More

Firearm Background Checks Spike In 2011 According To FBI Statistics

Gun Sales 2011

First Posted: 01/04/12 11:42 PM ET Updated: 01/05/12 04:30 PM ET


By James Kelleher

CHICAGO, Jan 4 (Reuters) - The FBI performed a record number of instant background checks on would-be firearm buyers in 2011 as Americans went on an apparent gun-buying spree, according to new government data.

The FBI said it fielded nearly 16.5 million queries from firearms sellers last year, checking that customers buying guns did not have criminal records or other red flags that made them ineligible to purchase weapons.

That was up 15 percent from 2010, when the FBI performed 14.4 million screenings using its so-called National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), and the highest number of annual screenings performed since 1998, when the checks went into effect.

The FBI cautioned that each background check did not necessarily represent an individual firearm sale, in part because some would-be buyers fail to pass the screening.

But FBI spokesman Stephen Fischer said the background checks are correlated with weapon purchases. So the uptick in screenings last year suggests that an increase in gun sales the agency has been tracking for several years was continuing.

Fischer declined to analyze or comment on the jump in firearms purchases, saying the bureau's responsibility was only "to operate and maintain the NICS system."

But Andrew Arulanandam, a spokesman for the National Rifle Association, said he believed the political uncertainty surrounding next year's general election was prompting would-be gun buyers to accelerate purchases.

Arulanandam said the jump in sales since 2006 largely reflected concern that the Democrats swept into office in recent years, including President Barack Obama, would curb the right to bear arms.


BUYING SURGE SINCE 2006

Purchases of handguns and rifles, which had held steady throughout the early part of the decade, began to surge in 2006 and have nearly doubled since then, FBI data showed.

Kentucky, which ranks 26th nationally in terms of population, topped the state rankings for pre-purchase background checks in 2011, the FBI said.

Gun sellers in the Bluegrass State, which has just 4.3 million residents, generated almost 2.3 million instant background checks in 2011 - accounting for roughly one of every seven the FBI processed during the year.

But Fischer said Kentucky's numbers were distorted because the state runs a fresh background check every month on gun owners with state-issued concealed weapons permits.

Texas, which ranks No. 2 in population according to the Census Bureau, ranked No. 2 in the background checks as well, with 1.15 million screening requests in 2011.

Texas was followed by Utah, which accounted for nearly a quarter of the overall increase in checks and sales in 2011.

Utah is an increasingly popular place for gun owners from all over the country to get a concealed-firearms permit because it is cheap, easy to apply for even if buyers do not live in Utah, and recognized in nearly three dozen other states.


'PACKING HEAT'

The FBI data for 2011 was released close to the Jan. 8 anniversary of the shooting rampage in Tucson, Arizona, that killed 6 people and injured 13, including Democratic Representative Gabrielle Giffords.

That incident raised serious questions about the background checks after it emerged that Jared Lee Loughner, the accused shooter, had legally purchased the gun he allegedly used in the attack from a sporting goods store - despite having engaged in bizarre, disruptive behavior well before the shooting.

While the FBI data show the number of background checks have risen, the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence says there has been no progress on legislative efforts to tighten gun control following the Tucson shooting.

Dennis Henigan, the group's acting president, told Reuters the only gun bill that has come for a vote in Congress since Tucson has been the so-called "Packing Heat On Your Street" bill, officially known as "National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act of 2011" (H.R. 822).

That measure, which has passed the House of Representatives but stalled in the Senate, would make it easier for people to carry concealed handguns across state lines.

"Really it is a national disgrace that the only piece of gun-related legislation to come to a vote since Tucson was this legislation that would have enabled dangerous concealed carriers like Jared Loughner to carry their guns across state lines," Henigan said.

But the National Rifle Association says H.R. 822 would only require states to recognize one another's concealed carry permits the same way they recognize one another's driver's licenses, eliminating confusion and potential legal problems for traveling gun owners. (Additional reporting by Tim Gaynor; Editing by Cynthia Johsnton and Peter Bohan)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CRIME

By James Kelleher CHICAGO, Jan 4 (Reuters) - The FBI performed a record number of instant background checks on would-be firearm buyers in 2011 as Americans went on an apparent gun-buy...
By James Kelleher CHICAGO, Jan 4 (Reuters) - The FBI performed a record number of instant background checks on would-be firearm buyers in 2011 as Americans went on an apparent gun-buy...
Filed by Michael McLaughlin  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 421
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montestruc
War is the health of the state--Randolph Bourne
04:06 PM on 01/08/2012
We had a recession with legitimate fear of runaway inflation. Guns and ammo hold value very well. If you keep the gun in good condition a gun will sell for close to or even over the inflation adjusted value of the original price, and the investment required is well within the reach of even relatively poor people in the USA. Also guns can be bought and sold in private sales without reporting it to the IRS, which allows people to avoid and in some cases evade income taxes.

Makes all kinds of sense from a pure economic perspective.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
02:02 AM on 01/09/2012
Faved! And how you word an issue also is often an indicator or your biases or lack of same. For instance I might have re-written the headline to this piece, "Firearm Background Checks Spike In 2011 According To FBI Statistics" this way instead, " Firearms Sales Lead Nation's Economic Recovery According to FBI".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
enlightened45
09:44 AM on 01/09/2012
The gun lobby thanks you for your advice/tips on how to achieve tax evasion, but guns as investments?
photo
OdinsEye
Korean-Latino cop and combat vet
10:58 AM on 01/09/2012
One of my firearms has doubled in price even being in used condition. Another has nearly quadrupled. The others have done pretty well at retaining their original value. There are many fine, unique, and historical firearms than fetch very high numbers at estate sales, auctions, etc. In fact there is even a TV show where a guy out in Colorado basically does this for a living.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montestruc
War is the health of the state--Randolph Bourne
03:25 PM on 01/09/2012
What gun lobby?

Guns manufacturing is a small machine shop type operation. In a black market situation it would be impossible to stop black market manufacture of firearms as the capital cost of equipment would be under ~ $20,000 and would fit in a two car garage. Firearms makers are small fry in terms of lobbing power. The lobby you may be speaking of is people like me who don't like busybodies who do not know what they are speaking about using the government to inflict their small minded prejudices on us.

Tax avoidance (which is legal) and tax evasion (which is not) are facts of life in investment. The difference between them is all too often the opinion of a federal judge, unfortunate because law should be transparent.

As to investment, why not guns? They historically are good at holding value against inflation, and in some cases of appreciating in value.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigWillyG
03:18 PM on 01/08/2012
I'm sure I'll add to this number as soon as I've got the spare cash for the Mosin I've been looking at. Gotta love how everyone uses the market to show how unpopular anti-gun laws are whenever you get anti-gun people in political power.
photo
wolflover3825
Hungry Like the Wolf.
03:44 PM on 01/08/2012
I have a Mosin-Nagant 91/30. Made in 1934. Good shooter, but hits about 8 inches hight at 100 yards. Hard to find empty brass for the 7.62x54R. Could use .303 British bullets to reload. Winchester makes factory ammo for it, resaonably priced at $20 per box.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigWillyG
03:57 PM on 01/08/2012
Nice. Friend of mine has one of those from '42, shoots 3 inches low. He makes ammo for hunting and target shoots with Warpac surplus rounds. Fellows also got a nice WWII Czech made Kar 98K and uses Yugo 8mm Mauser ammo for it that works well despite being made in the '50s.
photo
JimInHouston
Arma virumque cano...
08:52 PM on 01/08/2012
"Hard to find empty brass for the 7.62x54R. "

Why bother to reload. Commie surplus ammo is half the price.
photo
OdinsEye
Korean-Latino cop and combat vet
01:00 PM on 01/08/2012
Why is an article about the legal purchase of firearms listed under "Crime News"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigWillyG
03:19 PM on 01/08/2012
Pretty sure HP doesn't understand legal firearms exist.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:49 PM on 01/08/2012
Obviously because HuffPo believes it is a crime to allow people to legally purchase firearms. Probably a crying shame as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wolverine 556
Moderate Boogeyman
03:51 AM on 01/08/2012
Second Amendment: "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

U.S. Code Title 10, Subtitle A, Part I, Chapter 13, § 311: (a) "The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and ... under 45 years of age" and (b2) "the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia."

U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 8: Congress shall have the power to "provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States..."

Can any anti-gun person explain how a law-abiding citizen of this country is not a part of the militia under US Code Title 10, as well-regulated as made possible under Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, and thus is not entitled to the rights as detailed under the Second Amendment?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ConservativebyNature
I'll cling to my guns and religion, thank you
11:22 AM on 01/08/2012
I would imagine that someone would argue that anyone over 45 would not longer fall into that category.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wolverine 556
Moderate Boogeyman
01:44 PM on 01/08/2012
Thankfully, the SCOTUS has ruled that the Second Amendment represents a broader, personal right. I just saw anti-gun nuts repeatedly saying that the Second Amendment is about the security of the state and does not apply beyond the militia. We can keep arguing with them to say that the Second Amendment is a private right, which they will keep denying, or we can undermine their entire argument by showing that most Americans are still protected under the Second Amendment even using their narrow definition.

Think of it like trying to batter down fortified walls of ignorance. You can either waste your time trying to batter through the walls, or you can just remove the foundation. Most of them will still deny it, but you at least kicked their legs out from underneath them.
photo
OdinsEye
Korean-Latino cop and combat vet
12:57 PM on 01/08/2012
The Second does not say a person must be a member of the militia in order to have the right to arms. Militia participation is not a prerequisite for the right to arms.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wolverine 556
Moderate Boogeyman
01:35 PM on 01/08/2012
I certainly agree with you, but their regurgitated argument is that the Second Amendment no longer applies because it is only for national security and the militia. By definition, the militia still exists and covers most Americans. My point was to undermine their nonsense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wolverine 556
Moderate Boogeyman
05:04 PM on 01/07/2012
Since the 1950s, 30,000-50,000 Americans are killed every year by motor vehicle use. BAN CARS! They are far too dangerous to trust the American people to use. People don't kill people. Cars kill people.

/sarcasm
02:53 AM on 01/08/2012
30,000 Americans are killed by gun use yearly. I'm sure their families wouldn't appreciate your twisted idea of sarcasm. Gun use kills people. Families suffer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wolverine 556
Moderate Boogeyman
03:31 AM on 01/08/2012
30,000+ Americans are killed by car use yearly. 75,000+ Americans are killed by alcohol use yearly. 400,000+ Americans are killed by tobacco use yearly. You could save nearly 17 times more Americans every year by continually repeating those numbers on Huffington Post. I'm sure their families don't appreciate you not copying and pasting for them.

On a serious note, at least half of those 30,000 Americans commit suicide, which is sad, but that also means that they would simply find some other way to do it should you take their guns away. In any given year, less than half of that number are murders, and criminals will not give up their guns simply because you pass some law asking them to do so. So do the math. Suicides will continue happening. Criminals will continue committing violent crime. So in essence, your entire argument is to take legal guns away from tens of millions of law-abiding American citizens to prevent
12:16 PM on 01/07/2012
If you own a gun - Please join the NRA !
12:49 PM on 01/07/2012
DISAGREE, and I'm a pro-gun advocate, academic, lecturer, and campaigner.

While I have taken membership in the NRA a few times in my life, I cannot endorse them broadly. They have chosen the route of partisan hackery and industry interests too often to make them a viable rights protector. ONLY their recent strategic shift in the ILA portion of their organization (and their long term safety/youth/hunting trifecta) renders them even moderately worthy of support.

Instead, find non-partisan groups and legal action committees to support. SCCC, SAF, CCRKB, etc. While there's still underlying partisan tones it's no where near as pronounced and is generally kept out of strategic maneuvering. What's more, the legal actions from these groups have proved far more impacting than those of the NRA in modern times.
photo
Grumpy Man
Disappointed idealist
12:58 PM on 01/07/2012
Having read your posts for about a year now I will take your advice under very serious consideration.

I stayed away from the NRA for a long time because I viewed them as being a bit "over the top." I eventually joined because I believed that, though I didn't always agree with them, they, I thought, were at the forefront of legal actions that make a difference.

Your assertion that "the legal actions from these groups have proved far more impacting than those of the NRA in modern times." has certainly caught my attention.

Thanks for sharing. You may make a convert out of me.
06:40 PM on 01/21/2012
Hi Phoenix182, I've been trying to cover all my bases. I'm a Life member of SAF, CCRKBA, GOA & a few others, including some State organizations. Us members are the NRA, join them, then contact them & express your concerns. They are the 900 lb gorilla that we need to argue for us at the Capital, like them or not , but they do carry the most clout. If you really don't want to support them, then at least go for a Life membership commitment w/the 2A Org of your choice. We the 2A Community need all the help we can get. thank you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RevJimIII
Open Carry Oklahoma!!
12:59 PM on 01/07/2012
There are quite a few pro rights (2A specific) organizations other than the NRA, but if you are a gun owner who is also a big fan of ALL rights, please be engaged in State and Federal issues..  VOTE!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
enlightened45
01:56 PM on 01/07/2012
Come to some of the other topical threads, rev. You might discover how the rest of the world relates to articles based on other interests and concerns besides guns. Do you and your guys ever emerge from that proliferation cave for any other purposes than communal backslapping, firearm minutiae discussion, or crowing about the number of guns that you have in your home arsenal. I'll be looking for you all.
photo
Grumpy Man
Disappointed idealist
11:24 AM on 01/08/2012
I do.

Oh wait... the last time I said that...

;o)
photo
wolflover3825
Hungry Like the Wolf.
07:21 AM on 01/07/2012
What part of criminals don't obey the law doesn't Hennigan understand? Whether HR 822 passes or not, the criminal will still carry across state lines. Does he really think that a law is going to stop them from committing a crime? If that is the case why are they called CRIMINALS then? For OBEYING the law?
photo
cheechazteca
Thank you very much!
11:03 PM on 01/07/2012
That is so true! Criminals don't care what law there is out there. Therefore the name "criminal"
photo
wolflover3825
Hungry Like the Wolf.
07:36 AM on 01/08/2012
I don't know what it is, but the gun banning people really do think that if they can enact enough laws the criminals will be scared straight and start obeying the laws and turn in their guns.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
thorrsman
Why should I define myself by quoting others?
07:29 PM on 01/06/2012
Funny that all those gun purchases didn't mean a sky-rocketing crime rate. Rather the opposite, actually.

Guess the hysterics of the Brady Bunch are wrong once again.

I suppose they must be well used to that by now.
07:42 PM on 01/06/2012
Gun use killings have nor gone down. 30,000 Americans lose their lives to gun use yearly. The NRA promotes gun proliferation which endangers us all.
photo
OdinsEye
Korean-Latino cop and combat vet
08:05 PM on 01/06/2012
You need to double check you stats, ST.
photo
wolflover3825
Hungry Like the Wolf.
07:32 AM on 01/07/2012
Cut and paste kids strikes agian.

Booorrrrrinnngggggggggggg.
InYourWorld
Progressive, educated, redneck but fan of no party
06:55 PM on 01/06/2012
And yet gun crimes decline..........
photo
wolflover3825
Hungry Like the Wolf.
07:34 AM on 01/07/2012
Ssshhhhh! That's their little secret. They don't want the public to know that.
photo
OdinsEye
Korean-Latino cop and combat vet
05:05 PM on 01/06/2012
""Really it is a national disgrace that the only piece of gun-related legislation to come to a vote since Tucson was this legislation that would have enabled dangerous concealed carriers like Jared Loughner to carry their guns across state lines," Henigan said."

Again with this?

1) Lougner would not have been covered under this proposed law.

2) Giffords herself co-sponsored a previous bill just like this one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
My comments are funnier than yours.
06:50 PM on 01/06/2012
The reason why the Brady Campaign is taking such an interest in undermining a right supported by Giffords in supposed support of her is that she's going to make a full recovery, while Jim Brady didn't. Authoritarianism goes hand-in-hand with vindictiveness, envy, and mean-spiritedness.
07:43 PM on 01/06/2012
The 30,000 Americans killed by gun use last year don't have a voice to be vindictive.
photo
stymie500r
Live Free or Die
02:35 PM on 01/06/2012
"Really it is a national disgrace that the only piece of gun-related legislation to come to a vote since Tucson was this legislation that would have enabled dangerous concealed carriers like Jared Loughner to carry their guns across state lines," Henigan said.

Hey Henigan, the ONLY disgrace here is not the National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act of 2011 (H.R. 822) which allows legal purchasers who are trained to carry and law abiding to be able NOT TO DISARM when crossing a state line, but the lies and outright hanus treatment of CCW holders by the anti-gunner groups like the "Brady Campain" and "Mayors against Guns" which inevitably caused the situation in New York last week (woman tourist at ground zero checks concealed weapon to guard in response to sign posting, and is arrested only to face 3 year felony for mandetory gun violation) along with the outright lies told to the public by said groups is the REAL disgrace here. Wise up and leave my right to defend myself alone you putz.
07:45 PM on 01/06/2012
If we don't pass this law how are gun use serial killers gonna be able to traverse the country killing people?
photo
OdinsEye
Korean-Latino cop and combat vet
08:06 PM on 01/06/2012
You really think that state firearm laws stop serial killers? LOL! You are hilarious.
photo
stymie500r
Live Free or Die
02:20 AM on 01/07/2012
The same way serial killers do now since laws mean nothing to criminals. And if you are thinking of reciting anti- gunner talking points to me forget it since legal handgun ownership stops crimes, below is a link to the proof if you dare read it.

http://www.pulpless.com/gunclock/noframedex.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
01:20 PM on 01/06/2012
I wonder if Eric Holder had his ATF agents do "background checks" on the Mexican drug cartels he sold 1,700 assault weapons to?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Steaphens
It's all about liberty.
03:39 AM on 01/06/2012
WOOT!I'm betting the anti-gun nuts are getting thier unwashed thongs in a bunch over this.I have almost two dozen weapons,and plan on adding more.Might even buy that Uzi I've been looking at.Hey,credit card company just upped my limit!
07:46 PM on 01/06/2012
We don't care about your gun fetish, gun hoarding problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Steaphens
It's all about liberty.
01:09 AM on 01/07/2012
Good.Then stop your un-American calls to disarm us.Oh,and since I have those,it doesn't appear to be a "hoarding problem".I fill out the form,pass the check,lay my money down,walk out with the purchase-no problem!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Carson
05:07 PM on 01/07/2012
ST--we all know that owning ONE firearm indicates fetishism and hoarding in your world
photo
wolflover3825
Hungry Like the Wolf.
07:52 AM on 01/07/2012
Only 24? You're lagging.
photo
Old Jarhead
often tested, always faithful, brothers forever
12:44 PM on 01/07/2012
It's a nice start.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Steaphens
It's all about liberty.
09:37 PM on 01/07/2012
Financial restraints.I also have a custom 1969 Chevy,a 1964 Chevy to restore,customizing a 1995 Honda Del Sol,a 1966 VW Beetle,and wanting to add a turbo to my Miata.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shankapotomus
09:25 PM on 01/05/2012
I bet the libs don't know why.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
My comments are funnier than yours.
03:33 PM on 01/06/2012
This one does. In fact, as soon as I finish college, I'm buying a Kel-Tec Sub-2000 and a Remington 870.

Naturally, as the universe seems to view me as an object for practical jokes, the Navy's going to send me to California.

And yes, I am a liberal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
03:52 PM on 01/06/2012
I recommend the Glock magazine version of the Sub-2000 in either 9mm or .40 S&W, your choice. Mags are easy to come by and highly reliable. And if legal in your state high-caps are available too.
http://www.thektog.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=85
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shankapotomus
04:35 PM on 01/06/2012
Good for you.