iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

On Roe v. Wade Anniversary, Obama Vows To Protect Women's Choice

Roe V Wade

First Posted: 01/22/2012 2:52 pm Updated: 01/22/2012 3:49 pm

Drawing a stark contrast between himself and the Republican presidential candidates on the issue of women's reproductive rights, President Barack Obama released a statement on Sunday, the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, reaffirming his commitment to protect a woman's right to choose.

As we mark the 39th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, we must remember that this Supreme Court decision not only protects a woman’s health and reproductive freedom, but also affirms a broader principle: that government should not intrude on private family matters. I remain committed to protecting a woman’s right to choose and this fundamental constitutional right. 

While this is a sensitive and often divisive issue -- no matter what our views, we must stay united in our determination to prevent unintended pregnancies, support pregnant woman and mothers, reduce the need for abortion, encourage healthy relationships, and promote adoption. And as we remember this historic anniversary, we must also continue our efforts to ensure that our daughters have the same rights, freedoms, and opportunities as our sons to fulfill their dreams.

The Obama administration made a particularly notable decision in favor of reproductive rights on Friday when Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced that all U.S. employers -- with the exception of churches and other places of worship -- would be required to fully cover the cost of contraception for the women they employ. The religious community had been lobbying to broaden the exemption to include all faith-affiliated organizations, such as Catholic hospitals and universities, but the Department of Health and Human Services denied that request to ensure that millions more women could benefit from birth control coverage.

By contrast, the four remaining GOP candidates have said they would like to see Roe v. Wade reversed, so that states could have the power to ban abortion.

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, the winner of Saturday's South Carolina presidential primary, last week reaffirmed his support for a fetal "personhood" amendment, which would criminalize abortion even in cases of rape and could ban some forms of contraception, in vitro fertilization and stem cell research. He has also pledged to strip government funds from Planned Parenthood, which provides basic health care and affordable contraception to millions of low-income and uninsured women across the country each year.

“Planned Parenthood will be hopeless in trying to defend itself," Gingrich said at a Personhood USA forum in South Carolina Wednesday night. "It is the largest abortion provider in the United States, period.”

Cecile Richards, Planned Parenthood's president, said on Saturday that Obama's pro-choice and pro-contraception decision on Friday will likely be a major reason for women to rally around him in November.

“In the general election, there will be a stark contrast between the GOP nominee and President Obama on a fundamental issue important to women: birth control," she said. “Women’s health is a key issue for women voters, who will likely decide the next election.  And the more the GOP presidential candidates attack women’s health, the more out of sync they are with women voters.”

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Drawing a stark contrast between himself and the Republican presidential candidates on the issue of women's reproductive rights, President Barack Obama released a statement on Sunday, the anniversary ...
Drawing a stark contrast between himself and the Republican presidential candidates on the issue of women's reproductive rights, President Barack Obama released a statement on Sunday, the anniversary ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,843
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (37 total)
10:42 PM on 02/19/2012
I rarely feel the need to comment on such articles, but after reading article after article about the issue of abortion I am appalled by the responses. For one, I am not political, but I have always felt that it is a women's choice when it comes to whether or not to keep a baby. A women is the one who carries the baby and is often charged with taking care of the baby. Realistically speaking, society looks to a women to care for a baby, and I am not weighing on whether that is right or wrong. But if we were to look at the issue of the baby having rights from a pure logical standpoint, the baby would have rights after it can be considered alive. Alive is the opposite of dead, and we define being dead when the heart stops beating or when the brain is no longer functioning. Being alive would mean that the heart starts beating and the brain is functional, which happens as around week 7 or 8. Abortion before that would not be illegal in any sense as the infant cannot be considered an alive person. Before then, in my opinion, the woman has all the rights to figure out how she wants to proceed.
11:12 PM on 01/31/2012
This a simple thing women are the only one's that have a choice in the matter and should only discuss it with their boyfriend or husband but no one else.
frbridge
In all things acknowledge Him
09:37 AM on 01/29/2012
Some thoughts on freedom...

Freedom is the power, rooted in reason and will, to act or not to act, to do this or that, and so to perform deliberate actions on ones own responsibility.

The more one does what is good, the freer one becomes.

There is not true freedom except in the service of what is good and just.

Freedom makes man responsible for is acts to the extent that they are voluntary.

~Equal rights for the unborn~
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VirginiaBlue
02:39 PM on 12/16/2012
Except that fetuses do not have MORE RIGHTS to a woman's own body than the woman herself. You are saying unfortunately, that fetuses do somehow, have more rights to use a woman's body against our will. This is nothing short of a kind of rape against our bodies by forcing us to have our own bodies used against our will by some other entity. This is also a kind of involuntary servitude by forcing us to perform a service (or, labor...no pun intended) against our will. This is the REAL issue. What you are really saying is that women must be second class citizens by forcing us to submit to tragic, unwanted pregnancies against our will or force us to risk our lives in unsafe, illegal abortions. This is hardly pro-woman.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:08 PM on 01/28/2012
Abortion appears to go against nature. Our bodies have evolved the ability to stop pregnancies naturally through apoptosis and natural miscarriage. So, if we have assisted abortions, it trumps the evolutionary process. In the future, the fetus might develope a defense against assisted abortion...that would be interesting to see. However, assisted abortion does show natural selection in a way, you know, survival of the fittest... the strong killing off the weak.
09:01 PM on 01/27/2012
Abortion has declined every year, every decade, in huge numbers, since Roe vs. Wade.

Planned Parenthood has helped dramatically.

These are the Facts. Period.

Further, nearly half of pregnancies are aborted by GOD (or Goddess, Nature, or what ever words you choose)

This is also a fact.
If those that claimed to be PRO LIFE fought for the LIVING the same way the fight for fetus's , the world would be a much shinier place*
09:35 AM on 01/28/2012
Millions of Americans agree with you. I'm not one of them. Your "facts" are LIES; FACT.
frbridge
In all things acknowledge Him
07:05 PM on 01/28/2012
People in the pro-life circle are falsely categorized. We do indeed fight for the living. In serving the child/baby we also serve the woman. It is a dual effor. It is ongoing, and it does make things a whole lot brighter and indeed "shinier."

~ equal rights for the unborn~
photo
goatini
We are two-legged wombs, that’s all
07:42 PM on 01/28/2012
A single-cell fertilized egg, 70%+ of which never implant in the uterine lining, are sloughed off in the monthly flow, and are flushed down the toilet, do NOT have "equal rights" to - or, in reality, MORE rights than - living, breathing female US citizens.

Anyone who thinks that a zygote should have "equal rights" to a living, breathing female US citizen, thinks that women are utterly disposable and replaceable. Such a person equates a woman with things that get flushed down toilets.

Ever notice how the people who screech the loudest about how each zygote is a "unique individual", never think that the living, breathing WOMAN is a "unique individual"? They think women are just like things that get flushed down the toilet, utterly disposable, utterly replaceable.
frbridge
In all things acknowledge Him
07:33 PM on 01/27/2012
There seems to be much hurt and sorrow in the voices of many here. I cannot imagine the depth of pain or suffering some must feel and endure. I will keep all of you close to my heart, in my thoughts and prayer, as I do all life.
photo
goatini
We are two-legged wombs, that’s all
07:44 PM on 01/28/2012
You seem to have mistaken the words of freedom fighters, fighting for their very rights and autonomy, for some nonsense about "sorrow".

Geez, with people like you around, we'd still be a British colony, since to people like this, fighting against oppression and tyranny is just "sorrow".
frbridge
In all things acknowledge Him
09:07 PM on 01/28/2012
more sad....
04:30 AM on 01/27/2012
The Bible says "...Thou shalt not commit Adultery...". {EXODUS 20 verse13 ].

The problem is that there are just too many Wishy Washy politicians with no Moral Compass that enact immoral Laws to corrupt society and that make Dumb speeches that don't make a lick of sense and just puts a plaster on the festering sore that has cankered society instead of taking the surgeon's scalpel to cut away the cancerous growth !

Good moral standards encourages people to become good moral citizens.

"...No pre-marital sex equals no unwanted pregnancies !...".

Young men should be taught to respect young women and not engage in pre-marital sex.

Young women should be taught that they must respect themselves and respect their bodies and that they should not engage in pre-marital sex.

Murder of Innocent Unborn Children is COLD BLOODED MURDER. The best way that Abortion can be avoided is that The Bible should be reintroduced back in the Schools and corrupt politicians voted out of office.

The USA needs Leaders with BACKBONES not WISHBONES !

The USA needs Leaders with a MORAL COMPASS not a COMPASS OF PERVERSITY !
frbridge
In all things acknowledge Him
09:23 AM on 01/27/2012
Powerful testimony! And don't forget prayer. Also needed very much in this day and age.
10:08 AM on 02/01/2012
Amen. Thank God for the BLOOD COVENANT of Yeshua Messiah The Lord Jesus Christ and that His Mercy and Grace is sufficient to OVERCOME The dark forces of satan at work !
08:57 PM on 01/27/2012
GOD aborts about half of all fetus' HIMSELF actually.
10:09 AM on 02/01/2012
No. point the FINGER OF BLAME at Abortion Legislation & illegal abortions !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DianePVK
No, you!!
06:14 PM on 01/26/2012
OK, "pro-lifers", a question:
I know that you don't care about other people's rights, but do you care about your own? I ask because as soon as you give the government power to invade the rights of women and their relationship with their doctors, as well as their personal rights over their own bodies, you open the floodgates for the government to swoop in and take away the rights that YOU hold dear whenever they like.
So, even if you can only think of yourself, allowing abortion to remain legal is the only smart choice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DianePVK
No, you!!
07:33 PM on 01/26/2012
So none of you have anything to say about this, eh? That's what I thought!
frbridge
In all things acknowledge Him
09:00 PM on 01/26/2012
ummm... you don't seem to care what we say.
09:42 AM on 01/28/2012
Murdering babies is not a "smart choice" no matter how many stupid people say it is. It's too late to stop the government from "swooping in and taking away the rights that I hold dear", because by allowing women freedom of choice over my offspring also takes away my freedom over my wallet. You blindly see abortion as a freedom of choice for women, but I see it as a denial of choice for men. And while you can say men give up their right thru sex, why can't the same be said for women? I haven't met an abortionist yet who wasn't also a hypocrite like you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DianePVK
No, you!!
11:09 AM on 01/28/2012
Men don't carry the babies and men aren't stuck with the babies for life.
End of argument.
photo
Veritas is Pro Life
Follower of Christ, Family Man and Marine
08:09 PM on 01/25/2012
Why does this President support killing of innocents? This move is truly isolating him from any legitimately Christian vote. Veritas
09:51 PM on 01/25/2012
why do so many legitimate christians want to force women to have families they are not ready for and also take away the programs that help support these women raise these children?
photo
Veritas is Pro Life
Follower of Christ, Family Man and Marine
08:42 AM on 01/26/2012
We want these women not to kill their children. They can give their child up for adoption, but should not kill them. Who wants to take away the programs you describe? The Catholic Church conducts many such programs and is being attacked by this Administration by being forced to violate conscience regarding the health care insurance mandates. Veritas.
frbridge
In all things acknowledge Him
10:27 PM on 01/25/2012
It is a sad thing, isn't it? Thank your for your pro-life stance. We seem to be few, here, but we will keep the faith, and gently try to change hearts and minds.
photo
Veritas is Pro Life
Follower of Christ, Family Man and Marine
08:44 AM on 01/26/2012
Thanks frbridge. I try to present my view gently because that is the only way to change hearts and minds. I don't always succeed. Let's keep each other in our prayers. Veritas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DianePVK
No, you!!
06:06 PM on 01/26/2012
You aren't pro-life, you are pro-control. Get it right. You are control freaks that aren't happy enough to run your own lives, you have to run the lives of those around you.
06:40 PM on 01/25/2012
To say that we need to teach kids about marriage to prevent unwanted pregnancy is completely irresponsible. When it comes to pro-lifers the only other sexual alternative they want to talk about is abstinence, which is also ridiculously irresponsible. Kids need to be taught about sex. Safe sex. Contraception should be talked about in every household, and it should absolutely be covered by health insurance. Everyone should have access to it whether they use it or not.

What it really comes down to is that a woman's body is hers, not the governments and not a pro lifers, and she has the absolute right to do what she wants with it. But you can't have it both ways. You can't say abortions should be illegal and then turn around and say contraception shouldn't be accessible to all (Planned Parenthood). You're delusional if you think that would solve any problems. That is not the world we live in. Kids should be taught about healthy sexual relationships, but that's not what the anti abortion folks are all about.

The hypocrisy surrounding this discussion is always outstanding. Is it ok to cover Viagra and not the pill? Most companies do. If men could get pregnant this would not even be a discussion. And most pro-lifers believe in the death penalty. How is that ok?

Its not your body, its not your decision.
07:29 AM on 01/26/2012
I am so sick of the argument that it's a woman's body and her decision. Why are the pro-abortion people so willing to support women's rights, but not give the baby's father a right to choose? Why are her rights more important than his? I'll tell you why, because abortion and birth control are big business, that's why. In regards to Planned Parenthod saying women will be rallying around Obama this election, I am one woman who will not be and hopefully thre are many other Christians, men and women alike, who won't be rallying around him either.
10:38 AM on 01/26/2012
First of all its not an argument that its a woman's body and her right to choose, its a fact. Second, because I believe that doesn't make me pro-abortion, it makes me pro choice. Third, a father has a right to be part of the discussion if its within a healthy relationship. But there are many situations where there is not the presence of a father, rape for one. So should a woman be not allowed to make her own decision about her own body and life in those cases? She absolutely should.

And no one is asking you to rallying around anything. The beauty of this country is you have that right to choose what you believe in. Just like a woman should have the undisputed right to do what she wants with her body. Its none of your business. Plain and simple.
frbridge
In all things acknowledge Him
05:30 PM on 01/26/2012
You go girl!! I am with you.
08:41 AM on 01/26/2012
Thank YOU! This is what the conservatives don't get -- this is a PRIVATE DECISION THAT MUST BE MADE BY THE WOMAN. It's HER body, not the 'father's' body. He is not the one who will carry the child and in the in, in many cases, not the one which will end up WITH the child.

I still stand behind my words: IT'S NOBODY'S BUSINESS -- period!

It should not BE the 'business' of the government nor anyone else!
01:57 PM on 01/24/2012
who are we to not give women a choice when it comes to THEIR body and health?? I am all for forcing men to donate one of their kidneys without them having a say in it...Obama 2012!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrUniteUs
10:21 AM on 01/24/2012
President Obama,

While this is a sensitive and often divisive issue -- no matter what our views, we must stay united in our determination to prevent unintended pregnancies, support pregnant woman and mothers, reduce the need for abortion, encourage healthy relationships, and promote adoption.

"Reduce the for need abortion." 1.3 American lives are aborted each year. That is way too many. Both men and women are to blame. Choice also includes who you have sex with.

"encourage healthy relationships, and promote adoption."

Sound real good but can we say the M-word, Marriage. I think if children grew up with the idea of one day getting married and raising a family they would make better choices. Unfortunately they are bombarded with every other sexual alternative but the idea of getting married and raising a family.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrUniteUs
09:56 AM on 01/24/2012
"Kathleen Sebelius announced that all U.S. employers -- with the exception of churches and other places of worship -- would be required to fully cover the cost of contraception for the women they employ..."

Why should employers be required to pay for this cost? Also why should the employer even have to know if a woman is on birth control?

He has also pledged to strip government funds from Planned Parenthood, which provides basic health care and affordable contraception to millions of low-income and uninsured women across the country each year.

I agree with Newt on this. I would support funding a separate group that does not provide abortions.

“Planned Parenthood will be hopeless in trying to defend itself," Gingrich said at a Personhood USA forum in South Carolina Wednesday night. "It is the largest abortion provider in the United States, period.”

True. It's big business, and accounts for the bulk of their income. They don't make much money advising women to keep the child.

"Cecile Richards, Planned Parenthood's president, said on Saturday that Obama's pro-choice and pro-contraception decision on Friday will likely be a major reason for women to rally around him in November."

Let's hope that will not be the MAJOR reason.
09:48 PM on 01/25/2012
actually, abortions are the smallest percentage of PP's income, the bulk of their business is contracept­ion and screening/treatment for Sexually transmitted infections. Preve­nting pregnancie­s and allowing women the opportunit­y to have their families when they are ready. The more opportunity a woman has to plan when to have her children the less likely abortion will need ot be an option. Refusing women this choice adn then not wanting them to have any of the support systems available to raise children they are not ready for in the first place is pure hypocrisy. My niece was counseled at PP when she became pregnant at 15, she was encouraged to make the choice that was right for her and that was to keep her baby, my beautiful 7 yo nephew... PP made sure she had support, informatio­n on prenatal care, where to follow up for her obstetrica­l care and start prenatal vitamins..­. and i know many women who benefit from their preventati­ve care- please research your facts before you start preaching from the soapbox.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrUniteUs
10:55 PM on 01/25/2012
38.5% of PP's income comes from abortions
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrUniteUs
10:56 PM on 01/25/2012
38.4 % of PP's incomes comes from abortions
06:06 AM on 01/24/2012
God, made every one,So stop the negelect and murder of smokers when they get sick! All life matters,from conception to natural death...If you dont it may haunt you some day..After all Our President is a smoker.And Governer Patrick,sure go up on the cigarette tax,and put the money on Life Matters,for every one,no discrimanation against any one."You should protect life".Your our governer ,be a governer of every one has rights,Or someday it maybe that no one has.YOU CANT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.Its like the churches that beleive in the death squard."Thats who they call in when some one is terminal" to help them die".or is it depending on the doctor or who you are??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
travelingblogger
01:11 AM on 01/24/2012
I am pro-choice all the way, but I do not believe in abortion. Being pro-choice is being allowed to making a decision on what is best for you. Nothing else.

I do believe that the woman has the absolute right to make her own choices about her own body without fear of harassment, threats, intimidation, or any other outside interference. It's her body, therefore it's her decision and ONLY hers.

Until you've lived her life (walked in her shoes), you have absolutely no right to voice your opinions on her or to her - unless she has asked you to do so. Even then, be gentle and kind. She has enough to worry about as it is.
frbridge
In all things acknowledge Him
08:07 AM on 01/24/2012
If you support her right to make a choice, but you don't respect the consequence/result of what comes from making that choice, then why support it at all? You support her choice, but not what it yields? Seems to me that that is compartmentalization, of a serious kind. Try having what is proposed by many, here, in conversational form:.

"You know I support your right to choose, ( One of those choices being to take the life of a pre-born child ) But, I am sorry I don't support what will come of that choice. So, I support your right, but I don't support your action. "

It's convoluted. It's saying I support your right to choose, but I don't actually respect that choice once you make it. Twist it, turn it, it is not logical. If you support a person's right to something, then you are also culpable for the consequence of that as well.

And it's not imposing, intimidating etc, it is an act of love, if done with compassion and caring. And I do know, as I assist abortion minded women, with a listening ear and compassionate voice.
03:08 PM on 01/24/2012
Absolutely not. I support everybody's freedom of speech even if I disagree with what they have to say. There is no conflict of interest at play there. There is also no implicit support of said speech nor do I take on any responsibility for it.

Likewise, I can support a woman's freedom to choose (after all, who am I to tell them otherwise?) even if I might not agree with all of the choices that they can potentially make.

I also believe in the freedom of and from religion. You are free to believe what you want and other people are free to believe what they want and not have your beliefs shoved down their throats. Being free men (and women) is crazy that way.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
WhatTheHolyHeck
smiting trolls since 1984
04:27 PM on 01/24/2012
I'm with travelingblogger. I myself wouldn't have an abortion, but I would never want to deny that option to a woman who wants or needs to end a pregnancy. Her pregnancy is her matter, not mine. It's none of my business, just like her hysterectomy or mastectomy is none of my business.