More

Ma Ying-jeou, Taiwanese President, Wins Re-Election In Close Race

Ma Yingjeou

CHRISTOPHER BODEEN   01/14/12 09:31 AM ET   AP

TAIPEI, Taiwan — Taiwan's president won re-election Saturday, paving the way for a continuation of the China-friendly policies that have delighted Beijing and Washington, and caused consternation among some in Taiwan worried about the durability of their de facto independence.

With about 99 percent of the vote counted, the official Central Election Commission said President Ma Ying-jeou had garnered 51.6 percent of the total against 45.6 percent for Tsai Ing-wen of the main opposition Democratic Progressive Party. A third candidate, James Soong, once a heavyweight with Ma's Nationalist Party, had 2.8 percent.

Ma's Nationalist Party also retained control of the 113-seat legislature, though with a reduced majority.

Speaking before thousands of jubilant supporters in downtown Taipei, Ma said his China policies had resonated with voters.

"They gave us support for our policy to put aside differences with the mainland. To search for peace and turn it into business opportunities," he said.

Since taking office in May 2008, Ma has tied Taiwan ever closer to China, which for the last 60 years has represented a military threat, a political rival and, most recently, a key commercial partner.

The two sides split amid civil war in 1949, and China has never renounced its threat to use military force to bring the democratic island under its control. But over the past several years, and especially since Ma was first elected, tensions have eased considerably amid an upsurge in trade and new transportation and tourist links across the 100-mile-wide (160-kilometer-wide) Taiwan Strait.

Ma's re-election will be seen in Beijing as a big victory for President Hu Jintao, who has moved away from China's previous policy of repeatedly threatening the island with war and instead has tried to woo Taiwanese by showing the economic benefits of closer ties.

Still, Hu has funded a wide-ranging military expansion that has made the use of force a more credible option. A Ma defeat would have strengthened military hard-liners just as Hu is preparing to step down to make way for a younger group of leaders.

There was no immediate reaction from Beijing on the election results.

Ma's victory was welcomed by the United States, Taiwan's most important security partner despite shifting its recognition from Taipei to Beijing in 1979.

"We congratulate Ma Ying-jeou on his re-election and the people of Taiwan on the successful conduct of their presidential and legislative elections," the White House said in a statement.

Drastically lowered tensions have substantially reduced the chances that the U.S. will be embroiled in a Taiwan-China conflict at a time when it is trying to repair its economy, steady relations with Beijing and re-engage in East Asia after a decade of preoccupation with Iraq and Afghanistan.

"Cross-Strait peace, stability and improved relations, in an environment free from intimidation, are of profound importance to the United States," the White House statement said. "We hope the impressive efforts that both sides have undertaken in recent years to build cross-Strait ties continue."

Bruce Jacobs, a China expert at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, said, "Beijing, Washington and even Australia will all breathe better with a Ma victory."

While there is little appetite in Taiwan for political union with Beijing, a majority of Taiwanese do want to engage the mainland commercially, because they see it as an economic force whose footprint is constantly growing.

Since taking office 3 1/2 years ago, Ma has sanctioned big upsurges in direct flights across the strait, given the green light to accelerated Chinese tourist visits to Taiwan and opened the door to Chinese investment.

His signature achievement was the completion of a China trade deal in June 2010 that lowered tariffs on hundreds of goods. While most of Taiwan's $124 billion worth of exports to China last year were electronic items such as television displays and cellphone chips, there was also a big upsurge in agricultural sales from southern Taiwan, long a stronghold of Tsai's party.

Ma's victory was a bitter blow to Tsai, a 55-year-old London School of Economics Ph.D., who invested great efforts in driving home her message that Ma's policies were not only widening economic inequality but also undermining Taiwan's de facto independence in exchange for economic benefits from China – a claim meant to resonate with her party's pro-independence base.

While the DPP used to push for formal Taiwanese independence, under Tsai it has adopted a more moderate posture, insisting it wants to work with China, though without the same degree of intensity it attributes to Ma.

DPP partisans – and others on the island – worry that closer commercial links with the mainland will force Taiwan into a state of dependency that they fear will make political union inevitable. During the campaign, Ma insisted he has no intention of discussing the sensitive unification issue with Beijing during a second term, but fears of a closer political connection remain intact.

In his acceptance speech, Ma pledged to boost support for poorer Taiwanese and narrow the growing rich-poor divide while reaching out to civil society in making policy.

He promised to seek Taiwanese entry into international economic and cultural organizations from which it is now excluded by Chinese opposition, and to protect Taiwan's sovereignty, security and "the dignity of the Taiwanese people."

A former justice minister and Taipei mayor, Ma won the support of Taiwanese more with his policies than his personality. Low-key and wonkish, the 61-year-old Harvard Law School graduate has sometimes seemed ill at ease in trying to connect with ordinary Taiwanese. But his insistence that his China approach was popular in both Beijing and Washington resonated with voters seeking stability and prosperity in an increasingly globalized world.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

TAIPEI, Taiwan — Taiwan's president won re-election Saturday, paving the way for a continuation of the China-friendly policies that have delighted Beijing and Washington, and caused consternatio...
TAIPEI, Taiwan — Taiwan's president won re-election Saturday, paving the way for a continuation of the China-friendly policies that have delighted Beijing and Washington, and caused consternatio...
Filed by Benjamin Hart  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 143
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
randomelyawesome1969
10:09 PM on 01/15/2012
Why do the Chinese have such a h@rdon about Taiwan, anyway? Aren't they already one of the world's biggest country and economy? Why can't they just leave the Taiwanese alone in peace? Will they lose their national manhood if Taiwan declares independence? The Chinese need to look themselves in the mirror and figure out why the Taiwanese don't want them. When China lost a war to Japan, they gave Taiwan away like it's nothing. Then after WWII they came to Taiwan and slaughtered the Taiwanese like animals. And oh, they're communists too. The Taiwanese are much better off without the Chinese...they are bad news. Very bad news.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopgeorge
Paper Ballots WORK. Unverifiable e-voting doesn't
04:33 AM on 01/16/2012
Actually, Taiwan was never part of China -- ever.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
randomelyawesome1969
09:52 PM on 01/15/2012
When the country's enemy are celebrating your victory, Mr. Ma, you pretty much know what you are, don't you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramkshrestha
Lumbini-Kapilvastu Day Movement
11:50 AM on 01/15/2012
Congratulation!
09:10 AM on 01/15/2012
Ma winning means stability, for Taiwan, for China, and for the US. That's a good thing for just about everyone except for the hardcore Taiwan independence people. The problem with DPP is that it only has one message, and that's China bashing often at the expense of the economy and US relations. Channeling anti-China sentiments can only go so far. China- bashing is not a policy nor does it solve Taiwan's problems, it only creates headaches for the US to deal with. More importantly, using xenophobia to gather votes will not work on the long term because it's bad for the economy. Even when DPP managed to win last time with Chen, without sound policies and internal controls Chen and his party left the office disgraced.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopgeorge
Paper Ballots WORK. Unverifiable e-voting doesn't
02:03 PM on 01/15/2012
Would you mind telling China to remove it's 1500+ missiles pointed at Taiwan, please.
04:12 AM on 01/16/2012
Since your comment has nothing to do with my original comment I guess you agree with what I wrote.

Asking China to demilitarize makes about as much sense as asking the US to remove its military bases and carriers from Asia.
12:33 AM on 01/15/2012
If you noticed in other pictures, the vest that Ma Ying-Jeou is wearing has the full name of his party, the KMT. The full name of the KMT is the 'Chinese Nationalist Party (中國國民黨)'. (中國=China /國民黨=Nationalist Party ).

And Ma always states that he is the president of the Republic of China (official name of Taiwan). Looks like he is really adhering to the 1992 consensus.
12:59 AM on 01/15/2012
Because the KMT still considers itself the one and only legitimate government of China since it lost the Mainland to the communist party.

What's wrong with that? We still hold the hopes and dreams of one unified nation for the good of ALL PEOPLE.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopgeorge
Paper Ballots WORK. Unverifiable e-voting doesn't
02:30 AM on 01/15/2012
LOL! Are you kidding me?!

Tell that to any Taiwanese citizen and they will laugh at you -- green or blue.

BTW, the so-called "1992 Consensus" was a fabrication by the KMT. The person who coined that term for the party has since admitted that there was no agreement.
12:06 AM on 01/15/2012
Everyone's happy when former rivals trade televisions and cellphones instead of bullets and missiles. Isn't capitalism grand?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopgeorge
Paper Ballots WORK. Unverifiable e-voting doesn't
02:31 AM on 01/15/2012
At the expense of Taiwan's democracy and sovereignty?

Not a good deal, in my books.
03:28 AM on 01/15/2012
Your opinion on the subject is without factual support. This election was fully democratic. The people freely chose closer ties with the mainland. You may not have chosen that, but it's not up to you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doraemonpepsi
04:37 AM on 01/15/2012
In your books ? What book ?
09:53 PM on 01/14/2012
Ma and the KMT did much better than expected - he even won more than half the vote, so in Taiwan this is being seen as a major victory.
The main factor was the perceived unreliability of Tsai and her DPP. She approved of violent protests against Chinese delegations and the ECFA trade pact with China - yet during the campaign she failed to mention it. If ECFA was so disastrous for Taiwan, why suddenly let it go?
The fear of those kind of flipflops, more conflict and grandstanding speeches, more corruption by a party which used to stand for human rights and democracy, all those elements led to the DPP defeat.
The Taiwanese don't want Chinese rule and neither does Ma. The Taiwanese voted in favor of stability, economic development and peace. They rejected slogans, conflicts, and empty nationalism.
12:35 AM on 01/15/2012
Well said; fairly and objectively.
THANK YOU!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopgeorge
Paper Ballots WORK. Unverifiable e-voting doesn't
02:33 AM on 01/15/2012
"The Taiwanese don't want Chinese rule and neither does Ma."

You better tell Ma that.
09:35 PM on 01/14/2012
Selling one's country out for short-term economic gain at the expense of sovereignt­y is a very high price to pay? (source: stopgeorge) In the long term, the mainland will continue to be a major economic power, if not the largest center of economic activity in the world. That's long term economic gain right there. The idea that this came at the expense of sovereignty is flawed in ways. If one defines sovereignty as being immune to external developments and pressures, then sovereignty is a bygone concept in today's world of globalization. The concept of country or nationality is becoming increasingly meaningless as economies intertwine and ideas and people flow through borders, intermingling in various societies. Personally, I find patriotism/nationalism and other silly notions of chauvinism as a stain on Humanity.
09:36 PM on 01/14/2012
Continued:

The reelection of Ma Ying-Jeou doesn't mean the Taiwan is going to hopelessly fall into the "grasp of the CCP". *inserts cries and moans like those I heard from the republicans for the past year*. For most people, they worry about putting money on the table and a future for their children. To satisfy that, Taiwan must listen to the economic realities of the world she lives in, which includes increasing ties with the mainland. Why should we tether ourselves to the despondent economies of Europe and the US? As for calls that "freedom will be lost", I find it amusing that those who yell the loudest about protecting freedom are also the ones who will take it from others, in the name of "protecting freedom". Freedom is like infinity. It's a good tool for coming up with approximate solutions (very accurate in some cases), but it doesn't truly exist in reality/Universe. Until Ma or the KMT says something along the lines of handling political authority in Taiwan to the mainland, which they have explicitly denied (political suicide anyway), I don't see how the expansion of economic ties with mainland necessarily curtails "freedoms" in Taiwan.

The thing is, why sacrifice the welfare of the people for something as pathetic as ideologies. Why. Humanity has seen too many wars, genocides, discrimination, hate and suffering because of the short-sightedness of ideologues.
12:39 AM on 01/15/2012
YAY!!!!!!!
Knowledge does illuminate! :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopgeorge
Paper Ballots WORK. Unverifiable e-voting doesn't
02:48 AM on 01/15/2012
You're joking, right?

The KMT government has been called out (by academics and international watchdog organizations) for curtailing democracy ever since I can remember. The KMT are corrupt to the core, for goodness sakes.

As I said before, there is nothing wrong with negotiating economic agreements -- but when you do it behind closed doors and you are not honest with your people -- that is a different thing altogether.

Taiwan has fought a lot of blood, sweat and tears to gain the democratic freedom they enjoy today -- something the Chinese do not have. That, in itself, is worth protecting -- for one's sovereignty.

And let's make it clear. It is China who is threatening violence and bloodshed -- not Taiwan. It is China who is the aggressor here.

The KMT and CCP (most likely without a referendum from Taiwan) will now continue to negotiate political deals behind closed doors. It is only a matter of time before the Taiwanese start seeing the trojan horse for what it is.
05:55 PM on 01/14/2012
As an American born Taiwanese, I just want to set the record straight. Many of my family members here in the US who still have dual citizenship went back to vote in the election. Most of them voted for Tsai (my family is very pro-Taiwanese independence). But I think for those Taiwanese still living in Taiwan they were probably more immediately concerned with the economy. I definitely don't think the independence issue was the most pressing issue for a lot of people in this election (ie more concerned about jobs and what not), while for some it was an ideological issue at play. So for any of you making large generalizations about this being the people's problem, and Taiwanese people deserving whatever negative outcome results from this, and Taiwanese people only being "short-term" thinkers, remember that this was a 51 vs 46 percent of the vote. Not as close a race as it could have been, but not a total landslide victory either. Many Taiwanese people do care about Taiwan's future and independence and people that make statements like yours are very misinformed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopgeorge
Paper Ballots WORK. Unverifiable e-voting doesn't
08:04 PM on 01/14/2012
Selling one's country out for short-term economic gain at the expense of sovereignty is a very high price to pay.

And it wasn't like Tsai (like Chen before her) was going to halt economic negotiations with China.

The choice couldn't have been clearer for the Taiwanese.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doraemonpepsi
04:43 AM on 01/15/2012
Nobody is selling the country , if Taiwan is ever being recognized as an idenpendent country. The fact is here, we don't recognize Taiwan as an idenpendent country, china doesn't, neither does the EU or UN.

The Taiwanese people have voiced their opinion times after times. Is that they want peace and cooperation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doraemonpepsi
04:41 AM on 01/15/2012
Most Chinese Americans from Taiwan are "本省人"aka "Chinese from Taiwan before the split". No wonder they vote for the green.
05:21 PM on 01/14/2012
If it wasn't for the KMT fleeing to Taiwan where they engendered American military support, Taiwan and its people would have been taken over by the Mainlanders in the early 50's. We had absolutely no commitment to Taiwan whatsoever until the KMT went there. So, for all the "poor" Taiwan native sympathizers posting here, if you think it was bad under Chiang, you would have loved Mao.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:44 PM on 01/14/2012
He's doing the Nixon pose... I wonder will he use the Nixon one arm wave off if he gets the boot?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raymond Strand
03:36 PM on 01/14/2012
In Taiwan they have elections. In China people are murdered, tortured, imprisoned for authoring or signing a document promoting Democracy and Human Rights. I hope for the sake of the people of Taiwan that they never reunify with China while it is an Authoritarian Prison. I mean China is a country where they kidnapped a child plus his family and important figure in Tibetan Buddhism in order to influence a religion.

Ask the people of Hong Kong how their promised Democratic reforms are coming along. The Legislature in Hong Kong is based on Political Favor with Beijing and notoriously corrupt. They don't have votes to replace them but instead get to vote for a paltry few to represent them, which cannot overcome the large Beijing bloc in the Legislature.

Then ask the people of North Korea, or at least the defectors what kind of life they have in China backed North Korea. Because that's the kind of life China would have forced on to the people of South Korea, a growing and prosperous Democracy.

Was it right for KMT to displace the native Taiwanese? No, but do you think they would do better under a Government that actively seeks to stamp out Native languages and religions/cultures?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopgeorge
Paper Ballots WORK. Unverifiable e-voting doesn't
04:06 PM on 01/14/2012
I've learned over the years that the majority of Taiwanese are extreme short-term thinkers. When the time comes, they'll be wondering what happened to their hard-fought democracy and status-quo (sovereignty).

They have no one to blame but themselves.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Cynth
[Your ad here.]
04:42 PM on 01/14/2012
I don't support reunification; however, Ma's re-election (and a pretty close one at that) shows that the Taiwanese aren't just exercising short-term thinking. To continue things as they are without rattling the boat, without giving military hardliners in China any cause in advance of Hu's stepping down, yet without any promises of reunification is probably the best course, given the implications and ramifications.
05:26 PM on 01/14/2012
Exactly Ray. If it wasn't for the KMT fleeing to Taiwan in 1949 where they engendered an American military commitment as a result of the Korean War, Taiwan would have been militarily taken over years ago, or at a minimum been subject to economic deprivation. If the Chinese/Taiwanese on Taiwan want to split the country among ethnic divisions, they should remember how wonderful they would have had it under Mao, instead of Chiang, who by comparison was a humanitarian.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
emphatico
.....is very politically incorrect.
03:17 PM on 01/14/2012
That dude looks kinda like Rick Santorum.
03:15 PM on 01/14/2012
When the United States abrogated the Mutual Defense Treaty with Taiwan, cut diplomatic relations and withdrew all US military personnel, the die was cast for the future. It was unabashed appeasement of China by the United States , laying the groundwork for the pragmatic policies of the current government of Taiwan. They have no choice but to accede to eventual unification, and they are merely trying to make it peaceful instead of by force which would result in the total destruction of Taiwan's infrastructure and their people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopgeorge
Paper Ballots WORK. Unverifiable e-voting doesn't
03:39 PM on 01/14/2012
That's total B.S.

It wasn't an all or nothing situation. If you paid any attention to this election you would realize that Tsai (as was Chen before her) willing to be quite pragmatic with China -- just not at the expense of the status quo (sovereignty).
05:03 PM on 01/14/2012
Your contention that I imped anything of the sort, is what the B.S. is.
05:01 PM on 01/14/2012
I made a general comment that would apply to either party, so no, it's not total B.S. at all.
02:26 PM on 01/14/2012
As I have stated before, most Taiwanese are not ideological about the issue of Taiwanese independence. The reelection of 馬英九 is a clear demonstration of this as the KMT is generally considered to better at handling the economy than the DPP. I noticed that overseas media, particularly those in the US, loves to portray this election as pro-unification vs pro-independence, which is only one of the many issues involved and hardly the overwhelming one. I hope my family's vote for 馬英九 will help in ensuring continued progress for Taiwan and her people's welfare.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopgeorge
Paper Ballots WORK. Unverifiable e-voting doesn't
03:25 PM on 01/14/2012
"The reelection of 馬英九 is a clear demonstrat­ion of this as the KMT is generally considered to better at handling the economy than the DPP."

Although, under Chen, Taiwan was much better economically than under Ma.

As to "ideological" -- the politics of Taiwan centered around unification vs. status quo (sovereignty). The KMT will break that status quo and throw Taiwan into China's orbit. The DPP want to retain the status quo.

It's not about "ideology". It's about the Taiwanese thinking. Taiwanese are very "short-term" thinkers, unfortunately. Most do not care to think about the long-term identity issues and, inevitably, the loss of sovereignty and democracy. It's all about who lines my pockets the quickest.

Taiwan's welfare is in China's hands now -- short term and long term.
05:04 PM on 01/14/2012
That's where the B.S. enters the discussion, because under Chen the economy was tanking.
07:10 PM on 01/14/2012
Clearly NOT true. The economy wasn't better under Chen, it's better under Ma these years. Let's not ask your pro-DPP family and friend's feeling and objectively look at third party numbers. According to Geneva-based World Economic Forum, Taiwan recorded its BEST-EVER performance in the 2010-2011 Global Competitiveness Report released on Sept. 7th. Below quotes from p.28:

Taiwan, China ranks 13, one place lower than last year [...] The quality of the institutional framework continues to improve although by small incremements, now standing at 35th position, up from 40th in 2008. Thanks to greater efficiency, Taiwan has improved by 10 positions in the financial market developement pillar to 35th, a category where it used to place below the 50th mark. [...] Given its many strenghts, improvements in these areas would make Taiwan an even more competitive economy. (http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2010-11.pdf)

In a time when most countries including US and EUs are still under the effect of world financial crisis, Taiwan not only survived, managed to improved its competitiveness worldwide these years under Ma.

On the other hand, back in 2006 under Chen, suicides increased dramatically—more than 200 percent. The crime rate increased almost across the board. Youth unemployment increased markedly, contributing to adolescent crime, drug use, and other problems. (Quotes from Prof. John F. Copper of Rhodes College TN http://weblearn.ox.ac.uk/site/colleges/merton/1/n/llttyy/gpc09/top8/Taiwan%27s%20failed%20president%20Chen%20Shuibian.pdf)
03:27 PM on 01/14/2012
AGREE!!!!!