More

EU Iran Oil Embargo Sanctions 'Unprecedented'

Eu Iran Oil Embargo

DON MELVIN   01/23/12 02:40 PM ET   AP

BRUSSELS — The European Union and Iran raised the stakes Monday in their test of wills over the Islamic republic's nuclear program, with the bloc banning the purchase of Iranian oil and Iran threatening to retaliate by closing the Strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of the world's crude is transported.

The escalating confrontation is fraught with risks – of rising energy prices, global financial instability, and potential military activity to keep the strait open.

The EU's 27 foreign ministers, meeting Monday in Brussels, imposed an oil embargo against Iran and froze the assets of its central bank, ramping up sanctions designed to pressure Iranian officials into resuming talks on the country's nuclear program.

EU officials say the tighter sanctions are part of a carrot-and-stick approach, an effort to increase pressure while at the same time emphasizing their willingness to talk.

In Washington, Department of State Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton and Department of the Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner welcomed the EU decision, calling it "another strong step in the international effort to dramatically increase the pressure on Iran." In their joint statement, they said the EU sanctions, combined with earlier ones imposed by the U.S. and the international community, `will sharpen the choice for Iran's leaders and increase their cost of defiance of basic international obligations."

But the initial response out of Tehran, the Iranian capital, was harsh.

Ramin Mehmanparast, a spokesman for Iran's Foreign Ministry, called the economic sanctions "illogical and unfair" saying: "It is only understandable in the framework of propaganda and psychological war."

Mehmanparast was quoted by website of state broadcasting company as saying, "Pressure and sanctions against a nation that has a strong logic and reason for its policy is a failed method."

He said due to the world's long-term need for energy, "It is not possible to impose sanctions on Iran," which has huge resources of oil and gas.

And two Iranian lawmakers threatened that their country would close the strait in retaliation for the EU embargo.

Lawmaker Mohammad Ismail Kowsari, deputy head of Iran's influential committee on national security, said Monday the strait "would definitely be closed if the sale of Iranian oil is violated in any way."

The strait – just 34 miles (54 kilometers) wide at its narrowest point – runs alongside Iran and is the only way to get from the Persian Gulf to the open sea. Tensions over the potential impact its closure would have on global oil supplies and the price of crude have weighed heavily on consumers and traders. The U.S. and Britain both have warned Iran not to disrupt the world's oil supply.

After news of the EU move, benchmark crude for March delivery rose 90 cents on the day to $99.23 a barrel in early morning European time in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Brent crude was down 35 cents at $109.51 a barrel on the ICE futures exchange in London.

Many analysts doubt that Iran would maintain a blockade for long, but any supply shortages would cause world oil supplies to tighten temporarily. But Kowsari said that, in case of the strait's closure, the U.S. and its allies would not be able to reopen the route, and warned America not to attempt any "military adventurism."

An American aircraft carrier, the USS Abraham Lincoln entered the Gulf on Sunday without incident to conduct scheduled maritime security operations, and U.S. warships frequently operate in the Gulf. But when the carrier USS John Stennis departed the Gulf in late December, Iranian officials warned the U.S. not to return. The British Ministry of Defense said British and French warships joined the U.S. carrier group transiting through the Strait of Hormuz "to underline the unwavering international commitment to maintaining rights of passage under international law."

Russia's Foreign Ministry said the sanctions are a severe mistake likely to worsen tensions. "It's apparent that in this case there is open pressure and diktat, aimed at 'punishing' Iran for uncooperative behavior. This is a deeply mistaken policy, as we have told our European partners more than once," the ministry said in a statement. "Under pressure of this sort, Iran will not make any concessions or any corrections to its policies," it said.

The EU sanctions include an include an immediate embargo on new contracts for crude oil and petroleum products. Existing contracts with Iran will be allowed to run until July.

Last month, the U.S. enacted new sanctions targeting Iran's central bank and its ability to sell petroleum abroad, but it has delayed implementing the sanctions for at least six months, worried about sending the price of oil higher at a time when the global economy is struggling.

Other countries are steering clear of such measures altogether. China also does not support an embargo, and Japan's finance minister, Jun Azumi, has expressed concern about the effectiveness of U.S. sanctions on Iran – not to mention their potential impact on Japanese banks.

Some 80 percent of Iran's foreign revenue comes from oil exports and any sanctions that affect its ability to export oil would hit its economy hard. With about 4 million barrels per day, Iran is the second largest producer in OPEC.

"It means that we will paralyze, bit by bit, Iran's economic activity and keep the country from using a major part of its resources," said French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe. "You can be skeptical, but it is better than making war."

At the heart of the dispute is international unease about Iran's nuclear program. Iran says its nuclear program is peaceful, but the United States and other nations suspect it is trying to build nuclear weapons. Iran is now under several rounds of U.N. sanctions for not being more forthcoming about its nuclear program.

Late Monday, British Prime Minister David Cameron, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy issued a joint statement urging Iran to suspend its sensitive nuclear activities.

"Our message is clear," the statement said. "We have no quarrel with the Iranian people. But the Iranian leadership has failed to restore international confidence in the exclusively peaceful nature of its nuclear program. We will not accept Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon."

Iran's denials of military intent have utterly failed to convince EU officials.

"The recent start of operations of enrichment of uranium to a level of up to 20 percent in the deeply buried underground facility in Fordo near Qom further aggravates concerns about the possible military dimensions to Iran's nuclear program," the foreign ministers said in a statement Monday.

That accelerated enrichment is in violation of six U.N. Security Council resolutions and 11 resolutions by the board of the International Atomic Energy Agency, "and contributes to rising tensions in the region," the statement said.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague called the embargo part of "an unprecedented set of sanctions."

"I think this shows the resolve of the European Union on this issue," Hague said.

The EU also decided to freeze the assets of the Iranian central bank. Together, the two measures are intended not only to pressure Iran to agree to talks but also to choke off funding for its nuclear activities.

Before Monday's decision, negotiators worked hard to try to ensure that the embargo would punish only Iran – and not EU member Greece, which is in dire financial trouble and relies heavily on low-priced Iranian oil.

The foreign ministers agreed to a review of the effects of the sanctions, to be completed by May 1. And they agreed in principle to make up the costs Greece incurs as a result of the embargo.

___

Raf Casert in Brussels, Nasser Karimi in Tehran, Matthew Pennington in Washington, and Gregory Katz in London contributed to this report.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

BRUSSELS — The European Union and Iran raised the stakes Monday in their test of wills over the Islamic republic's nuclear program, with the bloc banning the purchase of Iranian oil and Iran thr...
BRUSSELS — The European Union and Iran raised the stakes Monday in their test of wills over the Islamic republic's nuclear program, with the bloc banning the purchase of Iranian oil and Iran thr...
Filed by Ryan Craggs  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 998
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
10:41 PM on 01/24/2012
Ridiculous. The sanctions will do nothing but destroy the US dollar and the
Euro. Russia, China and India, Irans biggest oil markets have already
announced they will be buying Iranian oil for physical gold. This is completely
outside of the central banking system that the US has any control over. The
UAE, Malaysia and several southern European countries have announced
they will accept Renminbi in trade in their flight from the US dollar . This will
mean these countries don't need US dollars to buy oil anymore. Not only will
they not need to buy our debt with petro-dollars, they will probably start
dumping the US dollars they have while they are still worth something and
using them to buy gold with which to buy Iranian oil. So instead of forcing
the Iranians to accept worthless US dollars for their oil, now we are forcing
them to get paid in gold. The Iranians will be laughing all the way to the
bank and thanking Obama for the ride. Obama could not have done anything
more stupid...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ColoradoCool
Relentless...
03:09 AM on 01/25/2012
Yes he could. He could have started another middle east war that he couldn't finish like King George the Incompetent and kicked it down the road to the next prez.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Susan Shaffer
04:04 PM on 01/26/2012
and dating back to 2010 China was talking of dumping usd for gold
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-11-01/china-should-buy-gold-oil-to-avoid-dollar-losses-china-business-reports.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
07:34 PM on 01/24/2012
then....and now
Brzezinski: U.S. should forcibly stop IAF flying over Iraq to reach Iran

Brzezinski added that "No one wishes for this but it could be a Liberty in reverse," referring to the IDF attack on the U.S.S. Liberty during the Six Day War, which Israel claims was a case of mistaken identity.

The incident was investigated by inquiry commissions in both Israel and the United States, and both concluded that it had, indeed, been a tragic error.

Late last year, Brzezinski had told Haaretz that Israel could do harm to its relations with the United States if it insisted on lobbying Washington for an American military strike on Iran.

Brzezinski told Haaretz: "One [piece of] advice that I would give the Israeli government is not to engage in this campaign for an American attack on Iran, because I don't think America is going to attack Iran, and if it did, and the consequences would be disastrous."

On Sunday Russian President Dmitry Medvedev told CNN that Israeli President Shimon Peres told him that Israel would not launch an attack on Iran..

The Russian president described such an attack as "the worst thing that can be imagined." He said Peres made the comment at a meeting in the Russian resort of Sochi in August.

http://www.haaretz.com/news/brzezinski-u-s-should-forcibly-stop-iaf-flying-over-iraq-to-reach-iran-1.7531
Vyslichajici
private american citizen
08:44 AM on 01/28/2012
not a choice for us. iran controls iraq now, more than the usa does.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
07:13 PM on 01/24/2012
Don't existing nuclear powers have obligations to get rid of their weapons under the NPT?

Article VI commits them to "pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament". The nuclear powers claim they have done this by reducing their warheads, but critics say they have not really moved towards nuclear disarmament. Critics also argue that the US and UK have broken the treaty by transferring nuclear technology from one to another. The US and UK say that this is not covered by the NPT.

Doesn't Israel have a nuclear bomb?

Yes. Israel, however, is not a party to the NPT, so is not obliged to report to it. Neither are India or Pakistan, both of which have developed nuclear weapons. North Korea has left the treaty and has announced that it has acquired a nuclear weapons capacity.

On 18 September 2009, the IAEA called on Israel to join the NPT and open its nuclear facilities to inspection. The resolution said that the IAEA "expresses concern about the Israeli nuclear capabilities, and calls upon Israel to accede to the NPT and place all its nuclear facilities under comprehensive IAEA safeguards... "

Israel refuses to join the NPT or allow inspections. It is reckoned to have up to 400 warheads but refuses to confirm or deny this.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-11709428
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gracie fr
06:09 PM on 01/24/2012
A total financial freeze on Iranian oil is almost impossible. Greece imported 25% of its oil from Iran; Spain 13% and Italy 10%. Greece has already asked for an exemption. . Then there is India, China and Pakistan none of which are about to go along with the US's sweetheart deal. If the Obama administration gets too rough with enforcement of sanctions, don't expect the rest of the world to cry uncle and comply. A coalition could very well gather momentum to inflict harsh trade sanctions or an embargo on American goods. Better to have a trade war than a nuclear war. The policy is downright foolish, a collective shooting oneself in the foot....
photo
TAIsabel
Suffer no fools.
03:44 PM on 01/24/2012
Has anyone asked Russia and China what their thoughts are on the matter? I am sure they are relishing the thought of having the US and Europe strangled by another and even greater war.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Susan Shaffer
04:54 PM on 01/24/2012
to a point but where will china sell its goods if usa goes down the plug hole?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
05:21 PM on 01/24/2012
we are circling the drain now
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gracie fr
05:53 PM on 01/24/2012
...To everybody else perhaps....
06:20 PM on 01/24/2012
china probably gets a lot cheaper oil from iran now as iran will have to dump it's oil somewhere and china doesn't see any reason to cut off it's own energy supply over some nonsense about nuclear weapons(for now anyway). They will be the big winners for now by getting cheap oil and keeping their big oil development projects going in iran. They may eventually go along if it really looks like war as they won't want to lose their massive long term energy investment in iran. they play hardball and usually win. for now it's a win-win for them.
02:13 PM on 01/24/2012
"You can be skeptical, but it's better than making war." Let's hope the powers that be are finally learning the lessons from recent history. Too many men, women and children have perished because of oil greed and nuclear dominance....too many.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
terry63
No one expects the spanish inquisition
12:18 PM on 01/24/2012
China and Russia, are the main source for which Iran's Economy can be hurt by sanctions. Without these two nations on board, Sanctions will not work. They never do. The only result will be higher prices at the pump and/or a gun fight in the Gulf. Which Iran ,will loose. Also if it comes down to a gun fight ,Iran must consider the possibility of the U.N. to just go ahead and bomd its nukes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Susan Shaffer
04:58 PM on 01/24/2012
after the bin laden raid zardari and gilani of Pakistan went immediately on trips to moscow, beijing and tehran.
I think whatever happens has been brewing for a long time
The supply routes via pakistan are still cut.
I saw a documentary called secret pakistan. it said that a few years back when pakistan cut the supply routes the troops went on half rations immediately. Although the USA has organised supply from europe through central asia the cost is much more. They also will not allow munitions through. The troops will be fed but they will be brought home...unless a war is started with Iran in which case they will attack from Afghanistan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
terry63
No one expects the spanish inquisition
12:00 AM on 01/26/2012
Im am now educated! I will fan you, but I doubt that you will notice. Lol. Dang! 1596?!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
debnaert
10:52 AM on 01/24/2012
Hey Guess what? It was just announced that the Canadian company that spent over a billion dollars to run that pipe line to their border for the United States to continue is going to sue the US government for over a billion dollars.... WAY TO GO OBAMA.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
07:17 PM on 01/24/2012
they were then offered to run pipeline thru Washington state to deep water port
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
debnaert
10:50 AM on 01/24/2012
Iran just kills me... We could flatten them in one day.... and Israel will help... what a joke.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
01:41 PM on 01/24/2012
$20 a gal. gasoline sound good to you or how about almost no diesel to deliver your foodstuffs?

Stop thinking only about yourself and think globally!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Susan Shaffer
04:59 PM on 01/24/2012
is that like how the usa flattened Iraq and Afghanistan? 10 years and still no definite win.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
devildoc68
10:45 AM on 01/24/2012
The face on this lead picture would do best on a carton of milk.
09:52 AM on 01/24/2012
Russians have got to support Iran after all if they don't Iran won't pay for all the aid, buildings and armaments the Ruskies have supplied. Nothing changes.
frank1946
Tell the Truth
08:56 AM on 01/24/2012
Follow the Money ? Hey Boss, can we use your credit card ?

No Mun, No Fun, Your Mullah !
07:59 AM on 01/24/2012
That's the common punishment for any country with oil, considering a move to sell it for gold instead of dollars i suppose...

Sanctions, followed by invasion/coup/concocted civil-war (ala. Libya)
07:51 AM on 01/24/2012
Kim Jong il must be jealously watching from wherever he may be....

Nuclear tests and even proven stockpiles never got him this kind of attention.

Probably envies |r@n's close proximity to |$rae|...
photo
TAIsabel
Suffer no fools.
07:34 AM on 01/24/2012
"The EU's 27 foreign ministers, meeting Monday in Brussels, imposed an oil embargo against Iran and froze the assets of its central bank, ramping up sanctions designed to pressure Iranian officials into resuming talks on the country's nuclear program."

Imposing "unprecedented" sanctions in order to generate talks is like asking someone to love you while you are chocking them to death. The freezing of assets and the boycott of their livelihood is a declaration of war in my eyes. I just hope that China and Russia see the danger in this insanely hubristic and self serving move by the USA and EU and warn them of the inevitable consequences.

Our illadvised, illbred and illegal war in Iraq and Afghanistan will look like a cupcake bake off compared to what will befall us if we continue to bow down to Israel's self serving war against Iran, a country that has NOT threatened, attacked or invaded any of these players. On the contrary, it suffers cyber attacks, the killing of their scientists in their own country by covert
operatives and now, "unprecedented" sanctions. We will be very sorry if we continue to pursue this nefarious endeavor.
11:10 AM on 01/24/2012
I've got a news flash for you: the EU is hardly very pro-Israel these days. That said, on the one hand you imply that no state has the right to tell Iran what do, but the reverse is also true. The EU has a perfect right to say to Iran we don't want your oil and we don't want you to use our financial system. China seems to be backing away from Iran, but at least the Iranians can rely on their allies: the Russians, Cubans, Venezualans and Syrians.
photo
TAIsabel
Suffer no fools.
03:38 PM on 01/24/2012
Rights...Ok, here is the deal honey. Everybody has rights but not the right to take over the funds in those banks that belong to Iran or to ban people from buying their oil and penalizing those that do. It would save space and effort if you could tell the difference.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:52 PM on 01/24/2012
Well they may not be Pro Israel, but the Banksters have them by the u know whats.
Imagine that.
01:08 PM on 01/24/2012
This isn't about Israel, it is about oil.
The US can halt Iran-Russia trade by restricting global Russian banking transactions.
We have the power to cripple banking in virtually any country by ending the ability of any financial institution with a US presence to conduct business in a given country.
Why do you think so many countries are suddenly joining the embargo when they enjoy discount oil from Iran?
Love it or not, we are the World's only reliable police force and will remain so for the forseeable future.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Susan Shaffer
05:21 PM on 01/24/2012
that was the case when ALL world transactions were conducted in USD. All money went from country a to new york and then onto country b. We sell rice out of Pakistan to countries and Pakistan accepts payments in a lot of other currencies. You only have to have a bank account in the foreign currency to receive the funds. So sales to Australia are paid in Australian dollars. Sales to Japan are paid in yen. Not one cent goes via usa and there is no forex transaction for the usa to make money on, which was the case in the past.
When things get really bad a country can do barter. A couple of years ago Pakistans foreign reserves were 500million usd. The banks were grinding to a standstill. The government bought the rice stocks from the farmers and sold it onto saudi and Iran for oil.
After the bin laden raid zardari and gilani went to moscow, beijing and tehran on emergency meetings.
The Afghan border is shut for supplies for troops for over a month now.
Iran and pakistan share a common border.
Iran can truck oil to pakistan and it can be shipped out from either gwada which is managed by the chinese or to karachi which is managed by the pakistanis. If the US is stupid enough to attack any oil shipments then I can pretty much guarantee that the taliban will become more aggressive in Afghanistan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Susan Shaffer
05:22 PM on 01/24/2012
oh, and should the military take over from Gilani and Zardari don't expect them to be more pro USA