iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Yellowstone River Spill: Exxon Reaches $1.6 Million Settlement

Yellowstone River Spill

Posted: 01/19/12 04:09 PM ET

BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) — Exxon Mobil agreed Thursday to pay the state of Montana $1.6 million in penalties over water pollution caused by a pipeline break last summer that fouled dozens of miles of shoreline along the scenic Yellowstone River.

Montana Department of Environmental Quality director Richard Opper told The Associated Press that the penalty marks the largest in the agency's history.

The Texas oil company will pay $300,000 in cash and spend $1.3 million on future environmental projects, Opper said.

Also Thursday, Exxon increased its estimate of how much crude spilled into the river during the July 1 accident near Laurel to 1,509 barrels, or more than 63,000 gallons.

That's up from earlier estimates of 1,000 barrels spilled — a number that Gov. Brian Schweitzer had disputed as too low.

Only about 10 barrels of crude were recovered by cleanup crews. That's less than 1 percent of the total spilled, federal officials have said.

Thursday's settlement over water pollution violations came after more than three months of negotiations between attorneys for Exxon and the state. It contains provisions to shield the company against any future lawsuits from state agencies, although it will not become final until after a 30-day comment period.

"It was a significant violation. There were hundreds and hundreds of acres of land affected and it was a major oil spill," Opper said. He added the penalties likely would have been "a lot higher" if Exxon had not cooperated on the cleanup.

"It doesn't mean they were perfect. They were responsible, but they really were committed to undoing the damage that was caused," he said.

The settlement requires continued monitoring of environmental damage by Exxon, and requires the company to clean up any more oil that is discovered. That includes any crude that might be stirred up when the Yellowstone rises again in the spring as mountain snow begins to melt.

Testing of river sediments near public water supply intakes also will be required.

Opper said company representatives were expected to sign the deal late Thursday.

As part of the settlement, Exxon also will reimburse more than $760,000 in emergency response costs racked up by state agencies.

In an emailed statement regarding the settlement, Exxon spokesman Alan Jeffers reiterated that the company "takes full responsibility for the cleanup."

"We are pleased to be able to resolve this environmental compliance issue with the State of Montana," Jeffers wrote.

Regarding the change in how much crude spilled, Jeffers said the company recalculated the volume after discovering the pipeline had been completely severed during the July 1 accident near Laurel. Jeffers says pipeline breaches typically involve a crack or fissure. That was the assumption used to craft the initial estimate.

Jeffers added that the higher estimate would not have changed the response to the spill, which at its peak involved more than 1,000 Exxon Mobil contractors working to clean up oil-soaked sandbars, log jams and vegetation.

"We had a lot of people and a lot of resources brought to bear in response to the spill," he said. "None of this would have made any difference."

Still pending against the company is a lawsuit from a group of riverfront property owners who are seeking tens of millions of dollars in damages over allegations that the company failed to properly clean up after the spill.

Attorneys for Exxon have asked U.S. District Judge Richard Cebull in Billings to dismiss the case. A decision is pending.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) — Exxon Mobil agreed Thursday to pay $1.6 million in penalties to the state of Montana over water pollution caused by a pipeline break last summer that fouled dozens of miles of...
BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) — Exxon Mobil agreed Thursday to pay $1.6 million in penalties to the state of Montana over water pollution caused by a pipeline break last summer that fouled dozens of miles of...
Filed by James Gerken  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:19 AM on 01/23/2012
Trans Canada just thanked their deity.
03:05 PM on 01/22/2012
All you have to do to stop the pipelines from operating is to stop driving.
12:29 PM on 01/22/2012
In my lifetime the Communist ruled Chinese Government backed and were directly involved in two wars, Korea and Vietnam. The Communist ruled government of the Chinese Republic still wages war but now it is in Piracy, hacking into U.S. Chamber of Commerce computers stealing plans, and undermining our economy. They would rather conserve their resources, and buy energy resources such as toxic tarsands, with no regard to our safety, health, water resources, and pollution. Our oil refineries already work 24/7 keeping up with the oil glut in Cushing, O.K. If you are any kind of a patriot at all, you will not contribute to the Keystone XL pipeline which would fuel the Chinese Military (i.e, naval vessels) , Korean Military, etc. Are the temporary jobs worth your contribution to our enemies? Will you sell your soul or will you protect your family and future generations to come? If some of you out there would have petitioned your reps to stand by the infra-structure proposal by our President, instead of letting our reps who live off of lobbyiest monies; you would have the jobs your looking for. Take some time, go to Stoptarsands.org. Get the facts, look at the Spills, the shoddy work of the Keystone 1, pipeline and then when you wake up the next morning see if you still feel the same way about the Keystone XL pipeline that is definitely not in our U.S. National Interest. Thanks fellow patriots!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
phatdaddy51
heros;jefferson, paine and beth warren
08:49 AM on 01/22/2012
the settlement includes provisions to sheild the company from future lawsuits.
sounds like a payoff to me

lets creare a spider web of oil pipelines for the oil companys

nobody really minds a little oil along the river banks. after all, they did recover ten barrels.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayTOE
Morals evolved due to cooperative group living
06:51 AM on 01/22/2012
So they lie about how much spilled, clean up 1% of the mess, and pay a little money ....
and the environment is degraded for everyone.

It isn't a very good trade off.
Wind power is looking better all the time, at least wind spills never cause problems.
photo
chuychrist
My friends call me Chuy,
06:21 AM on 01/22/2012
Another slap on the wrist for Big Oil! When will anyone stand up to them and make them pay for the true cost of cleanup? What about accountability and criminal penalties? Until someone starts smacking Big Oil back in the face nothing will change.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rivrgrrl
Our Constitution trumps your Bible.
01:34 AM on 01/22/2012
"Only about 10 barrels of crude were recovered by cleanup crews. That's less than 1 percent of the total spilled, federal officials have said."

What a joke.

That area, dozens of miles along the river, will be polluted for years to come.

The oil company pays a pittance of a fine and 'promises to clean up any more oil' they might find.

Considering the job they did on the original spill, that doesn't really inspire confidence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bon1042
11:59 PM on 01/21/2012
they don't talk about what 63,000 gallons must have done to any life in the water and surrounding areas. One man said at the time he went down there and it was completely quiet, no life anywhere. Where did all that oil go, settled on bottom of river? What does that mean for fish and other water life, animals that drink it? I could kill..... watch this video.... this is what we've come to. EPA has to bring drinkable and usable water into Dimock, PA. Also Josh Fox speaks near end of video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uiRSozoXP0&feature=uploademail
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrJJ
如果你不投票,你不能抱怨
04:46 PM on 01/21/2012
OT: Tony Hayward

Former BP boss earns £12m from Iraqi oil venture ...equiv to U$ 18M

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/jan/20/former-bp-boss-iraq-oil-venture
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
motoGpifupleez
watching with amusement
09:55 PM on 01/20/2012
Here a spill, there a spill............

Now, let's get that job creatin', recession endin', gas price dropin' KeystoneXL pipeline up and runnin'.

What's an aquifer or two in the grand scheme of quarterly dividends?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Angel Whitebird
Invest in America..Buy a Congressman!
02:40 PM on 01/20/2012
If we were running our cars on Hemp oil and not this dirty crap..we wouldnt be having this problem now..would we??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Angel Whitebird
Invest in America..Buy a Congressman!
01:59 PM on 01/20/2012
The people who run oil companies should be shot on the spot!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sister Bluebird
12:37 PM on 01/20/2012
I saw other stories that this pipeline leaked Tar Sands oil, and not light sweet crude.

So I wonder if that should have affected the settlement?
12:31 AM on 01/20/2012
Exxon should have set the river on fire it would be cleaner and cheaper for all involved. Just over a million dollars for polluting rivers, I thought I read that wrong. I bet you just over a million that the executives garage costs more then that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kidkolor
10:31 AM on 01/20/2012
1.6 million is a joke. Exxon executives carry that in their wallets
08:10 PM on 01/20/2012
They might as well told the executives to continue polluting the environment and when they get caught the one in ten times they will have to pay a fine; which, which is nothing in comparison to maintaining a safe and "leak free" work environment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
10:29 PM on 01/19/2012
After all these months, we still don't know who's oil they were pumping.
10:34 AM on 01/20/2012
Silvertip collects crude from northern Wyoming and transports it north to the refineries in Billings, MT. It was built in 1949 by Interstate Pipeline, a Standard Oil of New Jersey (now Exxon) subsidiary.