iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

SOPA Forces Obama To Pick Sides Between Donors From Hollywood, Silicon Valley

Sopa Obama

First Posted: 01/18/2012 1:33 pm Updated: 01/18/2012 1:38 pm

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama entered the fray over two controversial anti-piracy bills with a Jan. 14 statement aligning the White House with technology and Internet community critics of the legislation. The statement put the president on one side of a major debate between two of the biggest donor communities in the Democratic Party -- the technology and Internet industry vs. movie and recording companies -- in the middle of his reelection campaign.

Obama's position on the anti-piracy legislation -- the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) in the House and the Protect IP Act (PIPA) in the Senate -- hints at the increasing role played by computer and Internet companies, their executives, and their employees in the Democratic Party coalition. Since 2007, executives and employees of such companies have given $52 million to Democratic Party efforts, up $12 million from the period 2001 to 2006, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Hollywood and the entertainment industry, long counted as stalwarts of the Democratic money machine, continue to give more than the party's new tech friends. The Democratic National Committee received $1 million more from the entertainment sector than from the tech sector through Sept. 30, 2011. The biggest supporter of the president's reelection was DreamWorks CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg, who has raised at least $500,000 for the reelection and contributed $2 million to a super PAC supporting the president.

Obama has also appeared at a New York fundraiser hosted by Miramax co-founder Harvey Weinstein and, in one visit to Los Angeles, held three separate fundraisers at the Sony Pictures movie studio. Donors include big-shot Hollywood executives and producers such as Steven Spielberg, Brian Grazer, John Pepper and Katzenberg and actors like Tom Hanks, Jamie Foxx, Jennifer Garner, Eddie Murphy and Alec Baldwin.

Perhaps it is the entertainment industry's heavy tilt leftward, rarely giving fewer than 70 percent of all its contributions to Democrats, that makes the industry's support look like a given. And that may have freed the White House to issue the Jan. 14 statement -- written by Victoria Espinal of the Office of Management and Budget, Aneesh Chopra, U.S. chief technology officer, and Howard Schmidt, White House cybersecurity coordinator -- on the side of tech community.

A more recent convert to the Democratic coalition, the tech community has a strong relationship with the Obama White House. With its less glamorous, more cerebral stars, it seems like more of a natural fit for Obama than Hollywood. And that fit shows in campaign contributions.

The $9.2 million that Obama raised from the computer and Internet industry in his 2008 campaign is three times more than any other politician had raised from the industry over an entire career. It also marked the first time that computer and Internet interests beat the entertainment industry in donating money to a Democratic presidential candidate. Although the DNC has received significantly more from entertainment companies, the tech and entertainment sectors through Sept. 30, 2011, are nearly evenly matched in giving to President Obama's reelection campaign: The tech sector gave $1.3 million; the entertainment industry, $1 million.

Silicon Valley and the tech sector overall grew from a small player in politics in 1999 to a major Democratic donor community by 2006, according to a 2008 Atlantic article by Joshua Green -- and then further accelerated its involvement with Obama's 2008 campaign. As Green describes, the increase in contributions from the tech sector were helped along by a shift in fundraising tactics away from the smaller living room events that favor the rich -- such as Hollywood elites -- and toward a subscription model based on Silicon Valley software sales. This was largely the model that Obama adopted by establishing online fundraising platforms and by connecting rally attendees to those platforms through mobile devices.

The relationship between Obama and tech companies has involved more than money. Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes left his Silicon Valley job to help the Obama team run its social networking and online fundraising platforms. Google's Eric Schmidt served as an informal adviser to the campaign and later went to Washington to serve on the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. In the White House, the president appointed the nation's first chief technology officer and first chief information officer and reached out to the tech community in both Silicon Valley and Washington.

"People in the tech industry appreciate the competence of his tech work and the stand in favor of Internet freedom," Craig Newmark, who founded the popular site Craigslist.org, told The Huffington Post. Newmark, who calls himself a "libertarian moderate," added, "His stand regarding SOPA reflects the understanding that it won't really help stop piracy, but it would do a lot of damage to the U.S. and could shut down much of the tech industry, destroying jobs."

The Obama administration's statement on the anti-piracy bills was specifically elicited by an online program, called We The People, that allows citizens to submit petitions asking for a White House statement of policy. An official White House statement is delivered if the petitioners can round up enough people to co-sign their request.

The Jan. 14 statement says that the president "will not support legislation that reduces freedom of expression, increases cybersecurity risk, or undermines the dynamic, innovative global Internet." The White House statement provides a broad critique that largely embraces the arguments of critics of the legislation, such as Google, Facebook and Yahoo.

The administration also stated its opposition to specific elements of the two bills. The statement singled out as a threat to cybersecurity a much-noted provision related to Domain Name System rerouting, recently removed by the bills' sponsors in Congress.

Despite the president's seeming abandonment of the entertainment industry on this subject, the industry does not appear ready to quit the president just yet. The Motion Picture Association of America, a major supporter of the anti-piracy bills, decided to interpret the White House statement as a sign of support for its side.

(AOL Inc., HuffPost's parent company, is lobbying against the Stop Online Piracy Act and the Protect IP Act. AOL CEO Tim Armstrong has met with President Obama.)

Make your voice heard on SOPA and PIPA:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama entered the fray over two controversial anti-piracy bills with a Jan. 14 statement aligning the White House with technology and Internet community critics of the l...
WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama entered the fray over two controversial anti-piracy bills with a Jan. 14 statement aligning the White House with technology and Internet community critics of the l...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,726
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (36 total)
01:58 PM on 01/19/2012
by and far the entertainment industry are leaches. not only have they crafted ways to suck the life out of the 'less fortunate' stars and entertainers they have devised points and percentages to do so. They whine a lot after years of stepping and standing on the backs of those who have gone before. and the stars who make the big bucks make a pittance of what is taken by the industry.....cry me a river.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Philosopher-king
1100001100 110011 011001
01:34 PM on 01/19/2012
Silicon Valley vs. Hollywood:

FInish off the music industry and crush the movie studios; celebrities have to get real jobs now, and the internet will stay democratic!

Go Silicon Valley!
03:53 PM on 01/19/2012
I agree somewhat, but I don't really want my favorite actors and musicians to have to squeeze their creative output in between shifts at a 9-5.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GlassMask
Comedian/Curmudgeon
10:02 AM on 01/19/2012
It shouldn't be a matter of choosing between bribes. It should always be choosing the right option. Movies, television and music are 95% awful, but the internet is something we use everyday to escape those bad "entertainment" choices, and to look for better ones.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whitney Danielle Pyant
01:14 PM on 01/19/2012
They won't be able to stop it anyway because they way too many sites
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l monroe
I question authority.
10:33 AM on 01/23/2012
Shakespeare stole as well!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He was a peacock with stolen feathers. He only prettied them up until they are only recognizable today as his. Hamlet was the originally prince of Denmark. Romeo and Juliette was originally the Italian tragedy(I Believe, could be wrong) The point is rich is as rich does. Lord help those who get in the way. Control is what they are trying to achieve, just like the politicians of the past.
09:14 AM on 01/19/2012
Politricks is so f'ed up in this country... This headline sums it up perfect. Obama has to pick between two sets of big donors?? What about the people who actually voted for him? What about we the citizens? We just sit back and let it happen... Both sides Rep and Dem are just caught up in getting campaign contributions to stay in office and then owe favors. Terrible cycle, legal bribery... get money out of it.
Paulo1
Thanks for reading, (even if you disagree)
08:58 AM on 01/19/2012
Headline reads" Obama burns crucial donors"

Really? That's not news, that's just Obama as usual.

Can anyone name one segment of the Democratic base that Obama has not burned?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
blurredmolly
Ipswich, Mass. 1641
02:42 PM on 01/19/2012
all of them. republicans.....yeesh.
photo
NOV 2012
USA 1776 - 2012
08:56 AM on 01/19/2012
███ ██ trust █ ██████ your ████ █ ██ ███ ████ ██████ ████ ███president███ ████ ██████ █████ ██████ ████ ██████████ █everything█████████ ███ ████ ███ ██████████ ████████ ██ is ██████████ ██████████ ███████ ███ █████ fine.
08:55 AM on 01/19/2012
Who cares! It's wonderful to see our President take a stand and do the right thing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PizzaGuy1
Konnichiwa. Hajimemashite. Karasu desu.
09:06 AM on 01/19/2012
Absolutely. Right is right.
08:50 AM on 01/19/2012
Only Democrats speak out against the interests of big donors. Republicans never do that, they obey their masters' wishes.
photo
NOV 2012
USA 1776 - 2012
08:56 AM on 01/19/2012
bbbbbbbbwwwwwwwwwwwhahahahahahahahahahahahhaha
photo
NOV 2012
USA 1776 - 2012
08:57 AM on 01/19/2012
KEYSTONE PROJECT RING A BELL SFB?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theobserver4
progress is a process not an end result
09:11 AM on 01/19/2012
Yep he did the right thing there too, over some Union objections. You can't have it both ways you know.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
indjoe
Keep our Constitution; Do not mix church & State
08:32 AM on 01/19/2012
This is a pure pro SOAP and PIPA spin ! The same as NEWS CORP FOX's has been spinning the
this garbage yellow journalism . AOL HP> has put out this make believe, made up speculation
pice; that as little to no bases in realities Obama supporter do not back him as one issue lobby's
like this peace would assume the president as a whole ! Given the republican alternative He will
get even more money from the entreatment industries SOAP PIPA or not .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeff Parfitt
Two democrats walk into a bar. Three walk out.
08:05 AM on 01/19/2012
This is what the President is supposed to do. He/She is supposed to do what is best for the people, even if it means alienating their base, their party, or their donors. In this case, Obama is spot-on in standing up against SOPA and PIPA. You'd never see a Republican going against the lock-step of the party to do something that benefited the people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PizzaGuy1
Konnichiwa. Hajimemashite. Karasu desu.
09:07 AM on 01/19/2012
Exactly.
AveragePatriot
god is imaginary
07:33 AM on 01/19/2012
Obama shouldn't worry. The GOP clown circus is working hard to get him elected for a 2nd term...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thegreenhornet
civil rights lawyer
07:32 AM on 01/19/2012
This is something the republicans just wont get. here is a president who is willing to offend one of his big donor bases in order to do the right thing adn stick up for individual liberty and freedom. Nice backbone. Glad we finally got to see it.
01:41 PM on 01/19/2012
The thing is, BOTH of these groups are big Dem supporters, so he has to choose one or the other. He's not being brave here, he's just picking between 2 backers who both want him to vote their way. He HAS to offend one of them. It's not possible to appease them both with these bills.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sunil Weliwitigoda
07:11 AM on 01/19/2012
Do not waste your time analysing what the presidents actual intentions and goals are. It is simple - He wants to be reelected and he needs the money, the more the better and it does not matter why or where or whom, it comes from. At the end of the day, he wants to be Potus again - That is all that matters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PerryLogan
We don't want your guns; we just want your women.
05:51 AM on 01/19/2012
Obama's accountants no doubt figured he had enough dough to take the hit. Obama just has to keep the progressives fooled until election day.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Grechen Allen
03:55 AM on 01/19/2012
Well thats because Obama likes to appear next to celebrities...the big tech guys just arent as :cool" to be seen with...even though they created more jobs than hollywood.