iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Ron Paul Gives New Life To Gold Standard Issue

WILL WEISSERT   01/18/12 01:39 AM ET  AP

AUSTIN, Texas — Facing double-digit inflation in 1981, Congress created a commission to consider a role for gold in U.S. monetary policy. The 17-member panel rejected the idea of returning America to the gold standard – except for two dissenting members.

One was a little-known congressman from Texas named Ron Paul.

Today, Paul's surprisingly strong race for the Republican presidential nomination is drawing new attention to a notion that long has been a cherished cause for a small group of conservatives but is considered a relic of history by mainstream economists and politicians.

Paul and his supporters would like to set a firm value for the U.S. dollar, much like when it was pegged to a specific amount of gold. They say prices would be stable and inflation controlled because the government couldn't print more money than it had gold to back it up. This approach, Paul maintains, would address many of the economy's problems.

Other Republican candidates haven't joined him, though, and most experts dismiss the scheme as completely unfeasible in the modern global economy. For one thing, it would require most other countries to change their monetary systems. It would also preclude the ways that nations now manage the ups and downs of their economic cycles.

"Is it feasible to go back to something called `the gold standard'? The answer is no," said Edwin Truman, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, who has written about gold and monetary policy. "The United States does not have the capacity to run such a system in the world today."

Still, talk about a gold standard, which the United States used in its early years but largely abandoned in 1933, shows how economic anxiety has fed a growing appeal for unusual remedies.

"People sense that there's something deeply wrong with the economy, so I think economic radicalism is much more popular than it has been in the past," said Jeffrey Bell, a GOP political consultant who helped Ronald Reagan record a campaign ad endorsing the gold standard in 1980. It never aired.

The Federal Reserve, America's central bank, sets interest rates to keep the economy, inflation and employment on a healthy track. Truman said the Fed has been reformed frequently and a key way to overhaul it today would be to restrict the assets it buys and sells.

"The Federal Reserve is not any different in its fundamental operations than any other central bank in the world," he said. "And, at the core, you'd still want what the Fed has, which is humans, policymakers, deciding how to set interest rates." An inability to loosen credit has been blamed by some economists for prolonging the Great Depression in the 1930s.

Paul calls for auditing – and then ending – the Federal Reserve. He argues that with gold backing the value of the dollar, the Fed would be obsolete and thus unable to play a role in creating credit bubbles that cause misery when they burst. He says the Fed made money too easily available in recent years.

"The gold coin standard, although imperfectly adhered to, permitted startling economic growth combined with falling prices in the 19th century," Paul wrote in his 1981 book "Gold, Peace and Prosperity: The Birth of a New Currency." "In the 67 years since the abolition of the gold standard, the Consumer Price Index has gone up 625 percent. In the previous 67 years, under an imperfect gold coin standard, the CPI increased 10 percent."

The United States still allowed foreign nations to convert dollars into gold at a fixed rate of $35 an ounce through August 1971, when Richard Nixon closed the Treasury's "gold window." Paul says that's what inspired him to run for Congress.

Truman said going back is impossible: "It would drain all of our gold and we would go into huge deflation."

Mark Thoma, an economics professor at the University of Oregon who also has written on the gold standard, said there's not enough gold in the world to cover the value of global transactions and thus alleviate the need for paper money – meaning governments would still want to float their currencies' value against gold.

David Schraeder, spokesman for the World Gold Council, an industry group that tracks gold bullion holdings, said the idea of setting a market value for gold can't be done unilaterally by the United States.

"You cannot have a gold standard with only one country participating," he said.

GOP candidates Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry both have called for firing Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and reining in monetary policy, but neither has endorsed a new gold standard. They and other Republicans have avoided ridiculing the idea, however, and alienating its ardent believers.

"It's like poking a stick at a beehive," said Jonah Goldberg of the conservative American Enterprise Institute. "You're not going to get rid of them. You're just going to get them angry at you."

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 116
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
10:20 AM on 01/31/2012
As America's central bank, the Fed ..."sets interest rates to keep the economy, inflation and employment on a healthy track."... Really? These non elected and faceless individuals wield way too much power and decide with impunity how it's going to be for us while at the same time making a profit. I am reminded of "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid" every time I heard about The Fed. Who are those guys? And why not audit them and get rid of them if they are doing more harm than good? Returning to even an imperfect gold standard would seem to be in our best interests.
05:25 PM on 01/22/2012
+The Federal Reserve, America's central bank, sets interest rates to keep the economy, inflation and employment on a healthy track.
Well, the Fed has failed in keeping the economy, inflation and employment healthy. Here is a chart that shows the value of the dollar over the years. You be the judge.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/will-inflation-emerge-victorious-were-not

+Truman said going back is impossible: "It would drain all of our gold and we would go into huge deflation."
That statement assumes you revert the gold-to-dollar ratio to historical standards. But his argument only strengthens the case to fix the value of the dollar to a commodity by only asking, "well, why would we have huge deflation?"... Because the fed printed so much money. So the answer is, fix the dollar-to-gold ratio to today's market and you won't get the deflation.

+"You cannot have a gold standard with only one country participating," he said.
Of course, he fails to mention how everyone started using the dollar as the standard... same can be used to get onto some type of commodity-based currency standard.

But no one cares to discuss what are the dangers of maintaining a debt-based fiat currency standard. Or, no one cares to mention that NEVER in history has a fiat currency standard survived very long but gold has... and why? Because the propensity to print free money is too great.
08:11 AM on 01/20/2012
Just one thing wrong with this: Paul isn't for returning to a gold standard; he's for the Hayekian model of competing currencies that float against one another. The Dollar would be one, and the Euro and various hard metals would keep it stable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CarlIII
Liberal Virginian living in Remlap Alabama
09:40 PM on 01/18/2012
Not sure who said "There's no fool like an old fool" maybe Mark Twain but it sure fits in Paul's case. He is so old and foolish he F.A.R.T.S gold dust.
07:30 PM on 01/18/2012
This should be updated to note that Gingrich just today called for a panel to consider reinstituting the gold standard.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CarlIII
Liberal Virginian living in Remlap Alabama
09:40 PM on 01/18/2012
And that helps Paul how?
05:40 PM on 01/18/2012
What a surprise! The people who are stealing the wealth from you by manipulating the money supply call it unfeasible. Sure it's unfeasible to them. They would have to go out and get a real job.
05:42 PM on 01/22/2012
What floors me some of the "intellectuals" fail to ask who benefits from the fed printing? Well, who ever has the highest leverage ratio and gets the newly printed money first. Those are able to buy good/services before the rest prices are raised to account for the extra money supply injected into the economy.

They also fail to ask, "who is hurt by printing the most?"... those of us who save and have fixed incomes.
04:03 PM on 01/18/2012
There is no left vs. right. It's a paradigm to keep you in control.
02:55 PM on 01/18/2012
For reasons aforesaid, answer is to interface a modern gold standard with the present system as an emergency failsafe.
02:47 PM on 01/18/2012
Gold historically charachterized its users as having the impress of a sovereign making self evident who one is by the charachter of one's transactions. Same holds true for States relative to the Doctrine of Recognition. How one sovereign recognizes another. Fatal flaw to American democracy is that U.S. citizens can't challenge or question any part of the national debt collection process U.S govt. subjected itself to as evidenced by terms and conditions which make up the " New Deal" contract. U.S. Supreme Court holds Federal Reserve notes are circulating evidence of debt. Fed private banks can pull rug out from under U.S. democracy by retoring full power money privilege back to Congress letting the U.S. govt. fall from the weight of its indebtedness. A re-invocation of gold illegality re: U.S. citizen possession would subject America to an international contract where the creditors govern the debtor. Fed notes cease being money as debt can't pay debt. Only remedy would be debt forgiveness or lien power attachment to all assets tied to past fed note/credit use acquired possessions. Private bank creditors could say to self contract out from under Constitution and pledge allegiance to U.N. Charter and supranational organizations and accept one world money RFID subdermal biochip as new terms of "Bigger,Better,New Deal". America needs to be tied to substance of value outside American democracy and U.S. citizen recognition to safegaurd the Constitution and people from debt slavery.
01:02 PM on 01/18/2012
Remember, the US went off the gold standard under a Republican administration.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jester2069
Shameless veteran
01:09 PM on 01/18/2012
Remember, nobody likes Nixon.
01:11 PM on 01/18/2012
Oh please. That old false paradigm? Dems vs. Republicans? Left vs. Right? There is no left/right paradigm. Just top and bottom. Lords and serfs. The rulers and the ruled.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jester2069
Shameless veteran
01:28 PM on 01/18/2012
Fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CarlIII
Liberal Virginian living in Remlap Alabama
09:44 PM on 01/18/2012
You must have been in a coma for the last year. The republican Congress vs the Democratic President shoots down your lame political theory.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
armchairpickleback
"Truth is treason in the empire of lies" -Ron Paul
11:57 AM on 01/18/2012
Any one know what the commodity is that backs up the dollar now..........ITS ME AND YOU. Full faith and credit means the federal government HOPES YOU AND I will continue working our arses off. When we went off the gold standard, humans became economic slaves. Our labor and future labor is the only comodity left.
11:49 AM on 01/18/2012
The biggest problem talking economics and the nature of the debt-based fiat monetary system that requires perpetual growth to prevent the currency from collapsing in hyperdeflation is this:

Very few understand the nature of the debt-based fiat monetary system that requires perpetual growth to prevent the currency from collapsing in hyperdeflation.

Most of us were deflected from education in government schools. Discussing this topic with most is analogous to suddenly speaking Klingon to most.
11:44 AM on 01/18/2012
"It would also preclude the ways that nations now manage the ups and downs of their economic cycles."

----

Anyone see the irony here? It's the nations central banks debt-based fiat monetary systems that *CAUSES* the boom/bust cycles.

Truly, government is a disease masquerading as its own cure.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueinannarbor
My micro bio is now full
11:37 AM on 01/18/2012
"The gold coin standard, although imperfectly adhered to, permitted startling economic growth combined with falling prices in the 19th century," Paul wrote in his 1981 book "Gold, Peace and Prosperity: The Birth of a New Currency."

To hear Rep. Paul talk, you'd think that there was no such thing as a business cycle depression in the 19th century. Such clearly was not the case. During the Monroe administration from 1816 to 1824 has been called the 'era of good feelings' because the federalist party essentially disappeared and Monroe ran virtually unopposed, however, during his administration, the nation was in a depression for about 7 of the 8 years. People had to feel good back in those days because they couldn't afford anything else.

It's interesting and ironic that Wray opens his article by referring to 'demagogues' because that's absolutely what Ron Paul is-a demagogue. Now and then he says something that I agree with, but then I think, wait, it's Ron Paul and he's kind of crazy. Oh, well, even a broken clock...
http://www.rooseveltinstitute.org/new-roosevelt/federal-budget-not-household-budget-here-s-why
05:38 PM on 01/18/2012
Notice how it coincided with the creation of the second central bank of the US in 1816? Which is one of the reasons Andrew Jackson got rid of the Second Central Bank of the US.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The National Inquire of Politics the GOP!
11:35 AM on 01/18/2012
Wrong move to push that agenda in a guns and bible state!