iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Iowa Caucus Results: Ron Paul Vows 'We Will Go On'

First Posted: 01/03/2012 10:16 pm Updated: 01/03/2012 10:42 pm

ANKENY, Iowa -- Rep. Ron Paul is not going away.

The Texas Republican who speaks for the party's libertarian wing is projected to finish third, dashing hopes of an Iowa victory that would have rattled the GOP establishment. Yet Paul will wind up within a handful of points of the leader, pulling in a strong 20-plus percent of the vote, despite weeks of bad press and a surging former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.).

"It won't be long before there's an election in New Hampshire and believe me this momentum will continue," Paul told a disappointed but energetic crowd. "We are going to keep scoring just as we have tonight." Paul said that there were "three top vote-getters. We will go on, we will raise the money. I have no doubt about the volunteers. They will be there."

With former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Santorum turning in top-tier performances as well, a divided party slugs its way to New Hampshire and South Carolina, where no immediate end is in sight.

Paul's run, while dismissed by the mainstream media, has the type of grassroots financial support that will allow him to remain competitive, possibly for months, as he takes on Romney's super PAC money machine and Santorum's evangelical support. Paul is also the only other candidate besides Romney who qualified for the Virginia ballot. Paul's persistent presence threatens to prevent any other candidate from collecting enough delegates to lock up the nomination without a drawn-out battle. A long race, then, allows for all sorts of surprises, the type Romney would rather avoid.

Since Paul's first "money bomb" raised $6 million in one day in December 2007, Paul has had the means to compete on the national stage. He's spent that time and money articulating a consistent message of "individual liberty," and through much of 2011 was considered a second-tier candidate, stuck at around ten percent in national and local polls.

But he began to climb as the 2012 Iowa caucus drew closer, and came into election day Tuesday either tied or just behind frontrunner Romney.

As Paul climbed, however, the media finally began turning its attention to him -- not always a benefit to a campaign. The rehashing of newsletters with racist content bearing his name stunted his rise, as fellow Republicans turned on him. Rick Santorum went so far as to call Paul "disgusting."

Pressure mounted and a longtime former aide emerged to defend Paul -- sort of. In a long statement, Eric Dondero, who served Paul off and on from 1987 to 2003, wrote that the Texas Republican was not racist and didn't dislike gay people, but was uncomfortable around them, relating a bizarre story about an unwillingness to use a gay friend's bathroom. Dondero added that Paul suspected that former President George W. Bush may have had advance knowledge of the 9/11 attacks and that Franklin Roosevelt knew in advance about Pearl Harbor. Pressed last Sunday by Jake Tapper on the charge, Paul flipped out, calling it nonsense.

Paul's organization is as much a movement as it is a campaign, with self-organized elements that operate outside the campaign's direction. Though in a way, Paul's organization is distinctly, and ideologically, different from Romney's Super PACs, which are sponsored and organized by former aides and associates and are thinly-veiled arms of Romney's centrally-directed campaign.

The loose nature of Paul's organization makes it a less predictable entity, but also puts Paul's supporters closer to the ground, where they can sponge up crucial delegates other campaigns may miss.

Paul's overarching theme of personal liberty is combined with what he calls a non-interventionist foreign policy, which his critics deride as isolationism, and it's seen as his biggest weakness in the ongoing primary. Television ads in Iowa attacking Paul consisted largely of playing tape of his own remarks against attacking Iran, or opposing a U.S. presence in the Middle East. Paul's antiwar stance, however, has won him the strong support of college students and other young people, many of whom were lined up here in Waukee to register to vote for the first time, decked out in Paul stickers.

Paul also derives energetic support from general opponents of the drug war, a well as advocates of legalizing marijuana. Paul's critique of the Federal Reserve -- and his insistence that it should eventually be abolished -- dives deeply into the history of monetary policy and wins him a passionate following from a dedicated group.

Mike Johnson, a 29-year-military veteran, called himself "a little disappointed" as he shuffled out of Paul's election night party. "I figured it would be him and Romney," he said.

Johnson credited Santorum's performance with his relentless on-the-ground campaigning, but added, "He's not gonna be able to do that in every state."

This article was updated to include Rep. Ron Paul's speech to supporters in Iowa following projections of his third-place finish.

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,777
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (25 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
lunarsnare 06:53 AM on 01/04/2012
Under George Bush we grappled with 2 concurrent unjust no win wars.
Under Obama, it is so many that he, Obama doesn’t even bother going through he process to declare them anymore.

-Afghanistan
-Yemen
-Somalia
-Pakistan
-Libya 
-Iraq has been renamed
And currently the Obama is greasing us up for Syria and even worse Iran.

Fact:
Iran hasn’t started a war with  Read More...
photo
celebs4truth
@Conspiracy_X
10:17 PM on 01/06/2012
WOW! Phil Donahue totally blows the lid off of the establishment and its media's fear-mongering conspiracy! http://www.examiner.com/conspiracy-in-denver/donahue-questions-government-and-media-fear-mongering-conspiracy
photo
65irwin
I will offer a choice, not an echo.
09:16 AM on 01/05/2012
Who stands for individual liberty?
Who stands for limited government intervention?
Who stands for correcting the unjust enrichment of the top .001%?
Who stands for morality and less killing for resources?
Who stands for American privacy?
Who stands for free trade and diplomatic foreign policy?
Who stands for a return to sound money backed by something, instead of the impending hyper-inflation?
Who warned us about the housing boom..and subsequent bust?
Who is warning us now about the debt bubble and the potential reduction in our standard of living?
Who wants to create a country that inspires all nations to look up again to America as the hope of the free world?
Who sets the bar a little higher for all politicians, by voting his conscience not what the party dictates?
Who stands for equal rights for all?
Who rejects the notion that in order to be first in the world we need to conquer everyone else, which is purely irrational?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Austin Ray Walter
11:08 AM on 01/05/2012
Ron Paul does.

Ron Paul 2012.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:14 AM on 01/05/2012
Whether you are one of Ron Paul's ardent supporters or not, anyone who has an ounce of brains realizes that Ron Paul came in essentially 2nd in Iowa and was only "technically" 3rd, because for all intents and purposes Romney and Santorum finished in a dead heat with just a handful of votes separating the two and their delegate count is just about equal with Romney just a few more than Santorum. Some say he should quit. Quit? Why, because he wants to present his side to the American public-which many seem to favor as Iowa's results show? How absurd is that? The real reason is that no one can fathom Paul doing so well and really fear the man. That said, I will admit that I don't support Paul on every issue, but he has made far more sense on the pressing issues of today in my view-presented them good and intelligently enough that it would behoove some to listen to some of those important issues and his solutions for them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Austin Ray Walter
07:55 AM on 01/05/2012
We will never all agree. But Ron Paul is the only one serious about preventing the collapse of this country. People will still cling to pointless/baseless arguments and claims, and they're not critically thinking about the realities we will face if we do not resolve our financial condition.

Ron Paul has my unquestionable support. People need to wake up.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:10 AM on 01/05/2012
Yours is a well stated and truthful response, unlike some other shallow responses that are argumentative in nature. I agree with you that "people need to wake up" and at least listen. Something many are not won't to do, unfortunately.

“We will never all agree. But Ron Paul is the only one serious about preventing the collapse of this country. People will still cling to pointless/­baseless arguments and claims, and they're not critically thinking about the realities we will face if we do not resolve our financial condition.

"Ron Paul has my unquestion­able support. People need to wake up.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:12 AM on 01/05/2012
typo correction: won't should be wont in my previous post.
09:09 AM on 01/05/2012
Favorited! Excellent post!
Thanks for sharing!
Sadly most democrats and Repubs won't even touch the pressing issues of foreign policy, monetary policy, and the drug war. And if they do, they narrow it to an absurdly narrow set of options.

The more I read and understand Paul's positions the more I like him
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:38 PM on 01/05/2012
You're welcome and Good for you! Another intelligent and keen observer that cares about their country's serious problems!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:20 PM on 01/04/2012
Ron Paul , Lives !
10:07 PM on 01/04/2012
Ron Paul will get the Anti war vote from both sides of the isle.
06:34 PM on 01/04/2012
The media is rough on Ron Paul. Just because he's voicing his opinion and not with the mainstream ideas of foreign war fair hes considered a crazy person. He seems to be the brightest of any of the candidates and is willing to do what needs to be done for the country. He is the only candidate who stands true to his value's while all the other candidates continue to flip flop on their policies. RON PAUL 2012, if you don't want a repeat of the last 12 years.
06:05 PM on 01/04/2012
Elect Ron Paul in 2012
06:38 PM on 01/04/2012
No, thanks..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Austin Ray Walter
04:28 AM on 01/05/2012
Who is your candidate?
03:48 PM on 01/04/2012
Ron Paul will go on but not to victory. The cards are on the table. I like the politics of Ron Paul. There is the third party presidential candidate, Gary Johnson who is running for sure. Gary Johnson has the same beliefs as Ron Paul. The only difference is that Gary Johnson WILL be on the 2012 ballot and Ron Paul will have been voted out by then.
06:42 PM on 01/04/2012
What do you like about the gold standard and basing our currency on a metal that we don't mine but the Russians do? Seems like a great idea to give them the power to control our currency.
Ending regulations would give even more power to the banks and companies, and end whatever safety we have regarding air, water, food, whatever.
Not to mention he is staunchly anti abortion, and his idea that "liberty" means businesses or even states can be racists just not something most people would support.
07:24 PM on 01/04/2012
Where do you get your information? There are numerous sources on record stating the United States mines MORE gold than Russia. In fact, the United States ranks 4th in worldwide production whereas Russia only ranks 6th.

Ron Paul's own belief is that he personally does not believe in abortion. However, he has said if he was President that issue would be left up to the states individually to decide.
11:40 PM on 01/04/2012
"What do you like about the gold standard and basing our currency on a metal that we don't mine but the Russians do? Seems like a great idea to give them the power to control our currency."

A common misconception. Ron Paul advocates competing currencies which is very different from a gold standard. This is meant as a guard against inflation which protects ordinary people from governments engaging in inflationary spending

1. During QE 2 the Fed has purchased hundreds of billions of dollars of Treasury debt, enabling the government to fund its profligate deficit spending, push the national debt to its limit, and further devalue the dollar. Confidence in the dollar is plummeting, confidence in the euro has been shattered by the European bond crisis, and beleaguered consumers and investors are slowly but surely awakening to the fact that government-issued currencies do not hold their value.

2.Currency is sound only when it is recognized and accepted as such by individuals, through the actions of the market, without coercion. Throughout history, gold and silver have been the two commodities that have most fully satisfied the requirements of sound money. This is why people around the world are flocking once again to gold and silver as a store of value to replace their rapidly depreciating paper currencies. Just look at the increasing prices of gold and silver. These are inflationary effects hitting the market place
03:15 PM on 01/04/2012
There is no one fonder of Ron Paul than I, but the time has come to face facts. He needs to drop out like Bachmann and Perry did. He will not get the Republican nomination. So what are we faced with for candidates? There will either be Romney or Santorum on the Republican ticket. Gary Johnson on the Libertarian ticket and of course our Commander In Chief on the Democratic ticket. All in all, Gary Johnson is the most like Ron Paul!
11:11 PM on 01/04/2012
You obviously are not that fond of him.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FastPlastic
01:18 AM on 01/05/2012
Right, because a strong 3rd place finish behind a man that went from less than 1% to 25% in just two weeks means it isn't going to happen. Not to mention that the first place finisher got the exact same 25% he got in 2008.
02:48 PM on 01/04/2012
BLATANT Ron Paul CENSORSHIP by CNN of Soldier Supporting Ron Paul's Foreign Policy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TSxm2V8aVQ&feature=g-logo&context=G2fec3d1FOAAAAAAAAAA

"My policy has been and will continue to be ... to be on friendly terms with, but independent of, all nations on earth. To share in the broils of none. To supply their wants, and be carriers for them all; being thoroughly convinced that it is our policy and interest to do so; and that nothing short of self-respect, and that justice which is essential to a national character, ought to involve us in war."

- George Washington
02:30 PM on 01/06/2012
I'm sorry, but this was most definitely NOT a case of censorship - it was a technical glitch, pure and simple. The words that this solider was supposedly being "censored" over according to the comments on these videos ("He mentioned Iran! He mentioned Israel! He said they should take care of themselves, and the liberal media elite don't like that!") don't actually occur until the signal from the remote feed has already begun to degrade. Watch CNN often enough, and you'll see that this sort of thing happens far too often - but it's NOT censorship.
02:34 PM on 01/04/2012
During my year stay in S korea I spent much time talking with Korean college students and graduates. They want the US to remove troops, allow them to make policy with out US intervention. They explained that the North South conflict would already have been resolved without the US perpetuating the negative situation. They asked, Why don't you stay out of our business? Why don't you remove your troops? I explained that many in the US want them to have control of their country, policies, and our troops home, but the MSM misleads us about national security. I then told them to get their government to push the US into leaving. They say many try, but with no change. The government reps do as they please and not what the people want. I say we need a strong foreign policy, a strong military, but do not need troops everywhere,or dictate how other countries make policy. If the people of our ally, South Korea, resent our presence, is it not reasonable that our adversaries would also resent our interference? Many say Ron Paul wanting to bring all troops home is too radical, but is it not fair to say the current policy is also too radical? Just because this is the way we have been doing it does not mean that it is the best course for the USA. It is time to reevaluate our foreign policy. Lets find a better balance of working with our foreign allies and foes alike.
02:34 PM on 01/04/2012
A strong third - basically second as the first place position was a near tie - is very, very good news for the Ron Paul campaign!

By the way, anyone afraid of Ron Paul's foreign policy should go to non-intervention.com

Pass the link around to Republican voters and all who need a lesson in the truth.
06:47 PM on 01/04/2012
And anyone who thinks we should base our currency on the value of a metal mined in Russia and S Africa but not here should support RP. I am sure the Russians would keep our best interests in mind.

Plus anyone who is not straight and white should read his newsletters..
http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/ron-paul-newsletter
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/12/why-ron-pauls-racist-newsletters-didnt-hurt-him-in-texas/250427/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FastPlastic
01:35 AM on 01/05/2012
I recommend checking your facts. Based on 2007 stats the United States was 4th in the world in gold mining, behind Australia, South Africa, and China.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_mining_in_the_United_States
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FastPlastic
02:23 AM on 01/05/2012
Reality Check: The story behind the Ron Paul newsletters
http://www.fox19.com/story/16449477/reality-check-the-story-behind-the-ron-paul-newsletters
photo
CeltGunn1970
Hope is a waking dream
02:19 PM on 01/04/2012
All of you Paul supporters I cannot find and click all of you, but if you run across me, fan me and I'll fan you back.
I've been trying to find you all and share info where I can but it's not easy to keep up sometimes. =)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Putty Pants
01:34 PM on 01/04/2012
Sorry Fineman...I know his strong showing displeases a lot of military industrial folks but yes...I believe Paul will do great with reasonable thinking people and he must continue on. I've always voted democrat thinking they're anti-war but they've proved over and over again they are not. They too want us to be the policmen of the world. Independents who understand what these wars are costing us..america's safety, our treasure and our men and women in the armed forces who come back maimed. I will do everything in my power to help Paul win. I'm not a youngster and I will let everyway middleaged person know all that Paul really stands for. Not the lies and innuendo that media and both parties have been spreading around about him. I'm not in anyway connected with his campaign but I will give money, word of mouth and get literature out about him. So media you can all go suck on a big pickle...no matter how hard you all try to stop him we will work harder. He's the right man for the times. Both dem's and repub's are all hashing over the same unsustainable garbage for years and it's gotten us practically into bankruptcy.
02:43 PM on 01/04/2012
Of course he should continue he did great in Iowa! First place was basically a tie, then there's Paul. Santorum won't do as well ever again. He was listed as one of three most corrupt Congressmen in 2006. He lied and continues to lie about his residence. He enrolled five of his kids in a tax payer funded cyber school they didn't meet residency requirements for. He spoke out about medical malpractice suits then filed one. Look it up.

Ron Paul has the backing of Michael Scheuer, ex C.I.A. chief of the bin Laden unit BECAUSE OF HIS FOREIGN POLICY.
12:42 PM on 01/04/2012
all of you paul supporters so in love with his isolationist tendencies need to study your history because you must not have done that yet. . an isolationist america gets world wars started
01:18 PM on 01/04/2012
I know my history. I'm not in love with "isolationism", I'm in love with peace and a foreign policy of minding our own damned business! I'll worry about going to war when the United States is attacked by a foreign nation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:28 PM on 01/04/2012
Why is there a major US military lobby called Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs?

I don't think being naive is a reason to be opposed to "isolationist tendencies."