iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Asaib Ahl Al-Haq, Iraq Shiite Militia, Will Reportedly Lay Down Arms

Asaib Ahl Al Haq

ADAM SCHRECK and QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA   01/ 6/12 02:50 PM ET   AP

BAGHDAD — A decision by a Shiite militia to transform itself from an armed, anti-American movement into a viable political force could complicate Iraq's political crisis and strengthen Iran's clout in this country as U.S. influence wanes.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's government has welcomed the recent decision by Asaib Ahl al-Haq to lay down its arms and join the political process. But bringing the former militants into the fold may alienate the Sunni minority and increase tensions between competing Shiite groups.

Al-Maliki, who is widely believed to have played an active role in encouraging the militia to transform, may now gain an important ally that could also lessen his dependence on radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr's political bloc. Al-Sadr considers Asaib Ahl al-Haq a disloyal faction that broke away from his own anti-American militia several years ago.

Asaib Ahl al-Haq, or Band of the Righteous, believes it played an important role in resisting the American presence in Iraq and that it now deserves some political payback. The group is thought to have fewer than 1,000 armed militiamen, backed by tens of thousands of supporters. An Iraqi close to the extremist group said last year that it relies on Iran for roughly $5 million in cash and weapons each month.

It is unclear how committed the group is to disarming entirely. Despite agreeing to renounce violence in late December, its members have not handed over their weapons, according to the Iraqi official in charge of reconciling with the country's armed groups.

"The government will not buy up the group's weapons, but we are ready to take them if they want us to," said the government official, Amer al-Khuzaie.

A senior member of Asaib Ahl al-Haq said in an interview this week that the group wants to ally itself with other Shiite groups to run in provincial and parliamentary elections. But he stopped short of saying the group would disarm completely, saying its members would "do its best to secure Shiite areas."

Qais al-Khazali, the group's leader, was also circumspect when reached by The Associated Press late Friday.

"The issue of handing over our weapons will be discussed with the Iraqi government sometime in the future, away from the media," he said.

In a brief phone interview, al-Khazali also said the group is willing to turn over the body of kidnapped British bodyguard Alan McMenemy, though he wouldn't say when that might happen.

Asaib Ahl al-Haq and the Hezbollah Brigades were among a group of Shiite militias backed by Iran that carried out lethal attacks against U.S. bases in June, the deadliest month in two years for American forces in Iraq.

U.S. troops completed their pullout last month after America's nearly nine-year war.

There is little sign that the Hezbollah Brigades intends to follow Asaib Ahl al-Haq's path. The Hezbollah group, which is believed to be funded and trained by Iran's elite Revolutionary Guard and its Quds Force special operations wing, issued a statement Dec. 30 denying it was joining any national reconciliation process. It said it would not challenge the Iraqi government directly but made no mention of plans to give up arms.

A Shiite lawmaker in Baghdad said bringing Shiite militants into the political process will only strengthen Iran's influence in Iraq.

"Iran has full control of these armed groups and Iranian officials know how and when to manipulate them to exert pressure on the Iraqi government," he said on condition his name not be used because of the sensitive nature of the issue.

Asaib Ahl al-Haq announced its independence from al-Sadr's movement in 2008 and turned down several calls by the cleric to rejoin his group.

Relations between the Sadrists, who are a key component of al-Maliki's' Shiite-dominated government, and Asaib Ahl al-Haq remain strained. Al-Sadr recently lashed out at the group's followers, calling them disloyal. He has also accused them of having Iraqi blood on their hands – though al-Sadr's Mahdi Army organized death squads that kidnapped and killed countless Sunni civilians during the height of the war.

Al-Khazali, Asaib Ahl al-Haq's leader, "is a bona fide political and religious rival to Muqtada al-Sadr," said analyst Michael Knights, Lafer Fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

"At the moment, the Maliki government is leaning toward Muqtada because he holds 40 seats in parliament and AAH holds none. That could change," he said.

If Asaib Ahl al-Haq does organize itself into a more traditional political party, it could damage al-Sadr's own political ambitions and weaken his standing in the coalition government.

Hadi Jalo, a Baghdad-based political analyst, said the tension between al-Sadr and the Asaib Ahl al-Haq could devolve into low-level violence in Shiite areas as the two groups compete for power.

"Even if that is the case, the Iranians will be the main beneficiaries because they will take on a bigger role as mediator by making the struggling Shiite groups sit together to settle their differences," he said.

Any indication that Iran is wielding greater control over political decisions in Baghdad will only exacerbate sectarian tensions that have risen following the U.S. troop withdrawal.

Sunni lawmaker Falah Zaidan said Shiite militias are not welcome in Iraqi politics.

"They come with Iran's agenda, which is a dangerous one," he said.

Iraq's minority Sunnis, who were the biggest beneficiaries of Saddam Hussein's rule, feel increasingly threatened by what they see as efforts by al-Maliki to consolidate power and sideline them politically.

Al-Maliki's government issued an arrest warrant for the country's top Sunni politician just as the last American troops were leaving last month. The Sunni official, Vice President Tariq al-Hashemi, remains holed up in Iraq's semiautonomous Kurdish region in the north – effectively out of reach of state security forces.

Most members of the Sunni-backed Iraqiya bloc, al-Maliki's main political rivals, are boycotting parliament sessions and Cabinet meetings, paralyzing a broad-based unity government.

What are almost certainly Sunni insurgents are using the political upheaval to launch a new wave of deadly attacks aimed at Shiites.

Roadside bombs killed two Shiite pilgrims early Friday. Around midday, a volley of rocket and mortars shook the Iraqi capital.

The attacks came a day after a wave of bombings targeting Shiites killed at least 78 people, making Thursday the deadliest day in Iraq in more than a year.

___

Associated Press writers Bushra Juhi and Sameer N. Yacoub contributed to this report.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

BAGHDAD — A decision by a Shiite militia to transform itself from an armed, anti-American movement into a viable political force could complicate Iraq's political crisis and strengthen Iran's cl...
BAGHDAD — A decision by a Shiite militia to transform itself from an armed, anti-American movement into a viable political force could complicate Iraq's political crisis and strengthen Iran's cl...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 39
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:00 PM on 01/06/2012
Who needs militias when you gots the army.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Leon Engelun
08:35 PM on 01/06/2012
Praised by Iran, led by Sadr, Armed by Pakistan,,, Don't trust them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
07:59 PM on 01/06/2012
Sounds like good news.
09:33 PM on 01/06/2012
how is this good news?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Mikester
No, Dagnabbit! Consarriit!
10:50 PM on 01/06/2012
never mind him, he has 9 lives!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
10:49 AM on 01/07/2012
They are turning in weapons, getting involved in the political process - peace is better than war.
07:13 PM on 01/06/2012
I assumed this was about Muqtada Al Sadr and the Mahdi Army
06:21 PM on 01/06/2012
Who didn't see this coming??.. Former President Bush didn't consider what would happen to Iraq or the region by his decision to attack Iraq.

Sometimes you must think, "the devil you know is better than the devil you don't."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ladyrosedeky
05:23 PM on 01/06/2012
There were some things Pres. George W. Bush should have done before he went invading anything that he failed to do:
1) Check emotions at door
2) Study the history of the players such as Iran and the Aytollahs and their goal of a Persian Empire
3) Study the history of Iraq and the players in Iraq that went way beyond Saddam such as the Sadr movement
4) Read books like Caleb Carr's The Lessons of Terror: A History of Warfare Against Civilians (It would have been good for him to have read this book before invading Afghanistan too)
5) Instead of running of generals that know more than you, listen to them - like Gen. Colin Powell and Gen. Shinseki, both who, unfortunately, were right when they tried to tell Bush not to invade Iraq and why.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Mikester
No, Dagnabbit! Consarriit!
10:55 PM on 01/06/2012
that's what happens when you elect politicians as president.

and now in addition to the working, and upper, we have the; political class!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ladyrosedeky
07:08 PM on 01/07/2012
Out of all the politicians serving in D.C., I only know of three that can really relate to the lower class.

1) Sen. Claire McCaskill
2) Sen. Dennis Kucinich
3) Cong. Lynn Woosley

There may be others but they are the only ones from their backgrounds that I really know of that can relate to the working poor. Cong. Lynn Woosley originally ran because after being married to an upper-class income earner with five children lost everything and ended up living as a single, low-income mother herself and saw first hand why so many women and children were living in poverty. Nothing like living it to learn what the real struggles are. Like Sen. Patrick Moynihan told Tim Russert when he felt less than the Ivy Leaguers he worked with less than them, he knew things from his working hard that they would never be able to learn or understand.
04:17 PM on 01/06/2012
It does sound good, that belivers who live by the Word would put their arms down and try to find a PEACEFUL and political out come. What a great idea.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Mikester
No, Dagnabbit! Consarriit!
10:55 PM on 01/06/2012
I'm holding my breath!
03:33 PM on 01/06/2012
Another nonsense. So this group is an Iranian puppet; so is Sadr's group and Maliki and everyone else on any given day.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
capt ayhab
No War on IRAN
03:32 PM on 01/06/2012
A decision by a Shiite militia to transform itself from an armed, anti-American movement into a viable political force could complicate Iraq's political crisis and strengthen Iran's clout in this country as U.S. influence wanes.

So democratic way of gaining power is BAD, Armed confrontation is good? Just because America needs to have chaos in that part of the world?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
03:23 PM on 01/06/2012
I hate to be pestimistic but for some reason I just don't see this happening like they say it;s going to.Even if some of them do lay down their arms there's going to still be a huge many that are not going to do so.Iraq is going to be unstable for along time to come nfortunately
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nighthawlk
04:56 PM on 01/06/2012
I agree. Those wanting peace and stability will be at odds with both the Iran led lawmakers and the Iran supplied militia.

Iran finally owns up to supplying terrorists with arms, money and other support to destabilize Iraq. Closer scrutiny will likely find that Iran and civilians in Pakistan are also funding the Taliban. We were actually fighting a no win war.

I had my reservations about economic sanctions imposed on Iran. However now, it is time ignore Iran by not recognizing them as a country. The US can ignore Iran at the UN. Refuse to engage in diplomatic discussions concerning their nuclear program. This and this alone will worry Iran. By Not engaging discussions about the nuclear issues, Iran will know that the US has determined their action or reaction beyond speculation.

This is referred to as “walk softly and carry a big stick”.
09:37 PM on 01/06/2012
with all the fuss made already about their nuke program they may think that we gave up
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Mighty Cynic
03:14 PM on 01/06/2012
"An Iranian-backed Shiite militia that carried out deadly attacks on U.S. troops" This article just makes wild claims with zero actual evidence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Mighty Cynic
03:12 PM on 01/06/2012
"An Iranian-backed Shiite militia that carried out deadly attacks on U.S. troops"

PROOF OF THIS FROM THE YELLOW JOURNALIST ARTICLE?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Mighty Cynic
02:57 PM on 01/06/2012
"An Iranian-backed Shiite militia that carried out deadly attacks on U.S. troops"

PROOF OF THESE CLAIMS???? NO ACTUAL EVIDENCE, JUST MORE YELLOW JOURNALISM AND TALLEN COMMENTING "blah blah blah bomb Iran"
photo
tallen
panem et circenses
01:28 PM on 01/06/2012
All this means is that Iraq is moving closer to becoming a puppet state of Iran.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Mighty Cynic
02:57 PM on 01/06/2012
or that you are just here to spread Israeli propaganda and nothing else.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nighthawlk
05:24 PM on 01/06/2012
4 hate filled comments? Wow, you sound like me this morning. I was just in the right mood to bitch.

Has it ever occurred to you that this may not be propaganda? We knew Iran was involved in supporting terrorists while we were fighting over there. I could care less about Israel. ‘They made their bed and now they must sleep in it” What I do care about is the lives we lost in Iraq fighting terrorists.

Many say that we killed 50,000 or so Iraqi civilians. We might have killed a few noncombatants and that is about all. Why would we need to when the terrorist were killing their own noncombatant innocent citizens.

Go to war over Iran? Absolutely not, as the in everything, ‘two can play the game’ of destabilization. It is time for Iran to face it’s own ‘Spring’, buy modern educated Iranians that are not stuck in the Middle Ages with barbaric and fanatical religious fervor.
03:31 PM on 01/06/2012
Now there is only one country left between Iran and Israel..... Iranians are coming over to take Israel over..... booooo