More

F.C.C. Lifeline Program To Help Bridge Digital Divide, Chairman Julius Genachowski Says

Fcc Lifeline

First Posted: 01/09/12 04:11 PM ET Updated: 01/09/12 05:58 PM ET

The head of the Federal Communications Commission on Monday announced a new plan to expand broadband Internet access by modernizing a program that provides discounted telephone service to low-income Americans.

In remarks made in Washington, F.C.C. Chairman Julius Genachowski said he planned to overhaul the agency's Lifeline program, which has helped defray the cost of basic telephone service. Genachowski said he also plans to launch a pilot program that will transition Lifeline to focus on reducing the monthly cost of broadband service and digital devices and improving digital literacy.

Genachowski noted that high-speed Internet has become an essential tool for Americans, particularly those who are unemployed, as job postings and applications have moved online and more companies now require computer skills.

"Broadband has gone from being a luxury to a necessity in the 21st century," he said.

Yet one-third of American households still do not subscribe to broadband Internet at home -- a disparity that experts refer to as the "digital divide."

In some rural areas, broadband access is still unavailable. But Genachowski attributed a lack of Internet adoption to three factors: high costs for service, lack of digital literacy and a perception that the Internet is irrelevant.

His announcement Monday marks the latest government initiative to make high-speed Internet available to underserved communities.

The 2009 stimulus package provided $7.2 billion to expand access to broadband services nationwide.

In addition, the FCC announced last year its "Connect to Compete" program, in which cable providers will provide broadband Internet access for $9.99 a month for two years to low-income households.

The program, which also supplies refurbished computers for $150, requires that eligible households have a child enrolled in the national school lunch program, not be a current or recent broadband subscriber or have an overdue bill or unreturned equipment from a participating cable provider.

In Philadelphia, an advocacy group called Action United has criticized "Connect to Compete," claiming its guidelines are too restrictive and many of the city's low-income residents had not heard of the $9.95-per-month service. Comcast, the major Internet provider in Philadelphia, has said it promoted its discounted Internet service by partnering with nonprofits and advertising in minority media outlets.

On Monday, Genachowski said the Lifeline program would expand the growing effort to bring high-speed Internet to low-income communities. He said Lifeline had ensured phone service to millions of low-income Americans, but was laden with waste and inefficiency. For example, he said phone carriers had provided the service to residents who already signed up with another carrier or enrolled customers who were not actually eligible.

Genachowski said the cost savings from such reforms could be used to increase digital literacy training at libraries and schools. This, he said, "could eventually arm more Americans with the digital skills they need to fully participate in our 21st century economy and society."

Wade Henderson, president of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, called Genachowski's plan to modernize the Lifeline program "an important first step" to narrowing the digital divide. But he noted the program only serves about 10 million Americans, or about 32 percent of eligible households, according to F.C.C. figures, while about 100 million people do not subscribe to broadband at home, often due to cost.

"We see this as an important step to narrowing the digital divide -- but not yet the quantum leap necessary to include all Americans in the new economy," he told HuffPost in a statement.

Amalia Deloney, media policy field director at the Center for Media Justice, also expressed concerns that a modernized Lifeline program would still not address "the immediate needs" of thousands of people across the country.

"Though the pilot program and private partnerships are important components of modernization, they will not be enough to ensure that all communities are able to experience the full benefits of this 21st century communications infrastructure," Deloney said.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

The head of the Federal Communications Commission on Monday announced a new plan to expand broadband Internet access by modernizing a program that provides discounted telephone service to low-income A...
The head of the Federal Communications Commission on Monday announced a new plan to expand broadband Internet access by modernizing a program that provides discounted telephone service to low-income A...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 152
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
belgarde1
16 grandangels
04:48 PM on 01/10/2012
this would be great IF, I am putting a big IF here the cable provider cared about their customers. I personally have been fighting COMCAST now for over a year. They have a monopoly on the internet service as far as the speed of it. I own a Magic Jack which works great but it works off of your internet, I also have 3 computers that are pulling off of the internet. I'm computer stupid but everyone tells me you have to have over the 5 or 7 mbs that Century link offers with Direct TV to run the Magic Jack and the 3 lap tops. So Comcast wins. BUT I've had it with Comcast and their customer service or lack of. For the $73.65 a month they want for internet I struggle to have my service running. Every other day it's out. I call and go through the samething. "Have you checked the line?Have you checked your modem?" I keep telling them the servicemen they send out tells me the problem is at the pole the wires are sitting in water. I had one of their customer servicemen ask me "do you stand outside to see if we have shown up at the pole?" NO. I'm not going to stand outside everyday in hopes that they will show up. He told me "Well then that is your fault for not making sure they arrive." Well I'm done I'll just have to figure out something.
photo
wizardneedsbeer
For Sale ! one micro-bio space
01:38 PM on 01/10/2012
the reason these things don't work is there rules and regs
(have a child enrolled in the national school lunch program)
(have an overdue bill from a participating cable provider)
That alone knocks out most in need
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mediamarv
1-2-3 Is this thing working?
12:09 PM on 01/10/2012
Based upon my experience it won't happen with AT
photo
Mister Grumpy
An Angry American
11:36 AM on 01/10/2012
Funny. $7.2 billion spent, and still many in rural areas are without high speed internet. Maybe we should throw another couple of billion towards the problem? Yeah, that'll fix it.
10:32 AM on 01/10/2012
oh good lord.... !!

I cant wait for the free Escallade program!!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
P51MUSTANG
From the planet Sarcasia
10:09 AM on 01/10/2012
Bottom line: You WANT kids living in rural areas to have access to broadband, and the same educational opportunities as city kids.

We have enough people who don't believe in evolution in this country. Do you want even more?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
authorized-user
No right way to do a wrong thing
09:38 AM on 01/10/2012
Thanks to the federal economic policies, more of us will qualify for the free stuff.
09:49 AM on 01/10/2012
Not getting screwed by comcast, isn't the same thing as getting something for free
photo
wwrd1472
Loud, Proud and Country by the grace of God
09:20 AM on 01/10/2012
How about everyone just pay for their own Internet, if thy cant afford it go to the library it is free there. This is nothing but another entitlement.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nosybear
Liar, damned liar and statistician
09:29 AM on 01/10/2012
It's not an entitlement if you live in the middle of nowhere and don't even have the possibility of access. Take a look somewhere outside of your own biography, please, before making these bombastic statements!
photo
wwrd1472
Loud, Proud and Country by the grace of God
09:46 AM on 01/10/2012
I live in Southeastern Ohio, the middle of Appalachia so I know just a little about limited access to everything. Im not talking about it being availability, I am talking about giving away free computers and subsidizing broadband .
10:33 AM on 01/10/2012
it is called satalite and millions already subscribe to that at their cost....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CSKAP
Morlock or Eloi?
10:10 AM on 01/10/2012
Too funny, you're channeling Glen Beck.
He said the same thing, “The library is free”.
Actually the public library is another of those awful socialist things that communities have, like public schools, police and fire department.
They are actually paid for by the taxpayers!
Once President Paul is elected, we’ll do away with all those things.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tquin
10:41 AM on 01/10/2012
Obama is doing a pretty good job of getting rid of them all by himself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlonzoQuijana
Independent, Libertarian, Skeptic
09:12 AM on 01/10/2012
Another micro-managing -- "Look poor person: here's what we, the government experts, want you to do." -- welfare state program. Here's an idea: let's get rid of food stamps, heating assistance, insulation help, school lunch subsidies and all the micro-targeted programs. Then take the savings and wrap them into a lump sum payment along with the core welfare payment and be done with it. One form. One office. One bureaucracy. Better still, it allows the needy to determine where the money goes. Poor people are smarter than you think.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nicko68
09:08 AM on 01/10/2012
My Comcast bill just went up, and so did my Blue Cross, I guess that's to pay for those that get it free.
09:26 AM on 01/10/2012
Your Comcast increase is to pay for the HUGE increase in fees to Fox this year. Fox is now charging cable companies about 3X what they were just a year ago.

Your BCBS rate is regulated by the state. You can easily contact your state government and ask to see the new rate tariff proposals, and why they were granted.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
authorized-user
No right way to do a wrong thing
09:40 AM on 01/10/2012
Comcast won't allow you to drop the cable TV and use web service only without a penalty rate being imposed.

The CEO of BCBS shield in my state recently retired and gave himself a $1million bonus funded by the 3 million subscribers.

Something is wrong here.
10:35 AM on 01/10/2012
naaa - Nick was correct..... our comcast bill is more expensive as a result of this program!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gschear
Buhbye D. Rehberg, Sincerly, Bozeman MT
10:14 AM on 01/10/2012
That is what the Mandate in the Affordable healthcare act is for. To keep your Blue Cross from going up to pay for people who should have their own insurance policies. Catching on yet?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vorykua
08:31 AM on 01/10/2012
so the fcc wants to spread the kinder gentler and CENSORED version of the internet that SOPA and Protect IP want to create?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:25 AM on 01/10/2012
40mi west of Wash DC, broadband not available except for lousy satellite. sad commentary.
KenInd
Keeping some levity among all the gravity....
08:19 AM on 01/10/2012
My Verizon mobile will not stream videos or Netflix, and is limited to usage. My UK Three mobile broadband dongle is fast, will stream videos and is unlimited, for 15 pounds ($24) a month.

The US is years behind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlonzoQuijana
Independent, Libertarian, Skeptic
09:14 AM on 01/10/2012
We have wildly expensive and inefficient healthcare and telecom. It is frustrating.
KenInd
Keeping some levity among all the gravity....
08:11 AM on 01/10/2012
Fine, but let's restore heating allowance money that was cut earlier this year first. People die in the cold; not from lack of internet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlonzoQuijana
Independent, Libertarian, Skeptic
09:15 AM on 01/10/2012
Just bundle ALL assistance into one payment and the let the people decide where they spend the money. It's simple. It puts responsibility on the recipient.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
authorized-user
No right way to do a wrong thing
09:41 AM on 01/10/2012
How about a tax cut?
10:37 AM on 01/10/2012
40's and cigaretts would benefit for sure!!
07:54 AM on 01/10/2012
Maybe its time to go back to tin cans and string, to crystal sets and the telegraph. Lets start a 21st century Luddite movement, smash the high tech devices and dig out those rotary phones. Hey whatever happened to soda bars?
photo
Mitchman57
I might be indecisive. But... maybe not.
08:20 AM on 01/10/2012
As long as rickets and polio aren't part of the plan too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CSKAP
Morlock or Eloi?
10:12 AM on 01/10/2012
Getting close to Ron Paul’s level there.
Except I think things like Radio and telegraph are still too restrictive of “liberty”