More

HuffPost Social Reading

Men As Rape Victims: Obama Administration Expands Definition Of Sex Crime

PETE YOST   01/ 7/12 01:32 PM ET  AP

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration says it is expanding the FBI's more than eight-decade-old definition of rape to reflect a better understanding of the crime and to broaden protections.

The new definition counts men as victims for the first time and drops the requirement that victims must have physically resisted their attackers.

Vice President Joe Biden, author of the Violence Against Women Act when he was in the Senate, said the new definition announced Friday is a victory for women and men "whose suffering has gone unaccounted for over 80 years." Calling rape a "devastating crime," the vice president said, "We can't solve it unless we know the full extent of it."

The change will increase the number of people counted as rape victims in FBI statistics but will not change federal or state laws or alter charges or prosecutions. It's an important shift because lawmakers and policymakers use crime statistics to allocate money and other resources for prevention and victim assistance.

The White House said the expanded definition has been long awaited as many states and research groups made similar changes in their definitions of rape over recent decades.

Since 1929, the FBI has defined rape as the carnal knowledge of a female, forcibly and against her will. The revised definition covers any gender of victim or attacker and includes instances in which the victim is incapable of giving consent because of the influence of drugs or alcohol or because of age. Physical resistance is not required. The Justice Department said the new definition mirrors the majority of state rape statutes now on the books.

Congress approved $592 million this year to address violence against women, including sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence and stalking, under the Violence Against Women Act and Family Violence Prevention and Services Act. Of that amount, $23 million goes to a sexual assault services program and $39 million to a rape prevention and education program administered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Obama administration had sought $777 million to combat violence against women.

The change likely will result in big increases in the number of reported rapes, but it was not immediately clear how big. To take just one example of how the FBI totals will change, Chicago didn't report any rapes to the FBI for 2010 because its broad definition of the crime didn't match the FBI's narrow definition.

The change has been sought by women's groups for more than a decade.

The Women's Law Project, on behalf of more than 80 sexual assault coalitions and national organizations concerned about violence against women, wrote FBI Director Robert Mueller in 2001 that the narrow definition reflected gender-based stereotypes and requested it be changed.

Using the old definition, a total of 84,767 rapes were reported nationwide in 2010, according to the FBI's uniform crime report based on data from 18,000 law enforcement agencies.

Nearly 1 in 5 women and 1 in 71 men in the U.S. have been raped at some time in their lives, according to a 2010 survey by the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which used a broader definition.

The revised FBI definition says that rape is "the penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object," without the consent of the victim. Also constituting rape under the new definition is "oral penetration by a sex organ of another person" without consent.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CRIME

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration says it is expanding the FBI's more than eight-decade-old definition of rape to reflect a better understanding of the crime and to broaden protections. The...
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration says it is expanding the FBI's more than eight-decade-old definition of rape to reflect a better understanding of the crime and to broaden protections. The...
Filed by Michael McLaughlin  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,006
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (26 total)
05:04 PM on 02/19/2012
http://www.dailystrength.org/c/Rape/forum/4458991-anal-rape/page-2

Pretty Sad Stories.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AcaciaJules
20-something college student, majoring in history
01:44 AM on 02/15/2012
Why the HECK did it take this long?!
10:50 PM on 02/14/2012
It's so about time that men are included in rape statistics. Sexual violence knows no boundaries.
04:16 PM on 02/08/2012
Dear President Obama or somebody: Please do something about preventing crime over the U.S. by getting police to search streets, houses, apartments, nightclubs, bars, highways and streets and if the police catches any suspects or streetgangs suspicious [i.e.] [attempted] child abduction, murder, wife assault, child abuse, elder abuse and animal abuse and guns and gangs, the police will quickly arrest the suspects and streetgangs, lock them up and throw away the key.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sobaytransplant
Obama 2012! Accept no substitute!!
08:49 PM on 01/10/2012
Years ago when I was a reporter for the local hometown newspaper, I had to do a story with several people at the Rape Crisis Center (victims as well as administration personnel.) I was uncomfortable to begin with because it's just an ugly and degrading crime, but it was my ASSIGNMENT and I was determined to help people understand it. So, I wrote the story and within the body of the piece I mentioned that statistics show that MEN are victims of rape far more often than anyone realizes. (I don't remember the percentage of crimes where men were the victims, but it was noteworthy.) My editor CHANGED the wording before it went to press (without ever asking me to clarify the info) because he was SURE that I'd made an error. Men are never victims of rape, he thought! OH MY! Of course the Crisis Center was angry with ME when the story hit the stands, even though I had reported the correct information. We ended up having to print a retraction (which they did at the bottom of the last page a week later. Gee, thanks.) When you really understand that rape is NOT a crime of sex, but IS a crime of violence and control over another human being, it suddenly all comes clear. Men can be victimized just as easily as women can! I applaud this upgrade to the existing law! People need to understand the crime itself.
01:29 PM on 02/20/2012
Not only that, but when men are raped, they are far more likely to be raped repeatedly. Especially in a setting like prison, where a man who makes any show of physical weakness can be sexually assaulted regularly for years. You never hear about that on television news...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:50 PM on 01/09/2012
Having had this happen to me 20 years ago has affected the my life and years of healing. So those of you who have negitive comments may not realize what it means to the rest of us. My situation never had a resolution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EdCorey1971
07:52 AM on 01/09/2012
Now there shouldn't be anymore arguments saying that it wasn't rape went a adult female teacher sleeps with an underage boy because the new law says that their doesn't have to be any resistance and that any case of sex with an underage minor is rape. It's been that way for men for the longest now more women will be held accountable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sobaytransplant
Obama 2012! Accept no substitute!!
08:53 PM on 01/10/2012
Well, there will probably always be arguments about it even when the law is clear, but your point is well-taken!
07:12 AM on 01/09/2012
All you have to do to step around this law is use Bill Clintons definition of { IS } !!!~~~~~
07:09 AM on 01/09/2012
Anderson Cooper will be in tears reporting this news !!!~~~~
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
11:37 PM on 01/08/2012
I don't understand why such a positive change that has been SUCH a long time coming can create so much bitterness, contention, and people attacking one another. Why can we not just be grateful something that is quite serious and has needed addressing has finally received attention? (I know some of us are) No doubt it doesn't solve every issue, and we still have a long way to go. But isn't it counterproductive to do anything but write our elected officials to let them know what other changes we would like to see? Also, vote for those politicians which will stand for the issues which most concern us. That is how we make things happen...
As far as men being victims more than women or women crying false rape...that sounds like biased opinions to me and unfair statements. I happen to personally know of women who have been raped and have been afraid to report it, so there is no way to know accurate statistics. Bottom line: we weren't there, so we don't know what happened.
I hope we can all do whatever is in our power to effect positive change in this country and in the lives of those around us instead of contributing to the hate and breakdown of unity...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mericart
Proud to be progressive
09:17 PM on 01/08/2012
The administration had done a great deed. Statistics tell a powerful story, as they influence people's attitude toward crimes. All victims deserve justices, but for too long many victims were not counted. Now that we have the new definition, the next and more important step is cultural change. People need to take rape seriously in any circumstance, and victims deserve fair treatment from the law enforcement.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mailman
09:14 PM on 01/08/2012
The problem I have is they seldom use the word rape, it's PC to call it a sexual assault. Call it RAPE!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MyResponsibility
To Disagree,one need not be disagreeable
07:15 PM on 01/08/2012
How will this change anything at all? Rape is not a federal crime, it is a state crime...
07:31 AM on 01/10/2012
It will change how statistics on crimes are gathered and funded.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]