iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Frank Wuterich Trial: Marine Accused Of Haditha Killings Pleads Guilty

Frank Wuterich

JULIE WATSON   01/23/12 09:36 PM ET  AP

CAMP PENDLETON, Calif. — A Marine sergeant who told his troops to "shoot first, ask questions later" in a raid that killed unarmed Iraqi women, children and elderly pleaded guilty Monday in a deal that will carry no more than three months confinement and end the largest and longest-running criminal case against U.S. troops from the Iraq War.

The agreement marked a stunning and muted end to the case once described as the Iraq War's version of the My Lai massacre in Vietnam. The government failed to get one manslaughter conviction in the case that implicated eight Marines in the deaths of 24 Iraqis in the town of Haditha in 2005.

Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich, 31, of Meriden, Conn., who was originally accused of unpremeditated murder, pleaded guilty to negligent dereliction of duty for leading his troops to disregard rules of combat when they raided homes after a roadside bomb exploded near their convoy, killing one Marine and wounding two others.

The Haditha incident is considered among the war's defining moments, further tainting America's reputation when it was already at a low point after the release of photos of prisoner abuse by U.S. soldiers at Abu Ghraib prison.

"The case doesn't end with a bang, it ends with a whimper and a pretty weak whimper at that," said Gary Solis, a former Marine Corps prosecutor and judge. "When you have 24 dead bodies and you get dereliction of duty, that's pretty good defense work."

Wuterich, his family and his attorneys declined to comment after he entered the plea that halted his manslaughter trial at Camp Pendleton before a jury of combat Marines who served in Iraq.

Prosecutors also declined to comment on the plea deal. Marine Corps spokesman Lt. Col. Joseph Kloppel said the deal was not a reflection or in any way connected to how the prosecution felt their case was going in the trial.

Wuterich, the father of three children, had faced the possibility of life behind bars when he was charged with nine counts of manslaughter, among other charges.

The prosecution implicated him in 19 of the 24 deaths.

The manslaughter charges will be dropped now that Wuterich has pleaded guilty to the minor dereliction of duty charge. As a result, he faces a maximum of three months in confinement, two-thirds forfeiture of pay and a rank demotion to private when he's sentenced.

Both sides will present arguments Tuesday during a sentencing hearing. Seven other Marines were acquitted or had charges dismissed in the case.

The killings still fuel anger in Iraq after becoming the primary reason behind demands that U.S. troops not be given immunity from their court system.

Kamil al-Dulaimi, a Sunni lawmaker from the Anbar provincial capital of Ramadi, called the plea deal a travesty of justice for the victims and their families.

"It's just another barbaric act of Americans against Iraqis," al-Dulaimi told The Associated Press. "They spill the blood of Iraqis and get this worthless sentence for the savage crime against innocent civilians."

News of the plea agreement came late in the evening in Iraq, just hours before curfew most cities still impose, producing no noticeable public reaction. Government officials didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.

The issue at the court martial was whether Wuterich reacted appropriately as a Marine squad leader in protecting his troops in the midst of a chaotic war or disregarded combat rules and ordered his men to shoot and blast indiscriminately at Iraqi civilians.

Prosecutors said he lost control after seeing the body of his friend blown apart by the bomb and led his men on a rampage in which they stormed two nearby homes, blasting their way in with gunfire and grenades. Among the dead was a man in a wheelchair.

Wuterich has said he regretted the loss of civilian lives but believed he was operating within military combat rules.

During Monday's hearing, he acknowledged he told the squad before the raids to shoot without hesitation, leading them to believe they could ignore the rules of combat. He told the judge that caused "tragic events."

"I think we all understood what we were doing so I probably just should have said nothing," Wuterich told the judge, Lt. Col. David Jones.

He admitted he did not positively identify his targets, as he had been trained to do. He also said he ordered his troops to assault the homes based on the guidance of his platoon commander at the time.

Wuterich also acknowledged in his plea that the squad did not take any gunfire during the 45-minute raid on the homes or find any weapons.

After Haditha, Marine commanders ordered troops to try and distinguish between civilians and combatants.

The prosecution had several squad members testify, but many said they do not believe to this day that they did anything wrong because they feared insurgents were inside hiding. Several also acknowledged lying to investigators in the past, leaving doubt about their credibility.

The prosecution was further hurt by the testimony of former Lt. William T. Kallop, Wuterich's former platoon commander, who said the squad was justified in its actions because the house was declared hostile. From what was understood of the rules of combat at the time, that meant Marines could attack without hesitation, Kallop said.

Legal experts say the prosecution had an uphill battle because of the delay caused by six years of pre-trial wrangling between the defense and prosecution, including over whether the military could use unaired outtakes from an interview Wuterich gave in 2007 to the CBS newsmagazine "60 Minutes."

Prosecutors eventually won that right but overestimated its value, analysts say.

Solis, the former military prosecutor, said the military should have pushed for an earlier trial to ensure witnesses' memories were fresh.

"Six years for a trial is unacceptable," said Solis, who teaches law of war at Georgetown University Law Center. "Delay is always to the benefit of the accused."

He said prosecutors may have been cowed by the Army's missteps in its handling of the death of former NFL star and Ranger Pat Tillman from friendly fire in Afghanistan in 2004.

___

Associated Press writers Barbara Surk and Mazin Yahya in Baghdad, and Elliot Spagat in San Diego contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

CAMP PENDLETON, Calif. — A Marine sergeant who told his troops to "shoot first, ask questions later" in a raid that killed unarmed Iraqi women, children and elderly pleaded guilty Monday in a de...
CAMP PENDLETON, Calif. — A Marine sergeant who told his troops to "shoot first, ask questions later" in a raid that killed unarmed Iraqi women, children and elderly pleaded guilty Monday in a de...
Filed by Clare Richardson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,004
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (19 total)
01:34 PM on 01/25/2012
Marine Corps justices Department dropped the ball in this case. As a Marine S/Sgt this to me brings shame on the Corp. Killing woman and children is not what Marines in charge order no mater if even during combat. Again we our way better then that and what that shows is a bad message to the world we don,t offer honest justices for our military doing wrong. I have seen marines that are charged UA for a day get much more handed down.
photo
h20rider
My micro-bio is empty....
12:02 AM on 01/25/2012
This combines two atrocities.
First the S.Sgt's overseeing and participation in the killings of unarmed civilians.
Second, the actions of all who facilitated the plea deal for "dereliction of duty." The actions of these court officers will prove to many in the world that we do not even honor our own codes of justice. Trivializing the murder of children, women, and elderly, and the unarmed by our soldiers provides every enemy of the United States with the means of recruiting bumper crops of terrorists. Americans will undoubtedly suffer as a result of the toxic actions of these plea bargain brokers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:54 PM on 01/24/2012
This is just disgusting....3 months confinement for ordering/killing innocent civilians...have no respect for Iraqi lives, makes me want to cry. RIP to the victims, this man belongs in prison
09:42 PM on 01/24/2012
I'm tired of people making excuses for this guy. I'm disgusted. Period.
photo
Boduognat
Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'entrate.
10:17 AM on 01/25/2012
Well, it could have been worse....

1) He didn't pee on the victims (as far as we know)
2) He didn't upload the video to liveleak (no pun intended)

Oh.. and let's not forget: they hate "us" for "our" freedoms.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lilipilicious
07:07 PM on 01/24/2012
Wow. This guy is a cold blooded murderer who contributed to the brutal killing of 24 unarmed human beings and he only gets a rank deduction? But Bradley Manning who exposed the war crimes that individuals like HIM and the government that backs him up commit, is facing something like 34,000 years in jail (i.e. forever)? And no one is outraged about this and it makes barely the headlines? Everyday I am convinced more and more that most humans are sc/um and that we are a failed experiment requiring abortion.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:54 PM on 01/24/2012
i agree
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LongRunAggregateSupply
Stare Decisis, Inter Alia
04:57 PM on 01/24/2012
To the Sunni lawyer: Ever heard of the pot calling the kettle black?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:22 PM on 01/24/2012
Bet CBS's Scott Pelley is PI$$ED !!!! His vilification of the young Marine on 60 minutes was disgusting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
02:13 PM on 01/24/2012
In a time long ago and a war far away there was a saying, "If they're dead they're V.C."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Goffy
Linpossible Linzilla Linferno Lintegrity Lintastic
02:53 PM on 01/24/2012
With this kind of mentality, we have 50,000 dead G.I. in Vietnam...
Trust me, there is not a single Viet Cong in the mist.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
07:54 PM on 01/24/2012
The expression referred to Vietnamese, not to G.I.s  That said, most Vietnamese are "good people", just like us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roc-o-rama
Readers are plentiful; thinkers are rare.
12:46 PM on 01/24/2012
What a cherry plea deal he got for a body count of 24, he had an excellent lawyer. Every Marine NCO, especially a squad leader knows the rules of engagement, his troops were following orders though they should have known the difference between a friendly and a combatant. With not being involved in that fire fight you can't lay all the blame on him but he should have known that there are troops that take your words at face value and not think, especially when your scared going into an unknown building. As for the Intel saying it was hostile, you still have to use judgement. This Court Martial will affect his career even though he received a light sentence.
03:30 PM on 01/25/2012
What career it is over for him in the Marine Corps because he has shamed the Corps for his stupid actions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roc-o-rama
Readers are plentiful; thinkers are rare.
05:10 PM on 01/25/2012
The article didn't say he was getting the Big Chicken Dinner Discharge so presumably he'll be finishing out his enlistment with an option to re-enlist, but ya he certainly shot himself in the foot so to speak.
11:24 AM on 01/24/2012
It's impossible for me to know what any of those people were experiencing: those who were shot & those who were shooting. I guess I never thought of 'the fog of war' as basically synonymous with temporary insanity, but it sounds like it kind of is. Given it was (then) Sgt. Wuterich's first combat patrol maybe he was especially susceptible to being overwhelmed by the fog. That makes the ruling seem strange to me: if he was doing the best he could and he was overwhelmed by his circumstances, how is he guilty of negligence? If he's guilty of negligence resulting in the death of 24 unarmed, no-apparent-threat-posing civilians then why is his punishment so light? Maybe it's like in car accidents where each of 2 drivers can share some of the blame. Maybe he's partly to blame and partly not? It does seem strange to me: he should be guilty or he shouldn't. Thoughts?
11:56 AM on 01/24/2012
keep in mind this was a plea bargain .It says the case lacked a lot of evidence. I wasn't there and don't know what prompted the plea.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DannyeSue
Living Life and Loving It
12:46 PM on 01/24/2012
The article spoke for itself and there's almost always an offer of a plea bargain. They took the coward's way out!
07:24 PM on 01/25/2012
Excellent point, Badwolf62.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Theotherside55
10:17 AM on 01/24/2012
I am fifty-six years old and know my morals and way of thinking has changed greatly since I was eighteen.I would like to know the age and if you are a vet of the posters.You might see something in common with each.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Reaves
America has spoken. Love it or leave.
10:16 AM on 01/24/2012
3 months? That's all?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DannyeSue
Living Life and Loving It
12:47 PM on 01/24/2012
Yes!!! 3 months and a slap on the hands. Sad isn't it? Another slap in the face to the USA and it's so called fair and equal justice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Llib Noswad
aka: Bill, Conservative
10:00 AM on 01/24/2012
"rules of combat", what an oxymoron, if you're going to have rules of combat, why have combat? It's no different than "rules of war", same question, if you're going to have rules of war, why have war?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DannyeSue
Living Life and Loving It
12:48 PM on 01/24/2012
You are so right! I suppose everyone is going to carry around the rule book and call for a "time out" so they can read rule number 100 before making a move.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onlyme9999
09:45 AM on 01/24/2012
the ones that put him on trial are the stuffed shirts that wear there over decorated uniforms to ballroom dances, and expensive dinners while our troops are over there fighting for their lives, we need a big protest on this one
03:43 PM on 01/25/2012
Those decorations are not for show they earned them and many in wars, and yes they also know about wars. This Marine Veterans says never disrespect those you may see in dress uniforms with their many ribbions that represent many awards and some by their courage under fire. No they wear them because they have earned them and with honor as I did.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onlyme9999
10:00 AM on 01/31/2012
not all are as honest as you are
09:13 AM on 01/24/2012
I scaned the posts with the little time I have(retired CEO, but just bought back), and see there are many different veiws on the headline. First, as a retired US Army Spec Ops, serving in three different conflicts(Nam 3 tours, Bosina and then Iraq), until one has been in a combat situation, it's almost impossible for me or anyone who was to explain what goes on in your mind, the fear, the anticipation of dying. Until you've been in that situation, one should not judge the actions of those who have. Terrible things happen in war, some are never reported, but in today's age, many things that wounld not have been reported, are. If we had the skills we have today, WW1, WW2, Korea would have had many stories like this, young men and women scare, with weapons, against the unknown, things will happen. I wish this wern't a headline, but it will generate many posts, pro and con. Everyone have a nice day.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onlyme9999
09:39 AM on 01/24/2012
choices, you dead, me dead, better you dead, USAF 1961-1965
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DannyeSue
Living Life and Loving It
12:51 PM on 01/24/2012
Tony, in many ways I do agree with you. My now deceased daddy was a combat vet from WWII... serving in the 10th Mountain Infantry Division (first Ski Patrol.) I know some of the things he and some of his buddies shared with me over the years and war is hell... but overall, this so called "Justice" is a joke. Murder is Murder.