to help us progress as a state, but every single person in the Mahoning Valley felt this earthquake," said state Sen. Joe Schiavoni, a Youngstown Democrat who on Tuesday called for a public hearing.

"I wouldn't deem it as an emergency, but when you live in a place that you're not used to earthquakes and you have 11 earthquakes, you're concerned," he said. "We need to give them some sort of confidence or security that this is going to be OK."

Fracking involves blasting millions of gallons of water, laced with chemicals and sand, deep into the ground to unlock vast reserves of natural gas, a boon both for energy companies and a public hungry for cheap sources of fuel.

That process, though, leaves behind toxic wastewater that must be expensively treated or else pumped deep into the earth. The wastewater is extremely briny and can contain toxic chemicals from the drilling process – and sometimes radioactivity from deep underground.

The practice of dumping underground has been controversial in light of scant research done on potential environmental dangers, highlighted by reports of contamination of aquifers in some communities in Pennsylvania and Wyoming. Some states are reconsidering it.

A coalition of environmental groups is preparing a protest for next week's return of the Ohio Legislature. Activists opposed to increased oil and gas drilling activity across Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York and West Virginia – where the Utica and Marcellus Shale formations are believed to hold vast quantities of gas – see trouble with the Ohio injection well. It took wastewater from fracking, as well as other forms of drilling.

"What other business or industry isn't held accountable for its full cradle-to-grave processes?" said Deborah Nardone, director of the Sierra Club's Natural Gas Campaign. "They need to be responsible for the waste stream that they've created."

Ohio's closure of the well will have little to no impact on drilling, said Travis Windle, a spokesman for the Marcellus Shale Coalition, an industry group based in Pennsylvania. Four of the five wells that Ohio shut down were not operational, Windle said.

Pennsylvania's drillers have turned in recent months to deep-well injection of millions of gallons of wastewater because of a voluntary state moratorium last year on dumping of waste at treatment plants where the partially treated liquids are discharged into rivers and streams that drinking water is taken from.

Most drillers in Pennsylvania accepted a voluntary state moratorium last year on dumping of waste at treatment plants, which had discharged the partially treated mix into rivers and streams that supply drinking water. Many drillers now recycle the drilling fluid, and some turned to deep-well injection of millions of gallons of the wastewater.

Pennsylvania has six deep injection wells that currently accept fracking fluid, said Amanda Witman, a spokeswoman for the Department of Environmental Protection. But some of its waste is trucked into Ohio, where the geology allows for more injection wells.

Ohio's willingness to accept the fracking leftovers amid a drilling boom in states to the east, south and west worries some residents and environmental advocates who say the science isn't proven – and point to the earthquakes as evidence.

The Ohio Petroleum Council, an industry group, says any public anxiety is misplaced.

"Injection wells have worked well to protect public safety for decades, and a situation like the one in question near Youngstown is very rare," executive director Terry Fleming said in a statement.

Kasich told reporters over the weekend that he doesn't believe the energy industry should be blamed for issues arising from disposal of their byproducts. That would be like blaming the auto industry for improper disposal of old tires, the first-term Republican said.

Scientists have known for decades that drilling or injecting water into areas where a fault exists can cause earthquakes, said Paul Hsieh, a research hydrologist with the U.S. Geological Survey in Menlo Park, Calif.

"That's widely documented and accepted within the science community," he said. "It's seen all over the world."

Injection wells have also been suspected in quakes in Arkansas, Colorado and Oklahoma.

Oklahoma's sharpest earthquake on record, of magnitude 5.8 on Nov. 5, was centered on a county that has 181 such wells, according to Matt Skinner, a spokesman for the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, which oversees oil and gas production in the state and intrastate transportation pipelines.

However, a study by the Oklahoma Geological Survey released earlier in 2011 found that most of the state's seismic activity didn't appear to be tied to the wells, although more investigation was needed.

"It's a real mystery," seismologist Austin Holland said in November. "At this point, there's no reason to think that the earthquakes would be caused by anything other than natural" shifts in the Earth's crust.

New York state's Department of Environmental Conservation is wrapping up an environmental impact review and proposed new regulations for gas drilling. Permitting for new gas wells has been on hold since the review began almost four years ago.

While the proposed permit guidelines do mention injection wells as a possible means of wastewater disposal, any shutdown of such wells in Ohio would have no effect on New York's regulatory process, department spokesman Emily DeSantis said Tuesday.

James Smith, spokesman for the Independent Oil & Gas Association of New York, said he knows of no drillers in the state who are shipping waste to Ohio and whether they would in the future is a matter of speculation.

___

Associated Press writers Kevin Begos in Pittsburgh, Mary Esch in Albany, N.Y., and Justin Juozapavicius in Tulsa, Okla., contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

COLUMBUS, Ohio -- In Ohio, geographically and politically positioned to become a leading importer of wastewater from gas drilling, environmentalists and lawmakers opposed to the technique known as fra...
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- In Ohio, geographically and politically positioned to become a leading importer of wastewater from gas drilling, environmentalists and lawmakers opposed to the technique known as fra...
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- In Ohio, geographically and politically positioned to become a leading importer of wastewater from gas drilling, environmentalists and lawmakers opposed to the technique known as fra...
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- In Ohio, geographically and politically positioned to become a leading importer of wastewater from gas drilling, environmentalists and lawmakers opposed to the technique known as fra...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 129
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
02:09 PM on 02/05/2012
I sure hope our taxpayer dollars don't end up being used to clean up earthquakes caused by fracking!! Just another example of a bailout waiting to happen!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:48 PM on 01/08/2012
Very few people know that oil companies were conducting deep seismic explosion tests
off the Tasmanian - Australian shelf just before the massive earthquake
that caused the Great Indonesian Tsunami, responsible for killing nearly
250,000 innocent people.

I challenge the HP investigative team to look into this further, so
everyone clearly understands the full potential of the dangers involved.
12:26 PM on 01/05/2012
Let's thank Dick Cheney for allowing gas companies to bypass clean water regulations. The earthquake link is very concerning, but regardless, the contamination of millions of gallons of water should be grounds for criminal action. But thanks to our former vp, it's just a byproduct of industry that they just don't quite know what to do with.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:35 AM on 01/05/2012
Duke University peer reviewed science publication demonstrated that 81% of drinking water wells within 2/3 of a mile of an active fracking sites were contaminated with shale methane....gas industry states categorically that their failure rate with cement jobs designed to stop this is less than one percent....therefore vast amount of fracking pollution in PA is coming from "vertical migration" which was also documented by the EPA as occuriring with fracking pollution in drinking water in Pavillion WY....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:31 AM on 01/05/2012
fracking is done with explicit exemptions to the safe drinking water act and clean air act....that is really all you need to know to demand the process be banned....
photo
Spock
You are completely, absolutely, illogical
09:24 PM on 01/04/2012
Back in the 80s I remember hearing about tremors in Ohio that some believed was caused by brine injections.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
03:28 PM on 01/04/2012
More of the article from propublica.com

"“No one can accurately say that there is ‘no risk’ where fracking is concerned,” wrote Amy Mall, a senior policy analyst at the Natural Resources Defense Council, on her blog. “This draft report makes obvious that there are many factors at play, any one of which can go wrong. Much stronger rules are needed to ensure that well construction standards are stronger and reduce threats to drinking water.”
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
03:25 PM on 01/04/2012
"The findings by the Environmental Protection Agency come partway through a separate national study by the agency to determine whether fracking presents a risk to water resources.

In the 121-page draft report released today, EPA officials said that the contamination near the town of Pavillion, Wyo., had most likely seeped up from gas wells and contained at least 10 compounds known to be used in frack fluids.

“The presence of synthetic compounds such as glycol ethers … and the assortment of other organic components is explained as the result of direct mixing of hydraulic fracturing fluids with ground water in the Pavillion gas field,” the draft report states. “Alternative explanations were carefully considered.”

propublica.com
05:16 PM on 01/04/2012
http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/bmordick/groundwater_in_pavillion_wy_co.html

Read the response to the linked article. It demonstrates the EPA lack of scientific rigor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
06:16 PM on 01/04/2012
Apparently you didn't read the article you posted. It did not demonstrate a lack of rigor. It is building on what is done to confirm the findings. Better do something about that attention problem or is it a deception problem that you have?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lensman3
10:45 AM on 01/05/2012
I'm surprised at your response. I read the EPA report and the in you URL. Interesting that there were no page/paragraph numbers to say exactly what the wrong. The response was rather vague in my estimation. As for the connection between deep and the shallow wells, the draw down test discrepancy between water well completion date and now shows that "something" in the field is mucking with the various horizons and cross horizon co-mengling.
I think most of the problem with cross horizon contamination is drilling companies trying to complete a well "on the cheap" and doing a very poor job cementing parts of the well.
I understand here in Colorado gas/oil wells have to be cased to 1000 feet, but in Wyoming they are only required to be cased to 100 feet. Again a State who is in for "on he cheap".
The technology appears to be available to stop cross horizon contamination. So you it!
05:23 PM on 01/04/2012
a second article which is devastating to the EPA's analysis
http://newsroom.coga.org/pr/coga/document/COGA_Statement_Pavillion.pdf
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
06:18 PM on 01/04/2012
COGA - Colorado Oil and Gas, the Mecca of Mining, and you want us to trust this? Isn't that like trusting the tobacco companies? Get a clue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greatest Darthfruit
So, you the brains of this outfit, or is he?
12:50 PM on 01/04/2012
FRACKING MUST END!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snowmanjny
Real Americans believe in an educated opinion.
12:14 PM on 01/04/2012
Fracking Idiots! It'll be too late by the time they stop this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greatest Darthfruit
So, you the brains of this outfit, or is he?
12:51 PM on 01/04/2012
Yes, its too late already. Too much environmental and social harm already.
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
12:11 PM on 01/04/2012
Saying that fracking is OK is the same
thing as saying------------ 'Iam a moron.'
12:05 PM on 01/04/2012
We're fracked.

If you pollute the ground water what do you do then?

Republicans are good at their deregulation rant. Let the companies make the profits and then leave the clan up to the tax payers. We need common sense regulation.

Republicans are bad for the environment and bad for America.
11:58 AM on 01/04/2012
I tried to understand fracking by watching a video that describes it and still dont' fully understand it, they talk of water chemicals but refuse to tell you the chemicals used, if they did that would tell you if it is toxic or not. I felt those earthquacks spoken of from arkansa. I did nto feel the one from youngstown. since living here I have felt 2 earthquacks once when in bed another when sitting in my chair. it felt weird. the chemicals is wht I am more concerned with, I have well water, some people get theirs from a reservoir not to far from here, if they pollute my water then are they going to pay me for damaging my rights to clean water?

so here in ohio they set aside places for parks and recreation but now they want to extract resources now after they promised and used unethical methods to get ownership of land because common folk were made to believe it was to preserve the area for their use and enjoyment not for gov to give priveleges to corproations who would damage us in many ways and no doubt they will not reduce the cost of gas and oil by one penny.

so they lied. typical. when will those in authority ever tell the truth for once? I mean why is that so hard. if your right and have the moral high ground then why are you afraid to be truthful?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
04:13 PM on 01/04/2012
Thanks for reporting about reality on the ground, as it impacts on real people. We must get this disastrous practice stopped.
11:49 PM on 01/04/2012
When most of the parks were created the technology for looking for gas and oil was not nearly as advanced as it is now. Just 30years ago much of this area was passed over because what the thought were small pools of gas were not worth the cost of drilling. If you want to blame someone for drilling in the parks blame the state officials that have squandered our tax money. If they were not so desperate for money they would not need to drill in the parks. The next time you complain because the road ditches or the freeways are not mowed just remember your tax dollars pays for the equipment, fuel, and manpower. Twenty years ago they mowed those things once a year-now they're keeping it like your yard. Just one of the many ways the cost of running the state has gone up.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
09:08 AM on 01/04/2012
"Fracking involves blasting millions of gallons of water, laced with chemicals and sand, deep into the ground to unlock vast reserves of natural gas, a boon both for energy companies and a public hungry for cheap sources of fuel."

It's certainly a boon for drilling companies. As to whether long-term gas production from shale wells pays off the cost of making the well, it's an open question, and one that depends on high natural gas prices.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
03:32 PM on 01/04/2012
We already have a water shortage and now we are turning good water into toxic soup by the millions of gallons. Doesn't make sense to me. It also threatens the water supply due to run off contamination.
07:40 AM on 01/04/2012
This is a relatively new industry. It's maybe ten fifteen years old? It's production narrative is still very, very sketchy. There is much room for improvement. Any government - fed or state or county - that does not act responsibly to protect the health, wealth and future of their territory must be replaced with a group that will protect it. It's up to the constituents to vote in people who will protect them.And not sell them out like Bush/Cheney did with the US to the oil & gas outfits. Try and go fishing or hunting in a former strip mine. Take a big long drink from a spring that is downhlll from mine tailings. Take your kids swimming in the waters downstream from Houston or Baton Rouge. Then ask yourself if this is the world you want to hand over to the generations to come.
01:52 PM on 01/04/2012
New industry - 15 years old - the reality is more than 80 years.
Fracturing has been done since the mid 40's
Saltwater disposal has been done since the early 30's
There are more than 500,000 saltwater disposal wells through the United States.
The technology is well known - the correlation between earthquakes and fracturing or with saltwater disposal wells is remote - highly unlikely.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
03:43 PM on 01/04/2012
And yet there has been numerous recent reports of earthquakes in places where they have never happened before. The more serious problem that is immediate and well known is water pollution, at a time when there is a mounting serious concern about a water shortage, a problem which needs to be addressed immediately, a problem which is more life threatening than the lack of energy, which can be made in other ways.