More

Toyota's Sudden Acceleration Problem May Have Been Triggered By Tin Whiskers

Toyota Sudden Acceleration

First Posted: 01/22/2012 7:07 pm Updated: 01/23/2012 5:26 pm

Even as Toyota has reckoned with a wrenching crisis of confidence, acknowledging reports that some of its best-selling vehicles have been prone to accelerating while drivers step on the brakes, the car giant has consistently maintained that its electronic systems are not the culprit for a series of lethal accidents.

Sometimes floor mats have been to blame, said Toyota, prompting recalls. Sometimes moisture has gotten inside gas pedals and caused them to stick, triggering another recall. And still other times drivers have hit the wrong pedal with their foot, the company has said. But when NASA conducted an investigation, it found no evidence of electronic malfunctions, according to the resulting report.

When that study was released last February, Toyota and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration both seized on that conclusion as proof that Toyota's electronic systems were beyond reproach -- a contention amplified widely in media accounts. But buried within that same report are details that safety experts construe as disturbing evidence of problems potentially afflicting the electronic systems governing the gas pedal -- problems that Toyota and the highway safety agency have so far dismissed.

Investigators found so-called tin whiskers -- which grow on tin when it is electrified and can conduct electricity to unintended places -- inside the electronic systems in Toyota Camry gas pedals, according to the report. These wiry fibers of metal are thinner than a human hair and can sprout unpredictably. They have been implicated in crippling defects besetting a range of equipment, including communications satellites, pacemakers, missiles and nuclear power plants.

The study falls well short of identifying tin whiskers as a cause in fatal accidents involving sudden acceleration in Toyota vehicles. But safety advocates say the mere confirmed presence of tin whiskers demands deeper investigation before such a causal link can be ruled out. Even sudden acceleration at slow speed can cause cars to run through stop signs, perhaps resulting in fatalities, they say.

"It's not potentially dangerous; it's absolutely dangerous," said Sean Kane, founder and president of Safety Research & Strategies, a Massachusetts-based auto safety consulting firm. "If you talk to anyone in the field, they'll tell you it's dangerous. NHTSA is trying to minimize what it means."

For Toyota, the world's second largest auto manufacturer, the existence of tin whiskers in one of its most popular models presents the latest in a string of troubling disclosures about the safety of its vehicles. The account of alleged acceleration problems linked to a highly publicized series of fatal accidents has shaken the company to its core, placing one of the business world's most admired brands under the harsh light of legal and regulatory scrutiny.

The company maintains that the issue of tin whiskers has already been fully examined, yielding no reason for additional concern.

"Our systems are designed to reduce the risk of tin whiskers in the first place," said Toyota spokesman John Hanson. "And we have many fail-safe systems in place to counter any short circuits that might happen."

A spokeswoman for the NHTSA concurred that tin whiskers do not pose an area of concern, reiterating that agency's position that the NASA report eliminates such worries.

"NHTSA is monitoring the issue, but there is currently no indication of a safety concern that would warrant further action," said the spokeswoman, Lynda Tran.

The debate over tin whiskers, largely out of the public eye -- among scientists and car safety advocates -- is the latest thread of concern stemming from the high-profile safety concerns that began dogging Toyota vehicles three years ago. In late 2009, Toyota issued a recall citing evidence that floor mats in some models were apparently getting stuck under the gas pedal, causing acceleration. In early 2010, Toyota issued a second recall, saying some gas pedals could stick, continuing to add gas to the engine even after a driver took a foot off the pedal.

In a February 2011 report that accompanied the NASA study, NHTSA identified a third cause: Drivers sometimes press on the gas when they mean to step on the brake.

But outside safety experts have long speculated that a fourth cause could be at play in cases of unintended acceleration: faulty electronics. In March 2010, the highway satety agency asked NASA to investigate, prompting the investigation whose results the agency published last February.

Tin whiskers are discussed on pages 17, 112 to 117 and 171 of the resulting 177-page report. NHTSA, which is responsible for overseeing driver safety and pushing automakers to conduct recalls in response to problems, says the study determined that the tin whisker effect in Camry sedans is minimal and not dangerous.

The problem can cause engine revving, surging and hesitation. But all those issues are eliminated as soon as a driver take the foot off the gas, NHTSA asserted on the basis of an analysis of NASA's data, consumer complaints and Toyota's warranty data. The agency concluded that it was effectively impossible for tin whiskers to have caused Toyota vehicles to have accelerated out of control.

"Neither NASA nor NHTSA has any evidence indicating that tin whiskers have caused high-speed, unintended acceleration or are capable of doing so," Tran said.

But the details of the report reveal that NASA and NHTSA based their conclusions on a tiny sample of evidence. The analysis looked at just three gas pedals. Two of the pedals came from drivers who complained their cars lunged forward when they pressed on the gas pedal. The third came from a car in a junkyard. Despite the fact that all three pedals were passed around -- one was shipped via FedEx across country, and no one knows how the car in the junkyard was handled -- the fragile, thin tin whiskers stayed intact. NASA found tin whiskers in all three pedals.

None of the inspected pedals were from cars that experienced high-speed unintended acceleration, the circumstance of greatest concern. NHTSA brushed off suggestions from safety and electronics experts that it needed to examine those sorts of gas pedals, asserting that it had already conclusively determined that tin whiskers could not cause high-speed sudden acceleration. Furthermore, NHTSA said, the tin whisker problem is rare, affecting a small number of 2002 to 2006 Toyota cars.

Toyota also dismissed suggestions from outside critics that tin whiskers could pose a problem. The issue happens infrequently, Toyota said, and when it happens, cars automatically react and go into what's called "limp home mode." That limits how fast the car can go, and drivers are forced to consult a mechanic to figure out what's wrong.

But researchers at the University of Maryland's Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering published a paper last fall saying they found evidence of more tin whiskers in Toyota gas pedals. They examined pedals from two Toyotas -- a 2005 Toyota Camry and a 2002 Camry -- probing them with X-ray fluoroscopes and scanning electron microscopes to look at the inner workings. They found six tin whiskers growing inside one of the pedals and two inside the other. Based on how many tin whiskers they discovered and how many NASA found, they estimated that the whiskers could cause shorting failures in 140 out of 1 million vehicles, which could result in more sudden acceleration cases.

Given that Toyota sold 3.3 million cars in the past two years alone, such a rate would amount to a significant problem.

Some experts at NASA -- the agency NHTSA relies on as basis for its contentions -- have offered a more complex depiction of the potential problems of tin whiskers, one that appears to undermine the central notion that the fibers of metal are not a problem.

Last fall, Henning Leidecker, an expert for NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland, gave a presentation that lent credence to the idea that tin whiskers could render any car with this problem effectively inoperable.

Leidecker used X-rays and microscopes to examine a gas pedal from Albuquerque that was malfunctioning. He found two tin whiskers inside. One whisker was long enough to bridge the internal electronics and was causing a short. Leidecker discovered that the specific gas pedal would work fine if depressed quickly. But when pushed slowly, the accelerator jumped and sped up suddenly. If pressed even harder, the throttle sometimes opened entirely, as if the driver were pressing intending to speed up rapidly.

"Although the vehicle would operate, we did not consider it to be drivable," he wrote in the presentation.

Leidecker told The Huffington Post he was willing to discuss his presentation but asked that an interview request be cleared by NASA's public affairs department, which subsequently referred questions back to the Department of Transportation, the overseer of NHTSA. A NHTSA spokeswoman reiterated the agency's position that the NASA report backed up claims that Toyota's electronic systems have not caused incidence of sudden acceleration.

THE CASE IN ALBUQUERQUE

A driver from Albuquerque, N.M., was one of the first people to catch NHTSA's attention with an acceleration problem. She filed a complaint through NHTSA's Office of Defect Investigations, stating that her 2003 Toyota Camry would hesitate when she pressed on the gas and then would surge forward.

Although her name was stricken from the resulting NHTSA complaint, the details of the incident are not. The NASA report cites the substance of her complaint.

According to the report, the driver complained that in November 2009 the accelerator on her 2003 Toyota Camry began performing erratically.

"When stepping on the gas pedal, I couldn't get any gas, and the car would jerk forward at a rapid rate so that I had to apply the brakes," she told NHTSA. "It was totally undrivable."

After several months, the agency reached out to the woman and spoke to her by phone in conversations that are not included in NHTSA's public record. Emails in NHTSA's database show that the agency asked her to ship her gas pedal to investigators in Washington. The agency then forwarded the pedal to NASA. The tiny, brittle tin whiskers inside the part stayed intact despite the fact they were shipped across country. Investigators found two tin whiskers – one 1.9 millimeters in length and one 1.5 millimeters long and about 1/10th to 1/100th the width of a human hair.

One of the whiskers was causing part of the accelerator to short out, according to the report.

The agency also examined other accelerator pedals, including the one from the junkyard. Those, too, contained tin whiskers in similar locations, according to the report, though they had yet to cause problems in the functionality of the pedals.

NHTSA and Toyota say there is no evidence the tin whiskers cause cars to accelerate out of control. The Albuquerque driver was still able to brake, they argue, and when she lifted her foot off the gas, the engine stopped revving.

Toyota said the fail-safe modes kick in when there is a short, forcing the car into "limp home mode," which tops out the speed at 35 mph to 45 mph.

"It induces deceleration, so it's almost the opposite effect" of sudden acceleration, he said.

But the Albuquerque driver told NHTSA that her vehicle had, on the contrary, jerked forward rapidly when she pressed on the gas. Hanson said he wasn't sure if Toyota had examined her gas pedal.

The release of the NASA report last year prompted a letter to NHTSA from Gordon Davy, a retired materials engineer from Northrup Grumman who had previously inspected failed relay switch boxes from E3 radar planes and discovered they were covered in tin whiskers. He urged NHTSA to reconsider its reassurances about the sanctity of Toyota's electronic systems, arguing that the agency's findings were not supported by the available facts: The mere presence of tin whiskers makes accidents a real threat, even as accidents are rare.

"Dismissing the lessons learned from decades of study of tin whiskers and the failures and countermeasures employed by other industries in the case of motor vehicle unintended acceleration is too dangerous," he wrote, adding, "Lives are at stake."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Even as Toyota has reckoned with a wrenching crisis of confidence, acknowledging reports that some of its best-selling vehicles have been prone to accelerating while drivers step on the brakes, the ca...
Even as Toyota has reckoned with a wrenching crisis of confidence, acknowledging reports that some of its best-selling vehicles have been prone to accelerating while drivers step on the brakes, the ca...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,025
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (19 total)
10:05 AM on 02/23/2012
I have a 2005 Avalon that has an acceleration problem when I apply the breaks to stop the car. It is frightening when it occurs. I have all the recalls put in and never believed it was the problem. The car has had other major problems that had problems with acceleration and deceleration supposedly traced to the speedometer and GPS that cost me thousands. Toyota was not helpful and offered a pittance to forget the problem. I am now terribly concerned and believe the tin fiwhisker problem is the first time explanation that makes sense. I am a graduate Electronic Engineer by the way. Gerald Heller, Tamarac Florida
02:20 AM on 02/16/2012
Yes i am agree with you that Toyota's Sudden Acceleration Problem May Have Been Triggered By Tin Whiskers. Toyota has a legal problem just with the lack of the brake override system. Nobody can accident intentionally because this is the question of their life.Your all posts are wonderful. Thanks for all the information.

www.phillyinjurylawyer.com
08:56 AM on 01/30/2012
"Sean Kane, founder and president of Safety Research & Strategies, a Massachusetts-based auto safety consulting firm." The truth is that this is a law firm disguising itself as a public safety advocacy group. Sean Kane has thousands of hours and money tied up in going after Toyota and he is not going to drop this until he gets his payoff. It has nothing to do with concern over public safety. Sean Kane is grasping on "tin whiskers".
03:16 PM on 01/31/2012
Everyone knows Kane is a for-profit mouthpiece for the plaintiff lawyers behind the curtain. Everyone, that is, except the reporters who are supposed to deliver such information so the reader can file his screeds in the proper mental folder. The reader has to find out by reading the comments section. Welcome to 21st Century Journalism.
02:24 AM on 02/02/2012
During city driving the vehicle accelerated up to 47 mph without pedal input
The field technician shifted to Neutral. That caused the RPMs to rise to ~6,600
When the vehicle was returned to the service facility, service manager pressed and released the pedal. The pedal position returned to 16% (idle) and RPMs returned to idle
The field technical service told TMS PQ&SS. A Go&See was arranged the following day.

There is truth (important) and there is money (irrelevant to many). The truth is emerging.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard58
07:47 PM on 01/27/2012
Are people still buying these deathtraps?
05:33 PM on 01/25/2012
RANDOM STATIC IS 4 SURE THE PROBLEM .YOU HEAR IT HERE FIRST .. SPARKY
06:42 AM on 01/25/2012
Pontiac Fiero engine fires....putting Tucker out of business because he made a vastly safer car than the Big Three...killing early breathalyzer technology to prevent a drunk driver from getting behind the wheel......"Unsafe At Any Speed".....l
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lovelace
Texan against Perry
09:16 PM on 01/25/2012
Good point.
Wait, there wasn't one.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
11:03 PM on 01/24/2012
Corporations cut corners till systems break.

Figure it out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheTightwireGuy
Attempting to balance reason and passion
12:17 AM on 01/25/2012
It's not the corporation's fault. Our governments are forcing manufacturers of consumer products to not include lead (because of the health risk from lead exposure) and that is causing a lot of problems in electronics (because there is no cheap alternative to lead to prevent tin whiskers, unless you think silver is cheap). Here are a few websites discussing this problem:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/apr/03/research.engineering
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/02/tin-whiskers-implicated-in-unintended-acceleration-problems/
http://lowendmac.com/mail/07/0628.html

And if you really want to get more technical:
http://www.aciusa.org/leadfree/leadfree_verdi-11-5-04.htm
http://www.nist.gov/mml/metallurgy/thermodynamics_kinetics/lead-free_surface_finishes.cfm
http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/background/

And even solder that contains silver (chemical symbol Ag) forms tin whiskers:
http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/other_whisker/sac/index.htm

And, in fact, silver can form its own "whiskers":
http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/photos/pom/2003sept.htm

So, unless someone can somehow figure out how to change the laws of physics as they relate to chemistry -- Calling all Nobel Prize aspirants! -- there doesn't seem to be an easy solution to the problem of tin whiskers other than to return to using lead (about 3%) in electronic solders and coatings.

The Tightwire Guy
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PackFlats
06:07 AM on 01/25/2012
It's not the corporatio­n's fault:

So why haven’t FORD / GM / CHRYSLER had this problem? Maybe just Maybe we build a better car but lets not give credit their , speed on my friend.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
01:33 PM on 01/25/2012
Of course it's no corroboration FAULT, corporations are machines designed by humans.

Its the fault of the officers of those corporations.

I know all about tin whiskers, so does nearly anybody who has every worked in the electronics PCB field. In fact your links prove that.

So they should have know, everybody else does and most everybody else solves the problem. Toyota cut a corner. duh.
10:27 PM on 01/24/2012
So in other words, this is a problem in all cars with electronic accelerator pedals, NOT just Toyota?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
10:20 PM on 01/24/2012
Here is how Ford would have handled this:

http://www.wfu.edu/~palmitar/Law&Valuation/Papers/1999/Leggett-pinto.html
photo
liberalbug
do you want fries with that?
10:08 PM on 01/24/2012
Sudden acceleration? Isn't there a pill for that?
07:31 PM on 01/24/2012
Official response from Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.:

No one, including paid consultants to plaintiffs' attorneys suing Toyota quoted by the Huffington Post, has ever found a single real-world example of tin whiskers causing an unintended acceleration (UA) event. Nor have they put forth any evidence of UA occurring in a Toyota because of tin whiskers forming. It is disappointing that the Huffington Post would continue to publish baseless claims from these so-called “experts” without disclosing their clear financial self-interest in generating controversy where none exists.

“Tin whiskers” are not a new phenomenon, they do not represent a mysterious or undetectable problem in a vehicle’s electronics and no data indicates that they are more prone to occur in Toyota vehicles than any other.

Toyota's systems are designed to reduce the risk tin whiskers will form in the first place. In addition, multiple robust failsafe systems are in place to counter any effects on the operation of our vehicles in the highly unlikely event that they do form and connect to adjacent circuitry. In the unlikely event that tin whiskers cause a short-circuit in the pedal position sensor, in every instance our systems have detected the fault, illuminated the malfunction indicator light and put the vehicle into “limp home” mode.
03:19 PM on 01/24/2012
This is an unresolved issue: Why only Toyota's and not other brands? Something is wrong and it needs to found.
12:55 PM on 01/24/2012
Toyota's internal documents show they held a number of design reviews with their engine computer supplier Denso during the period from 2003 to approximately 2010 and during that time they found at least several incidents of tin whiskers forming on the components in the ECU. They took the responsible step of replacing the pure tin with lead-tin solder to attempt to solve the problem. I am not sure that cars were not produced before this problem was identified and fixed. It could be that they are on the road now. NHTSA needs to check this.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Bike Commuter
logical
02:16 PM on 01/24/2012
The NASA report indicates that for the Denso sensor (Hall Effect sensor) used since 2007, the circuitry was encased in potting plastic, making tin whiskers a virtual impossibility. The report indicates that the other sensor manufacturer, CTS, used other techniques, such as sealing. They don't detail the construction prior to that, but it is natural to assume that the 2007 changes were to address the issue of tin whiskers forming. In any case, the researchers found that the results seen from this kind of fault do not match the unintended acceleration scenario. Instead, it makes for an obvious fault that is obvious the first time you attempt to accelerate. It seems that it is being deemed more of a quality issue than an inherent safety issue.
03:37 PM on 01/24/2012
I have not read the NASA report thoroughly nor am I an engineer, so I cannot comment on it. What I know is that there are dozens of documented types of electronics-related faults in the pedals, from which supplier I don't remember offhand, probably from both, and some of them are clearly documented to relate to speed control issues, and sometimes there is a fault and no diagnostic code is set, and the fault cannot be duplicated. Toyota's own engineers call that pedal assembly a "tangle" of problematic parts. Tin whiskers are only one small part of the story of all the electronics, and electronics faults are many and varied, not all resulting in UA events either.
There is no one "UA scenario" because there are many causes of UA and incident types--high speed, low speed, forward, reverse, while with cruise control, going up hill, when passing another car, etc. What they all have in common is a throttle opening more than the driver commanded. Toyota was and is dealing with a very complicated problem.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Bike Commuter
logical
06:46 PM on 01/25/2012
The "UA scenario" I was talking about was not specific. I was talking about it not meeting the definition of an unintended acceleration. The point was that the tin whisker situation does not appear to be able to create a UA. Instead, it makes it to where you can barely drive the car at all. Only if you try hard (very slowly pushing the pedal) can you get the car to "jump", and it is accompanied by a delayed response. You trying to redefine to make it seem like it meets the definition doesn't change anything. Plus, the problem is identified by an indicator light when you are driving. If it happens when the car is off, you will know before you even get it out of the driveway. ........... That turns the question into more of a reliability issue than a safety issue. The above article tries to argue that it is a safety issue, which neither the NHTSA nor NASA seem to agree. ......... I don't have enough information to determine whether it is really a significant quality issue or not (which would have to include consideration of how common it is).
09:55 AM on 01/24/2012
Aren't ya'll tired of bashing Toyota yet. Some of the best made cars in the world and their customers know it. Ten times more reliable and maintainence free than similar American cars with the exception of Ford whom ya'll hate too for not giving in to BO. I own one of those Camry's , my Mother-in-law and three of my sister-in-laws. Not one problem. The way some idiots drive today, texting and doing drugs, they would wreck an Abrams tank. It's easy to lie about what happened in a wreck when the truth would put you in jail. I don't believe the claims of victims, but I think I don't see the data tabulations on other brands. I know Chysler hid massive brake problems throughout the nineties and got away with it. I had one. There are way more important issues ya'll.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
10:29 AM on 01/24/2012
I totally agree. (And I don't even own a Toyota, I am just aware of their superior quality.)

The last count I heard was 37 deaths due to this problem. A tragedy, of course. But when the Ford Pinto was having its problems, the death count rose to over 500 until Ford finally accepted some responsibility. Furthermore, the only reason that Ford took any responsibility for that fiasco is that eventually the news agencies actually got around to reporting their abuses. It was discovered that Ford had known about the problem for quite some time, but it was weighing the cost of letting people die vs. the cost of litigation. Ford decided it was far cheaper to let people sue them for killing people than it was to do a recall on all those Pintos and repair the problem.
11:25 AM on 01/24/2012
Untrue. A Rutgers Law Review study showed the number of deaths in the Ford Pinto brouhaha was closer to the 27 NHTSA had recorded, not the 500 you claim.

Furthermore, it says a lot that the only example you keep repeating is over 30 years old.
07:44 PM on 01/24/2012
The Pinto? Are you really going back to the early 1970's to bash Ford? 500 deaths is an absolute falsehood, a complete and utterly made up number by you. Toyota made flawed and unsafe vehicles that killed people, that is not superior quality, it's criminal.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Hpotterfan77
The Liberal Leaning Deist!
12:42 PM on 01/24/2012
I'm sorry but I can't accept anything as serious from someone that actually uses the word ya'll. I may be a Yankee but my gosh that's bad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
signgrrl
typeface geek
04:04 PM on 01/25/2012
especially since it's " y'all "
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
09:04 AM on 01/24/2012
On December 15, 2011, The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) announced that 15 Toyota, Lexus, and Scion vehicles earned Top Safety Pick awards for the 2012 model year, more than any other automaker.

Toyota is having problems, but they are still far less severe that others.