More

Garth Brooks Sues Hospital That Promised Mother's Namesake Building In Exchange For Donation

Garth Brooks

JUSTIN JUOZAPAVICIUS   01/17/12 06:34 PM ET   AP

CLAREMORE, Okla. — Garth Brooks appeared before a friendly crowd Tuesday – the jurors who will hear his claim that an Oklahoma hospital refused to name a building for his late mother after he gave it $500,000.

Nearly everyone in the jury pool raised their hands when Brooks' lawyer asked whether they had heard of the country music star. Eight of the 18 selected for possible duty acknowledged they were fans, and several said they had attended one or more of his concerts.

Brooks claims he made the donation to Integris Canadian Valley Regional Hospital in Yukon because he believed at least some part of the facility would be named after his mother. He has sued to have the money returned.

Integris has said the donation was an "unconditional" gift and it has done nothing wrong by not naming a building after Colleen Brooks.

"Unfortunately, talks broke down or did not continue or Mr. Brooks was not satisfied with the options we were offering, and that's when he decided to sue," hospital spokesman Hardy Watkins said Tuesday before the trial began.

Dressed in blue jeans and a black cowboy hat, Brooks shook hands with lawyers and made small talk before proceedings began Tuesday afternoon. He was accompanied by his wife, country singer Trisha Yearwood, and a number of potential jurors said they were her fans too. Brooks' lawyer Peter Brolick called Yearwood "every bit the superstar" as Brooks.

Integris lawyer Terry Thomas, who indicated he was a pop music fan, asked potential jurors to ignore Brooks' celebrity and decide the case fairly.

"If Mr. Paul McCartney or a Mr. Brian Wilson were sitting there, I couldn't sit there, I just couldn't," Thomas told the prospective jurors. "That's what we're looking for here. If you're just not going to be able to determine that Mr. Brooks (is wrong), I need to know at this point."

None of the potential jurors were removed from consideration. The judge swore 12 jurors in and planned to pick an alternate. Opening statements begin Wednesday.

Brooks lives near Owasso, a Tulsa suburb, and is originally from Yukon, near Oklahoma City. His lawyer said the case features "one of the biggest country music stars that ever lived vs. the largest health care system in Oklahoma."

According to the lawsuit, hospital officials showed Brooks mock-ups of buildings bearing his mother's name and told him his donation was earmarked for such a project. Brooks' mother died of cancer in 1999.

In a statement prior to jury selection Tuesday, Brooks' spokeswoman said the musician was "stunned and hurt" by the company's failure to name anything for her.

Watkins, the vice president of marketing and communications for Integris Health, said Tuesday that hospital officials had several discussions with Brooks about naming options – including for a women's center and even renaming the hospital itself – in the two years after the donation was made. The naming options ranged from $250,000 to $15 million, Watkins said.

Watkins said Brooks' $500,000 donation, made in 2005, remains unspent in a hospital account and that the hospital followed all IRS guidelines governing donor giving.

"We certainly recognize Mr. Brooks is an amazing ambassador for Oklahoma, and a very accomplished star in his own right," he said. "We certainly wish it did not have to come to this."

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST IMPACT

CLAREMORE, Okla. — Garth Brooks appeared before a friendly crowd Tuesday – the jurors who will hear his claim that an Oklahoma hospital refused to name a building for his late mother after...
CLAREMORE, Okla. — Garth Brooks appeared before a friendly crowd Tuesday – the jurors who will hear his claim that an Oklahoma hospital refused to name a building for his late mother after...
Filed by Eleanor Goldberg  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 105
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
ttsgw
Atheist and secular humanist
12:08 PM on 01/19/2012
Pathetic.
03:25 PM on 01/18/2012
So many people donate without notoriety. Everyday! America's poor are the most generous givers. I understand him "paying to name" aka a donation memorializing his mother. Then again I cannot get his quote I watched him say on TV... "I have more money than my children's children could ever spend." out of my head. Who are you again? Oh yeah...Garth Bucks. Or even better... ego...Chris Gaines?
02:55 PM on 01/18/2012
Watkins VP of marketing etc for Integris Health said Brooks' $500,000 donation, made in 2005, remains unspent in a hospital account and that the hospital followed all IRS guidelines governing donor giving.
Does that mean they have earned interest on the money for the past 7 years? It leaves so many questions. It seems that naming options depended on how much was donated. Where they trying to get more money from him. Do all hospitals sell naming options for donations?
02:58 AM on 01/18/2012
How effed up is this hospital? They couldn't name a garden after her after a half million dollar donation? Looking forward to seeing them lose this case...
12:02 AM on 01/18/2012
You would think that after the guy dropped half a million dollars in their pocket, the hospital would gladly name a building after his mother. I don't blame him for wanting his money back. I would be some other hospital would be happy to have it.
awckid3
No good deed goes unpunished.
06:28 PM on 01/17/2012
Give 'em hell, Garth!
photo
msgirlintn
Magnolia's mom!
06:22 PM on 01/17/2012
Garth is one of the most generous men in this country. He is a true Southern gentleman. But he is also a great businessman. He gave 500k for the hospital and only asked for his mother's name to be on the building. He doesn't give up when he is right about business decisions. Ask some people in the Music Business in Nashville.
06:10 PM on 01/17/2012
Sorry, I find this in "poor taste". If your aren't giving from the heart, then don't give at all! Will a name on the outside of a building add or detract from the sick who would be helped? My mother would be humiliated if I acted like this!
photo
msgirlintn
Magnolia's mom!
06:23 PM on 01/17/2012
stmonica, Garth is the type of business man that wants what he was promised for his 500k. He could have given that money to any Hospital in the country and they would be happy to have Garth Brooks as a donor.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:34 PM on 01/17/2012
I think you are missing the point.
It's not about a name on a building. Garth wanted to "Honor " his Mother.
12:59 AM on 01/18/2012
No, I didn't miss the point. "Honoring" one's mother simply means something different to me than it does to Garth. My mother would have been honored for me to give to a hospital-she wouldn't have cared two hoots if her name was on it. In fact, she would have considered it a bit "tacky". He did say he wanted his mother's name on the building. I'm a liberal, but also a Christian (yes, contrary to right wing propoganda, we exist). Remember the widow's mite? "Giving" is a "heart" thing.
06:07 PM on 01/17/2012
There has to be more to the case then what is being reported, such as a misunderstanding involving a third party intermediary.

If there is no paper trial to substantiate either claims, perhaps court-ordered mediation is in order.

It's hard to see how there could be a winning outcome for anyone other than the attorneys.

Stacy Harris
Publisher/Executive Editor/Media Critic
Stacy's Music Row Report
http://stacyharris.com
06:03 PM on 01/17/2012
That is not as rare as it may sound. Some people will say anything to get donations and those
people should be 'outed'. I pray Garth has the opportunity to either get his money back, or have his mothers name as he was 'sold' on the building. Very sad state of affairs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mitch Johnesee
06:31 PM on 01/17/2012
Why are you taking his side on this? He never finalized an agreement, leaving the decision in the hands of the hospital...

And why would you applaud the efforts of a multi-millionaire to rescind a donation to a HOSPITAL of all places... those dirty scheming doctors always trying to keep others from dying and such... they should walk in Garth's shoes for one minute and realize the life-affirming work he's performed over his lifetime.

I hope he's kicked right in the butt for trying to screw over a hospital because it doesn't include a name on the side of the building.
08:26 PM on 01/17/2012
Many people who have money donate all the time to different places and I agree that taking money from a hospital without making stipulations shouldn't be questioned. I do believe that giving to any donations, you should not expect anything in return but knowing that you were helping others. Living in Yukon myself makes me sad that someone with his kind of money has doesn't just give to be giving, but expects things in return. I know that the hospital can use the money for those who can not afford hospitalization.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dannywanny
09:48 PM on 01/17/2012
This hospital is owned by a large corporation, whose primary motive is profit, not patient care. If many hospitals were not profit centers they would not have been acquired by
for-profit businesses. Corporations dont invest in losing operations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dean S6
My job is to poke holes so you can fix your story
05:58 PM on 01/17/2012
I'm Surprised you people are frittering in rabies of the brain over 500k... in OKLAHOMA...... it's not like this is fkn Manhattan Island. It's not even a really major-major city IN OK.
05:49 PM on 01/18/2012
So...people with cancer in Oklahoma are less important than people with cancer in Manhattan? Wrong is wrong...no matter how large or small the place is in which it occurs. Geez...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dean S6
My job is to poke holes so you can fix your story
02:23 AM on 01/19/2012
I love how you take what I've said and blown it COMPLETELY out of context. I was referring to all these dill-weeds foaming at the mouth about "How does donating $500k to a building help complete a building?!?!" 500K in a small town goes a VERY long way. I should know considering I live in one.
photo
ttsgw
Atheist and secular humanist
12:09 PM on 01/19/2012
People with cancer is only important as long as they have money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Caroli
Give peace a chance
05:43 PM on 01/17/2012
Bait and switch. Take the money and run. If he has no proof then it's his bad for being taken.
Gperky
Born with a Plan
06:51 PM on 01/17/2012
Sounds like something Obama would do. I hope Garth wins.
09:54 AM on 01/19/2012
Obama would approve the Fed to print Garth off $600K and write off the loss.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlonzoQuijana
Independent, Libertarian, Skeptic
05:26 PM on 01/17/2012
$500K for a building??? That's not much, unless it was a very, very small structure. At my local hospital that might get you a canopy at an entrance to one of the smaller clinics or medical office buildings, e.g. "The Garth Brooks Gateway to Excellent Medicine" or some such confected name. I remember working at a library and that would have bought a name for a reading room or alcove.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Southern Cali Native84
Waitin' 4 the race-istG.O.Pgeneration 2d+i+e off
06:20 PM on 01/17/2012
Did you not read correctly? He wants a building NAMED after his mother.
photo
mightytonkatruc
Armed Liberal Texanist
06:24 PM on 01/17/2012
The Houston's Texans owner donated $500k to build a barn for Girl Scout horses. (And yes their name is on it) LoL
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Terry McDill
No! Your micro-bio is empty!
05:11 PM on 01/17/2012
An honest crook is one that stays bought. :P
05:08 PM on 01/17/2012
Did Garth approach the hospital or did they approach him? The article doesn't make it clear. Did Garth call the hospital and ask if they would name a building after his mother if he donated $500K? Or did the hospital call Garth and say if he donated $500K they would name a building after his mother? With as much money as Garth probably has, somehow I doubt he would go through all the hassle of court unless he truly believed that the hospital reneged on their promise.