More

In Vitro Meat: Will 'Frankenfood' Save The Planet Or Just Gross Out Consumers? (VIDEO)

First Posted: 01/05/12 08:45 AM ET Updated: 01/05/12 02:42 PM ET

Hi everybody! Cara Santa Maria here.

Would you eat a hamburger grown in a petri dish? How would you feel if your breakfast sausage came from the lab? Well, scientists are getting close to making this a reality. It's called in vitro meat, and Dutch biologist Mark Post is pretty confident that he can put a lab-grown hamburger on your plate by the end of the year.

The stakes are high. Right now, 40 billion animals are killed per year in the US alone. One million chickens are killed per hour. Over one-fourth of the total land surface of the earth is used for livestock grazing (or non-grazing, like in factory farms). Global meat production accounts for 18 percent of greenhouse gasses. That's more than every car, bus, train, and airplane produces combined. And its not like conventional meat production is even efficient. To make 15 grams of edible meat, we have to feed that animal 100 grams of vegetable protein. Is that sustainable with a growing world population? You do the math.

We know how to make the meat. All it takes is a biopsy of muscle cells from a living cow, chicken...whatever...called myoblasts. The cells are then grown in a nutrient-rich culture medium that delivers them all the goods that they would get in vivo--that is, if they were still inside the animal. But that's not all. They also have to grow on an edible scaffolding which would allow them to organize into 3-D muscle fibers that can stretch and bend. Essentially, they need to be able to exercise like traditional muscle, because of course, that's what meat is.

Lots of labs are working on this, and the miniscule meat bits that they have been able to produce so far are kind of grey and flavorless. But that's what happens when you grow a thin sheet of muscle cells all by themselves. The holy grail of in vitro meat will be to make a product that simulates the complexity of muscle in a living animal. Truth is, that's probably not in the cards just yet. The first available in vitro meat will likely be a combination of muscle fibers, fat cells (for flavor) and blood vessels (for color and iron). They'll be grown separately and then mixed together. But I honestly don't see that being a problem. As Americans, we're kind of okay with the chicken nugget and hot dog culture we've grown to know and love.

Growing in vitro meat would use up to 60 percent less energy, emit up to 95 percent less greenhouse gas, and use 98 percent less land than conventionally grown meat. The meat would be cleaner (no more pesky E. coli or Salmonella), grown without the use of hormones or antibiotics, and we could even engineer it to be high in healthy omegas or other nutrients. What's more, we could eat weird stuff, like zebra meat or hammerhead shark, since animals don't have to die...they only have to donate a few cells. One day, we may even be able to make tyrannosaurus burgers. I mean, that's really cool.

What do you think? I hope you'll join the conversation. You can hit me up on Twitter, Facebook, or leave your comments right here on the Huffington Post. Come on, Talk Nerdy to Me!

See all Talk Nerdy to Me posts: www.huffingtonpost.com/news/talk-nerdy-to-me
Like Cara Santa Maria on Facebook: www.facebook.com/pages/Cara-Santa-Maria
Follow Cara Santa Maria on Twitter: www.twitter.com/CaraSantaMaria

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SCIENCE

Hi everybody! Cara Santa Maria here. Would you eat a hamburger grown in a petri dish? How would you feel if your breakfast sausage came from the lab? Well, scientists are getting close to making t...
Hi everybody! Cara Santa Maria here. Would you eat a hamburger grown in a petri dish? How would you feel if your breakfast sausage came from the lab? Well, scientists are getting close to making t...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 661
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (26 total)
03:31 PM on 02/29/2012
Sounds promising, however there is missing information before I'm convinced that energy & water will be saved and we will produce less CO2 ommissions: Where do the nutrients for this production come from? How and where are they manufactured and how are they transported to the petri dish? How is the subsequent protien material turned into consumer items? How are these products transported to market?
02:43 AM on 01/29/2012
I am a vegetarian and would love in vitro meat. but only from normal animals like pigs, cows and chickens. No growing human dog,cat, horse ect.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gregory57
Micro-bio, was one of my favorite classes.
02:07 PM on 01/26/2012
Do you really need the Lisa Loeb impersonator in these videos?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DangerousTalk
National Atheist Examiner - http://exm.nr/j1EA0c
09:40 AM on 01/26/2012
The two factors I would want to know about would be taste and cost. But all things being equal, I would eat the in vitro meat over the animal meat.
10:00 PM on 03/02/2012
same here, but how long does it take to grow this stuff?? people who expect a porter house steak might be let wanting since it seems like it would be growing thin sheets of meat rather than a roast etc for the better cuts and would make more like sandwich meat. I seriously doubt they would ever be able to produce enough to feed a nation let alone the world. using something of this nature in space to feed a few people might be feasible one day. I have eaten some strange stuff in my life, ie crow, popcorn shiners (headed, gutted and rolled in cornmeal and fried) just to name a couple so as far as grossing me out it would take a lot to do so but others have weaker stomachs and would be easily grossed out.
05:15 PM on 01/12/2012
This is a long-awaited form for human nutrition. Yet we need to look at the implications in the larger picture. Like, where does the nutritional bath come from that feeds the growing in vitro meat? The more direct we can cleanly recycle human waste back into the in vitro meat growth system, the less burden on the environment. It may well be that we create an in vitro system that takes human waste as an input, does a bacterial in vitro processing to extract the metals and toxins, then another in vitro using agricultural plant cell complex derived conversion; from there into an in vitro animal-derived digestion system of the plant products, which then supplies the in vitro meat muscle growth. All these need to be directly powered by sunlight insofar as possible. Note that much of this technology needs to be developed for long term life in space colonies, whether on the Moon, in large space stations in high Earth orbit, or long duration voyages. The closer to designing the system to tightly fit into the big picture of energy and materials, the less disruption to the ecosystem; this big picture is that solar energy of high energy and low entropy, is used to process food, then is re-radiated out to the blackness of space as high entropy low energy radiation. We will be then able to maintain stocks of all food-sourcing animals - and fish, crustacea, birds and plants - as cherished creatures.
06:01 PM on 01/12/2012
Ohhh, Mr. Cline! Glad to note you're THINKING BIG! Thank you VERY VERY mucho!
12:21 PM on 01/13/2012
Big picture provides a map.
08:33 PM on 01/10/2012
oh wait that takes away my leather jackets and pants oh no.
ok we so have to stop this invitro steak stuff i want my leather boots plastic is so gauche.
08:29 PM on 01/10/2012
hmmmm will it sizzle on the barbie? if you ever butcher your own meat you learn that it helps to bleed it out . when you dont and you cook the meat it tastes alot like liver. while i enjoy liver i am not fond of liver flavored bacon or steak.
one of the developments of this to look forward to is the mass production of blood for transfusions that have no diseases or stray chemicals floating in it and in currently rare types. get hurt need blood quickly made custom blood just for you.
loose the muscle in your leg from a shark or bear bite( wolves are coming back and cougars too) theres soon to be a tech to fix that.
i guess im all for it go frankenburgers yeah!
06:24 PM on 01/10/2012
I say in-vitro-Meat's singularly one of the greatest scientific discovery of this era, Ms. Sta. Maria! Beats animal husbandry and all its economic, environmental and societal costs, for one. For another, these science-driven animal-husbandry farmers can ably nutrients-tailor future ready-to-eat meat-types (such as incorporating the craved-for omega-3 fatty acid in beef, venison, pork, mutton, chicken—or any meat a human carnivore desires—for instance) for specific persons needing special physician-ordered diets. And still for another. . .which will truly open up space-age exploration and the beginnings of prolonged space/planetary-residency of humans (and even light-industrialization), the perfection of this new i-v-meat technology will necessarily likely conquer global hunger and lotsa environmental problems on Planet Earth, would make Antarctic, lunar and Martian permanent-residency very probable . . . well, would likely inaugurate invigorating opportunities in such other promising fields of human endeavors. Btw, who is/are the Nobel-Prize-potential GMO-scientists who is/are responsible for i-v-meat science/technology?
11:21 PM on 01/09/2012
This will be unspeakably better for animals and the environment. Let's do it. Just look at how bad it is for animals the environment right now: MeatVideo.com.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DovS
02:46 AM on 01/10/2012
Yeah, but if we don't need animals for food anymore, why would anyone care about letting any of them live at all?
05:02 PM on 01/09/2012
Pretty interesting thought. Sort of reminds me of the first baby formula. The scientist thought they knew everything about breast milk so he replicated that into a synthetic baby formula. Turns out he didn't know everything about breast milk which obviously led to a pretty bad outcome. Has anyone considered that our knowledge about food may not be complete? Look at the obesity and health results related to all the "enriched", "fortified", and "improved" foods that we consume now. Just a thought.
photo
Junius Gallio
homelessfilker.blogspot.com
02:37 PM on 01/09/2012
I could definitely get over the "yuck" factor,though I doubt we'll be seeing T Rex meat any time soon, even after in vivo meat production is commercially viable. You have to have the introductory sample, and last I knew, all of the food markets were fresh out of dinosaur meat.

Disclaimer: I am a member of the other PETA: People for the Eating of Tasty Animals.
photo
jondekonkeroo
Spells and remedies..
01:46 PM on 01/09/2012
This is probably a better alternative than getting protein from Lumbricus Terrestrias, as has been predicted many times. This would be preferable to annelid meat to most people, I'd bet.
photo
jondekonkeroo
Spells and remedies..
01:44 PM on 01/09/2012
those of you with yuck factor issues might heed this little joke:

Waiter..our specialty of the day is smoked toungue

customer...yech! it came out of a cow's mouth...give me two eggs and a glass of milk.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddanimal
01:13 PM on 01/09/2012
This "food" product will never be affordable or practical, and thats a good thing. Its a terrible idea.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brettford
I don't have faith in faith
01:46 PM on 01/09/2012
affordability and practicality would likely be the easiest aspects of the concept to overcome. There would be fewer calories wasted growing meat as opposed to a whole active animal. There wouldn't be as much land required for grazing and there would be far less energy and man power wasted during the farming and butchering process. The hardest part would really just be making it palatable.
07:45 PM on 01/11/2012
You're seemingly thinking quite like that of an animal well-far-below that of a human being's creative/innovative capacity because your objections are so pathetically shallow to posit in a forum whereby cutting-edge technologies are on the table. . .

Why can't you even think of a scenario where huge farm-laboratories (such as fighter-plane hangars in closed military bases, for example) are stacked from floor-to-ceiling with cheap petri-dishes growing designer-meats and operating non-stop 24/7 year-in-and-year-out, run by an army of high-school students earning federal minimum-wage rates doing 6-shifts daily @ 4-hour/shift 'round-the-clock — and supervised-online by graduate students doing their graduate research-works somewhere in America (at coupla-dollars over the minimum-wage rates for compensation) — such kinda mass-production of top-quality meat products can lower-drastically food prices so much so that traditionally-produced meats would become very expensive (which positive results redounding in practically-every-field of human endeavors could easily be visualized. . .), hey! ...continued...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StarGazr5992
Retired
11:34 AM on 01/09/2012
As long as it is tasty and has some nutation values and isn't just empty carious