iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Newberry Volcano: Geothermal Energy Advocates In Oregon Have High Hopes

By JEFF BARNARD   01/14/12 04:29 PM ET  AP

In this May 16, 2008, file photo, a drilling tower stands under clear skies at the Newberry Crater geothermal project near LaPine, Ore.

-- Geothermal energy developers plan to pump 24 million gallons of water into the side of a dormant volcano in Central Oregon this summer to demonstrate new technology they hope will give a boost to a green energy sector that has yet to live up to its promise.

They hope the water comes back to the surface fast enough and hot enough to create cheap, clean electricity that isn't dependent on sunny skies or stiff breezes – without shaking the earth and rattling the nerves of nearby residents.

Renewable energy has been held back by cheap natural gas, weak demand for power and waning political concern over global warming. Efforts to use the earth's heat to generate power, known as geothermal energy, have been further hampered by technical problems and worries that tapping it can cause earthquakes.

Even so, the federal government, Google and other investors are interested enough to bet $43 million on the Oregon project. They are helping AltaRock Energy, Inc. of Seattle and Davenport Newberry Holdings LLC of Stamford, Conn., demonstrate whether the next level in geothermal power development can work on the flanks of Newberrry Volcano, located about 20 miles south of Bend, Ore.

"We know the heat is there," said Susan Petty, president of AltaRock. "The big issue is can we circulate enough water through the system to make it economic."

The heat in the earth's crust has been used to generate power for more than a century. Engineers gather hot water or steam that bubbles near the surface and use it to spin a turbine that creates electricity. Most of those areas have been exploited. The new frontier is places with hot rocks, but no cracks in the rocks or water to deliver the steam.

To tap that heat – and grow geothermal energy from a tiny niche into an important source of green energy – engineers are working on a new technology called Enhanced Geothermal Systems.

"To build geothermal in a big way beyond where it is now requires new technology, and that is where EGS comes in," said Steve Hickman, a research geophysicist with the U.S. Geological Survey in Menlo Park, Calif.

Wells are drilled deep into the rock and water is pumped in, creating tiny fractures in the rock, a process known as hydroshearing.

Cold water is pumped down production wells into the reservoir, and the steam is drawn out.

Hydroshearing is similar to the process known as hydraulic fracturing, used to free natural gas from shale formations. But fracking uses chemical-laden fluids, and creates huge fractures. Pumping fracking wastewater deep underground for disposal likely led to recent earthquakes in Arkansas and Ohio.

Fears persist that cracking rock deep underground through hydroshearing can also lead to damaging quakes. EGS has other problems. It is hard to create a reservoir big enough to run a commercial power plant.

Progress has been slow. Two small plants are online in France and Germany. A third in downtown Basel, Switzerland, was shut down over earthquake complaints. A project in Australia has had drilling problems.

A new international protocol is coming out at the end of this month that urges EGS developers to keep projects out of urban areas, the so-called "sanity test," said Ernie Majer, a seismologist with the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. It also urges developers to be upfront with local residents so they know exactly what is going on.

AltaRock hopes to demonstrate a new technology for creating bigger reservoirs that is based on the plastic polymers used to make biodegradable cups.

It worked in existing geothermal fields. Newberry will show if it works in a brand new EGS field, and in a different kind of geology, volcanic rock, said Colin Williams, a USGS geophysicist also in Menlo Park.

The U.S. Department of Energy has given the project $21.5 million in stimulus funds. That has been matched by private investors, among them Google with $6.3 million.

Majer said the danger of a major quake at Newbery is very low. The area is a kind of seismic dead zone, with no significant faults. It is far enough from population centers to make property damage unlikely. And the layers of volcanic ash built up over millennia dampen any shaking.

But the Department of Energy will be keeping a close eye on the project, and any significant quakes would shut it down at least temporarily, he said. The agency is also monitoring EGS projects at existing geothermal fields in California, Nevada and Idaho.

"That's the $64,000 question," Majer said. "What's the biggest earthquake we can have from induced seismicity that the public can worry about."

Geologists believe Newberry Volcano was once one of the tallest peaks in the Cascades, reaching an elevation of 10,000 feet and a diameter of 20 miles. It blew its top before the last Ice Age, leaving a caldera studded with towering lava flows, two lakes, and 400 cinder cones, some 400 feet tall.

Although the volcano has not erupted in 1,300 years, hot rocks close to the surface drew exploratory wells in the 1980s.

Over 21 days, AltaRock will pour 800 gallons of water per minute into the 10,600-foot test well, already drilled, for a total of 24 million gallons. According to plan, the cold water cracks the rock. The tiny plastic particles pumped down the well seal off the cracks. Then more cold water goes in, bypassing the first tier, and cracking the rock deeper in the well. That tier is sealed off, and cold water cracks a third section. Later, the plastic melts away.

Seismic sensors produce detailed maps of the fracturing, expected to produce a reservoir of cracks starting about 6,000 feet below the surface, and extending to 11,000 feet. It would be about 3,300 feet in diameter.

The U.S. Bureau of Land Management released an environmental assessment of the Newberry project last month that does not foresee any problems that would stop it. The agency is taking public comments before making a final decision in coming months.

No power plant is proposed, but one could be operating in about 10 years, said Doug Perry, president and CEO of Davenport Newberry.

EGS is attractive because it vastly expands the potential for geothermal power, which, unlike wind and solar, produces power around the clock in any weather.

Natural geothermal resources account for about 0.3 percent of U.S. electricity production, but a 2007 Massachusetts Institute of Technology report projected EGS could bump that to 10 percent within 50 years, at prices competitive with fossil-fuels.

Few people expect that kind of timetable now. Electricity prices have fallen sharply because of low natural gas prices and weak demand brought about by the Great Recession and state efficiency programs.

But the resource is vast. A 2008 USGS assessment found EGS throughout the West, where hot rocks are closer to the surface than in the East, has the potential to produce half the country's electricity.

"The important question we need to answer now," said Williams, the USGS geophysicist who compiled the assessment, "is how geothermal fits into the renewable energy picture, and how EGS fits. How much it is going to cost, and how much is available."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 89
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:08 PM on 01/17/2012
There have been at least three minor earthquakes on the eastern and southern edge of the Barnett Shale play which have been attributed to salt water injection into the Ellenburger formation. Increasing fluid pressure in stressed rock apparently is providing the "grease" for the slip. I have no doubt that faults are a lot more prevalent than what are actually detected on seismic, surface or subsurface work. I also suspect that there is a network of ring fault and fractures surrounding the
Newberry Volcano.
04:42 PM on 01/18/2012
More that 3 have occurred, but all have been minor. As a 2010 study of the quakes, said,

"On the basis of time and spatial correlations, we conclude the DFW sequence may be the result of fluid injection at the SWD [salt water disposal] well, but we are puzzled as to why earthquakes occur at this particular location but not near other [more than 200] SWD wells in the region."

http://smu.edu/newsinfo/pdf-files/earthquake-study-10march2010.pdf

Perhaps you should read the project's environmental assessment to better inform your speculation. It addresses the issue of faults in the project area (there are none), as well as how the maximum expected earthquake size is related to the relatively low pressures they will use.
03:25 PM on 01/16/2012
Wind, solar, wave energy, geothermal and second generation biofuels made from algae, cellulose and waste are the future. The world produces a lot of trash every day. That trash can now be turned into biofuel, energy (methane) and raw materials for new products. It is time to move to a more sustainable future.
11:54 PM on 01/16/2012
Bankrupt the nation. Cost $60k per annum per household to run on green solar/wind without gas backup.

Burning trash instead of recycling it causes enormous air pollution and can produce only a tiny amount of energy.
10:30 AM on 01/17/2012
Green energy is growing every year. The cost of oil coal and nuclear keep rising while the cost of wind and solar are dropping.

Renewable energy investment is surpassing fossil fuels in new power plants.

Electricit­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­y from sun power, wind energy, wave energy and biomass had an investment of $187 billion last year compared with $157 billion for natural gas, coal and oil, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

The Investment in renewable power will grow even more this year
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tjconkster
Occupy the Voting Booth 2014
12:08 PM on 01/16/2012
What the frack? What if that cold water wakes the dormant volcano?

(Its a joke people)
09:14 AM on 01/16/2012
Hmm, bringing hot stuff from deep in the earth to the surface won't contibute to global warming? It will contribute to global surface warming.
10:17 AM on 01/24/2012
More-so than all the hydrocarbons we're burning into the atmosphere? Hardly. Geothermal energy has extremely low carbon emissions - pretty much negligible.

As far as surface warming, you think that a geothermal power plant is releasing heat into the atmosphere? Wrong - as soon as the steam hits the turbine, it's instantly cooled down to condense the steam back into a liquid, which is then pumped back underground. It's essentially a close-looped system.
09:09 AM on 01/16/2012
"Hydroshearing" uses the same physics to create fractures in the rocks as "fracing." If the DOE used the chemicals oil service companies use in "hydroshearing" they would able to keep the fractures open through the use of proppants. It would be horrible though if the US Government was involved in "fracing" - hence the new public relations term.;)
08:14 PM on 01/16/2012
No, the physics are different.

Fracking uses high pressures to break new rock and keeps the new fractures open with sand and other proppants. Hydroshear­ing uses low pressures to inflate the small, preexistin­g fractures that all rock has, and allows existing tectonic stress to shift the two sides of the fractures sideways -- this is the "shearing" part. The natural roughness of the rock faces will then keep the fractures propped open.

Big fractures won't work in geothermal -- the water needs to take a somewhat leisurely trip through the hydroshear­ed cracks in order to heat up enough. In contrast, convention­al shale oil and gas developers want to drain the hydrocarbo­ns from the rock as fast as possible, so they shoot for big, wide fractures.

The additives used in convention­al frack fluid help transport the proppants into the cracks, and give the fluid stiffness and mass that helps fracture the rock and keep the cracks open during the job.

In AltaRock's hydroshear­ing operation (based on the environmen­tal assessment published by the BLM -- http://www­.blm.gov/o­r/district­s/prinevil­le/plans/n­ewberryegs­/ ), a non-toxic plastic polymer will be used to temporaril­y block one of the fracture networks they've generated so they can go deeper and create a new one, and so on. This way, instead of having just a single fracture in a well like all other EGS projects, they hope to have multiple networks in a single well, which improves the economics.
09:18 AM on 01/17/2012
"..allows existing tectonic stress to shift the two sides of the fractures sideways..."- that's how you turn factures into a fault through the process of an earthquake. So the procedure is to drill into a fracture zone, pump it up, and allow movement that is the definition of an earthquake? Curiouser and curiouser....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cindy Russell444
08:36 AM on 01/16/2012
Next Crisis: The Earth's core is cold. Geothermal to blame. We'll have to figure out how to move the sun closer.
01:36 PM on 01/18/2012
You've just managed to prove yourself clueless.
07:06 AM on 01/16/2012
Anybody see that old movie 'Crack in the World'? I know that isn't going to happen but . . .
06:15 AM on 01/16/2012
Why the hype? Iceland demonstrated geothermal technology decades ago... and let's not forget old Smokey doing it like clockwork. This is no rocket science, just a matter of drilling depth. What frac? Without severe pressure on the earth's mantle, earthquake fears are an unwarranted expression of ignorance.
05:54 PM on 01/17/2012
Old Smokey? You mean "Old Faithful?" One of three projects to date have been shut down due to earthquake complaints. I'm sure real estate there is cheap, give it a shot.
04:48 PM on 01/18/2012
Maybe you could provide references to back this up. I'm not aware of any geothermal projects in the US being shut down due to quake complaints, and certainly none associated with "Old Faithful."
12:32 AM on 01/16/2012
Sounds just like a frac job to me, reguardless of rather or not there's chemicals in the water or not it's not like you'll be able to hold your cup out and drink it once it comes back. Where's the outrage? Why isn't everyone in Oregon up in arms over their water being polluted? I'm a fan of any type of new energy production, but when that energy is produced in essentially the same way as oil and gas, it seems somewhat hypocritical to try to label it "green".
06:50 AM on 01/16/2012
There's 2.5 people in Oregon and they've been told they can use hot water to run their SUV's, same as gas. Are you not one of them?
09:50 AM on 01/16/2012
nope, i'm from west virginia where we do the real deal
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nomadrdw
Zen Druid
01:56 PM on 01/16/2012
1 the plastics are NOT toxic.
2 it is meant to be a closed system. the cold water goes down the well, steam is returned, used to power the turbine, it cools and condenses back into water, and back down the well.
09:51 PM on 01/15/2012
I'd rather solar or wind power. No nuclear (scary :p) and no coal (dirty). See, me and my fellow 30+ other school bus drivers put a lot of diesel fumes in the air, and my Cummins ISB surely can't help lol.
11:49 PM on 01/16/2012
Bankrupt the nation. Cost $60k per annum per household to run on green solar.wind without gas backup.
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
07:44 AM on 01/17/2012
What does a gallon of sunlight cost these days?
07:03 PM on 01/19/2012
But, a lot of electrical companies pay you back for using and making your own power by using solar power. I know that Connecticut Light and Power pays one of my fellow drivers quite a lot of money every month, just because she had solar panels installed on her roof.
01:38 PM on 01/18/2012
Neither solar nor wind are baseload sources of energy. Geothermal is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mhh310351
Roosevelt Democrat
08:23 PM on 01/16/2012
Hydroshearing is not fracking. The phrase from the document you cite is,

"Enhance permeability by causing existing fractures to slip and propagate or creating new tensile cracks by raising fluid pressure"

AltaRock will use low enough pressures so that the first part of that -- "Enhance permeability by causing existing fractures to slip and propagate" -- happens, and not the second part -- "creating new tensile cracks."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mhh310351
Roosevelt Democrat
09:30 PM on 01/16/2012
My Apologies:

http://geothermal.inel.gov/publications/future_of_geothermal_energy.pdf

Chapters 5.8.6 discuss hydraulic-fracturing simulation & chapter 8.2.7 discuss Induced seismicity.
01:41 PM on 01/15/2012
Sounds promising, but where do you get 24 million gal. of water the is renewable and not a danger to the aquifer?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hawklord Tst
gamer. i was born, and will probably die one day
02:28 PM on 01/15/2012
24 million gallons is, no pun intended, a drop in the bucket, and just cycles
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gas-Bag
If it was easy they'd call it shopping...
02:34 PM on 01/15/2012
Oregon may be able to afford the initial water and I would think that there would be the opportunity to recycle the water back for reuse, a loop if you will. Having said that your question is a smart one and merits consideration by those involved.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
babyspittle
Fox Fake News kills brain cells
12:59 PM on 01/15/2012
"waning political concern over global warming."

The conservative war on reality's sad impact.
10:44 AM on 01/15/2012
Geothermal energy is the best type of clean renewable energy.  Unlike solar, wind and tidal, it generates energy constantly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
babyspittle
Fox Fake News kills brain cells
01:00 PM on 01/15/2012
I'll take solar.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Hatch
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
01:11 PM on 01/15/2012
You'll both take a thin-gruel-diet of power. Goodbye First-world living.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
angusmciver
Feels Empty
01:58 PM on 01/15/2012
Throw 'geothermal' or ground-source heat pumps into the mix. Highly efficient and leans toward conservation making available energy go further.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muggles5
10:10 AM on 01/15/2012
Renewable energy has not been held backnin Germany by the factors mentioned in the first paragraph. They are on track for 20% renewable within a few years. So no, it's not a technical problem and it's not a demand problem. It's a lobbying and corruption and misdirected subsidy problem. The US is a slave to its oil dealers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverwolf13
I know that I do not know.
09:55 PM on 01/15/2012
Precisely. Fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mhh310351
Roosevelt Democrat
12:26 AM on 01/16/2012
I think it's still a cost problem. When coal cost $60.00/ton you can make electricity for about $0.03/kwh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nomadrdw
Zen Druid
02:05 PM on 01/16/2012
that cost is not the true cost though. the problem is that not all the real world cost are included, damage to the environment from the mining, moving, burning, mountain top removal, toxic air pollution, micro particle damage to lungs, acidified rain, storage of coal ash, which is severely toxic.