iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama NLRB Recess Appointments Thrill Labor, Infuriate Business

Obama Labor

First Posted: 01/04/12 04:03 PM ET Updated: 01/05/12 09:56 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Doubling down on President Barack Obama's bold recess appointment of Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the White House announced Wednesday that Obama would also use his recess powers to fill three vacancies on the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the federal agency charged with enforcing labor law.

The move is sure to further infuriate Republicans, many of whom feuded all last year with an NLRB they view as overly union-friendly and anti-business.

The labor board lost its quorum yesterday as the term of board member Craig Becker came to an end -- essentially crippling the agency, no doubt to the pleasure of many conservatives. Although the recess appointments will probably be challenged legally by business groups, the move could allow the board to continue operating without disruption. According to the White House, Obama plans to appoint union lawyer Richard Griffin, current Labor Department official Sharon Block, and NLRB counsel Terence Flynn.

Labor groups who had applauded the NLRB for many of its recent decisions quickly hailed Obama for the appointments. In a statement, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka commended Obama for "exercising his constitutional authority to ensure that crucially important agencies protecting workers and consumers are not shut down by Republican obstructionism."

Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis similarly applauded Obama for making the NLRB appointments and said that had he not done so, Republicans would have continued blocking the nominees to the detriment of the economy.

"We can't afford to not move on very important issues that affect working class people, and particularly working Americans that are struggling right now," Solis said during a Wednesday conference call with reporters. "We need to know there's a sense of security and ... that we honor the ability to collectively bargain."

Solis also singled out one of the appointees, saying she wanted to give "a shout-out to Sharon Block," a former Labor Department employee. "I know that she will bring a fair and balanced approach to all of her deliberations."

Generally a quiet, relatively little-known agency, the NLRB drew fury from conservatives throughout 2011. From a controversial complaint filed against the Boeing Company to new rules pertaining to union elections, the board issued a string of decisions and rules that conservatives said tilted the playing field toward unions and away from business owners. While Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and some of his colleagues went so far as to threaten to defund the board, labor groups and worker advocates hailed its actions as commonsense and beneficial to the middle class.

In a statement explaining his decision, the president said that "the American people deserve to have qualified public servants fighting for them every day - whether it is to enforce new consumer protections or uphold the rights of working Americans. We can't wait to act to strengthen the economy and restore security for our middle class and those trying to get in it."

Republicans' spat with the labor board started in April, when the board's general counsel filed its complaint against the Boeing Company. The complaint accused Boeing of breaking labor law when it tried to establish a production line for its 787 Dreamliner in South Carolina. The move was retaliation against Boeing's unionized workers in Washington State for having gone on strike in the past, according to the complaint. Although the case has since been settled, it temporarily put Boeing's plans in South Carolina on hold. Republicans and business groups accused the labor board and Obama of meddling in corporate decision-making and possibly costing South Carolina jobs.

To the disappointment of groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the labor board has also issued new rules that will speed up union election procedures -- leading to what some conservatives denounce as "quickie elections" -- and also make it easier for workers to determine their own collective-bargaining groups. Such actions have led conservative lawmakers like Graham to accuse the board of catering to the labor movement.

Business groups have even pounced on recent NLRB actions that appear non-controversial. For instance, the board has put forth a rule that would require employers to hang posters in the workplace informing workers of their collective-bargaining rights, much like the Department of Labor placards already found in American workplaces. Business groups have sued to stop the new NLRB rule.

The recess appointments will bring renewed attention to the labor board among conservatives in the coming days and weeks. In a tweet he sent out shortly after the White House announcement, Graham asked, "Mr. President, hasn't the NLRB already done enough damage?"

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said that in addition to raising legal questions, Obama's NLRB appointments are "particularly egregious" because the president didn't even nominate Block and Griffin until two days before lawmakers left town for the holidays in December.

That means "neither has undergone a single confirmation hearing or a single day of debate," McConnell said in a tersely worded statement. "What the President did today sets a terrible precedent that could allow any future President to completely cut the Senate out of the confirmation process, appointing his nominees immediately after sending their names up to Congress. This was surely not what the framers had in mind when they required the President to seek the advice and consent of the Senate in making appointments."

The president's appointments are likely to provoke similar reactions from other Republicans. As recently as Dec. 19, all 47 GOP senators warned him against making any NLRB recess appointments to allow time for "a full and thorough review of their qualifications through regular order in the Senate." As for Cordray, nearly all Senate Republicans signed onto a letter in May vowing to block him, or any other CFPB nominee, until key changes are made at the agency.

But while Obama's latest move may seem unusually aggressive, particularly given his reputation for pleading with Congress for bipartisanship, it reflects a theme that administration officials say will continue to surface in the months ahead of the 2012 election: the president leaning on his executive power -- and not relying on Congress -- to try to boost the economy.

A senior administration official, who declined to be named or quoted, told reporters this week that while the president will continue to press Congress to pass pieces of his jobs agenda and other bills aimed at strengthening the economy in the coming months, that will not be his sole focus. Instead, he will pay increasing attention to actions he can take on his own.

This article was updated to include comments from Labor Secretary Hilda Solis.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Doubling down on President Barack Obama's bold recess appointment of Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the White House announced Wednesday that Obama woul...
WASHINGTON -- Doubling down on President Barack Obama's bold recess appointment of Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the White House announced Wednesday that Obama woul...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18,039
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (252 total)
  1 of 8  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Turukano 10:24 PM on 01/04/2012
Recess appointments have been challenged in court before, but courts have generally given broad power to presidents on the issue. In 2004, when the Senate was on an 11-day recess, Bush named William Pryor, a former Alabama attorney general, to serve on a federal appeals court. The move infuriated Democrats, and the late Sen. Ted Kennedy sought to take the matter to court since it happened within the 10-day  Read More...
06:34 PM on 01/28/2013
NO other President in our nation's history has done more to divide this country. No Predident has had more law-suits filed against his policies than Obama. Even the Catholic Church has filed against him!!! More than 25 states have said they will NOT implement Obama-care; instead, they say, "if you want it here, YOU implement it." No President has so blatantly supported big Labor in spite of popular choices to the contrary!! He has PROVEN to NOT be the Great Unitor but rather the Great Dividor!!!
09:37 AM on 10/10/2012
Does anyone care..that our case (225) CNN workers who lost our jobs because of a "union Bust " move by Cnn in 2003 are still waiting justice?? The labor board has been rendered powerless to move foward.....We won our case but have been waiting for Final implamentation by the NLRB and its been 9 years !!! we have reached out to President Obama to help us...and nothing so far...This case is over 300 million dollars so far,and yet we still have no end in sight.....HELP US PLEASE
Mr President..........
08:11 PM on 01/09/2012
I am hoping this helps my husband. He has been on strike from GATX (Liberty Steamship) for over 2 years. They hired scabs and are paying them more than what they were paying the union workers. My husband, and his union brothers, agreed to the contract put out from Liberty Steamship only to be told that that contract was no longer being offered. How is that possible?!?!? They are the ones that submitted it to the union! Please, give us a break here!
06:36 PM on 01/28/2013
Madam, I fear your husband is being less than truthful about the wages those "scabs" are being paid.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
01:26 PM on 01/08/2012
Mollysmama: Your explanation sounds like Maddow ! First of all democrats were onboard in the beginning of Iraq. You are still harping on Bush, when all is said and done! GET OVER IT! If I had your attitude, I would be yelling at Nixon for sending my friends to Vietnam! War isn't cheap, or fair. That's life. Have you ever studied Ancient History or American History? You give too much credit to BO of OBL. First of all, I would like to know why he was dumped at sea? Just asking. BO would not have been able to make this call if Bush's people and others hadn't laid the ground work for the connections that altimately afforded them success.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Social Construct
Go left, young man.
03:19 AM on 01/09/2012
"Gett over it," while, perhaps, generally good advice on some personal levels, isn't all that great on a societal level. Yet, if one were to follow your advice then, following that logic, one would expect the person giving that advice to follow suit; i.e., heed the political history of, say, the US. Perhaps you could get over the fact that US administrations use political maneuverings folks on the opposing side find distasteful. Or, do not take that advice and work towards reigning in the machinations of our elected representatives. It might seem an uphill, never-ending battle, but I'll take latter, as it goes with that whole "consent of the governed" thingy.
photo
Pubdestroyer
Just your average comedic intellectual who is curr
05:48 PM on 03/11/2012
That comment went through one ear, a vacuum chamber and out the other ear. My comment, however, MAY be something he understands . . . but I'm not counting on it.
photo
Pubdestroyer
Just your average comedic intellectual who is curr
05:38 PM on 03/11/2012
So, Bush laid the groundwork for the killing of Bin Laden but has absolutely no reponsibiltiy for the current economy.
You really don't mean that, do you?
08:22 PM on 01/07/2012
Move over Jimmy Carter, there's a new president that just took your record.
08:12 PM on 01/07/2012
Trying to rationalize how you on the left can support Czars and other unconstitutional appointments, even to the point of giving powers that can clearly infringe on our civil rights. You cried like babies when Bush did things half as bad as this. You are truly blinded by your extreme bias. The tea party is bad, union bullies are good, God in our schools and courts are bad,partial birth abortion is good, invade Iraq is bad, invade Libya is good, ......as long as its done by Obama its all good?. Truly sick and twisted logic. Insert replies here like ...how about when the right did something wrong? Thats all you can find to justify this pathetic president.
photo
Pubdestroyer
Just your average comedic intellectual who is curr
05:39 PM on 03/11/2012
And there is no sick, twisted logic, no hypocrisy, no pathological lying, no greed mongering in your party.
Got it!
11:04 PM on 03/11/2012
Thanks for making my point..........Perfectly done I might add
photo
Pubdestroyer
Just your average comedic intellectual who is curr
05:49 PM on 03/11/2012
Still waiting for you to comment on my comment. You still around?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
07:25 PM on 01/07/2012
Hello to mollysmama: You missed some history, government, and civics classes dear.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BeIntelligent
Restore Glass-Steagall!
04:28 PM on 01/07/2012
Republicans have been playing hardball for a while. As soon as Obama does it, they start crying. "Whaaa, no faaaaaiiiiiirrrr!" Right on, Barack.
01:10 PM on 01/07/2012
Fury from the GOP? Is that a serious concern?

Really now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vidian6
Consultant with hard advice
07:41 AM on 01/07/2012
It's about time that the needs of the people were primary in a decision
photo
lemealone
It will take more than condiments to foil my brill
09:37 AM on 01/13/2012
This is about needs of union donations
photo
Pubdestroyer
Just your average comedic intellectual who is curr
05:40 PM on 03/11/2012
Are you critical of Wall Street's needs? You do know that the boys up there get tens of billions of dollars in corporate welfare each year, don't you? If not, why don't you?
sjaent2001
Change gets Challenged, changer gets Cross/poison
01:53 AM on 01/07/2012
The spirit of change has to keep its tempo ---- whatever the Congress do fight, veto, favor oil lines, go on recess, it is the Congress who does not believe in any change ---- so why wait for the sleeping. fundraising and recessing elephants ----- somebody has to be on the JOB and get things done so America MOVE in the right direction in 2012 after nothing accomplished houses in 2009, 2010, and 2011 ---- by GOPIERS ---- can someone tell them Wake up and CHANGE for God's Sake for US.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CynAnne
Laureates in Fact and Reality
12:27 AM on 01/07/2012
Since our wingnutter­­­­y keeps squawking, like dull-witte­­­­d Mynah birds, "What has President Obama done for America?", they can start reading here (slowly, if need be): http://obamaachievements.org/list
11:59 AM on 01/07/2012
Thank you for this link!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
07:14 PM on 01/07/2012
Soros gives the information so therefore not true.
photo
Pubdestroyer
Just your average comedic intellectual who is curr
05:42 PM on 03/11/2012
Do you know how pathetic you sound? Well, at least your snark has a sentence we can all understand, as opposed to the rest of the Pubs N' Baggers who's snark is indecipherable.
Congratulations!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrhandyman3105
Independent Voter
08:25 PM on 01/06/2012
Three cheers for Obama!!!

Hip, hip, hooray!!.....Hip, hip, hooray!!!......Hip, hip, hooray!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
07:42 AM on 01/07/2012
Why are you cheering? All of you are like kids. Every single website CynAnne quotes is a Soros connection. How biased could that be? The important issue is BO's sole agenda to make himself king.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrhandyman3105
Independent Voter
01:56 PM on 01/07/2012
I know it must be extremely disconcerting and unsettling to know that despite all the GOP obstructionist efforts to make Obama look bad and "appear" to be failing are not bearing any fruit, but instead causing the GOP to appear to the American public as the "bad guys" that they truly are. That the "majority" of the public supports Obama and not any of the GOP idiots.
But you too can turn from the dark side, if you really try. Just confess your sins, accept the truth and you will be forgiven.
photo
mollysmomma
God Bless Obama
01:59 PM on 01/07/2012
the things listed are true.....you all are just jealous that President Obama is not as foolish as his predecessor.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
07:23 PM on 01/07/2012
What truth has BO ever told? Tell me.The only reason he is being so attentive is: he is a narcissist, and 2. he wants to continue this easy job: golfing, agitating, lying, basketball, pizza, Hawaii, ices, Martha's Vineyard, shopping with a camera crew and a dog. Loves that he is following Cloward and Piven's Plan to kill our economy. Lies, Lies , Lies.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jstafrnd03
03:42 PM on 01/06/2012
WHY WOULD THE HP KEEP BLOCKING THIS???? just ask your self one question. Are you better off today than you were 3 years ago? Is your neighbor better off than he or she was 3 years ago???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tlee47ftw
05:17 PM on 01/06/2012
Yes, absolutely we are. We are out of one Bush war and getting out of the other. We have quit making our gay and lesbian military who are putting their lives on the line for us hide who they are. We have taken the cap off of health insurance, required pre-existing conditions to be covered in case you lose your job and have to get another company, allowed your children up to 26 to be covered by the parents so if they are in college or just getting started they can have insurance. Covered 31 million more Americans with insurance and extended Medicare solvency by 12 years. We are making progress in getting out of the Bush recession.
You bet we are better off than 3 years ago.
photo
mollysmomma
God Bless Obama
02:02 PM on 01/07/2012
Exactly........... tlee47ftw.....f & f.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
therealone
America won, baggers lost
06:11 PM on 01/06/2012
Yep, and yep. Especially since he's not fighting Bankrupt Bush's war in Iraq anymore, and I'm not paying for it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
06:45 PM on 01/06/2012
You have Bush derangement syndrome. Get help. I didn't like Bush. Watch the news and see the people being killed there now. The troublemakers want the Shites and Sunis to have a civil war. Oh, the czar thing. That many for Bush in 8 years. BO more thatn 40 in 3. BO has added 5 trillion in 3 years to our debt. Go onto USDEBTCLOCK.org. see how much YOU owe.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
07:13 PM on 01/07/2012
No we are paying instead for Solyndra, Fast and Furious, Unions, Unions, and illegals. I think that will be even soon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rotinfx16
01:53 PM on 01/06/2012
Any person still supporting this President is either a socialist or a fool. He has no love of country or respect for our heritage. Carter will retain his place as most inept, but this guy has sewed up most devious, for all time.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Dick Stone
My Andalusian works hard and loves his job
03:44 PM on 01/06/2012
I agree, but he will also take the prize for not only the worst President, but also the worst thing to ever happen to this country. He has already done more damage to our long term sustainability, and peaceful society than has ever been done before. This country including the ones that will vote for him again can not survive another four years of this President, because with four more years of him America will only be a remnant of being the great country she once was.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tlee47ftw
05:19 PM on 01/06/2012
You think we will be better off with any of the clowns on the Republican primaries? ROFLMAO
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
luvobama
Hospice volunteer...
07:57 PM on 01/06/2012
Oh brother.  Lookie here!!  The drama club has shown up.  This is exactly why no one likes you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tlee47ftw
05:18 PM on 01/06/2012
Tell us what a socialist is and what the president has done that is socialist.
And it is pathetic to say he has no love of the country. As to respect for our heritage, are talking about slavery? segregation? civil war? denying women's rights? denying homosexuals equal rights? Starting unnecessary wars? Which heritage is it you speak of?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
08:39 PM on 01/06/2012
Anyone who says he is sorry to our enemies doesn't represent America. He was the one with the mea culpas. Did it help America? Europe's leaders are laughing at us. All of your questions apply to life in a growing country. There are wars of neccesity and those of choice. I remember when the moonbats were onboard with Iraq. I was against the war in Vietnam because that was of choice. WWI and II were necessity. Women got their rights, Slavery? What do you call welfare? That is slavery and being paid to stay poor. Educate them to get jobs. Wtih Obama blacks 16% unemployment.
You don't like it-----MOVE to Cuba or MEXICO>
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rotinfx16
06:05 PM on 01/07/2012
Ignorance is bliss, so I hear. Have a blissful life.