iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Google 'Search Plus Your World' Brings Google+ Into Search Results

Google

By MICHAEL LIEDTKE   01/10/12 06:34 PM ET   AP

SAN FRANCISCO -- Google is sifting through the photos and commentary on its blossoming social network so its Internet search results can include more personal information.

The additional personal touches that began to roll out Tuesday mark another step toward one of Google's most ambitious goals. The Internet search leader eventually hopes to know enough about each of its users so it can tailor its results to fit the unique interests of each person looking for something.

Different people should start seeing different search results more frequently now that Google Inc. is importing content from its 6-month-old Plus service, a product that the company introduced in an attempt to counter the popularity of Facebook's online hangout and Twitter's short-messaging hub. Google's main search results page also will start highlighting more content from an older online photo service called Picasa.

Other features will recommend additional people and companies to follow on Plus, based on their search requests. Those suggestions will exclude publicly accessible information about accounts on Facebook and Twitter.

The preferential treatment for Plus might amplify concerns about the objectivity of Google's search results _a focal point of broad regulatory investigations in the U.S. and Europe.

The Federal Trade Commission, attorneys general in six states, and the European Commission are looking into complaints alleging Google has been unfairly exploiting its dominance in Internet search to promote its other services while ignoring or downplaying pertinent information about its rivals.

The exclusive Plus recommendations in Google's search results are "exactly the kind of thing that the antitrust people are screaming about," said Danny Sullivan, an industry expert who has been following Google since the 1990s and is now editor of SearchEngineLand.com. "This is very un-Google like. It's unfair to other services and it's unfair to people."

Sullivan's criticism is especially striking because he has generally defended other search features that highlight Google's own services.

Twitter said it's worried the added emphasis on Plus in Google's search results will make it more difficult to find breaking news and other compelling information shared within the 250 million messages, or tweets, posted on its service each day.

"We think that's bad for people, publishers, news organizations and Twitter users," Twitter said in a statement.

Facebook didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Google says its efforts to reel in more information from other sharing services are frequently thwarted by the providers. For instance, Twitter puts explicit instructions in its computer computing telling Google not to index the material, according to Google.

"Ushering in the new era of social and private data search will take close cooperation, and we hope other sites participate so we can provide the best possible experience for our users," Google said in a statement issued after it was asked about its added emphasis on Plus in its search results.

Facebook and Twitter pose a threat to Google because they don't allow Google's search engine to log most of the photos, links and observations cascading through those services. That's troublesome to Google because its search engine could become less useful if its system can't analyze what people are signaling is important to them so those preferences can be factored into the results.

Twitter once gave Google better access to the tweets flowing through its service as part of a 2009 licensing agreement, but that deal expired last summer. Microsoft Corp.'s Bing search engine is still paying to mine into Twitter's service.

Facebook has long cooperated with Bing, partly because Microsoft bought a 1.6 percent stake in the company in 2007. At the same time, Facebook has steadfastly resisted Google's attempts to peer deeper into its social network.

That's one of the reasons Google started Plus, which is now hatching "Search, plus Your World."

The feature will be automatically turned on for all English-language searches made by users logged into Google. Turning off the personal results permanently will require changing a setting in Google's personal preferences. The personal results can also be excluded on a search-by-search basis by clicking on an icon of the globe on the results page (the personal results will be denoted by a button featuring a human's silhouette).

If the new formula works as Google expects, the search results will include pertinent information culled from the requestor's Plus account. For instance, a query about the San Francisco 49ers might include links and comments made about the football team by other people in one of the social circles on the user's Plus account. A search request that includes the name of a dog owned by the user or a friend might turn up photos of the pet that have been posted on Plus and Picasa.

"This is going to open up a whole new avenue in search," said Ben Gomes, a Google fellow.

Google isn't the first to do this. Bing has been mining some of the preferences and other information shared on Facebook since May. But Google's emphasis on more personal results figures to attract more attention because its search engine is so dominant. It handles about two-thirds of the Internet search requests made in the U.S. while Bing processes less than one-third, including the activity that it comes through a partnership with Yahoo Inc.

Facebook, though, has greater insights into personal tastes. That's because its nearly 8-year-old social network boasts more than 800 million users who share more than 1.5 billion photos alone each week. In October, Google said Plus had more than 40 million users. Google hasn't updated the information since then, although some external studies have estimated Plus began the new year with 60 million to 70 million users.

The search changes Some of Google's changes may help prod more people into joining Plus.

As part of Tuesday's expansion, the profile pictures of Plus accountholders will appear in the drop-down suggestions on Google's search box. So when typing in "Mary," you may see those named Mary in your circle along with those Google believes you'd find interesting.

Searches on general topics such as "music" and "sports," will generate suggestions on people and companies that have Plus accounts. Sullivan considers this be unfair because some people might not have Plus accounts, or share more interesting information on their Twitter page.

While Google is hoping the addition of more personal results will make its search engine even more useful, the changes also could spook some people as they realize how much information is being compiled about them. Google tried to minimize privacy concerns by recently switching to technology that encrypts all its search results to protect the information from slipping out.

Previous privacy missteps by both Google and Facebook resulted in both companies entering into settlements with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission. The FTC agreements require Google and Facebook to submit to external audits of their privacy practices every other year.

Also on HuffPost:

Check out the slideshow to see how Google+ content is being integrated into Google Search results (and vice versa).
Watch the video (below) to see how the new integration works. ALSO ON HUFFPOST
FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

SAN FRANCISCO -- Google is sifting through the photos and commentary on its blossoming social network so its Internet search results can include more personal information. The additional personal tou...
SAN FRANCISCO -- Google is sifting through the photos and commentary on its blossoming social network so its Internet search results can include more personal information. The additional personal tou...
Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 392
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
05:21 PM on 01/24/2012
So if i search herpes, all my friends can lik.. +1 my search?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mikeeee
Did god apologize to you today?
09:51 AM on 01/12/2012
There's a wonderful thing called "Scroogle".
Check it out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Accoustic22
Common sense is everything but common
01:05 PM on 01/11/2012
I'm in love with our technological advancements. This is a great new feature and I can not wait to use it. I can definitely see the benefits of this new search method. Bravo Google! Innovation is the way to strive in this world!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mikeeee
Did god apologize to you today?
09:53 AM on 01/12/2012
Yes I can definitely see the benefits of your world reduced down your preconceived notions with little chance of an alternative view leaking in to clutter it up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Accoustic22
Common sense is everything but common
10:08 AM on 01/12/2012
No one is twisting your arm to use google. If you don't like it, don't use it. It's very simple. There is no need to complicate life.
12:17 PM on 01/11/2012
can google search find where i left my car keys?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RapidProf
09:32 AM on 01/24/2012
Not yet . . . but you can bet they're working on it.
05:57 AM on 01/11/2012
This post explores what this means to the average web user: http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/blog/google-search-plus-your-world-what-it-really-means/
02:04 AM on 01/11/2012
I recognize the benefit of making search suggestions based on: (1) A profile of a person who is doing the search (e.g., an explicit, or inferred, description of the person's interests); (2) The correlations between a person's own browsing or purchasing history and that of other people.

The search suggestions made by Amazon.com, Netflix, YouTube, and Google Web Search, have helped me discover new, interesting things.

However, I worry that broad application of personalized or popularity-influenced search methods might make it difficult to see the world objectively, impartially, accurately, and fully.

Putting on blinders: One possible problem is that people will intentionally (or accidentally!) block, or fail to receive, important facts that would challenge their ideas and influence their decisions. If Google or Netflix offered an option to block entire topics, in a manner similar to the so-called "safe search" (to block sexual topics), then users could permanently blind themselves to major aspects of reality, and thus lack the knowledge to make informed decisions (e.g., when voting).

Group-think and inappropriate stardom: Another possible problem is that popularity-influenced search results might promote "group-think", or rapid gravitation toward, and commitment to, particular ideas. A search algorithm might arbitrarily rank one result over another, and this random choice could be reinforced by people choosing the first search result over the second (simply because the first result was first), to a point where the first result becomes ranked overwhelmingly higher than the second result.
photo
BoFo
Like, you talkin' to me?
04:36 PM on 01/11/2012
That is exactly what this TED talk is about:

Eli Pariser: Beware online "filter bubbles"

http://www.ted.com/talks/eli_pariser_beware_online_filter_bubbles.html
12:55 AM on 01/11/2012
So much for "Don't be evil."
photo
BoFo
Like, you talkin' to me?
12:50 AM on 01/11/2012
"The Internet search leader eventually hopes to know enough about each of its users so it can tailor its results to fit the unique interests of each person looking for something."

There is a very interesting TED talk about the importance of individuals having control over how their search results are filtered. Watch it here:

Eli Pariser: Beware online "filter bubbles"

http://www.ted.com/talks/eli_pariser_beware_online_filter_bubbles.html
09:24 AM on 01/11/2012
so it can tailor its results to fit the unique interests of each person
------------------------------------
Does that mean more than selecting advertisements which constantly nag at me because I looked at some stuff?

It's like I look at a few office chairs. Then it's ''Are you going to buy one or not. Look at this one! What is wrong with you! This one is great. No! Look at this one.''

Brainwashing and nagging. Just what everyone needs more of.
photo
BoFo
Like, you talkin' to me?
04:25 PM on 01/11/2012
"Does that mean more than selecting advertisem­ents which constantly nag at me because I looked at some stuff?"

Yes it does -- that is what the TED talk is about. Check it out -- Eli Pariser does a better job of explaining it than I could, especially with the limitations on the length of comments here.
08:58 AM on 01/12/2012
That will end the web surfing, cause we'll be taking to wherever they think we should!!! no more exploration????

so sad...

Atenciosamente;
Dr. Fabio Corsini Motta - ABQ:0486
http://www.ipquiropraxia.com.br/quiropraxia.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mseguin
@ebodypolitic
10:56 PM on 01/10/2012
What exactly did folks think they were trying to create a social network for? Reference their mission statement (order the worlds information), add social, and the results are fairly obvious.

As a content producer I am all for it. Targeted ads are good for the business, and good for the consumer. As an epistemologist, I am deeply opposed. Help, I am torn.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pdubble
11:19 PM on 01/10/2012
I'm with you. This is even more reason I tie together almost none of my accounts from service to service and belong to one social network. We are almost making it too easy for companies like Google to sell our lives.
10:18 PM on 01/10/2012
No thanks Google, I like my searches to be broad. gives me more information. This is why there are browser add on's like stumble.
09:43 PM on 01/10/2012
What if I'm doing research and I Don't want the results tailored to my preferences?
09:53 PM on 01/10/2012
De/activate the thing...
09:40 PM on 01/10/2012
If you don't like the changes Google is making it's rather simple. DON'T USE GOOGLE! DON'T USE GOOGLE + if you are that doggon pissy about the changes made.

You are living in an internet and information age where every social-media site you are a member of is desperately trying to know everything about it's users. Some of these sites sell your info, some don't. Worried? Don't use the internet. Don't care? Then stop complaining. Simple.
photo
FreedomBeforeSecurity
Primary: The only time we truly control our future
09:45 PM on 01/10/2012
Or... fight back.
Adblock, Ghostery, Noscript, etc...

There are a ton of apps, and addons out there that exist to protect people from the perils of the Internet. But feel free to stick your fingers in your ears and hum.
01:08 AM on 01/11/2012
I find tor, combined with FoxyProxy (configured to send all google-related requests over the tor network) is useful.
09:38 PM on 01/10/2012
I'm all for it. I'm all for more personal search results instead of getting a plethora of non-related results.
09:38 PM on 01/10/2012
Google's personalization of search results is already beginning to change the online business landscape. At a basic level, more personalized search results based on user behavior and preference is going to mean less influence and real estate for virtually every online marketer - whether peddling a product or promoting a news outlet. At http://SearchRespect.com, we already feel the difference in the work we do everyday.

At another level, SEO's and savvy marketers will digest the changes and ponder how user behavior can be affected to achieve desired marketing results, but now on a finely diced block of cheese.

In the end, these changes are good for Google and the businesses that feed it, and bad for everyone else trying to make a name for themselves. For online users in general, it's still up in the air whether Google Plus's affect on search results is going to be useful. One thing is for sure, we're going to need more internet discovery tools since it seems like Google is going to be feeding us interpretations of our own vomit.
03:42 PM on 01/11/2012
"savvy marketers" Like the ones making informative posts on blogs and then displaying their web link?
04:22 PM on 01/11/2012
Hey Istok, glad you found it informative. It's good to know someone's affiliations when reading their views on Google, especially with the search landscape changing everyday.
09:30 PM on 01/10/2012
I may have just done my last search on Google.
This is just way too intrusive, to say nothing of trivializing search results. If I want to know what my friends think about a subject, the last place I would have looked would be Google. There, I expect a wide range of sources that I would not otherwise find.
Bye, bye, Google search engine!