iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Stephen Colbert's PAC Parody Explains Campaign Finance To America (Part 1)

First Posted: 01/16/12 09:04 AM ET Updated: 01/20/12 12:13 PM ET

This is the first part of a five-part series by The Huffington Post about Stephen Colbert's ongoing explanation of the nation's campaign finance laws. Read about his super PAC launch in part two, his storming of the FEC in part three, his quest for secret money in part four, and his mockery of the anti-coordination rule in part five.

WASHINGTON -- Two years after the Supreme Court voided many of the country's bedrock campaign finance laws, much of the American public is still confused by the change -- and stupefied by the often-impenetrable jargon that frequently encumbers any discussion of the topic.

But one public figure has managed to pierce the veil of dullness to actually demonstrate -- in an electrifying way -- just how dangerous and corrupt the current system of political campaign financing has become.

In an indication of the desperate state of campaign finance laws -- and the mainstream media -- that person is a comedian: Stephen Colbert, who plays a right-wing blowhard on the Comedy Central show "The Colbert Report."

Colbert has spent much of the past year on a crusade to accept unlimited contributions from corporations, unions and individuals in order to make political statements and lavish himself with luxuries. In so doing, he may have helped bring the troubling issues surrounding campaign finance to the public's attention more than either the reform community or traditional media.

The comedian has often used his on-air persona's actual participation in events to help educate his viewers about what he says are the craziest elements of the United States' political system. This journey began on March 30, 2011, when Colbert announced on his show that in order to influence the 2012 elections, he would be forming a political action committee.

"If you wanna be a political playa in 2012, you need a PAC," he said.

In his ensuing adventures, such as receiving approval in June 2011 for a super PAC, Colbert has exposed many of the potential dangers of the current campaign financing system, including the influence of PACs and unlimited-donation super PACs, secret contributions by big donors, the failure of regulators, and the coordination between campaigns and supposedly independent groups. On Jan. 12, Colbert took his antics to their next logical conclusion: He declared a run for the presidency of the United States ... of South Carolina.

"It's not very often that money-in-politics questions wind up in pop culture," said John Wonderlich, policy director at the Sunlight Foundation, a nonprofit that supports campaign finance transparency. "Colbert takes the most legalistic or complicated aspects of campaign finance and boils it down into a digestible popular form in a way that's unique."

Fred Wertheimer, president of Democracy 21 and a longtime supporter of tougher campaign finance regulation, is also a fan. "I think Colbert has made a real contribution to educating a broader public about the dangers involved in our current campaign finance system," he said.

Colbert's personal appearances before the Federal Election Commission and the attention he has generated on the subject even garnered the praise of FEC Commissioner Ellen Weintraub, who thanked Colbert for "shining a little light on this obscure corner of the federal government."

ABOUT THOSE PACS

Forming a PAC seemed an appropriate starting point for Colbert. The committees have traditionally been used to provide a vehicle for a group of people -- employees of a corporation, members of a union, supporters of a political figure -- to pool their money for campaign contributions or independent expenditures in support of the election of candidates.

The first PAC dates back to 1944, but their use exploded in the 1970s and the 1980s.

As he signed the forms to create his own PAC in March, Colbert joked about what else he could do with the money he raises.

"Let's say I'm Sarah Palin and I've got a couple of million dollars in my PAC there. Can I use that to, like, take private jets someplace?" Colbert asked his guest and lawyer Trevor Potter, a former FEC chairman and counsel to Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) during his 2008 presidential run.

Potter, who has since become Colbert's campaign finance straight man, responded with a smile, "You can!"

A common criticism of PACs connected to political figures is that they can be used to pay for things like luxury travel with funds contributed by other people. A PAC belonging to former Republican vice presidential candidate Palin, for instance, provided tens of thousands of dollars for her to travel to Israel and to take private jet trips across the United States

As Colbert has demonstrated, forming a PAC can be as easy as filling out a form and asking for money.

Video produced by Sara Kenigsberg.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
This is the first part of a five-part series by The Huffington Post about Stephen Colbert's ongoing explanation of the nation's campaign finance laws. Read about his super PAC launch in part two, his ...
This is the first part of a five-part series by The Huffington Post about Stephen Colbert's ongoing explanation of the nation's campaign finance laws. Read about his super PAC launch in part two, his ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,835
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (75 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olerealist
retired trial attorney; former member of VA abd Wa
12:08 PM on 04/23/2012
NEW YORK ABOUT TO DECLARE WAR ON “CITIZENS UNITED”

Interesting news for those concerned with the prospect of old white geezers buying the 2012 elections with multi millions in super pac contributions sanctified by the SCOTUS.

New York Governor Cuomo has proposed that the State of New York enact a law resembling the one currently in effect in N.Y. City. The Government would give each candidate for high office $6.00 in “matching funds” for each dollar raised from individuals who reside in New York. He is expected to get enormous support for this process based on its success in the City.

The proposal would not restrict any contributions from any source but it would counterbalance the billions coming in from corporations with individual contributions up to a max of the first $175.00 which would be matched times 6 by the Government.

It is expected that this would bring zillions of ORDINARY citizens back into the election campaigm process.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:44 PM on 01/31/2012
Corporations have the rights of people. When is there going to be a constitutional amendment that guarantees them the right to vote?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olerealist
retired trial attorney; former member of VA abd Wa
12:13 PM on 04/23/2012
QUOTE: "Corporations have the rights of people. When is there going to be a constitutional amendment that guarantees them the right to vote? "

OR THE RIGHT TO BE SENTENCED TO PRIZON FOR COMMITTING they type of financial fraud so prevelent during the final years of trhe BUSH administation. After all they are "people".
02:04 AM on 01/28/2012
Obama's bundlers, though not registered with the Senate, are technically lobbyists.

According to Blum, “Obama has said, he will not take contributions from lobbyists,” saying “to [Obama’s] credit.” But Obama allows “his fund-raisers [to advertise] their access to power brokers as they seek out clients,” which equals what a lobbyist has, access and influence. He further pays bundlers with jobs and appointments.

Therefore, Obama takes millions upon millions from CEOs, VPs, owners, and spouses of lobbying firms, corporations, and other affiliates, earning their money with promises and favors. Take for example, Ronald O. Perelman.

Likewise, 150 million corporate PhRMA-dollars went to Obama's health care campaign, after the secret meetings, advertising for the industry and him. Furthermore, he received more than $2 million from the insurance and pharmaceutical industries’ officials and insiders for his presidential campaign for the no-option healthcare legislation.

Republicans do it boldly and the others in secret. Painfully, this includes our president. Obama has left the donation avenues wide for corrupt corporate interests, though shrouded.

All of these antitrust actions disenfranchise, disconnecting us from equality and the Constitution, but we do have hope. With Ron Paul strongly urging the dismantling of TSA this week, we will have more huge industry funding Gingrich, Obama, and Romney. We need integrity.

Joseph C. Carbone III; 27 January 2012
photo
Harbinger08
You have the right to remain silent
06:51 PM on 01/20/2012
The next thing after "corporate personhood" will be effective "human non-personhood." Or maybe they'll call it ""corporate super-personhood."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeWebster
Always happy.
09:26 PM on 01/18/2012
The feckless FEC.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bertski
just a guy trying not to be part of the problem
01:04 PM on 01/18/2012
When the comedians showing us how we're being bent over the proverbial railing are more electable than the candidates actually running for office, we are beyond screwed. It's great that, in the tradition of George Carlin, guys like Colbert and Stewart are enlightening us, but once we stop laughing at the absurdity of it all, if we don't do something to correct it, we're doomed. Bill Moyers aired a great interview with the authors of "Winner-Take-All Politics." You can see it at www.billmoyers.com - it's a major eye-opener, and it's not at all humorous.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
twiggoat
03:18 AM on 01/18/2012
It's HOM MIDGE not O MARGE
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kathleen Morse
03:33 PM on 01/17/2012
Stephen Colbert is not only a great investigative reporter he is an American hero. He is a Warrior for the middle class. Of course the right claims they haven't been perpetrating a form of genocide against the middle class since Reagan. Stephen I dub you "Supreme Consciousness Raiser" and I thank you with all my Working Class heart.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sampson2
Gardener
06:30 PM on 01/17/2012
X2. F&F
02:55 PM on 01/17/2012
Foreign money can be flooding into the PACs. There is no way to know who is funding the PACs. Whats to stop a Saudi Arabian prince from buying the election?
06:21 PM on 01/17/2012
India and the Philippines are actually lobbying against HR 3596, the bill to ban federal money to companies that offshore. It's a matter of time before the PAC's are affected.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sampson2
Gardener
06:36 PM on 01/17/2012
"Whats to stop a Saudi Arabian prince from buying the election?"

Nothing! Thats one of the major points being made by Colbert's actions. By the way I don't think there is a whole lot of difference between the election being bought by a Saudi prince or an American multi-billionaire (think Koch).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
neolow
Radicalized Dem
02:24 PM on 01/17/2012
Ralph Nader has been about campaign finance reform for some time. "The main way to shift power, if you had to have one reform, its public funding of public elections. Clean money, clean elections. Clean money and clean elections stop the nullification of your votes by special interest money." Ralph Nader, 2003. I also saw another report that measured voter-candidate interaction as a function of donor contribution. You got it. The greater the donor contributions the less the interaction between voters and candidates. Our votes are needed to get into office but once in office, they pretty much follow the dictates of their corporate masters. Example, tax breaks for the 1%. No matter what the people say they want, the GOP will protect the 1%. The Dems are in it too.
03:14 PM on 02/02/2012
Nader has been a champion for everyday US citizens since day one, and he has my respect. It's unfortunate that he has never been elected President. I'm not sure why he doesn't get more air time; maybe that's just not his strong suit. Thankfully, we have people like him advocating behind the scenes, and folks like Colbert and Stewart to spread the real news out front.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vaf112675
Read my comments. You'll know me by them.
01:52 PM on 01/17/2012
"A common criticism of PACs connected to political figures is that they can be used to pay for things like luxury travel with funds contributed by other people. A PAC belonging to former Republican vice presidential candidate Palin, for instance, provided tens of thousands of dollars for her to travel to Israel and to take private jet trips across the United States"

In other words if you find enough suckers to back your political ambitions, you can go on luxurious vacations with your family to anywhere you want, and it's all legal.

Have to love the system
06:11 PM on 01/17/2012
I'm sure her PAC bought the bus too, while she "decided" whether to run or not.
12:59 PM on 01/17/2012
I like the part where they can attach some so call charitable branch to pac so they don't have to disclose donors... N is all legal because they are rich n they can legally manipulate the system...by contributing thousands n millions of dollars to corrupt politician in Washington to give they wat they want...
let than still the US is always accusing other countries of been corrupt when there are out of control corruption going on in Washington DC
There should be no pacs period..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
belladio
Not in the mood to suffer fools
12:05 PM on 01/17/2012
I find it unfathomable that I'd trust Colbert and Stewart far more than the thieving liars we currently have in office. GreedyBastardsAbound, integrity dies, and comedians again speak the truth we didn't hear when Carlin and others tried to tell us in the past.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Roger
Better dead than red (state)
12:48 PM on 01/17/2012
F&F if just for the Carlin shout out. My generation's sage, indeed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
belladio
Not in the mood to suffer fools
01:03 PM on 01/17/2012
My grandfather long ago asked me to listen to Carlin. Also had me read Solzhenitsyn. Wise man.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
belladio
Not in the mood to suffer fools
05:04 PM on 01/17/2012
He sure pegged it, didn't he. Hugs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sampson2
Gardener
07:16 PM on 01/17/2012
Can't fan you again but thanks for the comment. Colbert and Stewart have done more investigative journalism to explain the fraud called SuperPacs and the impact of Citizens United to the American people than all of our MSM combined.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TFlint
11:32 AM on 01/17/2012
I hope Colbert's writers have caught this! Newt claims that, as a candidate, he can not communicate with Super Pac, but as a CITIZEN, he CAN! So Citizen Colbert can communicate with Jon Stewart, right?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
belladio
Not in the mood to suffer fools
12:06 PM on 01/17/2012
Wait? What?? Is that how the superpac dealie works?

God, we're in the wrong business.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jangoodell
My micro-bio is empty
07:31 PM on 01/17/2012
I saw that, too. It was actually in the clip on JS last night.
photo
peoplesmoks
Your comment is pending censorship...
11:02 AM on 01/17/2012
Campaign finance reform is just another example of a good idea gone bad when liberals start writing legislation. An FYI, what folks know as McCain/Feingold is actually the House version written by Rep. Christopher Shayes (D-CT) as H.R. 2356. I include the HR number, so anyone can look it up themselves.