More

Taliban To Open Qatar Office: Move By Militants Seen As Possible Step Towards Peace Talks

First Posted: 01/03/12 06:18 AM ET Updated: 01/04/12 10:20 AM ET

KABUL, Afghanistan -- The Afghan Taliban said Tuesday they have reached a preliminary deal with the Gulf state of Qatar to open a liaison office there, in what could be a step toward formal, substantive peace talks to end more than a decade of war.

Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid indicated the liaison office will conduct negotiations with the international community but not with the Afghan government - a condition that President Hamid Karzai has indicated he would reject. Mujahid did not say when it would open.

For the United States and its allies, the idea of a Taliban political office in the Qatari capital of Doha has become the central element in efforts to draw the insurgents into peace talks.

"Right now, having a strong presence in Afghanistan, we still want to have a political office for negotiations," said Mujahid. "In this regard, we have started preliminary talks and we have reached a preliminary understanding with relevant sides, including the government of Qatar, to have a political office for negotiations with the international community."

Mujahid's emailed statement also said the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan - the name of Afghanistan under Taliban rule - has "requested for the exchange of prisoners from Guantanamo."

He was referring to a Taliban demand that the U.S. military release about five Afghan prisoners believed to be affiliated with the Taliban from the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The Taliban are holding Bowe Bergdahl, a 25-year-old U.S. Army sergeant from Hailey, Idaho, who is the only U.S. soldier held by the insurgents. He was taken prisoner June 30, 2009, in Afghanistan.

From the American perspective, other trust-building measures would involve assurances that the insurgents cut ties with al-Qaida, accept the elected civilian government of Afghanistan and bargain in good faith.

For the U.S., one goal of talks with the Taliban would be to identify cease-fire zones that could be used as a steppingstone toward a full peace agreement that stops most fighting.

The Obama administration wants to use its current extensive military campaign and an acknowledged but incomplete plan for a long-term American military presence in Afghanistan as leverage to draw the Taliban to talks with Karzai's representatives.

The gradual process of handing over areas of the country to Afghan security control would ideally be marshaled toward encouraging peace talks, by identifying areas where a test ceasefire could be tried, a senior administration official told The Associated Press last week.

There was no immediate comment from the Afghan government to the Taliban statement, but Karzai had agreed not to oppose the opening of a Taliban office in Qatar.

However, the Taliban statement appeared to restate the militants' long-held position that they would speak directly to the U.S. government and not to the Karzai administration, which they consider a puppet government.

"There are two essential sides in the current situation in the country that has been ongoing for the past 10 years. One is the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan and the other side is the United States of America and their foreign allies," Mujahid said.

That could torpedo talks before they begin.

Karzai has stressed his country will accept no "foreign intervention" in its plans to seek a negotiated peace with the Taliban. The U.S. has agreed that any peace talks with the Taliban would have to be led by the Afghans.

Wahid Muzhda, a former Taliban foreign ministry official and an analyst on issues related to the group, said any future talks would probably be "between the Americans and Taliban, but the Afghan government or High Peace Council representatives will be in the talks."

He said a 70-member High Peace Council set up by Karzai more than a year ago has made little or no headway, and that the U.S. had gone ahead with behind-the-scenes talks because the Afghan government was unable to on its own.

Such talks with Taliban representatives have been going on for months in Europe and the Persian Gulf region though they are now on an unofficial hiatus at Karzai's request.

Afghan experts said the Taliban's decision to open an office in Qatar could be the result of the U.S.-led coalition's military campaign in southern and eastern Afghanistan. Raids by special operations units have also rounded up hundreds of low and midlevel Taliban commanders.

"This proposal has been on the cards for many months, and it's logical that the Taliban would want to increase their options at some point ahead of 2014," when NATO is due to end its combat role, said Theo Farrell, a professor of war studies at King's College, London.

"The question is why now? It could be a sign that the Taliban are feeling the pressure of the military campaign," he said. "But it could also be the result of an internal power play, with those leaders holding a more accommodating view prevailing over the hard-liners and trying to open avenues of contacts with the government."

The prospect of formal peace talks suffered a serious setback in September when Burhanuddin Rabbani, a former president and the head of the High Peace Council, was assassinated by an attacker posing as a Taliban peace emissary.

After Rabbani's death, Karzai said peace efforts could take place only if the Taliban established a political office that would be authorized to conduct talks on a peaceful end to the 10-year war.

But Karzai initially balked when the plan for Qatar appeared to have been settled without him, officials said.

Early last month, Kabul recalled its ambassador to Qatar for consultations over reports that the Taliban was planning to open an office there. Karzai backed down last week, saying his government would accept the Qatar office to hold peace talks, although Saudi Arabia or Turkey would be preferable venues.

Despite talk of peace, violence persisted in Afghanistan.

Two bomb attacks killed six people in southern Afghanistan's Kandahar city.

First, a suicide bomber driving a motorcycle killed four civilians and a police officer. Gen. Abul Razaq, Kandahar provincial police chief, said the attack also wounded 16 people, including three police officers and six children. The bomber detonated his explosives at a police checkpoint, he said.

Hours later, another bomb blast killed a child, wounding five police officers and seven civilians. Dr. Kamal Shah of the local Mirwais Hospital said the attack appeared to have targeted a passing NATO convoy.

Also in the south, NATO said Tuesday that one of its service members was killed by a roadside bomb. A statement said the death occurred on Monday. It gave no further details about the soldier's nationality or where exactly the blast occurred.

A total of 544 NATO troops were killed in Afghanistan in 2011, the 10th year of the war. The figure was considerably lower than for 2010, when more than 700 troops died.

About 840 Afghan soldiers and policemen were killed in 2011.

___

Associated Press writer Slobodan Lekic contributed to this report from Kabul, Afghanistan.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

KABUL, Afghanistan -- The Afghan Taliban said Tuesday they have reached a preliminary deal with the Gulf state of Qatar to open a liaison office there, in what could be a step toward formal, substanti...
KABUL, Afghanistan -- The Afghan Taliban said Tuesday they have reached a preliminary deal with the Gulf state of Qatar to open a liaison office there, in what could be a step toward formal, substanti...
Filed by AP  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 887
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (21 total)
01:06 PM on 02/11/2012
they,ve also opened a butchers a bakers and a candlestick makers and have signaled their intention to offer the US a free trade agreement and favoured nation status, now i can at last have faith in religeous nutters whether they are in quatar or the US administration no more killing would be nice
03:05 PM on 01/30/2012
Curious as to what HP readers think about the pending Taliban peace talks. As a member of the Association For Intelligence Officers (AFIO), please take the quick POLL in the upper right hand margin of the free Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) News site. Thanks and I will share the results here. Robert at www.osintdaily.blogspot.com
11:27 PM on 01/03/2012
Wow, this is incredible, even if it's not true. On the one hand, the threat of war is being shoved down Iran's throat, and on the other hand an olive branch is being extended to a new regime called the Taliban. The more things change-the more they stay the same. Let it be known that Hillary Clinton is doing a fantastic job ballin on the world stage. The woman walks softly and definitely, definitely carries a big stick while operating in stealth mode. I would love to see Barack beg for Hillary to be his partner and running mate in 2012. Then we would see some real change. Enough of the money grubbing and subterfuge that the GOP is offering
Chestnut horse
with a white blaze
09:37 PM on 01/03/2012
Pakistan denies Taliban talks! Yes, the same Crackistan that denied Bin-Laden was living there.
photo
piul05
Can I have a biscuit yet?
07:50 PM on 01/03/2012
Because of that, let's invade Iran!

(Disclaimer...just in case...: sarcasm off)
07:16 PM on 01/03/2012
Don't they already have one? Qatar and Saudi Arabia are responsible for funding all the Wahhabi jihadists everywhere, The Taliban in Afghanistan, al-Qaida in Iraq, Al-Shabaab in Somalia, and all the other terrorist groups Yemen, North and West Africa.
11:28 PM on 01/03/2012
And then we invaded Iraq, that tells you how patriotic was Bush. He is and always will be a oil vampire.
06:49 PM on 01/03/2012
Smart move, the Taliban already said it's likely during an election year Obama will release these prisoners from Guantánamo Bay for a "peace offering". US agreed in principle and Obama is actually now considering releasing these prisoners hoping they will reciprocate in releasing one American they are holding. It has been reported these talks between the US and the Taliban have been secretly going on for months. The purpose of the office in Qatar is for talks to continue without anyone getting arrested or assisinated. Also, they wanted this office set up so the US and British don't get fooled again like they did in 2010 when an impostor prentending to be of a hgh level Taliban official bilked them out of thousands of cash incentives from British and US intelligence. He pocketed thousands of dollars in cash incentives for the so called, "coming of peace". One can only imagine now what's being paid to them to speed up the "peace" negotiation in time for the election. The Taliban will get the prisoners released, but the "peace" Obama is seeking to obtain is questionable and at best will be short-lived.
11:37 PM on 01/03/2012
You got something better? Don't blame Obama, this strategy has been done many times before and the results are whatever you need them to be. But, with all due respect, would you please explain to us what you would do to obtain "short-lived peace" and end this military industrial complex? Go ahead, and educate us.....
08:05 AM on 01/04/2012
Why not blame Obama for negotiating with the terrorists that have never been or ever will be in our best interests. Peace is not obtainable from those who threaten and harm our lives. You go ahead, and be naive to think there is someone who could offer a solution to end all wars. Maybe you can educate the soldiers who fought and shed their blood for your freedom against their terroristic acts. Or perhaps you can donate some cash for the Taliban to act better towards us
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gfgarv
but you are Blanche! You are...
06:11 PM on 01/03/2012
"Thank you for calling The Taliban. How may I direct yourt call?"
"Hi. Can I please speak to someone in your dirty bombs/ bio terrorism department?"
"Please hold while I put you through."
"Hello Terrorism office. How may I direct your call?"
11:13 PM on 01/03/2012
"Hello Terrorism office. How may I direct your call?" The Reagan connection has been temporarily disconnected - but I believe the Bush-Koch corporation might be able to help you.

A few months ago I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and my best intentions still tell me that's true, but the facts and the evidence tell me it is not. –Ronald Reagan [Testimony to the Tower Commission­] (4 March 1987)

Facts are stupid things — stubborn things, I should say. [Laughter] –Ronald Reagan Address to Republican National Convention­. (15 August 1988)

http://www­.btinterne­t.com/~nlpWESSEX­/Documents­/coupreaga­nbush.htm

The hostages were released on Jan. 21, 1981, minutes after Ronald Reagan was sworn in as President.

Almost immediatel­y thereafter­, according to Israeli and American former officials, arms began to flow to Iran in substantia­l quantities­...

Republican­s sabotaged Carter’s hostage negotiatio­ns as a way to ensure the 1980 election of Reagan as president and George H.W. Bush as vice president.

What do you think about Reagan/GHW­B selling massive amounts of weaponry illegally to this very same Iran? Thousands of TOW missiles.

The plan was for way over $1 billion worth, but had to be cut short after the two plane crashes and some investigat­ive journalism revealed what was going on.

The rewarding of hostage-ta­king led to increase in hostage-ta­king.”
11:44 PM on 01/03/2012
Wow, you in trouble, lol. I like it. But how would you be able to steal billions for the blind trust if you didn't convince the american public, good and decent people, that the Wizard of Oz was about subterfuge. I bet you got scared of the man behind the curtain also. Toto was smarter than all of them......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gfgarv
but you are Blanche! You are...
01:23 AM on 01/04/2012
Well done. A bit more detailed than I was going for but then again, that's what makes it great.
05:11 AM on 01/04/2012
Thank you for contacting the Al Qaida network, I'm sorry all our terrorists are busy at the moment , please leave a message after the tone.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:01 PM on 01/03/2012
Looking like the peace talks with North Vietnam.
05:54 PM on 01/03/2012
Get them all together for talks and pass judgement on them, sorry, they need to be dealt with. They are the ones who started with unprovoked aggression.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Free Speech on HuffPO
05:44 PM on 01/03/2012
You cannot trust these roaches. They must be burned out. To win, we will need to nearly eradicate an entire generation of radical Muslims. yes this means children, too.They understand strength, victory or defeat. They do not understand anything else. Kill them, subjigate them, or be subjigated. Those are the choices. They bring their children up not on "Goodnight Moon" rather on "Death To The Great Satan". Do not fall for this. they will simply be biding their time until our guard is down and they will then deliver a deathblow to America.
photo
disporting
Weapons not food, not homes, not shoes
05:58 PM on 01/03/2012
haha, lawl.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gfgarv
but you are Blanche! You are...
06:12 PM on 01/03/2012
you sound sane.
photo
treemonkey
Illegitimi non carborundum
05:44 PM on 01/03/2012
Sadly, I remember over a decade ago, signing petitions to ask the Taliban not to blow up statues revered by other religions, decades demanding that they allow women to have equal rights, and barring that, to at least stop stoning women to death. Unfortunately, at this point, I have no answers. Petitions did not work. World opinion, even world scorn did not work. And even fighting them for ten years, throwing everything we have, and everything we hold dear not only seems to have no chance of working, we seem to have destroyed our own economy, our outlook for jobs, our own civil rights, and the lives of countless young soldiers, especially if you try to count the lives lost among our and their children, and now I see us within about twelve months of getting right back to where we were when this whole thing started. And this the result of what, our response to a coordinated attack on our country by about a dozen Saudi Arabian extremists. Why not give peace talks a try? Especially considering how we suffer from that chain of decisions made by our government to really teach those 12 dead Saudis a lesson. They're dead. They have no idea how well their attack led us to do to ourselves what they could only start. Maybe the Beatles were right. Give Peace a Chance. Let them have their country before we totally destroy ours.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lhr1967
06:51 PM on 01/03/2012
One it won't work . and two we did not throw everything we have at them . If we did they would not be hear today , or even 5 or 6 years ago . When we go to war we have to bring hell onto the enemy . That is something we have not done since WWII . We always seem to go just so far and stop . And that drives me nuts . In for a penny then in for a pound finish the job or one day it will come back and finish us .
photo
vtmilitia
Vermont ain't flat.
05:40 PM on 01/03/2012
I wouldn't believe any of this as the militants in Pakistan,AlQaida and the Taliban were talking about combining forces in an earlier Huff/Po article.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Morgan378
05:07 PM on 01/03/2012
The Circle Turned - 2001 - 2011 - and the Taliban - controlled by the SSI Pakistanis - desires a sessation of hostilities in Afghanistan in order to Rule again. No longer wishing to hold merely Kandahar and it's environs to shield bin Laden and Omar - one dead, the other past his prime - the Taliban will now have the entire country. If the US backs Karzai - who is seen as corrupt and a puppet to most Afghanis - the US loses. Allowing the Taliban to put forth a "candidate" for "election" we will lose again. It's the Taliban's ability to shakedown the people of Afghanistan that has thwarted dominance by the US and NATO of Afghanistan along with infiltration of Afghani forces trained by the West and accepting payment from the Pakistani's (oh, yes Pakistan has spent our money well) that America is fighting now. If we invaded simply to get bin Laden - Mission Accomplished. Now, it's only a matter of who will Rule - in REALITY - as we get ready to leave.The Taliban have not changed. Grown more adept at "politics" to be sure. But they haven't changed. And in over 10 years of warring - neither have the people really.
04:57 PM on 01/03/2012
The simple fact is the US and NATO are going to be out by 2014. If we can get a deal before then, that would be great, but not expected. Then it will be Karzai's problem, not ours.

I read the armchair general posts and I am not impressed - 9 years of war has not extinguished the Taliban and Al Qaeda has just moved offices to Yemen and Somalia.

Perhaps just perhaps negotiations are cheaper than deploying 100K troops. Though a diplomatic settlement might not be as satisfying as a nuclear strike on the tribal territories of Pakistan, it may be longer lasting.