iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Abortion Rates Are Higher In Countries Where Procedure Is Illegal, Study Finds

Abortion

By MARIA CHENG   01/18/12 07:01 PM ET   AP

LONDON -- Abortion rates are higher in countries where the procedure is illegal and nearly half of all abortions worldwide are unsafe, with the vast majority in developing countries, a new study concludes.

Experts couldn't say whether more liberal laws led to fewer procedures, but said good access to birth control in those countries resulted in fewer unwanted pregnancies.

The global abortion rate remained virtually unchanged from 2003 to 2008, at about 28 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15 to 44, a total of about 43.8 million abortions, according to the study. The rate had previously been dropping since 1995.

About 47,000 women died from unsafe abortions in 2008, and another 8.5 million women had serious medical complications. Almost all unsafe abortions were in developing countries, where family planning and contraceptive programs have mostly levelled off.

"An abortion is actually a very simple and safe procedure," said Gilda Sedgh, a senior researcher at the U.S.-based Guttmacher Institute, designated by the World Health Organization as an official Collaborating Center for Reproductive Health. "All of these deaths and complications are easily avoidable," said Sedgh, the study's lead author.

Sedgh and colleagues concluded that the proportion of unsafe abortions rose from 44 percent in 1995 to 49 percent in 2008, the last year for which statistics were available and studied in the report. Sedgh acknowledged it was difficult to get an accurate number for unsafe abortions in particular and described their estimates as modest.

They used sources including official statistics, national surveys, and hospital records. To account for unreported abortions, they made adjustments and relied on information from other kinds of studies, expert assessments, and surveys of women.

The research was published Thursday in the journal, Lancet.

Abortion rates were lowest in Western Europe – 12 per 1,000 – and highest in Eastern Europe – 43 per 1,000. The rate in North America was 19 per 1,000. Sedgh said she and colleagues found a link between higher abortion rates and regions with more restrictive legislation, such as in Latin America and Africa. They also found that 95 to 97 percent of abortions in those regions were unsafe.

The authors defined unsafe abortion as any procedure done by people lacking needed skills or in places that don't meet minimal medical standards. Sedgh said some women in Africa resort to using broken soda bottles or taking strong doses of medicines or herbal drugs to induce abortions.

"It is precisely where abortion is illegal that it must become safer," wrote Beverly Winikoff and Wendy R. Sheldon of the Gynuity Health Projects in New York, in an accompanying commentary.

Experts said increasing birth control options for women in poor countries, like providing long-acting implants, would make a big difference.

"Wherever we have made better contraception available in the countries where we work, hundreds of women will walk hours to get it," said Dana Hovig, CEO of Marie Stopes International, a family planning organization. He was not connected to the study.

____

Online:

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING

LONDON -- Abortion rates are higher in countries where the procedure is illegal and nearly half of all abortions worldwide are unsafe, with the vast majority in developing countries, a new study concl...
LONDON -- Abortion rates are higher in countries where the procedure is illegal and nearly half of all abortions worldwide are unsafe, with the vast majority in developing countries, a new study concl...
Filed by Adam Goldberg  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 930
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
10:21 AM on 04/17/2013
Makes sense because it's in countries that are very religious and where they don't teach sex-ed. The Republican utopia.
08:10 AM on 04/17/2013
How would they know this? There wouldn't be any statistics available on an illegal proceedure.

I suspect that contraception is more difficult to get in the countries in question, thus the high abortion rate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Geldsmaggen
01:49 AM on 03/10/2013
Devil's advocate:
What if a country had abortion illegal but then also had laws regulating illegal abortions?
It sounds silly but here me out. You could have a completely separate branch of the police and court system that is empowered to enforce these regulations but not the law against abortion. They would not be able to share information with the regular police and would be exempted from "aiding and abetting laws" provided they stand out of the way should the regular police discover the abortion. Regular police would not be welcome to abortion regulation court proceedings. Identities in such proceedings and investigations by the abortion regulation police would be kept secret. This way abortion could be illegal and prosecuted but there'd still be incentives for illegal abortion providers to provide safe abortions.

Is this what I believe? No, but it's a conceivable idea and I like being open-minded. I could even be persuaded to come around to this position with enough persuasion. But I must see how others respond to the idea, because that can helpful in developing my views. I do not wish to just pat myself on the back for my ideas, I wish to honestly reflect on and develop them.
01:48 PM on 12/17/2012
Ms. Gilda Sedgh, talks about abortions being safe and simple but she seems to miss one very obvious point. 100% of abortions result in the death of a very innocent and helpless human being. Doesn't seem very safe or simple to me when 100% of the children are killed. If they are so safe and simple then why do they say so many are not performed safely?
07:53 PM on 10/24/2012
"Experts couldn't say whether more liberal laws led to fewer procedures..."

Exactly. So this "study" doesn't prove anything in regard to legal abortion lowering rates of abortion. It's called a logical fallacy. Post hoc, ergo propter hoc.

http://www.fallacyfiles.org/posthocf.html

The idea that legalizing abortion will lead to fewer abortions flies in the face of logic. Since when does legalizing *anything* lead to less of it? Among other things, the law is a pedagogue...it's a teacher. When people see something as legal, they typically consider it moral and acceptable. If that wasn't true, then we should do away with laws against stealing and murder and any penalties against these behaviors.

That's why after laws against segregation were enacted, more and more people stopped being so overtly racist. And more and more people accepted that segregation was wrong and immoral. The law reflects the morality of a people, but it also teaches and informs the conscience of the people.
12:43 PM on 02/07/2013
How could legalizing abortions produce less? Easily: countries where abortions are illegal are usually socially restrictive. They tend to also outlaw contraceptives and have social or legal restrictions on the rights of women. So it isn't the legalization itself that would reduce the number of abortions, but the more modern outlook on women and reproductive rights in general that do. A cautionary tale for the Right in the U.S., who seems to want to regress to the 1950s and either outlaw or make difficult to obtain the very contraception that removes the need for abortions in the first place.
01:14 PM on 04/23/2013
I think you missed the fact that the legalization and spread of contraception in the USA coincided with the occurrence of over 50 million abortions. 
If you do a little reading, you'll find that over half of all abortions in the USA are on women who were using contraception (Alan Guttmacher -  Planned Parenthood's research arm).  Virtually all contraception has significant real-world failure rates.  But it has created a society that thinks it can have sex without consequences.  Therefore more people are having sex outside of marriage than back in the 1950s.  And when that contraception inevitably fails, what's the answer?
Abortion.
01:45 PM on 08/01/2012
Don't want a baby? Don't have sex. Abstain. This is a very simple concept... additionally, we can avoid a great deal of conflict this way.
08:18 AM on 08/22/2012
Apparently you've never not gotten laid.
02:12 AM on 04/05/2013
35Fans, apparently you're not very creative, and equally psychopathic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anitaj
04:54 PM on 10/24/2012
Please realize that some areas in question have high rates of sexual assault and women do not have the legal right to refuse sex with their husbands.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jax328
Allergic to Bullsh**
10:13 PM on 07/28/2012
This is why you give women easy access to birth control...you dont get pregnant you don't get an abortion...so simple.
07:56 PM on 10/24/2012
1) Almost all contraception has real-world failure rates.
2) While contraception will no doubt lower the chances of getting pregnant in any one sexual act, it ignores the effect on over-all behavior. When you believe you can have sex without consequences, the natural tendency is to have more of it - and more of it outside of marriage.

More people having sex today outside of marriage, thanks to contraception.
12:59 PM on 11/25/2012
And...what will be the problem with them having sex if they're not producing a child they can't take care of?
07:31 PM on 03/21/2012
Do you want the blood to be on her hands? Or yours? These women died very painfully...but i suppose these prolifers think its perfectly ok to shoot an intruder in your home to protect their body, their family, and their home..and thats all these women were trying to do.
photo
RepublicanDepression
Of the1% by the1% for the Gerrymandering One% =GOP
02:32 PM on 01/23/2012
LOL!

GOP (Greedy One Percent) FAIL!

"Abortion rates are higher in countries where the procedure is illegal "
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Connie Markley Boppre
10:29 PM on 01/22/2012
this just proves it. when abortion is outlawed, only outlaws will perform abortion.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bruce Barron
03:20 PM on 01/22/2012
Abortion would be OK I suppose if it wasn't for the fact that you are murdering a person, since that is what is present at the moment of conception.
05:00 PM on 01/22/2012
Just because you call it a person, doesn't make it a person. We are approaching the point that we'll be able to turn a skin cell into a person. Does that mean that when you scratch an itch, you'll be murdering dozens of people?

No brain. No nervous system. No digestive system. No heart. No lungs. No organs of any kind. No thoughts. No feelings. A clump of cells is not a person. Potential to be a person is not a person, it's potential to be a person... just as your skin cells are not a person, but rather just potential to be a person.
10:44 PM on 10/21/2012
so when does it become a person? Go watch October Baby good movie!
photo
RepublicanDepression
Of the1% by the1% for the Gerrymandering One% =GOP
02:33 PM on 01/23/2012
Prove it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bruce Barron
11:00 PM on 01/23/2012
The term zygote is a term referring to any fertilized ovum.It is a biological term denoting quantity and nothing takes its definition from quantity.It is not the human nature nor could it ever be.
"Like generates like" is self evident and to deny it is an absurdity.
It is obviously human and alive.It has a human nature which is rational but unable to utilize these faculties it becomes more mature. Childen who die with not brainstill
have the faculties but cannot exercise these faculities of intellect and will..
Have you ever seen a human nature without a subject.This subject is the person.
An acorn is the smallest tree.A zygote the smallest person..
The understandingof "matter and form" makes this simple
It must necessarily be a person whether we agree or understand how..
It is a unique living human being which has intrinsic principles of operation, is essentially what it is.It cannot become a person but matures in size.Ifnot a person fromitsbeginning how does it ever "become"a persononce it comes into existence.It is a unique indiviidual
The 14 Amendment is silent whether the being in the womb is a person.
In the OT and NT there are plenty of examples of the zygote being a person.Besides this is a matter of faith and the above is of reason.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
longear
02:44 PM on 01/21/2012
Can we know, please, the position on abortion of the sources and commentary involved in this study?
photo
DuaneBidoux
Proud liberal
03:43 PM on 01/21/2012
You do have a point-the study was not referernced.

From what I can find it was in the Lancet medical journal and was undertaken by the

Neither of these groups takes an official position on abortion from a political standpoint although, as is pointed out by the article, the findings of the study do imply a position.
photo
DuaneBidoux
Proud liberal
03:47 PM on 01/21/2012
Somehow I accidently posted before finishing the post...

The institute which undertook the study was the Guttmacher Institute. Since they're mission statement is to educate about reproductive rights it is fairly safe to say they have an pro-choice starting point. Having said that however it is fairly common knowledge among doctors globally that restrictions on abortions just cause women to go get abortions anyway they can.

Historically, as hard as governments and others have tried to force women to do things with their body they want them to do somehow in the end the women always do what they feel they must in spite of those directives. That will likely never change--unfortunately with disasterous unintended consequences for millions of women every year in the world.

http://www.guttmacher.org/sections/abortion.php
08:45 AM on 01/21/2012
I haven't read the study, but it's not a real comparison if you compare industrialized nations to non-industrialized nations. If you want to compare abortion rates per capita, you've got compare the U.S. for example with a country like Ireland where abortion is illegal.

Otherwise, you have too many confounding factors that affect the rates.

I wonder how people deem abortions against those fetuses/babies screened via a pre-natal genetic test for Downs Syndrome or soon autism?

Currently in the UK, 90% of down syndrome babies are aborted. In Ireland, abortion is illegal and so they have more babies with down syndrome (and there aren't those back ally abortions either).
I don't want to fight, but just bringing up different issues within thttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/18/abortion-rates-higher-countries-illegal-study_n_1215045.html#he big for/against issue.
01:12 AM on 01/22/2012
I think there would need to be an effort to control for the accessibility of contraception, too, before you can come to the conclusion that banning abortions increases their frequency. Unfortunately many of the places where abortion is banned are also countries that ban contraception, or make it difficult to get, so that kind of spoils the ability to isolate a cause & effect here. While I don't support banning either abortion or contraception, I find the banning of contraception to be obviously counter-productive to minimizing abortions. And the morning after pill should be in the contraception class, since the fertilization through implantation processes typically take several days, so it almost always causes the egg to be shed before fertilization and the creation of a human fetus occurs. I wish we could at least agree the women have a right to contraception and the morning after pill so that motivation for abortions would be almost eliminated. I also think the female condoms should also be distributed with long-term implants, because the implant alone can not protect a woman from STDs, and many women are forced to have sex against their will and get infected and impregnated as a result.
04:41 AM on 07/31/2012
They don't have to be 'back alley' abortions anymore, it can easy to obtain a SAFE abortion where it is illegal.

Check WomenOnWeb.org, it's safe and has a doctor's supervision, this organization ONLY serves women in countries where abortion is illegal, in an ongoing effort to reduce the maternal mortality rate from illegal, unsafe, unsanitary etc abortions.

Down Syndrome/Autism - The only species on the planet who doesn't cull it's own weaklings or allow nature to do it for them is humans beings. We are making ourselves a weak genetically because we no longer think the laws of survival of the fittest apply to us.
06:32 PM on 01/20/2012
One thing I am never able to wrap my head around, is when pro-life and/or anti abortion supporters say 'Why do you have to have an abortion, why can't you just give it up for adoption?'.

I think that comment is just seeped in ignorance, just willful blindness. I'm Canadian, and abortion wasn't illegal, but the hoops women had to jump through were horrific. The SCC finally threw out all those rules, because they realized a few basic principles.

Very briefly, they understood that women have a right to their person's security. They understood that over the course of carrying a child, giving birth, and raising the child there are a multitude of effects: emotional, sexual, social, physical, mental, financial, health, and career effects, just to name a few. To force a woman to carry a child she doesn't want, and face all of these scenarios against her will is, in fact, criminal, and goes against her rights.

There is the idea then that if the woman's contraception failed, too bad. The price seems a bit high. There is this belief that this great responsibility women have to the fetus is something that is important only as pertains to the fetus. What women suffer and experience over the course of being pregnant and giving birth are no trifling matters. The repercussions for women when it comes to children are overwhelmingly greater than for men.

I wish that people wouldn’t couple morality and health together; they don’t belong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jamie Zupo
my babies ate my brains
07:38 PM on 01/20/2012
Very, very well said.

Most mothers in the unfortunate position will tell you that a first trimester miscarriage is nowhere near as heartbreaking, takes nowhere near the toll, as a stillbirth. Physically, psychologically, they don't compare.

I'm a pro-choice adoptee. Pro-life advocacy needs to stop presenting adoption as a win/win/win scenario. It will fit the needs of some women that don't want to raise a child. But it comes at a high price, and paying it NEEDS to be a choice.
12:37 PM on 01/20/2012
"unsafe abortions rose from 44 percent in 1995 to 49 percent in 2008, the last year for which statistics were available and studied in the report. Sedgh acknowledged it was difficult to get an accurate number for unsafe abortions in particular and described their estimates" Well my estimates show that the number of same abortions is 80%-20%. Prove me wrong with your claims of estimates please! I'm tired of "estimates" being used as facts. All they do is skew date. If we were a more moralistic people, then we wouldn't have these issues
photo
DuaneBidoux
Proud liberal
03:51 PM on 01/21/2012
Who is if "we were a more moralistic people?" Uganda? Afrtica? The species as a whole? If you are curious about where the hard data comes from here is a link:

http://www.guttmacher.org/sections/abortion.php
05:27 PM on 01/21/2012
More moralistic as in unwilling to end innocent lives both here and overseas. And the link you gave still did not give exact fasts, only estimates. Estimates prove nothing. It's a way of reporting "facts" with having nothing to back them up. Estimates can be on the very high or low side and will often vary depending on whose supplying the date. For example, please take the recent oil spill in the gulf and compare those estimates.
photo
DuaneBidoux
Proud liberal
07:28 PM on 01/22/2012
I think you misunderstood my post. I wasn't taking issue inherently with anything you said. I was pointing out that that using "we" is a bit vague.

As far the link I gave you I was showing you the source of the data from the Huffpost piece (which was poorly referenced by Huffpost as another poster pointed out).

There are indeed estimates on the website I linked however there are quite a few empirical studies available based on known data on that site as well.

You might be interested in the history of abortion. It would be interesting reading for anyone of any persuasion. Jews do not and have never found anything in their Bible (Christian Old Testiment) that they believe indicates abortion is wrong. In fact, even in the U.S. abortion was legal for most of our history until the end of the 19th century.

Belief that abortion is wrong is a fairly recent emergence in the history of humans. And there is one undeniable fact--when you take away access to abortion or counseling about reproductive options then abortions stay the same and injured and dead women are simply added to the tally. Women have shown that when confronted with no choice they will make the choice on their own.