More

San Francisco Abortion Ads Draw Ire Of Pro-Life Group (PHOTOS)

First Posted: 01/11/12 04:31 PM ET   Updated: 01/12/12 03:35 PM ET

SAN FRANCISCO -- A series of pro-choice banners posted on city-operated utility poles running up and down San Francisco's Market Street have drawn the ire of an anti-abortion group.

Life Legal Defense Foundation has demanded that the city remove the offending signage or face the possibility of legal action.

Since the new year began, dozens of banners trumpeting reproductive rights have been flying above the iconic San Francisco boulevard. Part of the Center for Policy Analysis' Silver Ribbon Campaign to Trust Women, the advertisements carry slogans like "U.S. Out of My Uterus," "Catholics for Choice," and "Reproductive Rights Are Human Rights."

(SCROLL DOWN FOR PHOTOS)

Traditionally, this space has been used for less controversial topics, such as ads for upcoming exhibits at deYoung Museum or a special event at the zoo.

While San Francisco is about as solidly pro-choice a town as exists anywhere in the nation, some -- especially Life Legal Defense Foundation -- find the messaging offensive. "If they believe in choice, they should talk about all of the choices available, not just abortion," Dana Cody, the organization's executive director, told The Huffington Post.

What's more, Cody's Napa-based group argues the banners themselves flagrantly violate city law because they advertise a political issue instead of a specific event. Article 5.6, Section 184.78 of San Francisco's Public Works Code states:

The Board [of Supervisors] does not intend to create a public forum on the upper portion of city-owned utility poles, it has decided to make the upper portion of city-owned utility poles available for the installation of banners that announce city-sponsored events, city-funded events, city-wide special events.

Department of Public Works Spokeswoman Gloria Chan defended her agency's decision to allow the Center for Policy Analysis to buy space on the poles, saying that the banners are running in conjunction with two events: the Walk for Trust Women scheduled to take place on Market Street on January 20th and the The Bay Area Coalition For Reproductive Rights' West Coast Rally For Reproductive Justice slated for Justin Herman Plaza the following day. Chan noted that any event expected to draw over 500 people, which DPW officials expect both of these to do easily, qualifies as a "city-wide special event" and is permitted to have its ads posted.

The Center for Policy Analysis' events are part of a campaign designed to combat what its founders see as a systemic rollback of abortion rights nationwide. "We saw a pro-choice president sign laws restricting access to abortion in at least three different ways. In health care reform law, an executive order and a regulation on state health plans," wrote the organization's director Ellen Shaffer in a blog on The Huffington Post. "This year, we learned it is not enough to appoint and elect smart, progressive women and pro-choice men to government. They and we need to mobilize visibly and vocally to advocate for reproductive rights and justice."

Yet Cody points out that none of the banners currently flapping in the wind over Market Street make any overt mention of upcoming events.

"The city minions who 'approved' these illegal banners might have thought that the public would ignore the challenge, but they are in error," said Cody. "We also believe this puts a stick in the eye of pro-life advocates who will be marching down Market Street on January 21 for the annual March for Life."

That event, in which participants will march in support of restricted abortion rights, will occur mere blocks from the Center For Policy Analysis' rally at Justin Herman Plaza. Cody argues that pro-life activists will already encounter enough resistance during their march without seemingly government-approved pro-choice messages flanking the intended parade route. "I went to the Walk for Life once and it's not a particularly hospitable atmosphere for the marchers there," said Cody. "The city isn't exactly 'life-affirming.'"

Cody's organization sent a letter to Department of Public Works chief Mohammed Nuru demanding the removal of the banners by the day of the March for Life. She claims she has yet to receive a response. If the department doesn't concede to the Life Legal Foundation's request, Cody says the group is strongly considering taking legal action.

This fight over the banners is the second high-profile conflict between the city of San Francisco and pro-life groups in recent months.

Late last year, the Board of Supervisors gave its near-unanimous approval to a measure that would penalize the city's two crisis pregnancy centers for engaging in what they deemed purposely misleading advertising.

At issue is the perception that the centers, both of which have staunchly pro-life agendas, implied in their advertising that they offered a full range of pregnancy options, including abortion. In reality, the organizations operate with the express purpose of counseling women out of terminating their pregnancies.

The crisis centers claimed they were being unfairly targeted because of pro-life beliefs.

Update: Read Ellen Shaffer's new Huffington Post blog entry on the banners and Trust Women Week here.

Check out the slideshow below of Market Street's pro-choice banners:

RATE IT!   |  
VOTE
CURRENT TOP 5 PICK YOUR OWN TOP 5
USERS WHO VOTED
NEW! CREATE YOUR OWN SLIDESHOW

Correction: The article originally misidentified the West Coast Rally For Reproductive Rights as the "Celebration to Trust Women."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SAN FRANCISCO

 
 
  • Comments
  • 76
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:14 PM on 01/22/2012
Abortion sucks the life out of women.
07:45 PM on 01/16/2012
want to see abortion disappear? make it mandatory.
charlesrfd2003
Proud American who believes in the Bill of Rights
03:07 PM on 01/14/2012
Free speech is free speech. There is not freedom form being offended. These banners are in a public area and the City of San Francisco would be censoring speech if they refused to fly them.

I would suggest that group put up banners with their viewpoint. That is the American way.
01:09 PM on 01/13/2012
Once again, can we please stop calling these people "pro-life" and start calling them what they really are...*anti-choice*? I thought HuffPo was progressive.
06:16 PM on 01/22/2012
Does the dad get to make a choice?
photo
goatini
We are two-legged wombs, that’s all
12:50 PM on 01/13/2012
Oh, dear, the theocrats and misogynists don't think anyone should have "free speech" except for them.
03:40 PM on 01/13/2012
I love how the ultra-religious love to judge and play hypocrit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
05:52 PM on 01/13/2012
Yep - they are good at it! Fortunately their ignorance gives them away.
06:19 PM on 01/22/2012
Free speech is a two way street. All too often the regressives
Ike you do not allow the other side an opportunity to state their piece.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KDMac
It's called sarcasm, Genius.
12:43 PM on 01/13/2012
"If they believe in choice, they should talk about all of the choices available, not just abortion," Dana Cody, the organization's executive director, told The Huffington Post.

100% agreed!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
squirrely girl
PhD in Developmental Psychology
01:19 PM on 01/13/2012
Other organizations discuss all of the other choices... and for that matter at least organizations like PP discuss adoption.

Basically that quote tells me that any discussion of abortion is unacceptable to those folks.
06:21 PM on 01/22/2012
Does planned parenthood perform more adoptions or abortions? The facts will tell you all you need to know.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gloriaswanson43
Ask and you will get more info.
10:47 AM on 01/13/2012
"believe this puts a stick in the eye of pro-life advocates ..." and every time I have to pass by one of your booths at the state fair I get a "stick in the eye" and would like to pull a Jesus-wrecking-the-money-tables on you. This is the United States of America. You don't have the right to not be offended.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:21 PM on 01/12/2012
The poles when they have the rainbow flags don't give a date for an event... So that argument is hogwash. I noticed them and unlike the aborted fetus billboard these are just words not images. Offence to words is Free speech but Images it's different.
photo
Wheelo
A man a plan a canal Panama
05:36 PM on 01/12/2012
Oooh nice point about the rainbow flags.
photo
Wheelo
A man a plan a canal Panama
05:15 PM on 01/12/2012
I'm a former BACORR member and staunchly pro-choice, but in truth these banners do appear to violate the City's code section.

It's a shame someone didn't use their heads a little better and place the above mentioned events on the banners.

If political speech is allowed on city utility poles - even speech I and many others support - what's to stop someone like Orly Taitz from buying banners to further her zany "birther" movement?

I guess the long term question for SF denizens is do they want to have political advertising everywhere paid for by the wealthiest political action committees?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
janthewordnerd
11:18 PM on 01/12/2012
There is nothing POLITICAL about reinforcing civil rights. Officials in some Washington transit districts have allowed the ACLU to post signs on buses reminding citizens AND non-citizens of their rights and responsibilities with respect to complying with immigration and customs personnel, after border patrol agents started showing up on transit routes harassing riders that didn't look "American" - and some were wrongly detained.

Just because wingnuts have politicized abortion, that does not render it a political issue. It's a legal medical procedure to which women have every right.
photo
Politidelic
Death & Taxes
02:34 PM on 01/12/2012
Keep Napa out of my City!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:24 PM on 01/12/2012
Amen to that
06:46 PM on 01/12/2012
It's one lawyer with a PO Box making a buck off whomever she can - who probably eats at French Laundry with all of her ill-gotten gain. All the way to the bank, Dana!
01:22 PM on 01/12/2012
For more info on the West Coast Rally for Reproductive Justice, check it out! http://www.facebook.com/events/132642460180071/

We're also raffling off a ticket to a bay area luncheon with Ms. Magazine and Gloria Steinem to anyone helping us with outreach! (Donation graciously provided by Silver Ribbon Campaign) http://www.facebook.com/notes/bay-area-coalition-for-our-reproductive-rights-bacorr/join-the-bacorr-street-team-enter-to-win-lunch-with-gloria-steinem/10150472363750922
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
janthewordnerd
01:18 PM on 01/12/2012
I disagree that the headline is inflammatory. The sign says "ABORTION." Time to stop kowtowing to the wingnuts and pretending it's a shameful procedure.
12:13 PM on 01/12/2012
How is talking about a legal right that every women has (according to the Supreme Court) offensive?
photo
lauranevitt
President of the DFL Feminist Caucus, amateur phot
11:42 AM on 01/12/2012
i find it hysterical that the anti-choicers think THIS is offensive and yet, showing bloody fetuses are not - oh, that's right, the truth and knowledge is offensive to them - nevermind.
05:08 AM on 01/13/2012
THIS ! ! !
photo
lovely09
I don't comment much, but when I do...
11:58 AM on 01/13/2012
Thank you lauranevitt for this comment. I was just about to mention that I have seen their ads of aborted fetuses but yet a nice, respectful poster of our reproductive rights is offensive?

My belief is that if it is NOT able to survive outside the womb, then I think a woman has every right and any reason to abort the fetus. Those are my only limitations in my opinion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Curtis inSF
Gay Progressive Agnostic Graphic Designer
11:01 AM on 01/12/2012
Dana Cody and the Life Legal Defense Foundations objections to the campaign are empty. She claims they don't show "all of the choices available, not just abortion". Not one of the banners said anything about any particular option, only the idea that women should have choice, and should be trusted to make their own choices.

The Right always demonstrates a complete disconnect with the concept of freedom. They only understand one idea; do everything the way they do it, and to make it easier to follow ONLY their way, you should legally only have the option to do it their way. They are enemies of freedom.