iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

More Regressive Tax Code Contributed To Growing Income Inequality Before Crisis: Report

Income Inequality

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 01/03/12 01:19 PM ET Updated: 01/03/12 01:19 PM ET

A national shift toward a more regressive tax code played a significant role in further increasing the wealth gap in the years leading up to the financial crisis, according to a new government report.

Between 1996 and 2006, a period when the top 0.1 percent of filers experienced an almost two-fold increase in income, the Congressional Research Service's report finds the poorest 20 percent of tax filers saw their incomes fall by 6 percent, increasing income inequality both before and after taxes.

That rise in inequality can largely be accounted for by the growing capital gains -- or profits from the sale of property or investments -- among richer Americans. During that ten-year period, the share of income from capital for the top 0.1 percent rose to 70 percent from 64 percent. But that's not the only reason for the growing wealth gap. The report also points to regressive alterations in the tax code as an important factor in rising income inequality.

"Taxes were less progressive in 2006 than in 1996, and consequently, tax policy also contributed to the increase in income inequality between 1996 and 2006," according to the report. "But overall income inequality would likely have increased even in the absence of tax policy changes."

A less progressive tax code hasn't just resulted in an increase in income inequality. At a time when the federal debt tops $15 trillion, tax cuts for wealthy Americans are also costing the U.S. Treasury $11.6 million every hour, according to an October report.

The study's findings mirror others that indicate income inequality has been on the rise for quite some time. The top one percent of Americans saw their incomes grow by 275 percent between 1979 and 2007, according to an October report from the Congressional Budget Office. During the same period, the bottom fifth of earners only experienced a 20 percent boost in income.

In addition, the 400 richest Americans, according to Forbes, have a combined net worth that is more than that of the bottom 60 percent of Americans. Perhaps even more surprising, one family -- the Walmart heirs -- had the same net worth in 2007 as the bottom 30 percent of Americans.

The gap between the richest Americans and the poorest has gotten so wide in fact that income inequality in America is even higher than levels reached in Ancient Rome, a study released last month found.

And if the past is any indication, that could be bad news for the U.S., seeing as it's less income inequality positively correlates with economic growth, according to a September report from the International Monetary Fund.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
A national shift toward a more regressive tax code played a significant role in further increasing the wealth gap in the years leading up to the financial crisis, according to a new government report.
A national shift toward a more regressive tax code played a significant role in further increasing the wealth gap in the years leading up to the financial crisis, according to a new government report.
 
 
  • Comments
  • 134
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:55 AM on 01/04/2012
The top 1% are doing well and are out of touch with most Americans.

America is suffering with high unemployment, stagnant wages, home foreclosures and insecurity. It seems the Republican party does not care about anyone but the top 1%.

People need to wake up and vote all Republicans out of office.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Midnight Cry
Tax Reform Now!
11:57 AM on 01/04/2012
•The top 1 percent of taxpayers paid 33.7 percent of all individual income taxes in 2002. This group of taxpayers has paid more than 30 percent of individual income taxes since 1995. Moreover, since 1990 this group’s tax share has grown faster than their income share.

•Taxpayers who rank in the top 50 percent of taxpayers by income pay virtually all individual income taxes. In all years since 1990, taxpayers in this group have paid over 94 percent of all individual income taxes. In 2000, 2001, and 2002, this group paid over 96 percent of the total.
redonthehead
Winning trophies for my game face alone
11:28 AM on 01/04/2012
Articles like this make me laugh.

Would a liberal's world be better if the wealthy were not wealthy?

Since the bottom 20% have a negative tax rate do you want to just hand more money to the poor? That should inspire upward mobility.

Are the poor entitled to the wealth of someone else?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sanfran55
12:18 PM on 01/04/2012
We're talking about the 1% here, not the middle class - which gets stuck paying for everyone, and is quickly disappearing in this bank/housing crisis. If the 1% doesn't wake up and start paying their fair share in taxes, the occupy movement is going to turn into a full blown revolution.

Those pitiable millionaires and billionaires, why can't they hide their money in offshore accounts, tax shelters and loop holes? They are not of the common class - they don't have to follow the rules! Rules are for the commoners!
10:41 AM on 01/04/2012
A solution is a Federal Income Supplement (FIS). The Federal Government would expand Social Security to make unconditional payments of $13,628 each year to every adult US citizen to provide a modicum of financial independence to everyone. This program can be financed entirely by cutting existing federal welfare associated programs and changing the federal personal income tax to a flat rate of 18% but allowing no deductions. This $2.975 trillion per year program would not add to nor reduce the federal deficit. Other potential avenues for federal deficit reduction such as Defense, Medicare, Medicaid, foreign aid, wealth taxes or gas taxes have not been preempted. The figure of $13,628 per year per adult was chosen because after 18% income tax it yields $11,175 per adult, which would amount to the 2011 Federal Poverty Level (FPL) of $22,350 for a family of 4 (2 adults plus 2 children). The numbers can work. See www.federalincomesupplement.com for detailed calculations.
photo
Levonsky
a fan of enlightened self interest
10:51 AM on 01/04/2012
How about we just cut defense? Do we really need another aircraft carrier or a whole new fleet of B2s?
01:33 PM on 01/04/2012
I agree that we should cut defense spending, but remember that the entire Defense Department Budget for 2012 is only $700 billion.
doc4fitness
curing Progressives one at a time
05:54 AM on 01/04/2012
Maybe if we flattened the tax rate, simplified the tax code, lowered the rates, and lifted the payroll tax cap, we would have a stronger economy. There is an income gap not due to tax rates but due to work gap. But even out the taxes, everyone will have more money in their pockets.
Russia and Estonia flattened out their tax rates, cut breaks, and their economies took off.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jfbuf
I guess people aren't corporations
10:47 PM on 01/03/2012
has it trickled down to you, vote for Obama if you want any chance of a living wage
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kamact
Market Observer
10:37 PM on 01/03/2012
Isn't our government wonderful,...for a few,...
photo
Kai-HK
Don't Share My Wealth! Share My Work Ethic!
09:16 PM on 01/03/2012
And yet the tax code became MORE progressive since the 2001...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dosadi
Political agnostic
08:02 PM on 01/03/2012
The entire trickle down theory was based on the thought that the wealthy would end up with more money than they could hold in their hands. The trickle down would come when they dropped a few coins every now and then.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
laura r
06:41 PM on 01/03/2012
I am not surprised by this report. We are just going through the same type of period as the nineteen twenties. The tax rate on the rich was dropped from 75% to 24% just a year before the crash of the stock market in 1929. Economist believe that the money of speculation on Wall Street fueled the crash.

1929----Deregulated markets, top tax bracket 24%, total crony Capitalism. Some bankers went to jail for fraud. The system was then regulated and it worked very well for 70 years until 1999 when congress deregulated the banks.

2008----Deregulated markets, top tax bracket 35% (with loophole so half of our corporation do not pay taxes), total crony Capitalism and NO BANKERS HAVE GONE TO JAIL. Congress has tried to set in place bank regulations, but the lobbyist are still trying to kill the bills.

And History repeats it's self-------Will anybody in Washington D.C. change the course of history this time--------or will crony capitalism and corrupt Government rule the next century.

Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it.
Edmund Burke
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
08:15 PM on 01/03/2012
F&F for "getting it"
doc4fitness
curing Progressives one at a time
06:02 AM on 01/04/2012
What happened before and during 1920s? Income tax, Federal Reserve, Farm Subsidies, government started meddling in the economy. Congress didn't deregulate banks... Clinton did because his buddies (like Bob Rubin and Reich) at Citigroup wanted to make their company legal combining commercial and investment banking, along with bailing out the Peso (actually Goldman Sachs).
Real estate speculation started in 1990s as CRA forced banks to loosen standards. FANNIE and FREDDIE were used to prop up subprime market. Repubs fought some of this in Congress in 1990s. Frank and Dodd kept in going during Bush admin until 2006, when Dems took over Congress. Curiously, 2007 is when crash started to show, year after Dems took back Congress. This economic crisis has its roots all the way back to formation of Fed reserve, 100 years ago
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
laura r
12:20 PM on 01/04/2012
Sorry, it was a bipartisan effort.

The Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act also known as the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 .
Respective versions of the legislation were introduced in the U.S. Senate by Phil Gramm (Republican of Texas) and in the U.S. House of Representatives by Jim Leach (R-Iowa). The third lawmaker associated with the bill was Rep. Thomas J. Bliley, Jr. (R-Virginia)

The House passed its version of the Financial Services Act of 1999 on July 1, 1999, by a bipartisan vote of 343-86 (Republicans 205–16; Democrats 138–69 1), the Senate version of the bill by a much-narrower 54–44 vote along basically-partisan lines (53 Republicans and 1 Democrat in favor; 44 Democrats opposed).

Yes, Robert Rubin (D), Larry Summers(D) and Alan Greenspan(R) advised Clinton to sign the bill. So, the bill was signed as a bipartisan effort.

Where are these people now---- they are part of the revolving door.

Phil Gramm ---- works for USB bank

Jim Leach--- Chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities

Thomas J. Bliley ---works as a senior government affairs advisor in the Washington office of Steptoe & Johnson LLP,(lobbyist firm)

Robert Rubin----works for CitiGroup bank

Alan Greenspan-----In August 2007, Deutsche Bank retained Greenspan as a senior advisor.

In 2008, hedge fund Paulson & Co. hired Greenspan as an adviser.The agreement he was not to advise any other hedge fund while working for Paulson. (During 2007 Paulson had hired Goldman Sachs to package their sub-prime holdings into derivatives.
madame48
NO..it's a gop Cookbook !Tempus edax,homo edacior
04:28 PM on 01/03/2012
Cap gains are income just like wages and should be taxed at an equal rate. why should Mittie pay a 15% rate on his millions in income while the head janitor of his building pays twice that rate? It is patently absurd and a sellout to the wealthy....want to live in a civilized country rich folks? One where there aren't poor kids selling gum to you on the sidewalk? Or do you want to live in an America more resembling Mexico? Stand up, stop being so frigging selfish
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
greysells2
grey cells matter
05:57 PM on 01/03/2012
I never inherited money. I never earned a big salary. We have no debts. We were never leveraged by borrowing someones elses captial to make more for ourselves. We always lived within our means. In otherwords, we were small "c" conservatives when it came to personal finance. But we were a good savers and we invested in good quality low risk stocks. Now being retired, we still pay our fair share of taxes and we do not resent this at all. It is part of the costs of having lived and worked in a country that allowed us to prosper modestly. I do have some cap gains and agree that the taxes on them are not fair. So I am ready to pay more taxes on my cap gains if everyone else, meaning those who are rich, pay more too.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dosadi
Political agnostic
07:47 PM on 01/03/2012
Me too.

Faved.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
08:20 PM on 01/03/2012
the "excuse" most often used is that cap gains are taxed less because of "risk" While I can agree up to a point, excessive cap gains ( in excess of $1million ) should be taxed as regular income and that rate should revert to at the very least pre-Bush levels, my personal preference would be pre-Regan levels back when we had enabled a strong middle class to propel the entire country to prosperity instead of just the 1% .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
George Cummings
Warning: Moderate. Future posts unpredictable
03:55 PM on 01/03/2012
Reganomics: Legalizing Usury and running huge deficits from tax cuts to make the economy look good while the wealth was bled out of the lower and middle classes to finance opening up Asian markets.
Some of us screamed loudly at the time where it would take us.
And..here we are...
madame48
NO..it's a gop Cookbook !Tempus edax,homo edacior
04:30 PM on 01/03/2012
Yup, many of us TRIED to warn people...just like we tried to warn there was no reason for Iraq war.....but in both cases we were demonized by the power of conservative crony markets as god ideology ( both R & D)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
08:28 PM on 01/03/2012
He toook the USA from being the World's largest creditor to being the World's largest debtor nation in 8 short years (12 if you count Bush1)
doc4fitness
curing Progressives one at a time
06:07 AM on 01/04/2012
Reagan budgets that were rejected by Democrat Congresses called for huge cuts. Tip O'Neill would just say they were dead on arrival....
photo
aforbes808
Naked is a state of mind.
03:34 PM on 01/03/2012
Put down the kool aid, take off the blindfold and wake up. We need to save ourselves, from ourselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bart DePalma
Bart DePalma
03:09 PM on 01/03/2012
1) CBO found that folks who invest in businesses and plow capital gains back into investments earn more income and accumulate more wealth than those who earn wages and spend most of that income. Well, duh.

2) CBO also found that the array of federal taxes redistributes wealth from the wealthy to the less wealthy and that the Clinton/Gingrich capital gains tax reform simply made the tax code slightly less redistributionary.

3) The tax code had nothing to do with the loss of income by the lowest quintile of earners. However, the capital gains tax reforms very likely helped cause the growth in equity market values and increased the wealth of the investor class - which was roughly half of the nation.

4) Instead of punishing those who invest in business and job growth, perhaps the better option might be to reform Social Security to allow all Americans to invest and reap the benefits that have heretofore been restricted to half of the nation.
photo
aforbes808
Naked is a state of mind.
03:41 PM on 01/03/2012
401k managers move your money around just to take a commission. Everytime they do, they take a little bite out of your money. Now they want your Social Security and to quote George Carlin, "they will get it too. Because, it's a big club and you ain't in it." I haven't seen any real growth in 401k's since their inception. If you don't mind sending me your info. from the CBO, I'd appreciate it.

Here's George at his best. R.I.P. "It's called the American Dream, because you have to be asleep to believe it."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5dBZDSSky0
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:05 PM on 01/03/2012
take charge of your own investments.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:44 PM on 01/03/2012
People who administer the social security fund at every level also get paid so what is your real point?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
greysells2
grey cells matter
06:16 PM on 01/03/2012
Regarding point 3, it might be true but the meltdown on Wall Street and the abject failure of the financial system took away any benefit that the cap gains reform conferred on society. Nearly everyone in America lost except the very wealthy.
photo
intolleft
ObamaTAX...getting you shovel ready
02:54 PM on 01/03/2012
I'll take a smaller piece of a large pie than a big piece of a tiny pie any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
greysells2
grey cells matter
06:18 PM on 01/03/2012
Me too. Well said. Greed will be our undoing. F & F'd
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sanfran55
12:25 PM on 01/04/2012
Greed - unregulated capitalism with banks, lenders, loans, housing, wallstreet - has already been our undoing and has gotten us into this mess.
photo
CrnkyOldMan
I'll accept Co's as people when TX executes one
02:53 PM on 01/03/2012
What policies, exactly, have the GOP proposed that will reverse this trend?
madame48
NO..it's a gop Cookbook !Tempus edax,homo edacior
04:37 PM on 01/03/2012
A bunch in the GOP presidential clown car advocate 0 % cap gains....the rich as the freeloaders extraordinaire
photo
sippewissett
We are ALL Americans, not just the noisy few.
10:28 PM on 01/03/2012
It's patently obvious that the GOP/TPers make such proposals because their donors/corporate backers 'own' them. Their re-election depends on pleasing their masters. The American people do NOT have the clout that corporations do now, thanks to SCOTUS and Romney, "Corporations are people too, my friend."

As a great sign at an Occupy rally read, "I'll believe that corporations are people when Texas starts executing them."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:46 PM on 01/03/2012
Policies which foster job growth and incentivize employment investment will have the effect of creating less income disparities because more people will have access to capital.

Yes, I realize I just espoused trickle down economics, but, if you - at the minimum - drop our corporate rates to the world average than you will see jobs returning to the states as it will be the best financial decision.
photo
CrnkyOldMan
I'll accept Co's as people when TX executes one
05:35 PM on 01/03/2012
Corp taxes are the lowest they've been in 60 years. Want to try again? (W/o the false premise that the %rate = rate paid).
photo
CrnkyOldMan
I'll accept Co's as people when TX executes one
05:36 PM on 01/03/2012
Also, how do you "foster job growth" w/o increasing demand?