iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

BP, ConocoPhillips, Exxon In Talks Over Alaska Gas Export Plan

Alaska Oil

First Posted: 01/05/12 07:33 PM ET Updated: 01/06/12 09:17 AM ET


(Adds background on overland pipeline plans)

By Yereth Rosen

ANCHORAGE, Alaska, Jan 5 (Reuters) - The chief executives of BP and ConocoPhillips, two of Alaska's three major oil producers, said on Thursday that the only profitable way to exploit a vast but stranded quantity of Alaska's North Slope natural gas is to export it to Asian Pacific markets.

In a dramatic change from decades-old plans to send North Slope natural gas to domestic U.S. markets by overland pipeline through Canada, the BP and ConocoPhillips CEOs said they will work with Exxon Mobil, the third major North Slope oil producer, to develop an LNG project that would export to Asia.

North American producers and LNG shippers are scrambling to develop export plans after a sudden surge in domestic natural gas production, thanks to shale gas, that swamped the market and pushed gas prices way below global levels.

BP CEO Bob Dudley and ConocoPhillips CEO Jim Mulva made the comments to reporters after an unprecedented meeting in Anchorage of the chief executives of all three major North Slope oil producers.

Exxon, whose CEO Rex Tillerson also attended the meeting, said the parties are in early discussions on an export plan, but added that the pipeline plan through Canada is still under consideration.

Once expected to be a major importer, the United States now has up to a century's worth of supply, prompting plans to ship the cheap fuel to thirsty markets in Europe and Asia where prices are up to five times higher.

Five projects across the United States and two in western Canada have applied for construction and export licenses, seeking long-term deals predominantly with buyers in Asia

However, critics say that exporting gas may drive prices higher at home and discourage use of a homegrown resource.

TransCanada Corp and partner Exxon Mobil have been unable to win customers for the 1,700-mile (2,735 km) natural gas pipeline they proposed building from Alaska's North Slope to Alberta, at a cost of up to $41 billion.

BP and ConocoPhillips in May abandoned a rival natural-gas proposal for a similar route and similar delivery volumes after they also failed to attract shipping commitments.

TransCanada has also floated the concept of a line to the port of Valdez, which would move 3 billion cubic feet of gas a day and cost up to $26 billion. (Writing by Bill Rigby, additional reporting by Edward McAllister in New York; Editing by Steve Orlofsky and Bob Burgdorfer)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
(Adds quotes, details) By Yereth Rosen ANCHORAGE (Reuters) - The chief executives of BP and ConocoPhillips, two of Alaska's three major oil producers, said on Thursday ...
(Adds quotes, details) By Yereth Rosen ANCHORAGE (Reuters) - The chief executives of BP and ConocoPhillips, two of Alaska's three major oil producers, said on Thursday ...
Filed by Reuters  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 126
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrammaTina
03:58 PM on 01/06/2012
Here's an interesting piece of this pie. These companies met with the Governor of Alaska (Sean Parnell, ShariaPalin's lapdog) and NO members of the public, NO members of the press were allowed to speak with the fuel company representatives.

Methinks that Mr. (leaves a bad taste in this Alaskan's mouth) Parnell is doing shifty business.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
03:47 PM on 01/06/2012
Maybe we should Nationalize our Petroleum industry? Why let them take the gas and sell it off for pennies on the dollar?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danceswithtrees
10:20 AM on 01/07/2012
Please move to Venezuela or Cuba. You would be quite happy there. This is America where private ownership is revered.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
09:34 AM on 01/09/2012
Its funny that you would mention private ownership when you talk about Multinational corporations.

And for whatever you want to say about Chavez, he has lowered the price his citizens pay for oil by kicking the blood sucking oil companies out.

And please remind me how much these oil companies pay our country to extract the oil that is the property of the US citizens only to sell it to the highest bidder on the world markets?
Realist2011
beware false profits....
01:17 PM on 01/06/2012
Time to start levying a hefty tax on every bit of these resources that we're exporting. Those resources belong to the citizens of this country, not a few greedy energy criminals. 75% royalties to Washington for every gallon/barrel/cubic ft of energy that comes out of OUR grounds.

Please don't tell me it will just raise our cost. You haven't seen our costs go down yet, have you? Those "world market prices" can work both ways.
02:14 PM on 01/06/2012
I don't want to provide royalty monies to Washington. All the politicians do is squander what we give them now. Besides, who do you think gains from royalties(?), no one. Alaskans get a Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD) yearly, all the while paying four times for their local gas and home heating oil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrammaTina
04:00 PM on 01/06/2012
That PFD doesn't even cover one months expenses for living in Alaska. It's the state governments bribe for the citizens to turn their backs while they r.ape the countryside.
12:48 PM on 01/06/2012
Open and free market: as long as you treehuggers keep buying gas to fill your 18mpg SUVs, they'll never develop the car that runs on water.
02:15 PM on 01/06/2012
I thought all the treehuggers drove Subaru's?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snowmanjny
Real Americans believe in an educated opinion.
12:42 PM on 01/06/2012
We don't want it. We need to get to where we don't need it. No Fracking way. By not bidding on that energy some would say we lost an advantage. I disagree. By not taking it we are walking a path to getting away from the dirtiest energy resource available.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
George Cummings
Warning: Moderate. Future posts unpredictable
12:04 PM on 01/06/2012
Drill all you want. Frack all you want. It won't be American oil and gas it'll be a multinational corps oil and gas and it will not benefit us one bit more than that which is produced in the mideast, russia, south america or canada.
We WILL get a handful of jobs and a whole lot of mess though.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrammaTina
04:02 PM on 01/06/2012
Exactly. Take a look at who owns BP, Philips, etc .... it's sure as he.ll ain't us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danceswithtrees
11:56 AM on 01/06/2012
So at least we can see "peak oil" is a lie.
02:15 PM on 01/06/2012
Some of "us" never believed that lie to begin with.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olitenup
11:51 AM on 01/06/2012
Isn't this special. Because they haven't done enough toxic damage to the world, they want to trash the North Slope.
02:18 PM on 01/06/2012
What would you know about the north slope? I doubt you ever visited Alaska. I you did, you would know that even septic waste is returned from Prudhoe Bay.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrammaTina
04:04 PM on 01/06/2012
I know all about the north slope. Been a resident since 1968. I agree with tolitenup.
11:51 AM on 01/06/2012
Publicly owned resource - Private company profits - no benefit to US taxpayers/citizens
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ruthless1
Enough TEA already!
12:57 PM on 01/06/2012
Low cost energy?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doctorkosan
PhD Chem E, HBS
01:25 PM on 01/06/2012
To Asia.
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
11:49 AM on 01/06/2012
reading the posts, one should really know the difference between oil and natural gas.
we have more natural gas produced here than we use, we will be a natural gas exporting country for a while....
if you want to help to use it, ford and gm will have natural gas vehicles this year.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jkipp
The Real Moderate America
11:53 AM on 01/06/2012
we seem to be very lacking in Natural gas stations.......
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
11:57 AM on 01/06/2012
you can put one at your house....kind of like a plug in car.
11:54 AM on 01/06/2012
Who cares about NG vehicles. In a few years after the Texas Tea boys export all the excess they be jamming us on NG price. The real key is self produced energy - geothermal for the home, solar/wind to charge the car and heat the hot water. Think clean and free folks. Think about an export tax on oil and gas to pay down the federal deficit.
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
11:58 AM on 01/06/2012
pretty good plan for the future.....maybe it will happen before the next 50 years, maybe it wont....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danceswithtrees
11:58 AM on 01/06/2012
I have geothermal and it is not a big saver. The energy uses you propose are small. We need oil and NG. Let's use OUR resources and get off middle east oil.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ohio Republican
Reg Repub because we need a 2 party system
11:49 AM on 01/06/2012
Funny how all that patriotic energy independence speak goes out the window when there's a buck to be made. IF energy independence were so important, then any US resources would carry a HUGE export tax or be kept in the ground until needed.
11:55 AM on 01/06/2012
Right on Ohio !!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
powercosmic
The Anti-Christ
11:48 AM on 01/06/2012
Beware the predictions and methods of the Oil and Gas lobby. There is no legal requirement for them to tell the truth about things they say regarding "estimates" or anything related to outlook, so they are always wanting to inflate (gas, heh) their position of course. Statements like this are meant to divert investment away from alternatives, doing this is something that the Oil and Gas Lobby are very good at.

Now, to say that there is "a century worth of supply" is NONSENSE, because there is not, most gas fields have actually petered out long before they were supposed to. Also keep in mind that LNG is not equivalent to Oil, LNG is great for use as a fuel or for use in fertilizers but it lacks the other heavier molecules that make Oil by products so useful.
02:23 PM on 01/06/2012
Actually, the main reason the oil companies didn't want to market is that they were getting "more" use by re-injecting in the north slope oil wells. It has nevere been about bringing this gas to market.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OLJW00
right is right
11:39 AM on 01/06/2012
Jobs and Energy, Jobs and Energy, Jobs and Energy, Jobs and Energy, Jobs and Energy, Jobs and Energy,Jobs and Energy, Jobs and Energy, Jobs and Energy, Jobs and Energy, Jobs and Energy, Jobs and Energy, Jobs and Energy, Jobs and Energy, Jobs and Energy, Jobs and Energy, etc....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
June25
11:37 AM on 01/06/2012
If every one just turned the temp.down to 56 degrees and wore thick sweaters at home we could save lots of energy.Na lets just blame the evil corporations.
photo
Ed Baker
All Hail Big Mother
11:30 AM on 01/06/2012
This is the best reason yet to keep it closed to them. This is exactly what would happen to the oil in ANWAR. Their lobby will sell it as a way to reduce our energy imports - but it will never see the US market.

Resources produced on public lands should remain in the USA.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wulfire
Don't tread on me, either.
11:41 AM on 01/06/2012
Agreed, this should include timber as well.
Does anyone realize that Alaska is a major exporter of coal?
Our natural resources are just that; OUR natural resources. They shouldn't belong to a petroleum cartel, or wood and pulp multi-nationals.
Do a little research and see how the Alaska pipeline project and north slope drilling was sold to the people. That oil and gas was never supposed to leave the country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danceswithtrees
11:48 AM on 01/06/2012
Then you both are in favor of pipelines and more refining in America right?
photo
Ed Baker
All Hail Big Mother
12:10 PM on 01/06/2012
We sent raw materials to Asia and then send back finished goods - that's a fool's game.
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
11:47 AM on 01/06/2012
there is more natural gas being produced on land in america than we need...we will be exporting natural gas very soon....
mmr is on a mult tcf find in the gulf as are others and the shales are producing more gas than we need....
photo
Ed Baker
All Hail Big Mother
12:18 PM on 01/06/2012
Keep it until we need it. It won't spoil.