iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

'The Real Romney': '08 Campaign Aides Say 'The Bain Way' Didn't Work

First Posted: 01/13/2012 2:52 pm Updated: 01/14/2012 6:30 pm

The failure of Mitt Romney's first run for the White House was, in many regards, an illustration of how inapplicable a background in private equity is to presidential politics, conclude the authors of a sharply reported new book on the former Massachusetts governor.

Obtained in advance by The Huffington Post, the book "The Real Romney" is an exploration of Romney's business and political careers by Michael Kranish and Scott Helman, who have followed him from their perch at the Boston Globe.

Set to be released on Tuesday, the book includes numerous nuggets from Romney's failed effort to win the GOP's presidential nomination in 2008. For example, his campaign's first top strategist, Alex Castellanos, had suggested adopting the phrase "Yes, we can," only to watch as Barack Obama snatched it first, the book reveals. Also, former Sen. Judd Gregg, who served as Romney's national co-chairman, felt uninvolved with strategy decisions, blaming his freeze-out on the "egos" of campaign staffers, the authors report. Plus, Romney's South Carolina team pleaded with the campaign's national headquarters to drop its focus on social issues in favor of an economic message to steer clear of flip-flopper accusations.

The underlying thesis of "The Real Romney" is the most important part of the book: Despite pitching himself as someone who could bring CEO-like leadership and free-market-like efficiencies to politics, Romney exhibited a style ill-suited for the campaign trail, the authors report. The result was a decision-making process that was too slow and plodding for the fast-paced world of politics.

Mandy Fletcher, the director of Romney’s Florida campaign, said she had originally been attracted to Romney because "he was the turnaround guy and the business guy." But she also said that the delays and conflicts in the national campaign’s decision making demonstrated that "running the campaign is a very different kind of business. In the business world you have a lot of time, weeks if not months and, on some projects, years" to make and implement critical decisions. "In the campaign it may be an hour or minutes."

Warren Tompkins, Romney's senior adviser in South Carolina, came to the same conclusion: "The glaring deficiency in the whole operation was the lack of an overall strategy, no single person that at the end of the day raised his hand and said, 'This is what we are going to do.' Somebody has to run the railroad. The irony of it is all is here's a man who sets up apparatus to make decisions, look at the bottom line, cut to the chase, and the campaign was everything but that."

There are numerous examples of internal staff frictions caused by the management style that Kranish and Helman turn up. They quote Doug Gross, Romney's 2008 campaign chairman, lamenting, "We had a lot of data but no information" and certainly not the strategy needed to build the coalitions necessary to win the caucuses. They quote Bruce Keough, Romney's former New Hampshire campaign chairman, as being struck by how duplicative many staff positions were.

As he looked around, the problem seemed obvious. It was, as one aide put it, the "Noah’s Ark campaign." There were two of everything, it seemed, including the competing media teams. The Romney campaign spin had been that the candidate loved the creative tension, but Keough had noticed a change in the candidate’s attitude since the Iowa loss. "Mitt was a little less certain that he had the best campaign that money could buy," he said.

The authors report that Castellanos (perhaps a source for much of the book's material) contemplated resigning over that Noah's Ark approach, which was alternatively described as "the Bain way" in reference to the private equity company that Romney had led.

The campaign was splitting dangerously into factions, further heightening the state-versus-Boston tension that had been boiling for months. The new media team was on board -- [Stuart] Stevens and [Russ] Schriefer -- and Castellanos suddenly felt his authority in question. He protested to Romney and members of the inner circle, according to several people with knowledge of the conversations, and was told that this was not a demotion but rather an implementation of "the Bain way," a reference to Romney’s management style at Bain Capital. Romney said he wanted as many smart minds as possible in the room, with ideas fought over and the best rising to the top. Castellanos considered resigning but, out of loyalty to Romney, agreed to stay."

It's hardly rare for internal disagreements to plague a candidate's staff, and certainly not for one filled with high-profile consultants. But Romney and his Bain-way ethos was supposed to bring businesslike order to the process. In "The Real Romney," his aides declare that perception always outpaced reality and that a business mind-set didn’t lend itself to a campaign setting. Even Romney seemed to acknowledge as much when, as the New Hampshire primary results trickled in, he sent Castellanos an email admitting that he had been wrong to wrangle over the campaign's theme.

"Alex. Well, change was it -- just like you said from the beginning," Romney wrote. "Never found a better word for it. Change it is. And change we will have -- soon. Hope for the better ... Mitt."

"I never had a strategist," Romney is quoted as saying at another point in the book. "I had all the pieces of the puzzle but didn't fit them together."

All of which may explain why Romney is performing much better as a candidate four years later. This time around there was neither a debate over the message -- it was Mr. Fix It from the start -- nor internal staff competition. He became, in short, a more adept politician.

Looking ahead to 2012, Romney concluded that he needed a different kind of campaign. He looked again to his close circle of advisers in Boston, who had learned from their mistakes and grown and changed in the intervening years ... In preparation for the second try, Stuart Stevens, who came with years of experience in presidential campaigns, moved to Boston and was empowered as chief strategist. The two bickering media teams of 2008 were reduced to one. After spending $2 million to win Iowa's straw poll in 2007, Romney would refuse to participate four years later. Instead of spending millions of dollars on early campaign ads, he would hoard his campaign cash. And rather than devoting countless hours to wooing evangelical leaders, he would say that the time for discussing his religion had come and gone. Read Article VI of the Constitution, he would say, quoting it: "No religious test."
FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 298
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
goodog 05:04 PM on 01/13/2012
We already tried the CEO president. Remember that guy. He decided to bailout Wall Street after plunging the world into global economic collapse. It's absurd that the GOP is still selling the businessman's pedigree as particularly effective when it comes to managing the affairs of state.

Another former businessman-turned-President had been a rising start and eventually partner at Bewick, Moreing &  Read More...
12:44 PM on 07/06/2012
2016: Mitt Romney still running for president after 9 years changes his message again. He is a middle class democrat giving his fortune to charity and buying a farm in Idaho,
11:18 AM on 01/15/2012
Romney is the competence this country needs!!!!
11:37 PM on 01/14/2012
Poor judgement.......

Lack of compassion........

Can not connect to average people because he was born with a silver spoon.......

This guy strapped his dog (in a dog kennel) to the roof of his car and drove 12 hours to his vacation with the dog on the roof of the car. The dog was so scarred that it took a SHI* and it came down the back window of the car. He thought nothing of it then. He still thinks it was ok.

What kind of person would you have to be to think that it was ok?
Fremon
Retired in Palm Desert CA
06:08 PM on 01/14/2012
This is a prime illustration that CEO's don't necessarily make for good politicians. First, our first MBA President in Bush 2 was going to run the country like a fine tuned company. How did that work out. Unfunded wars, tax cuts from the Clinton surplus, and drug prescription plan that was nearly 4 Trillion added to the national debt. The reasons are simple because the mission statement is different. The corporate management style is make profits and those two are competing ideas when one is trying to run a country for the health and welfare of the people (or have we forgotten). The Bain mission was to make profit for management and investors and not create jobs. This was the goal and they sought policies to achieve them including government assistance. Bush 2 really didn't have CEO experience in managing to make profits nor did he have the same in TX as governor with a weak gubernatorial system. In a way we could look back to Enron as say, would any of their executives been good presidents because before the fall, they made lots of money, hired people, and well we know devastated a company and lives of their workers and companies they took over. Beware of what we wish for America. It has been already delivered and not a good example resulted.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TheAntiOkie
01:35 PM on 01/14/2012
"We had a lot of data but no information"..................from what I've been able to observe about Bain and the people who trained there and then went on to destroy so many other lives through other companies, this is how they work: They purchase data from the professional data harvesters and base all of their decisions on the number that a computer program spits out to them. It's all about numbers. There is no humanity - not even a drop of it in any of the people out of this type of organization.
01:05 PM on 01/14/2012
Romney is a fraud period. One lie after another.
12:08 PM on 01/14/2012
Solyndra: Romney most likely would have been smart enough not to funded a losing company like Solyndra. The loan was rejected by Bush admin early Jan. 2009. 

Yet Obama approves the loan anyway. One of the principal investors in Solyndra was a major Obama donor.  Mid March Obama approves the loan. Then restructuring the loan again a year later. The restructuring put tax payers money in second position behind new venture capital. Then in 2011 losing the total 1/2 billion in tax payer dollars. 

The results of the Congressional probe show that less than two weeks before President Bush left office, on January 9, 2009, the Energy Department's credit committee had voted against offering a loan commitment to Solyndra.  Even after Obama took office on Jan. 20, 2009, analysts in the Energy Department and in the Office of Management and Budget were repeatedly questioning the wisdom of the loan. In one exchange, an Energy official wrote of "a major outstanding issue" -- namely, that Solyndra's numbers showed it would run out of cash in September 2011.  There was also concern about the high-risk nature of the project. Internally, the Office of Management and Budget wrote that "the risk rating for the project sponsor [Solyndra] … seems high." Outside analysts had warned for months that the company might not be a sound investment.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TheAntiOkie
01:37 PM on 01/14/2012
How many times are you going to post this? Are you getting paid by the word now?
04:05 PM on 01/14/2012
I'm going to post this everytime there is an article about Bain Capital.
Fremon
Retired in Palm Desert CA
06:09 PM on 01/14/2012
It's all they got! As if they don't have to contend with the Bush 2 fiasco years.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WhatWhat1
Don't believe everything you think.
08:29 PM on 01/14/2012
President Obama owns the Solyndra debacle lock stock and barrel. The problem I have is that this story has been beaten to a pulp by those who would give any Republican president the longest rope in history. In the overall scheme of things, this is small potatoes compared to the bailouts, the prescription plan, two wars, the stimulus, etc.
While I agree with you that there's more than just bad judgment going on here, your repeated postings come off as highly selective spin. I know you'd like to think "Oh good. I get to tell my story again", but in fact you are weakening your argument.
08:10 AM on 01/15/2012
Bain Capital is old news Romney steped down in 1999, the only 4 companies filing bankruptcy filed after Rmoney left Bain. Yet he he hammered for something he was not in control of. KC STEEL filed in 2001 after a bitter union labor dispute. Yet Obama made a personal decision tom fund Solyndra after the DOE AND OMB advised him not to. 1/2 billion some other deserving company that had applied will not get.
photo
camelias and sweet tea
Small drinking village with a shrimping problem
10:55 AM on 01/14/2012
Headline is very deceiving.."The REAL ROMNEY", there is no real Romney he is a phony through and through..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sabrinalilypup
peace I give you and peace I leave to you
10:42 AM on 01/14/2012
SOUTH CAROLINA - WAKE UP AND SMELL THE STINK. YOU ARE IN FOR A VERY RUDE AWAKENING IN THE LONG RUN. Mitt Romney has the audacity to go to your State asking you to give him the job. BAIN CAPITAL & MITT ROMNEY took away most of your jobs in your state. Is this something that South Carolina not aware of? You're giving him a job so he can further take away more jobs from your State, is this what you want? YOUR CALL on this issue. YOU DECIDE.
photo
camelias and sweet tea
Small drinking village with a shrimping problem
10:56 AM on 01/14/2012
As a resident of S.C....you are wasting you breath and time trying to tell these people anything, they just vote "R" for the person the party wants them to vote for everytime.
12:09 PM on 01/14/2012
Yes we will decide it will be Romney.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TheAntiOkie
01:36 PM on 01/14/2012
I'm so very sorry for you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
idisVA
10:40 AM on 01/14/2012
I will not vote for anyone to run my government like a business, which less like Vulture Capitalist firm like Bain Capital.
12:09 PM on 01/14/2012
How about how Obama run your government.

Solyndra: Romney most likely would have been smart enough not to funded a losing company like Solyndra. The loan was rejected by Bush admin early Jan. 2009. 

Yet Obama approves the loan anyway. One of the principal investors in Solyndra was a major Obama donor.  Mid March Obama approves the loan. Then restructuring the loan again a year later. The restructuring put tax payers money in second position behind new venture capital. Then in 2011 losing the total 1/2 billion in tax payer dollars. 

The results of the Congressional probe show that less than two weeks before President Bush left office, on January 9, 2009, the Energy Department's credit committee had voted against offering a loan commitment to Solyndra.  Even after Obama took office on Jan. 20, 2009, analysts in the Energy Department and in the Office of Management and Budget were repeatedly questioning the wisdom of the loan. In one exchange, an Energy official wrote of "a major outstanding issue" -- namely, that Solyndra's numbers showed it would run out of cash in September 2011.  There was also concern about the high-risk nature of the project. Internally, the Office of Management and Budget wrote that "the risk rating for the project sponsor [Solyndra] … seems high." Outside analysts had warned for months that the company might not be a sound investment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
idisVA
01:24 PM on 01/14/2012
Solyndra, Solyndra, Solyndra. Republicans have been trying for over a year about Solyndra, something started under Bush. You conveniently left out that the second partner is a a major Republican donor who supported Bush.
10:20 AM on 01/14/2012
Liquidating what others create is not business. Profit is not created, it is taken.
photo
camelias and sweet tea
Small drinking village with a shrimping problem
09:28 AM on 01/14/2012
No matter how bad things get for Romney, ALL they care about is who can beat Obama and the GOP insders will stuff the man down the throats of the lemming voters down here. Newtie , on the other hand is just destroying any chance, if this was any, of ever being in politics again if he keeps up his nonsense.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TheAntiOkie
01:38 PM on 01/14/2012
Don't you think Newtietootie had no real interest in running in reality? He knew his past would haunt him but he also knew he could make a TON of money while he was on the run - which was his ONLY true purpose.................OCTJMO-ICBW
photo
camelias and sweet tea
Small drinking village with a shrimping problem
01:40 PM on 01/14/2012
Spot On, I agree totally
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dbos
Single payer universal health insurance agent
01:48 PM on 01/14/2012
Agree plus newt will replace buchanan a the crazed voice of the right traveling the talk show airwaves; making millions more while just spewing negativism for many years to come.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NaaJane
Irony has a liberal bias.
09:25 AM on 01/14/2012
A country cannot be run like a business, businessmen don't make good presidents. remember prez no.43? romney is not a 'job creator', the main purpose of bain was to make as much profit as possible. i don't know how people are so gullible to believe he's a 'job creator'. if he was a job creator he would never have layed of a single worker.
photo
camelias and sweet tea
Small drinking village with a shrimping problem
09:29 AM on 01/14/2012
# 530..I posted something very similiar and agree totally of course.
09:58 AM on 01/14/2012
Agreed. Someone who has been successful in business doesn't relate to running a state or country. Check his poor record as governor........that's what Newt should be focusing on. Corzine had great success at Goldman but was a terrible governor. Captains of industry don't have board meetings looking to create jobs, they have meetings to make money.I f there is a job that takes 10 people, they explore to see if it can be done by 6. That means 4 get pink slips and they pocket the profits of saved salary and benefits.
photo
Zigman61
wow - just wow.........
09:07 AM on 01/14/2012
So Mittens is really Gilderoy Lockhart from The Chamber of Secrets. The way he is looking at himself in that painting says "Ooooh I love me so much!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bridgette Angelos
a mom
08:26 AM on 01/14/2012
People measure success in different ways, I for one measure success in terms of emotional growth and ones ability to not only empathize but embrace difficult and or painful issues. When the whole Reverend Wright race issue came up, instead of bailing or glossing over a very heated and painful issue, President Obama gave one of the most poignant speeches and the mere fact that he even went there spoke volumes about the man. Mitt talks of dark rooms. The insidious looks and comments that emote from Mitt are telling in and of themselves but the most defining action that Mitt has enacted thus far that tells me all I need to know about the man is the mere fact that he even THOUGHT about putting the family pet on the roof of the car and then he did it. Who thinks and acts like that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sabrinalilypup
peace I give you and peace I leave to you
10:56 AM on 01/14/2012
Bridgette Angelos - MITT ROMNEY IS A COLD CALCULATING KIND OF A MAN....NO HEART TO BE MORE SPECIFIC....In his world, MONEY IS HIS FIRST AND FOREMOST PRIORITY. Do we count as people? Heck no. In his mind, we (the people and the animals) are nothing to reckon with. His FOCUS is PROFIT he does not care whether you have food on the table today and starve tomorrow. Why should he care? He is wallowing in luxury while you wallow in your misery. People in South Carolina is giving him more ammunition for MITT ROMNEY to further grind the less fortunate to their grave. SOUTH CAROLINA....listen and listen well to the message of NEWT GINGRICH...NEWT MIGHT BE DOING IT THE WRONG WAY TO WAKE YOU UP......TO NEWT, IF THAT IS WHAT IT TAKES TO OPEN YOUR EYES, SO BE IT. Newt has a very important message to all of you, you may hate him, but listen anyway.

VOTE OBAMA 2012