More

New Hampshire Primary Election 2012: For Romney, Size Of Any Victory May Shape Race

Mitt Romney New Hampshire Primary 2012

DAVID ESPO and STEVE PEOPLES   01/10/12 11:43 PM ET   AP

CONCORD, N.H. — Mitt Romney cruised to a solid victory in the New Hampshire primary Tuesday night, picking up steam from his first-place finish in the lead-off Iowa caucuses and firmly establishing himself as the man to beat for the Republican presidential nomination.

"Tonight we made history," Romney told cheering supporters before pivoting to a stinging denunciation of President Barack Obama. "The middle class has been crushed ... our debt is too high and our opportunities too few," he declared – ignoring the rivals who had been assailing him for weeks and making clear he intends to be viewed as the party's nominee in waiting after only two contests.

His Republican rivals said otherwise, looking ahead to South Carolina on Jan. 21 as the place to stop the former Massachusetts governor. Already, several contenders and committees supporting them had put down heavy money to reserve time for television advertising there.

Even so, the order of finish – Ron Paul second, followed by Jon Huntsman, with Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum trailing – scrambled the field and prolonged the increasingly desperate competition to emerge as the true conservative rival to Romney.

With his victory, Romney became the first Republican to sweep the first two contests in competitive races since 1976. Based on partial returns, The Associated Press estimated that turnout would exceed the 2008 record by about 4 percent.

Romney fashioned his victory despite a sustained assault by rivals eager to undermine his claim as the contender best situated to beat Obama and help reduce the nation's painfully high unemployment. Gingrich led the way, suggesting at one point that Romney, a venture capitalist, was a corporate raider. The front-runner's defenders said the rhetoric was more suitable to a Democratic opponent than a conservative Republican.

Returns from 69 percent of New Hampshire precincts showed Romney with 38 percent of the vote, followed by Texas Rep Paul with 24 percent, former Utah Gov. Huntsman with 17 percent and former House Speaker Gingrich and former Pennsylvania Sen. Santorum with 10 percent each.

In interviews as they left their polling places, New Hampshire voters said the economy was the issue that mattered most to them, and a candidate's ability to defeat Obama outranked other qualities.

Romney had won in Iowa by a scant eight votes over Santorum, and gained barely a quarter of the vote there.

On Tuesday, he battled not only his rivals but also high expectations as the ballots were counted, particularly since his pursuers had virtually conceded New Hampshire, next-door to the state Romney governed for four years.

Seeking to undercut Romney's victory, Gingrich and others suggested in advance that anything below 40 percent or so would indicate weakness by the nomination front-runner.

They didn't mention that Sen. John McCain's winning percentage in the 2008 primary was 37 percent.

Romney's win was worth at least four delegates to the Republican National Convention next summer. Paul earned at least two delegates and Huntsman at least one. Five more remained to be awarded, based on final vote totals.

"Tonight we celebrate," Romney told his supporters. "Tomorrow we go back to work."

Unlike Iowa and New Hampshire, where unemployment is well below the national average, joblessness is far higher in South Carolina. That creates a different political environment for the race.

The state also has a reputation for primaries turning nasty, and it appeared that all of Romney's pursuers read the new Hampshire returns as reason enough to remain in the race.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who skipped New Hampshire to get a head start in South Carolina, said Tuesday's results showed "the race for a conservative alternative to Mitt Romney remains wide open."

"We're nibbling at his heels," Paul said of Romney.

Huntsman had staked his candidacy on a strong showing in New Hampshire, and he announced after the polls closed that he had passed his own test. "Where we stand is a solid position and we go south from here," he said.

Despite struggling to gain 10 percent in New Hampshire, Gingrich and Santorum also said they were in.

About one-third of Republican voters interviewed as they left their polling places said the most important factor in choosing a candidate was finding someone who could defeat Obama in the fall. Romney won their support overwhelmingly.

He ran about even with Huntsman among the one-quarter of the voters who cited experience as the most important factor in selecting a candidate to support.

Paul ran first among voters who cited moral character or true conservatism.

As was the case last week in Iowa, the economy was the issue that mattered most to voters, 61 percent of those surveyed. Another 24 percent cited record federal deficits.

Romney carried the first group and split the second with Paul.

The survey results came from interviews conducted for The Associated Press and the television networks with 2,670 voters across the state. It had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

New Hampshire has a rich history of humbling favorites, front-runners and even an occasional incumbent.

The state's Republican voters embarrassed President George H.W. Bush in 1992, when he won but was held to 53 percent of the vote against Pat Buchanan, running as an insurgent in difficult economic times. Buchanan, who never held public office, won the primary four years later over Sen. Bob Dole of Kansas, who was the nominee in the fall.

In 2000, national front-runner George W. Bush rolled into the state after a convincing first-place finish in Iowa but wound up a distant second behind McCain. Bush later won the GOP nomination and then the presidency.

Twelve Republican National Convention delegates were at stake on Tuesday, out of 1,144 needed to win the nomination.

Obama was unopposed in the Democratic primary.

In his first presidential run in 2008, Romney finished second in the state to McCain. This time, he campaigned with the Arizona senator's endorsement, as well as backing from Sen. Kelly Ayotte and numerous other members of the state's Republican establishment.

Romney committed a pair of unforced errors in the campaign's final 48 hours, and the other contenders sought to capitalize.

On Sunday, after a pair of weekend debates only 12 hours apart, the millionaire former businessman said he understood the fear of being laid off. "There were a couple of times when I was worried I was going to get pink-slipped," he said, although neither he nor his aides offered specifics.

And on Monday, in an appearance before the Nashua Chamber of Commerce, Romney was discussing health insurance coverage when he said, "I like being able to fire people who provide services to me. If someone doesn't give me the good service I need, I'm going to go get somebody else to provide that service to me."

Huntsman, a former Utah governor, saw an opening. "Gov. Romney enjoys firing people. I enjoy creating jobs," he said.

And Gingrich said Bain Capital, the venture capital firm Romney once headed, "apparently looted the companies, left people totally unemployed and walked off with millions of dollars."

Romney has made his business experience a cornerstone of his presidential campaign, saying that Bain on balance created 100,000 jobs, and as a result, he understands how to help boost employment.

He sought to shrug off the attacks, saying he had expected them from Obama in the fall, but Gingrich and others had decided to go first. "Things can always be taken out of context," he said.

___

Associated Press writers Philip Elliott, Shannon McCaffrey, Kasie Hunt, Beth Fouhy and Holly Ramer in New Hampshire, Brian Bakst in South Carolina and Connie Cass in Washington contributed to this report. Espo reported from Washington.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
CONCORD, N.H. — Mitt Romney cruised to a solid victory in the New Hampshire primary Tuesday night, picking up steam from his first-place finish in the lead-off Iowa caucuses and firmly establish...
CONCORD, N.H. — Mitt Romney cruised to a solid victory in the New Hampshire primary Tuesday night, picking up steam from his first-place finish in the lead-off Iowa caucuses and firmly establish...
Filed by Mark Hanrahan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,933
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (130 total)
  1 of 9  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Tulka2 05:20 PM on 01/10/2012
Tea Partiers and Libertarians are confused. 

Here is Mitt Romney standing in front of them and he is a perfect Ayn Rand superman.  Superior physically.  Born into every privilege.  Mitt cut a swath through ordinary people and their puny little lives to make his millions.  Ayn Rand would put on her red lip-stick and spike heels for Mitt Romney.  I mean... Mitt  Read More...

And yet....when it's spread out in front of them, Independents don't like Romney and it's not just that he is a Mormon (which is not Ayn Rand hot).  Is that the only thing about Romney they don't like? 

I propose the reason they don't like Mitt is because Americans, left and right, even if they don't like to say it, believe in fairness.  We want the American economy to be based on merit and hard work.  We all hate crony capitalism which is our real enemy.  Crony capitalism, the revolving door between government and business and the lobbying that goes with it, is the enemy of all.  We have got to get the money out. 

We don't need to re-invent the wheel either.  Look at the humane, civilized countries.  They have publicly funded elections.  No t.v. pundit will tell you that because where do you think all that campaign money gets spent?  On media ads for the candidates, is where. 

We all, left and right,  have a lot more in common than the media gives us credit for.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blackspeare
11:14 AM on 01/11/2012
IMHO I believe the GOP has hobbled itself with political-suicidal in-fighting. They just don't learn that with an incumbent president the party out of power has to forego primaries and select a frontrunner who can then focus on the true campaign.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EHenry
Author of the new book - How We Got Swindled by Wa
10:04 AM on 01/11/2012
Romney's expressed plan to fix housing - let the maker take over and allow all the people in homes that are either underwater or in forclosure go down and the banks then will take them over. So this does not take any of the banking practices which constitute fraud into consideration! Free enterprise without constraints - means more of the same.
11:54 PM on 01/10/2012
Now it's on to South Carolina. TIME TO PUT THE BREAKS ON ROMNEY.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IHateTheGOP
gravity - another scientific theory
10:36 PM on 01/10/2012
RMoney wins NH. ZZZZzzzzz.........
photo
had410
another veteran voting for Ron Paul
10:12 PM on 01/10/2012
If Romney wins it will be, Mitt "Goldman Sachs" Romney vs. Barack "Goldman Sachs" Obama. Be good little sheep and vote for the banksters.

Ron Paul 2012
10:24 PM on 01/10/2012
yup both are agents of the foreign banks running our government
10:34 PM on 01/10/2012
Are you being sarcastic, just curious?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IHateTheGOP
gravity - another scientific theory
10:37 PM on 01/10/2012
Ron Paul - buy your cheerios with gold nuggets. Good grief.....
photo
had410
another veteran voting for Ron Paul
10:50 PM on 01/10/2012
Ba Baaa Baa Baaaa Baaa Ba

Ron Paul 2012
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
10:04 PM on 01/10/2012
i know i attack obama all the time but you obama voters completely miss the ball when you think im coming from the perspective of republicans. but this post is fairly reasonable, so i wish to address it without it getting buried:

time2talk
An eye for an eye and we'll all be blind
917 Fans
Become a fan
32 minutes ago( 9:24 PM)
If the GOPTP are so wonderful, where is their jobs plan? Where is their plan to rebuild our crumbling infrastruc­ture. The only thing they are in favor is of building a oil pipeline where the product will be shipped out of the country, and don't want the environmen­tal issues (polluting the Nebraska water supply) to be further explored to be sure it is safe. Where is the money coming from to build that pipeline? That's always their criteria.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. the GOP is NOT so wonderful.
2. take my word for it or not, the bureau of labors historic record shows that tax cuts do stimulate. unemployment dropped significantly following both bushes and obamas tax cuts.
3. I STRONGLY condemn even the very IDEA of the pipeline. again..i attack obama...but the fact is that he was responsible for policing BP and he failed. his secretary of labor didnt even know if BP had a blowout plan when they approved the drilling. there has ALREADY been a RECENT tar sands spill in yellowstone river from one of those pipelines.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IHateTheGOP
gravity - another scientific theory
10:38 PM on 01/10/2012
Brilliant rebuttal. Keep the day job, if you have one.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
09:53 PM on 01/10/2012
why do i take up so much space telling the TRUTH?

because so many obama bots take up space telling LIES.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IHateTheGOP
gravity - another scientific theory
10:39 PM on 01/10/2012
It's the space between your ears you should be addressing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
10:54 PM on 01/10/2012
ohhhh boohoo you hurt my poor feelings now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
09:49 PM on 01/10/2012
stripedbass7
88 Fans
Become a fan
23 minutes ago( 9:23 PM)
Bank Of America & Teabaggers Support Romney = $$$$$$$.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cid=N00009638

Goldman Sachs $1,013,091

JPMorgan Chase & Co $808,799

Citigroup Inc $736,771

WilmerHale LLP $550,668

UBS AG $532,674

General Electric $529,855

Latham & Watkins $503,295
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

now look at how each has fared since the 2008 elections.

last i read about citigroup a judge was having to step in and defend americas interests because obamas SEC appointee was going too softly on citigroup.

and citigroup has since gotten a nice legup in obamas administration. see his appointment picks.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
02:46 PM on 01/11/2012
That's nothing compared to the billions Wall Street forks over to the GOP every year. Let alone, what the GOP rakes in from China.
09:47 PM on 01/10/2012
Today Ron Paul reminded me why I was a Libertarian in years past, when I was younger, because I have always been enamored with Individual Liberties - of all kinds: religious, private life, and most of all economical - No government dictating my life. Today, thus the message still resonates with me, I have grown more realistic and know at heart that eliminating the monetary system and other Paul's proposals will not happen, much as I'd like to.

Liberals and Libertarians have some things in common: both young and immature, both dreamers, both utopians, both utterly clueless. Yet, Liberals advocate for "communal" measures and big governments, while libertarians advocate for individual freedom and small government. In this Im 100% in agreement with Paul: The only government function should be to warrantee that freedom.

I will not vote for Mr. Paul for practical reasons, but Im delighted to see that the Libertarian message has finally been heard and is strong. Thanks Mr. Paul.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kirk Allen
Ron Paul 2012
12:47 AM on 01/11/2012
you only get one life , make the right choice, RP
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
02:48 PM on 01/11/2012
If libertarian policies were actually followed it would mean the end of the "free" market. All industries would be run by a single monopoly. You would also have the "right" to own people. People. That's right. Having no limits on what you can buy and sell means that nothing is sacred.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
09:44 PM on 01/10/2012
stripedbass7
87 Fans
Become a fan
1 minute ago( 9:39 PM)
WOW ! FACT ! Since 2009 REPUBLICAN­S HAVE BLOCKED 491" Bills Specifical­ly designed to increase Revenue & Create Jobs. Why ? They will DO ANYTHING" to get Obama out of office, & Continue theyre TIRADE Against the American People....­.....
THE GOP is DIRECTLY Responsibl­e For Americas Unemployme­nt........­....The Republican Party Cannot Be Trusted
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

unemployment rate when the GOP lost the majority in 2007: 4.4% , down 1.4% from 3 years earlier, thanks to tax cuts.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
09:41 PM on 01/10/2012
dear occupy wall street:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/15/tarp-vote-obama-wins-350_n_158292.html

"TARP Vote: Obama Wins"

do you agree or disagree?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
09:35 PM on 01/10/2012
another liar

time2talk
An eye for an eye and we'll all be blind
917 Fans
Become a fan
20 minutes ago( 9:12 PM)
He literally forced the Senate and House to extend the payroll tax, which helped unemployme­nt and small business who didn't have to pay into that fund
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

time2talk
An eye for an eye and we'll all be blind
917 Fans
Become a fan
6 minutes ago( 9:28 PM)
I didn't say the payroll tax cuts help unemployme­nt
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
09:33 PM on 01/10/2012
Bye-bye Huntsman. He doesn't even register a blip after NH. He couldn't beat Ron Paul in NH, forget it it's over. He's delusional if he thinks he stands a chance from now on.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
09:32 PM on 01/10/2012
Unlisted2u
94 Fans
Become a fan
10 minutes ago( 9:18 PM)
TARP IS a Bush program, duhhh..
----------------------------------------------------

less than half a truth is still a lie.

bush had a fundamentally different understanding of TARP than what actually made it through congress.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/12/obama-asks-bush-to-reques_n_157131.html

Obama Asks Bush To Request Rest Of TARP Money

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/15/tarp-vote-obama-wins-350_n_158292.html

The Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) is structured so that the president has access to the money unless Congress actively prevents its release. Only 42 senators -- seven Democrats, 34 Republicans and one Bernie Sanders -- voted to block the money.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
09:40 PM on 01/10/2012
"TARP Vote: Obama Wins"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
09:28 PM on 01/10/2012
NickyWhite
0 Fans
Become a fan
15 minutes ago( 9:11 PM)
I think you will find MOST average people do. But candidates like Mitt, obviously from the amount of over $100k people that voted for him tonight proves, the wealthy prefers a republican­. Wonder why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

again, i call you a LIAR

http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/bundlers.php?id=N00009638

Together, 357 elites are directing at least $55,900,000 for Obama's re-election efforts -- money that has gone into the coffers of his campaign as well as the Democratic National Committee.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
time2talk
An eye for an eye and we'll all be blind
09:34 PM on 01/10/2012
I think that's really great. I hope they double that amount. However the mess was created by your man and the tax breaks they get are from that administration. Obama agreed to extend them so the country wouldn't shut down. It was the only way he could get the GOPTP to agree. Obama also got in return, their signatures. If it was not approved or somehow settled this year, then the automatic cuts would go in. He deliberately set out so they would have to give in on some of their pet projects. Now they're stuck.
09:39 PM on 01/10/2012
WOW ! FACT ! Since 2009 REPUBLICANS HAVE BLOCKED 491" Bills Specifically designed to increase Revenue & Create Jobs. Why ? They will DO ANYTHING" to get Obama out of office, & Continue theyre TIRADE Against the American People.........
THE GOP is DIRECTLY Responsible For Americas Unemployment............The Republican Party Cannot Be Trusted.........................................................................................
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
time2talk
An eye for an eye and we'll all be blind
09:42 PM on 01/10/2012
You just got another fan = me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whythismess
09:43 PM on 01/10/2012
WOW fact! the government DOE NOT NEED MORE REVENUE

PROOF: the 6.5 billion obama is spending in iraq this year to replace combat troops with a private army.

WOW...extending unemployment is NOT a JOBS bill, and neither is a bill that costs 2 million per job!