iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

BP Ad Campaign Following Gulf Oil Spill Deemed 'Propaganda' By Some

By CAIN BURDEAU   01/ 8/12 11:38 AM ET   AP

NEW ORLEANS -- Nearly 20 months after its massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill – and just as the nation focuses on New Orleans, host of the BCS title game – BP is pushing a slick nationwide public relations campaign to persuade Americans that the Gulf region has recovered.

BP PLC's rosy picture of the Gulf, complete with sparkling beaches, booming businesses, smiling fishermen and waters bursting with seafood, seems a bit too rosy to many people who live there. Even if the British oil giant's campaign helps promote the Gulf as a place where Americans should have no fear to visit and spend their money, some dismiss it as "BP propaganda."

The PR blitz is part of the company's multibillion dollar response to the Gulf oil spill that started after the BP-leased Deepwater Horizon drilling rig exploded off the coast of Louisiana on April 20, 2010, killing 11 workers and leading to the release of more than 200 million gallons of oil. As engineers struggled to cap the out-of-control well, it turned into the largest offshore oil spill in U.S. history.

Now, BP is touting evidence that the Gulf's ecology has not been severely damaged by the spill and highlighting improving economic signs.

"I'm glad to report that all beaches and waters are open for everyone to enjoy!" BP representative Iris Cross says in one TV spot to an upbeat soundtrack. "And the economy is showing progress, with many areas on the Gulf Coast having their best tourism season in years."

The campaign, launched just before Christmas, has ramped up for the two-week period around the Sugar Bowl and Bowl Championship Series title game to be played on Monday between LSU and Alabama.

The company is paying chefs Emeril Lagasse and John Besh to promote Gulf seafood, it's hired two seafood trucks to hand out fish tacos and seafood-filled jambalaya to the hundreds of thousands of tourists and fans pouring into the city for the football games and it's spreading its messages at galas, pre-game parties and vacation giveaways.

But the ad campaign rings hollow to many folks here.

"They talk about areas being all open. There are areas that are still closed," said A.C. Cooper, a shrimp fisherman in Plaquemines Parish in Louisiana. He listed some bays and fishing spots that he says the state still has closed due to oil contamination. "It's bogus, it's not the truth."

He added that last fall's shrimp harvest was dismal. "The numbers on our shrimp are way down," he said. "They (BP) make it sound like they're doing a lot, but they're not doing much to help the fishermen out ... I got good fishermen struggling to pay their bills right now."

The head of the Louisiana Shrimp Association, a commercial shrimpers group, called it "BP propaganda."

"When you have a lot of money, you can pretty much get any point across," Clint Guidry complained. "It's kind of like indoctrination."

And businesses on the tourism-dependent Mississippi Gulf Coast say people aren't flocking in.

For example, Bridgette Varone, head of the Gulf Coast chapter of the Mississippi Hospitality & Restaurant Association, said restaurants reported similar revenues in both 2010 and 2011 for the month of June, one of the busiest months.

"I wish we had better news to report," Varone said. "We didn't blow any socks off."

"They might not blatantly lie in the ad, but the true story is far less shiny, and far more troubling," said Aaron Viles of the Gulf Restoration Network, a New Orleans-based environmental group.

He said the spill may have caused a decrease in shrimp harvests and abnormalities in killifish, a minnow. He noted that oil was still marring some marshes and was buried under some beaches. He also said Congress had not done enough to regulate offshore drilling and assure the long-term recovery of the Gulf.

"BP needs to put these facts in their ads," Viles said.

"They should be a little more apologetic and less triumphant," said George Crozier, an oceanographer and former director of the Dauphin Island Sea Lab in Alabama.

However, Crozier said many others were guilty of "spin" just like BP, including scientists and environmentalists who tried, for their own reasons, to push the notion that the oil spill had devastated the Gulf. Crozier said the spill's effects have not been as devastating as many argued they would be.

"The beaches are people-safe, there's no doubt about that," he said. "I thought there was a hysterical reaction to tar balls – unless we started eating them."

Tom Mueller, a BP spokesman, said the ad campaign was highlighting "facts," not "anecdotes."

"When you look at the tourism numbers, heads in beds, revenues, are generally up," he said. "There are some exceptions, but when you step back and look at the coast as a whole, the tourism industry is recovering."

He said BP's commitment to the Gulf was sincere, noting that the company set aside $500 million for independent scientific research into the spill.

"We're honoring our commitment here in helping promote the Gulf Coast and Gulf seafood and doing our best to help the region recover," he said. "As Iris says in the ads, we have more work to do, and BP as a company fully recognizes that there is more work to be done."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

NEW ORLEANS -- Nearly 20 months after its massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill – and just as the nation focuses on New Orleans, host of the BCS title game – BP is pushing a slick nationwide pu...
NEW ORLEANS -- Nearly 20 months after its massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill – and just as the nation focuses on New Orleans, host of the BCS title game – BP is pushing a slick nationwide pu...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 79
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
03:41 AM on 05/01/2012
In August, a team of government scientists estimated that 4.9 Million BARRELS of oil gushed out of the well based on a stating flow rate of 62,000 barrels of oil a day, decreasing as pressure in the underground resourvoir slackened to a final rate of 53,000 barrels a day in mid-July. That's a far cry from the 1,000 barrels a day BP offered as a best guess April 25 or the 5,000-barrel figure it reported for the first MONTH of the spill. Federal investigators are considering possible charges against BP officials for making false statements to government agents about this key piece of information.

Settling on the flow rate during the 87-day ordeal also remains important because every barrel of oil spilled translates in fines -----likely totalling Billions of dollars ----for BP and its contractors on the Macondo well project.

******
Tricky, considering that Obama has received the Highest Amount of Campaign donations - from BP, BP PACs and individual donations through BP - for the past TWENTY years.
03:39 AM on 05/01/2012
From The New Orleans Times Picayune - March 29, 2011

"Report: Early Repairs Made Oil Spill Worse - Cutting Drill Pipe Increased The Flow"

Buried deep in the 551-page technical forensic report lies new evidence that BP and the US Govt in their frantic attempts to get mechanisms working to stop the Gulf oil gusher last April, may have inadvertently made the situation far worse.

When industry experts an government overseers finally got part of the busted well's blow-out preventer to work nine days after the accident, they opened a new, larger path for the oil, according to the report by forensic examiners at Norway-based Det Norske Veritas. The finding raises questions about whether the flow of oil might have been smaller at the start of the disaster, something BP has long argued as it disputes government estmates of how much crude was spilled.

cont'd:
07:04 PM on 01/09/2012
If you saw the mess down here (the Gulf) first hand you might want to call BP Big Polluters or Big P----s
Allthosewhowander
My micro-bio is a microclimate
03:54 PM on 01/09/2012
To be perceived, propaganda must evoke the interest of an audience and must be transmitted through an attention-getting communications medium.

Joseph Goebbels
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
jscratz
Heja Sverige!
03:50 PM on 01/09/2012
Just change the name to USP and I guarantee Americans will buy it.
03:22 PM on 01/09/2012
The never ending destructive oil industry...

Spill Baby Spill!

http://www.smh.com.au/environment/conservation/new-spill-emergency-as-grounded-ship-breaks-up-off-new-zealand-20120108-1pq5h.html
photo
Grimmsd
Independent
03:04 PM on 01/09/2012
Of course people will believe it. If it's on the TV it must be true, right?
08:56 PM on 01/09/2012
You're right, no matter who pays for the p.r. It's of little interest or notice to most of the US audience.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Walton
Fairly Unbalanced
03:01 PM on 01/09/2012
When drug companies tout the wonders of their miracle drug, they must also inform the public of the realistic possible side effects. Maybe, PB should be required to do the same thing in their sunny ads about the Gulf Coast. I have seen this ad several times on TV myself. It was a feel good ad that seemed intended on anesthetizing public outrage about the oil spill and the irresponsibility that lead to it.
02:19 PM on 01/09/2012
I don't know about anyone else, but I stopped doing business with BP long ago...

Ya know if we ALL stopped doing business with the multienationals, they would go out of business and that would create MILLIONS of opportunities to create SMALL business's to take thier place.

The enemy of mankind IS the multienational corporation, lets get rid of them, before they get rid of mankind...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
barkingcat
Woof?
10:18 AM on 01/10/2012
Same here -- just as I did with Exxon years ago, as well.

Speaking of oil companies, Chavez's CITGO is popular here in the northeast because of its support of subsidized fuel oil for low-income households.
Republican crybabies
Enemy of plutocrats
01:42 PM on 01/09/2012
All corporations lie, it's axiomatic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Giacomo Salvadore
01:24 PM on 01/09/2012
It is not possible for any research funded by a self interested corporation facing huge lawsuits to be impartial. BP will own that research and they will publish only those parts they so choose.
12:45 PM on 01/09/2012
I will never knowingly buy a BP product again.

ismith
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Juan Carlos Mescalero
Free clues, no charge. You're welcome.
12:14 PM on 01/09/2012
BP lie? Inconceivable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Load
Politicians: What you see is never what you get.
11:34 AM on 01/09/2012
The saddest thing about this post?

The number of respondents. C'mon, only 58 since yesterday?

It leads me to believe that people not directly affected by a particular corporate catastrophe are perfectly content swilling the Korporate Kool-Aid® and going back to burying their heads in the sand.

Is it any wonder the nation's in the state it's in?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bobby Smith
Corn, Wine and Oil
07:25 PM on 01/09/2012
yes yes yes,what you said.
photo
CorpGreedSux
Romney's a FRAUD
11:09 AM on 01/09/2012
sadly yes, we Americans have very short memories and if if it didn't affect us to any great degree we won't solidfy with those fellow Americans it did hurt. We have become very selfish in our effort and support of others - sad but true and I'm ashamed to see it