More

Guantanamo Closure Hopes Fade As Prison Turns 10

BEN FOX   01/10/12 03:02 PM ET   AP

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico — Suleiman al-Nahdi waits with dozens of other prisoners in a seemingly permanent state of limbo five years after he was cleared for release from Guantanamo Bay.

"I wonder if the U.S. government wants to keep us here forever," the 37-year-old al-Nahdi wrote in a recent letter to his lawyers.

Open for 10 years on Wednesday, the prison seems more established than ever. The deadline set by President Barack Obama to close Guantanamo came and went two years ago. No detainee has left in a year because of restrictions on transfers, and indefinite military detention is now enshrined in U.S. law.

The 10th anniversary will be the subject of demonstrations in London and Washington. Prisoners at the U.S. Navy base in Cuba plan to mark the day with sit-ins, banners and a refusal of meals, said Ramzi Kassem, a lawyer who represents seven inmates.

"They would like to send a message that the prisoners of Guantanamo still reject the injustice of their imprisonment," said Kassem, a law professor at the City University of New York.

Prisoners informed the guards in advance that they would be conducting peaceful protests to mark the anniversary, Navy Cmdr. Tamsen Reese, a spokeswoman for the detention center, said Tuesday, adding that such actions are "not uncommon" at Guantanamo.

Human rights groups and lawyers for prisoners are dismayed that Obama not only failed to overcome resistance in Congress and close the prison, but that his administration has resumed military tribunals at the base and continues to hold men like al-Nahdi who have been cleared for release.

Critics are also angry over the president's Dec. 31 signing of the National Defense Authorization Act, which includes a provision allowing indefinite military detention without trial.

"Now, we have Guantanamo forever signed into law," said Andrea Prasow, senior counterterrorism counsel for Human Rights Watch. "Instead of pushing forward with the agenda of closure, he has accepted the idea of indefinite detention for the duration of some undefined hostilities."

White House press secretary Jay Carney said Monday that Obama still wants to close Guantanamo because "it's the right thing to do for our national security interest," a view that he says is shared by senior members of the military. He noted President George W. Bush and Sen. John McCain, while running for president in 2008, also supported closing the prison.

"The commitment that the president has to closing Guantanamo Bay is as firm today as it was during the campaign ... I think this is a process that faces obstacles that we're all aware of and we will continue to work through them," Carney said.

Today, Guantanamo holds 171 prisoners and it's an odd mix. Thirty-six await trial on war crimes charges, including the alleged mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks. There are 46 in indefinite detention as men the U.S. considers dangerous but who cannot be charged for lack of evidence or other reasons. The U.S. wants to release 32 but hasn't, largely because of congressional restrictions, and 57 men from Yemen, like al-Nahdi, aren't being charged but the government won't let them go because their country is unstable.

"There is not a thing keeping them from going home except that our clever government is waiting for conditions to improve in Yemen, where they have only deteriorated," said John Chandler, a lawyer based in Atlanta, Georgia, who represents al-Nahdi.

Few expected Guantanamo to reach this milestone. The prison, which occupies a portion of the 45-square-mile (115-square-kilometer) U.S. base at the southeastern corner of Cuba, started as an impromptu place to hold men scooped up at the start of the Afghanistan war, a mix that turned out to range from hard-core al-Qaida members to hapless bystanders.

Al-Nahdi seems to be in the middle. He was detained because he attended an al-Qaida-linked training camp in Afghanistan but he was not accused of any specific attacks on U.S. forces. The military classified him as a "low level" mujahedeen who could be transferred out of Guantanamo, where he has been held since June 2002.

The first prisoners, brought to the base shackled and hooded and clad in bright orange jumpsuits, were kept in outdoor cages and interrogated in wooden huts when they arrived on Jan. 11, 2002. With detainees later kept in steel mesh cells, the population grew to nearly 700 by mid-2003.

From the start, the camps seethed with tension. Prisoners, some subjected to harsh interrogations and sleep deprivation, staged mass hunger strikes, and banged on their cell doors for hours and hurled bodily fluids at guards.

In ensuing years, the military erected a modern prison complex virtually indistinguishable from a typical jail, keeping most men in communal blocks with amenities such as video games and cable TV.

U.S. officials have rejected most allegations of abusive conditions, and reports of clashes with guards and turmoil have dropped along with the decline in the prison population.

But the U.S. government also decided Guantanamo's reputation was more trouble than it was worth and began trying to empty it under Bush. His administration released 537 prisoners, transferring them to other countries or freeing them outright.

Under Obama, Congress balked at releasing prisoners, citing concerns that some already let go had rejoined the Taliban or al-Qaida. Congress imposed a requirement that the Defense Department certify a prisoner did not pose a threat if released, a guarantee that officials said was nearly impossible to grant. The law Obama signed Dec. 31 softened the language, but it's been a year since a single man has been transferred out.

"These are men who were in their early 20s when they were picked up and now they are in their early 30s and a significant amount of their lives has slipped away while this debate has gone on and on and on," said Cori Crider, a lawyer for the British human rights group Reprieve who represents several Guantanamo prisoners.

Zachary Katznelson, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, said Congress was more interested in scoring political points, and should listen to security experts.

"We are not talking about releasing anyone who is dangerous. We're talking about releasing people who the intelligence and military communities have unanimously agreed should be released," Katznelson said.

Congress also has prohibited moving any Guantanamo prisoners to the U.S. for detention or trial, which effectively blocked Obama's goal of closing the prison by January 2009 and trying the self-proclaimed mastermind of the Sept. 11 attack, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and others accused of war crimes in a civilian court. Mohammed is expected to be arraigned at the base later this year.

Congress also stripped the prisoners of the right to challenge their detention in the courts by filing writs of habeas corpus. The Supreme Court returned that right, but the courts have said the U.S. can still detain men even if there is little evidence against them and no intention of charging them. When prisoners have won their cases in a lower court, the government has appealed and won.

With such a bleak legal landscape, Chandler and his co-counsel withdrew al-Nahdi's appeal rather than face certain defeat. It's made for difficult meetings when the lawyers must explain why so many others, including prisoners who were convicted of war crimes, have been released.

"He says: 'How come I can't go home? I've never been charged and I'm never going to be charged. And of course, I have no answer to those questions," Chandler said.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico — Suleiman al-Nahdi waits with dozens of other prisoners in a seemingly permanent state of limbo five years after he was cleared for release from Guantanamo Bay. "I wonder...
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico — Suleiman al-Nahdi waits with dozens of other prisoners in a seemingly permanent state of limbo five years after he was cleared for release from Guantanamo Bay. "I wonder...
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico — Suleiman al-Nahdi waits with dozens of other prisoners in a seemingly permanent state of limbo five years after he was cleared for release from Guantanamo Bay. "I wonder...
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico — Suleiman al-Nahdi waits with dozens of other prisoners in a seemingly permanent state of limbo five years after he was cleared for release from Guantanamo Bay. "I wonder...
Filed by Jade Walker  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 679
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
Dan Stewart 11:14 AM on 01/10/2012
Just another in a long train of Obama's broken promises. As Glenn Greenwald explains it: "Even Obama's plan for closing Guantanamo entailed the mere re-location of its indefinite detention system to U.S. soil, where dozens of detainees, at least, would continue to be  Read More...
03:01 PM on 01/11/2012
The US initiates an unprovoked attack on Iraq and then rounds people up and holds them indefinitely without any kind of due process because they don't have evidence to convict them of anything. That sounds like a wonderful system of justice and, with the new NDAA, it can now be applied to American citizens. I guess the imbiciles defending this would have no problem spending the rest of their lives behind bars without a trial because some anonymous person accused them of being terrorists.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PorrickSF
What? Me worry?
08:21 PM on 01/10/2012
I think it bears repeating that the Republicans prevented Barack Obama from closing Guantanamo by refusing to allocate any funds for the purpose.

I am getting tired of these implications and iunnuendos that President Obama broke a campaign promise. He didn't break a promise, he signed the executive order to close it, rather Republicans did everything they could to prevent it from being shut down. Once again, they ignored what was best for the country and did what they felt was best for the Republican Party.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:05 AM on 01/11/2012
Congress also stripped the prisoners of the right to challenge their detention in the courts by filing writs of habeas corpus. The Supreme Court returned that right, but the courts have said the U.S. can still detain men even if there is little evidence against them and no intention of charging them. When prisoners have won their cases in a lower court, the government has appealed and won.
06:55 PM on 01/10/2012
Mr. Obama, who for the first two years of his administration, had a Democrat House and Senate, did not keep his promise of closing Gitmo within his first year in office.

No one to blame but himself.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
gaydood
Denied HC? goto PCIP.gov
09:42 PM on 01/10/2012
get alife
photo
danny saunders
ma nishtana?
02:51 PM on 01/10/2012
The land of the free? Say bye bye to that.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/world/americas/23iht-23prison.12253738.html?pagewanted=all
02:39 PM on 01/10/2012
Obama should have all of these individuals released back into the wild and then send a drone their way to apologize for the misunderstanding.
photo
NETarrant
Excellent
02:11 PM on 01/10/2012
This is in the top 10 of Obama failures.
photo
warloch2
Spraying cold reality from the hose of truth.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:03 PM on 01/10/2012
You understand that's a separate issue from whether Gitmo should remain open, right?
photo
warloch2
Spraying cold reality from the hose of truth.
06:29 AM on 01/11/2012
jacob,
No it is exactly why Club Gitmo should remain open and why Obama needs to be voted out.
:-)
photo
warloch2
Spraying cold reality from the hose of truth.
02:10 PM on 01/10/2012
Those vacationers at Club Gitmo should consider themselves lucky. They get to live rent free in a tropical paradise, they get three free square delicious meals every day, free top of the line medical and do not have to work. Lucky.
:-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kilchis
We're all in this together
02:32 PM on 01/10/2012
Would you trade places?
photo
warloch2
Spraying cold reality from the hose of truth.
06:27 AM on 01/11/2012
kilch,
If I had the choice of either living in a hot, filthy, treeless desert with nary a drop of water or relaxing in a tropical paradise rent free and all I had to do was give up information about my evil cohorts------YES.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:40 PM on 01/10/2012
So, if one of your neighbors accused you of working with the Taliban or AQ (motivated by a healthy reward), and you spent a few years in a cage in Guantanamo without being afforded the opportunity to contest the allegations, you'd consider yourself the pretty lucky, huh?
photo
warloch2
Spraying cold reality from the hose of truth.
06:19 AM on 01/11/2012
jacob,
Your comment above is what is known as a Straw Man Argument.
The prisoners in Club Gitmo were taken prisoner on the field of battle or caught in the act..
:-)
photo
arovingmind
I think, therefore I am liberal
02:09 PM on 01/10/2012
Just another broken Obama promise, shall we list them all? No, let's list the one's he kept.

He did sign the Act regarding age and gender discrimination suits. He did sign a Health Care Bill that benefits the insurance industry. He did extend the tax cuts for the rich. He did extend and expand the Patriot Act. He did give more money to Wall Street Bankers and turn his back on Main Street. He did turn his back on the homeless, the poor, the unions, and working men and women of this nation. He did turn his back on the core of Democratic principles that lead to the Civil Rights, Voting Rights, Equal Rights, Union development and protections, higher education for all, food programs to prevent hunger in the wealthiest nation in the world, and he presided over the increase of children living in poverty to its highest level since records were started on this issue.

It is time to elect a real Democrat, it is time to quit electing DINO's like Clinton and Obama, we need to return to the roots of this once great party. We need to reject the philosophy that compromises with a party that sees tax cuts for the wealthy as more important than the de@ths of thousands of Americans for lack of health care, lack of shelter, lack of food and basic necessities.
02:14 PM on 01/10/2012
Sadly like any other politician, getting re-elected is more important.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jame Gumb
It rubs the lotion on its skin
01:59 PM on 01/10/2012
Not only has Pres. Obama not closed Gitmo. He's backpedaled. It's obvious that he now believes it needs to be open. With words, he rejects indefinite detention, with acts he supports it and now he has even extended the reach to include American citizens on American soil.
01:53 PM on 01/10/2012
Now that NDAA was signed by Obama, you too can have a place there.
photo
warloch2
Spraying cold reality from the hose of truth.
02:13 PM on 01/10/2012
ferry,
No Obama will put U.S. citizens in some filthy dungeon here in the U.S. mainland.
photo
Esther21072011
I'm one of the 53% that pays taxes
02:26 PM on 01/10/2012
Maybe he can go back and look at the Democrat program that put US citizens of Japanese and German descent into camps indefinitely during WWI and WWII
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
krayonc
Travel is fatal to prejudice & bigotry.
01:52 PM on 01/10/2012
I saw this great poster yesterday:

Countries with indefinite detentions:

Hitler's Germany
Stalin's Russia
China
North Korea
Myanmar
Cuba
United States of America

Of course, it was a Ron Paul poster....hehehe... sorry, I can't help but be a Paulbot.
photo
Esther21072011
I'm one of the 53% that pays taxes
02:27 PM on 01/10/2012
Well -the US was already on that list from when FDR put Americans of Japanese and German descent into the camps during WWII
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kilchis
We're all in this together
02:39 PM on 01/10/2012
It was a mistake Esther,part of our history that we'll all have to live with,like a lot of things,but you can't just pin it on FDR,that's presentism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
krayonc
Travel is fatal to prejudice & bigotry.
02:40 PM on 01/10/2012
Agreed.
01:51 PM on 01/10/2012
i could really care less about gitmo. there are a thousand more important things that need to be done before they close that joint. less than 200 "enemy combatants", let em rot.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:01 PM on 01/10/2012
Guantanamo Bay is a stain on our national honor, serves as a recruiting tool for our enemies, and contradicts the principles we profess to hold dear.
photo
warloch2
Spraying cold reality from the hose of truth.
02:14 PM on 01/10/2012
Jacob,
AAAWWWWKK. Poly want a cracker?
:-)
photo
Esther21072011
I'm one of the 53% that pays taxes
02:28 PM on 01/10/2012
No stain that I see - and our enemies have so many recruiting tools it makes no real difference
02:27 PM on 01/10/2012
Guantanamo makes us look no better than Iran, China, Syria .... We're better than that.

Supporters and fear mongers of Gitmo forget how many real terrorists are serving life sentences in federal prison.

Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman (1993 WTC Attack)
Aimal Qazi (CIA Shooter)
Wadih el Hage (US Embassy Bombing)
Mohamed Sadeek Odeh (US Embassy Bombing)
Mohamed al-'Owhali (US Embassy Bombing)
Zacarias Moussaoui (20th Hijacker)

There are many more.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:43 PM on 01/10/2012
That can't be. We're told again and again that there's just no way for the U.S. federal prison system to possibly deal with these people. Every other day you hear about another successful escape from federal super-max prisons, after all.
April22
Some experiences in life are ineffable
01:34 PM on 01/10/2012
In 2002, Pres. G.W. Bush opened Camp Delta to hold detainees in the "War on Terror!"

Talk about irony!

Torturing other human beings in an effort to end terrorism!

With the enactment of Indefinite Detention, torture by the US government continues!

The estimated cost to Americans to keep Guantanamo up and running each year is between $90 - $118 million a year.

Guantanamo's Camp Delta is a symbol of 10 years of the US federal government's shameless propaganda!
01:42 PM on 01/10/2012
Thank God for G.W. and the U.S. govn't
photo
arovingmind
I think, therefore I am liberal
02:11 PM on 01/10/2012
If your godthingy is responsible they your godthing is a warcriminal too.
photo
warloch2
Spraying cold reality from the hose of truth.
02:16 PM on 01/10/2012
jslatts32,
Amen to that.
:-)
photo
AnotherAngle
This person is pending approval ...
02:01 PM on 01/10/2012
The cost for each state/federal/local prisoner is approximately $25,000 per year each and there are about 2,000,000 of them. Add it up. It makes Gitmo look like child's play.

I guess we should let them all out too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kilchis
We're all in this together
02:50 PM on 01/10/2012
So 171 times $25,000 is $4,275,000 as compared to the $100,000,000 that we are paying at Guantanamo.The inmates are all convicted felons,most of these guys have never gone to trial,they've only been accused. They should all get a hearing,then a trial if that's what is decided then those who are convicted go to prison.
01:32 PM on 01/10/2012
Empire's proud jewel.
April22
Some experiences in life are ineffable
01:36 PM on 01/10/2012
Rather like the Spanish Inquistion conducted by the Holy Roman Empire, wouldn't you say?